Jump to content
IGNORED

Chasing Scratch (the Podcast)


Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, iacas said:

That is NOT what I thought they looked like.

Yeah, ha.  I can see mike  but Eli was more surprising.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

What's up guys - found this thread and just wanted to say ... We completely agree with you. We had no idea what we were doing. 😂 Iacas - if you'd be willing, we'd love to have a phone call w

That’s not what I meant. I’m saying I’d like to see a guy or a group of guys who have the same things going on you mentioned but are actually making an educated attempt to become scratch. A + 3 is alr

I love their banter. I think this podcast is about best friends hanging out with golf as their favorite thing to do. Actually becoming scratch golfers...I don’t think they see that as attainable since

Posted Images

Just looking at MIke’s GHIN history and this summer was not pretty. I didn’t get the sense that he was going in reverse as much as he did from listening to the shows (or I guess I just forgot).  Adam Young has a lot of work to do.

Edited by Daveje97
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2021 at 8:54 PM, iacas said:

That is NOT what I thought they looked like.

This randomly popped up on my YT feed and I had read through this thread before so I checked it out (but lets be honest I just watch any and all golf content). I was surprised their offseason doesn't include any actual swinging of clubs aside from doing the superspeed training. They aren't out of shape guys so while it cant hurt to work out it seems odd how the goal of getting better at golf could involve not hitting a ball for months. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As an old, certainly not scratch anymore, returned to the game golfer, all I can say is that the reason I quit  golfing the first time is because I was playing for all the wrong reasons.

Edited by Esox
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Some quick notes…

  • Eli's swing is pretty good. I think Breed is slightly over-stating the early backswing stuff… because it gets to the top okay, and isn't waving around or still suffering effects on the downswing, but… I also haven't seen a face-on view or a six-iron swing. And, that said, a better takeaway is going to be better anyway. I didn't look at Eli's grip.
  • Mike's swing (back on his heels too much)… Grip is palmy, elbow gets trapped. Gonna lead to a lot of face control issues. I disagree with Breed's assessment that there's a little too much "toss" at the top of the backswing. Breed talks about his slight EE, but most of that is just due to his balance at setup, and many good players EE a little bit. So… yeah. I disagree with Breed here. That's not where I'd start.

image.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, iacas said:

A series of three tweets. Two more after that one.

Funny that Twitter had the sensitive content warning for the images.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
6 minutes ago, Darkfrog said:

Funny that Twitter had the sensitive content warning for the images.

Pretty much does that for most images, I think, if your settings are such. Change your settings, man. 🙂

(If you even have a Twitter account. Maybe it defaults to that label for most images from non-verified accounts or something to people not logged in to Twitter?)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, Darkfrog said:

Funny that Twitter had the sensitive content warning for the images.

Maybe due to the text at the bottom of the images?: "pelvis sway" "thrust"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

18 hours ago, iacas said:

Breed talks about his slight EE, but most of that is just due to his balance at setup, and many good players EE a little bit.

yeah, I've never understood why some instructors seem to obsess with shaft plane at address versus impact.  I get they should prob be closer than Mike's, but it will be if he's not so squatty at setup.  Seems like it should be more about is the shaft on an ok angle at impact.  

image.png.59b906e949e9a805d855c36c5d2f5cf5.png

 

Interesting stuff.   I enjoy the podcast and the youtube vids.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
11 minutes ago, Wanzo said:

yeah, I've never understood why some instructors seem to obsess with shaft plane at address versus impact.  I get they should prob be closer than Mike's, but it will be if he's not so squatty at setup.  Seems like it should be more about is the shaft on an ok angle at impact.  

image.png.59b906e949e9a805d855c36c5d2f5cf5.png

The shaft plane at address versus impact is a dumb one, I agree.

Apparently, you could get better at golf by just setting up with the handle much higher! Then it'd be closer to where it is at impact, right? 😛

  • Funny 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 1/15/2021 at 7:40 AM, iacas said:

The shaft plane at address versus impact is a dumb one, I agree.

Apparently, you could get better at golf by just setting up with the handle much higher! Then it'd be closer to where it is at impact, right? 😛

Seems to be true if you look at Moe Norman's swing. His angle at impact is the same as at address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Esox said:

Seems to be true if you look at Moe Norman's swing. His angle at impact is the same as at address.

I agree that a lot of pros and really good players end up at a similar angle at impact as they started.  In this example, would it make mike more consistent/better if he started with his hands higher but got to the same impact angle that he currently does?  Maybe, I’m not an instructor.  Just seems like an easy thing to point out that might not be the most important thing to change, at least not directly.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
10 hours ago, Esox said:

Seems to be true if you look at Moe Norman's swing. His angle at impact is the same as at address.

So, based on one guy, it “seems to be true”?

In other words, if this was some secret, and your hands returned 15° above where they were at setup, couldn’t you just raise your hands 15° at setup to become a significantly better player?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oh no...here comes the ‘ he was the greatest ball striker of all time’ talk....

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 hours ago, iacas said:

So, based on one guy, it “seems to be true”?

In other words, if this was some secret, and your hands returned 15° above where they were at setup, couldn’t you just raise your hands 15° at setup to become a significantly better player?

Perhaps it would work for some people. I was toying with it for a while. I was hitting the ball quite solidly, but at the cost of much lower clubhead speed.  I did end up with my hands slightly higher at address, but not the extreme of Moes single plane swing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
6 hours ago, Esox said:

Perhaps it would work for some people. I was toying with it for a while. I was hitting the ball quite solidly, but at the cost of much lower clubhead speed.  I did end up with my hands slightly higher at address, but not the extreme of Moes single plane swing.

My point is only that if the goal was to have the same angle, you could change setup. (Moe was higher at setup than most people.)

The best solution is to just get a good impact position, not just try to match setup to impact.

Impact is higher in most good players too.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Administrator

 

I didn't like his first "shallow" swing. He stays very closed, his hands roll over hard. He's right that the second one had a better turn. Same hands, and I wonder about the speed.

I don't care for the "nail drill." There are often very real mechanical issues at play, and if your goal is just to swing out more, you can do some very bad things to do this. You can tip back, stay closed, etc.

The "nail drill" has its place, but Mike and Eli act like it's the be-all, end-all.

  • Informative 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Played again today, a course I played a couple of times before and broke 90 easily. Shot 86 with 2x ob and one water hazard. The work that I put in the last year really shows and I feel that on the right course on the right day I could break 80 even this year. It probably won’t happen but that’s the goal for next season.    I see that I must work on 100 meters and in. So on one of the hardest holes which is a 440 yard par 4 I drove the ball over 310 and then had a pitching wedge in. It was a bit of an awkward stance but I was just left of the green. Almost chipped in but then messed up the comeback putt and instead of an easy par I made a bogey.    Maybe I’m being too hard on myself looking at the tour averages but I feel like that’s one area of the game I need to clean up - no 3 putts and more up and downs. And I really need to put more work / decide on how I want to pitch and then really let that sink in and finally get the distances for all 4 wedges for 1/2, 3/4 and full swings printed out and stick them on the clubs. 
    • Birdied #4 and #12 at Sand Valley last week, as well as #9 at The Links Course at Lawsonia. The 4th hole is the only new addition to my away composite.
    • I understand the need to protect what people perceive to be their freedoms, but I don't think that there is a problem in enforcing things like the wearing of seatbelts or driving whilst drunk etc. I think it SHOULD be mandated, but am realistic enough to know that any government who tried to to this would become very unpopular very quickly. At the very least I think there should be a sort of "vaccination passport" where it became pretty obvious that being unvaccinated stopped you from doing things you like to do - like going to restaurants, sporting events or even your job, which would be an incentive for them to get vaccinated. I kind of think that the greatest freedom you can have is being pretty sure that if you do get the virus it won't kill you. And there's a simple way to achieve that freedom.
    • I hadn't heard that, but given the stupidity of people out there refusing to take it (even for FREE, no less), I'm not surprised. It'll likely be upheld too because, while the case law is old, the case mostly on point has upheld such measures.
    • There's been a lot of stories in the news lately that, because enough people have not been vaccinated (thus starving the virus), we may be headed towards mandates.  Not desirable but the 30% to 40% not vaccinated are keeping Covid-19 rolling right along and harming those who have done their part to help beat down this pandemic.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Armando Araujo
      Armando Araujo
      (46 years old)
    2. chris3putt
      chris3putt
      (54 years old)
    3. CrazyHorsePete
      CrazyHorsePete
      (34 years old)
    4. DHak20
      DHak20
      (44 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...