Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2603 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

I didn’t say impossible, I said most likely not true. And that by far is the case. Someone who shoots 90 is very more likely to be raking up strokes from the long game. It’s not common that someone fires a 90 because they continued to make bogey/double bogey despite hitting a high GIR % or nGIR %. 

Practicing the long game should be disproportionate as it is that much harder. Again it’s possible but it certainly isn’t common that a player can hit fairways and greens in high percentages yet still make bogey/dB on almost every hole. 

I agree 100% for the group of players who don’t explicitly state they work harder on it and become successful at making it their strength (relative to the rest of their game). Once that claim is made, it doesn’t make sense (for me anyway) to disagree or suggest they don’t understand a strength in their own game.

Not a big deal if others choose to doubt it.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
40 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

 Once that claim is made, it doesn’t make sense (for me anyway) to disagree or suggest they don’t understand a strength in their own game.

Not a big deal if others choose to doubt it.

I played with a guy a couple years ago and prior to the round stated his strength was short game.  Turned out his strength was only that because of the people he regularly played with.  He rarely got up and down but because it was better than his buddies, he always thought it was good.  He didn't think that anymore after our round.

You can state a strength but if your only comparison is against buddies who you are already better than, it's hard to know how that strength actually stacks up against everyone else.  I would assume @hespeler knows his strengths because he's been taking lessons.

Back to topic, I think a lot of people, when beginning to try and start the downswing with the lower body, exaggerate how much of a "bump" they need at the top of the swing to get the hips started.  It is actually a small amount that you need, but it's usually enough to complete that hip turn by impact.  The thing is that the hips move slower than the arms, so by starting the lower body slightly earlier, they can release with the arms, instead of the arms passing the hip turn right away.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, phillyk said:

The thing is that the hips move slower than the arms, so by starting the lower body slightly earlier, they can release with the arms, instead of the arms passing the hip turn right away.

True but the hips also travel a much shorter distance than the arms. That’s the problem with getting them synced, at least for me. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I didn’t say impossible, I said most likely not true. And that by far is the case. Someone who shoots 90 is very more likely to be raking up strokes from the long game. It’s not common that someone fires a 90 because they continued to make bogey/double bogey despite hitting a high GIR % or nGIR %. 

Practicing the long game should be disproportionate as it is that much harder. Again it’s possible but it certainly isn’t common that a player can hit fairways and greens in high percentages yet still make bogey/dB on almost every hole. 

I’ve been hitting 8 or 9 GIR’s.  Maybe 50% fairways.  Have really good distance on all clubs.  I simply can’t close out holes.  I have a lot of par putts that turn in to bogey or double.

When I miss a green, it’s often because I didn’t do a good job picking the right club and overshot the green leading to a lost ball or awkward pitch.  Another 6 or maybe 7.

Do I hit really bad shots?  Definitely.  I can spray the driver into the next fairway maybe once a round and similar shots that lead to blow up holes.

But I can string together 4 or 5 holes with every shot being a good one...and maybe walk away with one par.

I’ll miss a 4 footer to save par or bogey once or twice a round.

I’m not there yet but I’ve come a long way and the full swing is not what’s really keeping me from going lower.   It puts me in position to score a lot, I just can’t...score.

I can stand on the practice green and drain putts and lag ‘em close, hit chips to a few feet but I can’t do it in a round.  Much like you can stripe ‘em on the range but shank ‘em on the course.

Between the net at my house, the range and lessons, I hit a ton of balls. Almost every day.  Pro I take lessons with says high 80’s should be a bad day for me.

Golf hasn’t been much fun and even though my swing is in good shape right now I’m glad the off season is coming up.

Personally, I can’t think about the lower body too much.  From years of experimenting and taking lessons.  Yes I get quick from the top from time to time, flip the face and hook it.  I’m just a hack, not a pro.  But when my swing goes bad, from experience, trying too much with the lower body never really gets it back on track.

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Rickie Fowler is an example of beginning the downswing pushing his feet down and everything following. That's the way I was taught, but of course it did no good in my case. Best, -Marv

  • Like 1

DRIVER: Cleveland 588 Altitude ( Matrix Radix Sv Graphite, A) IRONS: Mizuno JPX-800 HD Irons & 3,4,5 JPX Fli-Hi (Grafalloy Prolaunch Blue Graphite, R); WEDGES: (Carried as needed) Artisan Golf 46, 50, 53, 56 low bounce, 56 high bounce; PUTTER: Mizuno TP Mills 9

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

After reading this thread, I worked on doing a lower body turn during iron shots to get more speed. Didn't hit enough shots to get a reliable sample, but I hit a few surprisingly far. Distance is one of my main weaknesses - hit a 6 iron which was meant to be a layup, and it made it 170 onto the green, a good 15 yds further than normal, without feeling I was swinging fast. 

Hoping I've uncovered something here. 


  • Moderator
Posted
On 10/12/2018 at 8:33 PM, MarvChamp said:

Rickie Fowler is an example of beginning the downswing pushing his feet down and everything following. That's the way I was taught, but of course it did no good in my case. Best, -Marv

Is there a difference between pushing feet down and standing up by extending the legs?  In my case, my left leg extends as my hips rotate, at least that's my goal.

  • Like 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
26 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

Is there a difference between pushing feet down and standing up by extending the legs? 

Yes. This from Golf Digest in my journal:

Pound for pound, Fowler is one of the longest hitters in golf. He gets those extra yards by pushing off the ground. "Look at that squat position in his lower body," Harmon says. "When you go from the ground up, your hands and arms naturally drop into what I call the delivery position."

image.png.ac5862c09dca9fcd65c60d2421db9eaf.png

DRIVER: Cleveland 588 Altitude ( Matrix Radix Sv Graphite, A) IRONS: Mizuno JPX-800 HD Irons & 3,4,5 JPX Fli-Hi (Grafalloy Prolaunch Blue Graphite, R); WEDGES: (Carried as needed) Artisan Golf 46, 50, 53, 56 low bounce, 56 high bounce; PUTTER: Mizuno TP Mills 9

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
19 minutes ago, MarvChamp said:

Yes. This from Golf Digest in my journal:

Pound for pound, Fowler is one of the longest hitters in golf. He gets those extra yards by pushing off the ground. "Look at that squat position in his lower body," Harmon says. "When you go from the ground up, your hands and arms naturally drop into what I call the delivery position."

image.png.ac5862c09dca9fcd65c60d2421db9eaf.png

@MarvChamp, I'm not sure I'd agree. The only way to "push" against the ground is by "extending" the knees. That's part of why the pressure shifts to the right side during the backswing (the right knee is extending), and a big part of why pressure shifts so suddenly left during the downswing - the left knee is extending fast at that point.

"Squatting" is what you do before you extend. If your right knee never regains flexion, it can't "push into the ground" because it's just fully extended already.

You can't jump in the air very high from a standing position: you have to bend your knees (and usually at the hips/waist too), which actually decreases your pressure downward into the ground, before you extend or "jump" to push against the ground.

  • Like 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I had great day at the DR today because part of my focus today was on hip activity.  On days when I don't get solid hits, I often feel I was not turning the hips well.  For me, I feel hip turning is important in my striking the ball well; not topping not digging under the ball.  It keeps my shoulders fairly level, arms in good position, club face and angle good.  So for me, hip rotation is the start for a swing involving the whole body.  As with the whole swing, if one part is off of its purpose, the shot is less likely to be what I thought it should.  So, in some ways my shot IS from the ground up but the motion becomes whole body a mere micro second after the hips rotate to my right side. 

With my old arthritic body and a severe foot injury, I push against nothing.  Rather I need to be solid to a foot stance and ending up solid on the right foot and on the toe on the right.  Not a fan of creating unnecessary tension.

In My BELDIN Green Bay Packer 1999 SUPER BOWL CHAMPION bag :  :ping: G410 Plus Alta Red CB 55 sr,  GX-7  (acting as a 3 wood)  :ping: 4H, 5H. Sr Flex   :ping:  G400 6i Sr Flex, G-Max 7i. 9i Sr Flex , Glide 2.0  Wedges (50º, 56º, 60º)  :touredge:  Chipper  :ping: Putter: Cadence Mid-TR 350g:bridgestone:  e12 for the items I try to hit on purpose.  :footjoy: on my feet and hands, US Embassy-Singapore hat on my head (with PACKERS, Brewers or UW-Badgers hats as options).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
On 10/10/2018 at 4:54 PM, Sandhills Golfe said:

The question is, is a lower body swing key essential. Such as a hip bump or swing from the ground up? Cheers, SG

The lower body is very much involved in the downswing. 

Whether that's something the golfer needs to feel or be conscious of depends on the player and their tendencies. In some instances golfers can improve the dynamics of their downswing by making changes to the backswing. An efficient pivot on the backswing won't guarantee a perfect downswing but for a lot of players, the issues they see at impact/downswing originate well before it.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, iacas said:

"Squatting" is what you do before you extend. If your right knee never regains flexion, it can't "push into the ground" because it's just fully extended already.

Yeah...The word "push" may just be describing a feel. If I pause in the backswing, the push/squat is ONE of the things I feel as ALL things begin to unwind for the downswing. For me, an old baseball player, it's kind of like the beginning of the step into the swing.

8 hours ago, DrMJG said:

Not a fan of creating unnecessary tension.

There isn't any for me. I have developed a loose grip and (at least in practice) a swing that throws the clubhead toward the target in right field.

Good posts all the way around. I'm still learning in my advanced age. Best, -Marv

DRIVER: Cleveland 588 Altitude ( Matrix Radix Sv Graphite, A) IRONS: Mizuno JPX-800 HD Irons & 3,4,5 JPX Fli-Hi (Grafalloy Prolaunch Blue Graphite, R); WEDGES: (Carried as needed) Artisan Golf 46, 50, 53, 56 low bounce, 56 high bounce; PUTTER: Mizuno TP Mills 9

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
7 hours ago, MarvChamp said:

Yeah...The word "push" may just be describing a feel. If I pause in the backswing, the push/squat is ONE of the things I feel as ALL things begin to unwind for the downswing. For me, an old baseball player, it's kind of like the beginning of the step into the swing.

It is very much a feel, because two things contradict you here:

  1. Your right leg is already extended, and thus, cannot "push" much at all. Only a bent right leg can "push" (by extending), and one of the first moves in a downswing is to regain flexion in both the right hip and right knee (and right ankle). Hence, no "pushing."
  2. They've wired people up to machines and things to measure how much the muscles contribute to the golf swing, and the right leg does almost nothing to contribute to the golf swing. People get forward (slide their hips forward) and rotate almost entirely through their core muscles and a bit of their left (lead) leg.

So yeah, it's a "feel" entirely - you're not really "pushing" off your right side at all, and certainly not with your leg(s).

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On ‎10‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 6:50 PM, DaveP043 said:

Reading this again, I should probably clarify.  For me, a feeling of effort isn't always positive, its comes most often when I'm feeling out of sync, when I'm kind of hitting at the ball.  On those days, a golf swing is work!  When I'm swing with the proper sequence, I'm not feeling like I'm adding effort.  I know I'm using my muscles, throughout the swing and through most of my body, but somehow it seems "easy."

This is exactly how I feel, when I'm swinging easy and using my whole body striking is improved and it's less effort.

After a few bad shots turn into bad round of hacking with rushed upper body/more arms, my striking has been terrible and I leave the course exhausted!


Posted
3 hours ago, JM2334 said:

This is exactly how I feel, when I'm swinging easy and using my whole body striking is improved and it's less effort.

After a few bad shots turn into bad round of hacking with rushed upper body/more arms, my striking has been terrible and I leave the course exhausted!

Agreed, we've all made that effortless swing and the ball is flushed. But, when we intend to make an effortless swing, it's usually a weak shot. Why is the game so puzzling? I believe there should be an intended lower body move. But, it is still hard to execute.


Posted
On 10/12/2018 at 3:14 AM, JonMA1 said:

The full swing may be the most difficult part of the game to learn, but if @hespeler or anyone else works disproportionately harder on it than other part, it's shouldn't be that difficult to believe it would become their strength.

Two years ago I would have made that claim (and I have data to back it up). It only meant the rest of my game really sucked.

 

On 10/12/2018 at 4:34 AM, Vinsk said:

I didn’t say impossible, I said most likely not true. And that by far is the case. Someone who shoots 90 is very more likely to be raking up strokes from the long game. It’s not common that someone fires a 90 because they continued to make bogey/double bogey despite hitting a high GIR % or nGIR %. 

Practicing the long game should be disproportionate as it is that much harder. Again it’s possible but it certainly isn’t common that a player can hit fairways and greens in high percentages yet still make bogey/dB on almost every hole. 

Yeah, not this many higher handicapped players can have a decent long game and horrible short game.

Most of my strokes are lost around the green too, but’s that’s my long game being so bad. 🤪

And my lower body works pretty decent. 😁

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, Sandhills Golfe said:

I believe there should be an intended lower body move. But, it is still hard to execute.

I'll reiterate what I wrote before, but there should be a lower body move. Whether or not there needs to be intent on the part of the golfer depends on the individual golfer.

You might need to feel the lower body action but there are plenty of golfers out there who don't. 

3 hours ago, Lihu said:

Most of my strokes are lost around the green too, but’s that’s my long game being so bad.

You're an 11 who averages 40% GIR - your long game is not the cause of your scoring problems around the green.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, billchao said:

I'll reiterate what I wrote before, but there should be a lower body move. Whether or not there needs to be intent on the part of the golfer depends on the individual golfer.

You might need to feel the lower body action but there are plenty of golfers out there who don't. 

You're an 11 who averages 40% GIR - your long game is not the cause of your scoring problems around the green.

It is right now. 😫

My last two rounds were about 20% GIR, but agreed that it excluded about 2 to 3 fringe putts per round on 9-10 holes. Still kind of bad though 🙈

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2603 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.