Jump to content

69 posts / 7724 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, colin007 said:

Lol hey buddy!!

I was thinking something in between, like AP2s or CBs or JPXs. Nice compact cavity backs. 

Well, alright then. These are definitely acceptable... :-)

I have both Adams CMBs (cav backs) and bought a set of last year's King Cobra MBs (as blady as they get these days) as a guilty purchase.

Honestly I can't tell much of a difference, feel or flight once I got over psychological look of the Cobra's super tiny head. Same shaft too - KBS tours. 

33 minutes ago, onthehunt526 said:

Or Srixon Z785 irons. 😂

I got fitted for these at True Spec last year. Nice but it wasn't any appreciable flight difference.

Edited by GolfLug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, GolfLug said:

I got fitted for these at True Spec last year. Nice but it wasn't any appreciable flight difference.

Really I noticed a big difference, but then again I also have a better fitted shaft in mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

Really I noticed a big difference, but then again I also have a better fitted shaft in mine.

Compared to what clubs? Which shaft did you go to from which? He had me on Nippon MOD 3 which I think is stock for Srixon Zs, IIRC.

Honestly shafts make the lion's share of the diff with all gazillion bend, weight, frequency combos. 

We tried 5-6 different shafts. Anyway, not the topic here so don't want to digress too much. 

Edited by GolfLug

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

23 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

Compared to what clubs? Which shaft did you go to from which? He had me on Nippon MOD 3 which I think is stock for Srixon Zs, IIRC.

Honestly shafts make the lion's share of the diff with all gazillion bend, weight, frequency combos. 

We tried 5-6 different shafts. Anyway, not the topic here so don't want to digress too much. 

Well I’ll reel this back in so it’s back on topic there is a reason I brought it up. Mark went on opposite ends of the spectrum for his test. Super Game Improvement vs Blade. But what about the other categories, blades, player’s cavity, player’s distance, game-improvement, super game improvement? Through the spectrum off all the different types of irons I’d like to see the data of that test.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, but I played blades in the early 70s. It was all we had. When you hit a thin shot you knew it. Ouch! 

This said I was looking at a set of blades a year ago - the Cobra King MBs and I hit them well in the bay, but here's the problem.

I could hit the 7i 143 yds with a 10 yd gap between clubs down to the GW. Now that's not bad. But the yardage gap diminished to 9 yds going the other way: 152 for the 6i, And on a flushed 4i it was 170 yds. carry. Now my 5W carry is 210 yds. Thats 40 yds. Going the other way, the GW in the set went 103 carry which was fine. If I went with a standard wedge set up, I'd still have a yardage problem at the top end of the bag. There are some par 3s I couldn't reach with the 4i. 

So a set for me incorporating blades would go MB, 7-GW, 54, 58. GI 7i (155), GI 6i (170), 5H (185), 4H (200), 3W, D, Putter. Mix and match.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, DrvFrShow said:

Yeah, but I played blades in the early 70s. It was all we had. When you hit a thin shot you knew it. Ouch! 

This said I was looking at a set of blades a year ago - the Cobra King MBs and I hit them well in the bay, but here's the problem.

I could hit the 7i 143 yds with a 10 yd gap between clubs down to the GW. Now that's not bad. But the yardage gap diminished to 9 yds going the other way: 152 for the 6i, And on a flushed 4i it was 170 yds. carry. Now my 5W carry is 210 yds. Thats 40 yds. Going the other way, the GW in the set went 103 carry which was fine. If I went with a standard wedge set up, I'd still have a yardage problem at the top end of the bag. There are some par 3s I couldn't reach with the 4i. 

So a set for me incorporating blades would go MB, 7-GW, 54, 58. GI 7i (155), GI 6i (170), 5H (185), 4H (200), 3W, D, Putter. Mix and match.

143 yard carry with a 7i? That’s pretty impressive Julia.

The one thing I will say about blades, is front to back dispersion is smaller than with cavity backs. If you say hit a SGI 7-iron as Mark did. You could hit 100 shots, with reasonable strikes (not sculls and fats). And you’d have a bigger distance dispersion than you would with a blade on similar strikes. That’s why a lot of Lower handicappers these days have some sort of blended set of irons. Whether it’s blades from say 7-iron through pitching wedge, player‘s cavity 5 and 6 iron, utility or GI 4-iron and a hybrid or utility 3-iron.

I don’t know if I could jump from say 5-iron to a “Rinky Dinks” though because the gapping May become an issue. 
 

In my opinion, at least in the scoring clubs, (7 or 8-iron through PW) blades could be an option for probably almost any golfer with an 18 handicap or lower, no problem. If I’m say 152 yards out and I hit my 9-iron, I want that 9-iron to go 152 yards, not 130 sometimes and 170 others. Sometimes they go 149 others they go 156. I’m ok with that distance dispersion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

19 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

143 yard carry with a 7i? That’s pretty impressive Julia.

The one thing I will say about blades, is front to back dispersion is smaller than with cavity backs. If you say hit a SGI 7-iron as Mark did. You could hit 100 shots, with reasonable strikes (not sculls and fats). And you’d have a bigger distance dispersion than you would with a blade on similar strikes. That’s why a lot of Lower handicappers these days have some sort of blended set of irons. Whether it’s blades from say 7-iron through pitching wedge, player‘s cavity 5 and 6 iron, utility or GI 4-iron and a hybrid or utility 3-iron.

I don’t know if I could jump from say 5-iron to a “Rinky Dinks” though because the gapping May become an issue. 
 

In my opinion, at least in the scoring clubs, (7 or 8-iron through PW) blades could be an option for probably almost any golfer with an 18 handicap or lower, no problem. If I’m say 152 yards out and I hit my 9-iron, I want that 9-iron to go 152 yards, not 130 sometimes and 170 others. Sometimes they go 149 others they go 156. I’m ok with that distance dispersion.

I'd love to have a 152 yd 9i. It would make the course so much easier. Of course I'd have to move back a set of tees... or two. I use my hybrids a lot. Not always for full shots. They're great for hitting a punchy shot out of pine straw. And I use varying clubs for different types of shots... you know get creative at times. When you play as badly as I do, you have to get creative to walk off the green with "that was a par" or "that was a bogey".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Pretty cool seeing this discussion here. I watched this video when it came out and thought the results were reassuring, lol! I say that because I placed my order for a couple Titleist 620 MBs back in April and they finally came in here recently. I've only got two rounds in with them so far and only have 8i-PW but I am loving them so far and plan to buy more!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could probably game either type of head providing I like the feel/weight/length/shaft. My current irons (g25) and wedges were actually chosen because they had the shaft I wanted and were the last set of clubs I bought when chasing down a proper swing.

I still think slower swingers or those with a poor swing will benefit from cavity back/game improvement irons but shaft is still king.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 5/20/2020 at 2:38 PM, Darkfrog said:

At one point I thought I would benefit from GI irons. I tried a few from my friend's set, and also hit a few different models during lessons (Cobra F9, Mizuno Hot Metal), and they just looked too big behind the ball at address, and strangely, this did not give me more confidence. I guess I'm just used to the appearance of the thinner top line, narrower sole, and shorter heel to toe length. I'm the opposite with hybrids and woods though, with those, the bigger the better.

I have a set of Callaway Diablo Edge irons graphite shafts that just "look" super clunky and totally non-confidence inspiring when compared to the set of Titleist 962's w/rifle 6.0 shafts.  I love the 962's at address and when I swing those I pretty much know the distance even on mishits.  The Diablo's seem to be more erratic.  When I was looking at the data sheet on the carry distances that @iacas put in his original post, I was thinking - Diablo's left, 962's right.  What does all this mean - I think it proves we want verifiable data that will help validate the clubs we play or don't play.  The test was done as about consistently possible with a human doing the swinging.  Norming the data, taking out the flyers, proved that Mark can hit any club he wants with reasonable accuracy.  It is like @iacas said, he can shoot 73 with his wife's clubs.  It is the Indian who learns to shoot the arrow no matter the bow that does not starve at the end of the day.     

On a personal note, will getting fit for irons make me any better?  Not really, because you have to have good technique to be better.  Fitted clubs are often like eye candy on a motorcycle, looks good but won't get you home.  Truly believe in working through what the guys teach in LSW about working on the proper skill sets.  Then, just maybe, it will be time to look into clubs that are easier to work, hence the MB's and player's CB's.  Till then, Diablo's left, 962's right and 845s Silver Scots somewhere in between.   

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

To all the other guys on the forum that game blades or muscle-backs at what point in the longer irons did you feel it was best to hit a CB instead? 4i, 5i, 6i? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ShawnSum said:

To all the other guys on the forum that game blades or muscle-backs at what point in the longer irons did you feel it was best to hit a CB instead? 4i, 5i, 6i? 

Probably 6 iron and up for me. I could see 7 iron and up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, ShawnSum said:

To all the other guys on the forum that game blades or muscle-backs at what point in the longer irons did you feel it was best to hit a CB instead? 4i, 5i, 6i? 

When I played my blades, 7i was the transition point for me. If I wanted to mix and match to make my own combo set, I’d probably only play the blades in 8i-PW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

IDK if it qualifies, I play MP58s down to a 4 iron. I have the opposite problem where I hit my 4-7 irons more solidly than my 8-PW.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    SuperSpeed
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo
  • Posts

    • So you can do what you did and add head weight to counter the grip weight. You can find lighter midsize grips, which obviously isn't always a viable option. You can also find shafts with more tip heavy balance points. You could also add a little length to the club to get that weight back. All these options have pros and cons. My personal feeling on SW is that it's mainly about getting a consistent feel through your irons and wedges. I don't care about matching woods, hybrids, putters to an iron SW. Most important for me is a smooth weight progression through the set so each club is getting heavier moving from driver to wedges. The simplest option is start out with just the new grips and no additional weight at the tip. Use whatever iron you want, and hit some balls with impact stickers, foot spray powder, dry erase marker on balls, launch monitor, etc, to look at your impact pattern. Then start adding some lead tape to the back and repeat the process. At some point you should find your consistency is at it's best and adding or taking away weight from that point is detrimental. Then just add the same amount to the rest (remembering head weight influences longer clubs more than shorter so you may want to shave a gram or two off in the longer irons vs. the shorts). Only other thing to look out for if you add weight to the clubs is how you hit them at the end of the round when you are tired compared to the start of the round. Most people can handle an 130g shaft for the first 5-10 swings, but not necessarily by the end of the round.
    • Have you ever gotten a club fitting? I also launch the ball lower than ideal and part of that is my swing, part of that was the shaft I was playing. I wonder if changing to a higher lofted driver will cause you to hit the ball with more spin and you wouldn't see any gains in distance.
    • 15 signs you watch too much golf on TV | Golf World | Golf Digest Are you a TV golf addict? Then you're probably showing some of these symptoms. As much as I hate slideshows, please link the original article when posting these things, @ChetlovesMer.
    • I thought I saw that picture in a post office. Other than that, nothing controversial. I do celebrate the comments on how there is a place in golf for a wide variety of swings. That has made a comeback and this golf fan appreciates the diversity and individuality of the looks. 
    • I know politics are topic forbidden...but: If you golf on election day, make sure to cast an absent-tee-ballot.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Alecb
      Alecb
      (23 years old)
    2. BamaWade
      BamaWade
      (45 years old)
    3. Breaka100
      Breaka100
      (80 years old)
    4. dust1978
      dust1978
      (42 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...