Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hi all, saw a video of my swing my posture was slumped over the ball, looked terrible.Im over 6ft so I guess this can happen easily.Anyway before my round yesterday I had a session on the range, standing far taller to the ball the results were dramatic, benefit 1 the new address position felt far more athletic , benefit 2 standing taller obviously increased my swing arc, benefit 3 and for me the most important I felt I had far more time to swing the club, especially on the downswing, this extra time definitely helped my rhythm and tempo.Initially I lost a few balls to the right in the range session, but once I sensed the extra time on the downswing the consistency was excellent.Went out and shot a lifetime best score of 5 under 67 was never out of position.if anyones got posture problems give it a go, hope this may help someone.


Originally Posted by MiniBlueDragon

Nah the 'big butt' is (partly) a cause of the anterior pelvic tilt/lordosis. When I stand completely upright I still have a fair amount of tilt:

From there to address position adds a few degrees but not a significant amount; the difference between standing upright and address for me is a slight forward lean (more of a curving of the upper back) and settling on the balls of the feet more than tilting the pelvis.

Ok now one with the shirt pulled up a little bit.  This thread just took a sexy twist.  "Show us your bum bent over at address"


Originally Posted by gwlee7

Working on seeing the ball from the center of my eyes is something mvmac has had me work on.  In doing so, I hit the ball on better trajectory (especially with the driver) than when I lapse into the old way of "looking under my glasses".

Either mvmac or iacas gave me the same advice from my swing video and it has given me good results.  Before I was looking "down" at the ball (head up with eyes down) and causing some side to side head sway during swing.  Looking directly at the ball (head down eyes forward) gives me more consistency with my shot making.


  • 2 months later...

I remember reading a comment by mvmac in another thread talking about head/eye position where, I think, he recommended to someone that he get his eyes on more parallel line to the ball at address.  He said something to the effect that it gave him a "few other things for free" which I took to mean set him up to perform some other fundamentals more easily.  This was in regards to a full swing, not putting.

What is the 5ks theory on head/eye position at address?


Look directly at the ball.

Unless it's behind you in which case,

  1. Turn around
  2. Look directly at the ball.

:-P

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Found what I was looking for.  I should have known there was a "posture thread" somewhere:

The shoulders feeling rounded, inward and down, allows the chin to be down, which allows for the ball to be seen with central vision.  The eyes which are located in the head are what need to be stable or centrally foviated on the object to maintain the balance centers located in the eyes, ears, and muscular system.  When we are looking at the golf ball, and our head is down, we are able to see the golf ball out of the middle of our eye sockets and in the center of our vision, called "foveal vision".  When an object is in foveal vision, we are able to make more detailed processing of the image (being golf ball and surroundings) during the golf swing.  If the eyes are being forced to strain within the eye socket and keep relocating the golf ball because vision is temporarily lost from one eye, this is called "saccadic eye movement" and is slower and less detailed processing of sensory input from the eyes to the brain.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/56069/good-golf-posture

  • Upvote 1

The shoulders feeling rounded, inward and down, allows the chin to be down, which allows for the ball to be seen with central vision.  The eyes which are located in the head are what need to be stable or centrally foviated on the object to maintain the balance centers located in the eyes, ears, and muscular system.  When we are looking at the golf ball, and our head is down, we are able to see the golf ball out of the middle of our eye sockets and in the center of our vision, called "foveal vision".  When an object is in foveal vision, we are able to make more detailed processing of the image (being golf ball and surroundings) during the golf swing.  If the eyes are being forced to strain within the eye socket and keep relocating the golf ball because vision is temporarily lost from one eye, this is called "saccadic eye movement" and is slower and less detailed processing of sensory input from the eyes to the brain.

Isn't that just a reallllly fancy way of saying "look directly at the ball." :-P

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...

From the latest Golf Magazine:

I was wondering about what it says in the back section. It says his back shouldn't be straight, but he's pulling his shoulders back(which is what someone would do to straighten their back in the shoulder area, isn't it?). Also, aren't the arms supposed to hang down naturally, and isn't pulling your shoulders back contrary to that idea?


  • Moderator

I was wondering about what it says in the back section. It says his back shouldn't be straight, but he's pulling his shoulders back(which is what someone would do to straighten their back in the shoulder area, isn't it?). Also, aren't the arms supposed to hang down naturally, and isn't pulling your shoulders back contrary to that idea?

Lower back is pretty straight but upper back is curved, in order to get the neck/eyes down and also helps with the pivot.

Take a look at the first post in the thread.

Shoulders blades should not be pulled back, should not be pinched together, otherwise arms can't hang and makes a solid pivot more difficult.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I was wondering about what it says in the back section. It says his back shouldn't be straight, but he's pulling his shoulders back(which is what someone would do to straighten their back in the shoulder area, isn't it?). Also, aren't the arms supposed to hang down naturally, and isn't pulling your shoulders back contrary to that idea?

It says he's pulling his shoulders back, but I don't see it. The picture would look quite different if he was pulling his shoulders back.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah, I've read the whole thread. Your responses are kind of what I was referring to. If he was pulling his shoulders back, then his back would be straighter(in the shoulder area), and his arms wouldn't be hanging down naturally. It seemed like either bad observation or bad advice, based on this thread and the history of golf swings. I wasn't arguing for a straight back. Sorry I didn't make that clear.


  • 3 weeks later...

I may be asking a question that has an obvious answer, but how important is having depth perception, and correct depth perception, at that, to the golf swing?  For three years, I have been fighting a problem related to retina damage in my left eye.  On the opthalmologis's' depth perception test, I score zero out of nine (can't see even the first one).  Furthermore, if I were to try to simply tap the ball with the butt end of the club, I would miss it completely, on the short side of the ball.  If I finally tap it after several tries, I can then tap it again through some kind of spatial memory, but if I make a 360 degree spin and try again, I miss it again.  I'm currently changing my learning process to mimic as best I can what I think a sightless golfer would use, which mean that I have to cut down on the dynamic elements of the swing and focus more on making good contact.  Thank you for reading.


I may be asking a question that has an obvious answer, but how important is having depth perception, and correct depth perception, at that, to the golf swing?  For three years, I have been fighting a problem related to retina damage in my left eye.  On the opthalmologis's' depth perception test, I score zero out of nine (can't see even the first one).  Furthermore, if I were to try to simply tap the ball with the butt end of the club, I would miss it completely, on the short side of the ball.  If I finally tap it after several tries, I can then tap it again through some kind of spatial memory, but if I make a 360 degree spin and try again, I miss it again.  I'm currently changing my learning process to mimic as best I can what I think a sightless golfer would use, which mean that I have to cut down on the dynamic elements of the swing and focus more on making good contact.  Thank you for reading.


George Knudson used to do a lot of work with his eyes closed to "feel" his swing mechanics.

I reckon to begin with it would be more difficult but as time went on and you learned to understand the feelings, pressures etc you'd be perfectly fine with the swing itself.

Like me (no binocular vision) you'd benefit greatly from using a laser range finder with no depth perception.

SWING DNA
Speed [77] Tempo [5] ToeDown [5] KickAngle [6] Release [5] Mizuno JPX EZ 10.5° - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye (with Harrison ShotMaker) Mizuno JPX EZ 3W/3H - Fujikura Orochi Black Eye Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 4i-PW - True Temper XP 115 S300 Mizuno MP R-12 50.06/54.09/58.10 - Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex Mizuno MP A305 [:-P]


George Knudson used to do a lot of work with his eyes closed to "feel" his swing mechanics.

I reckon to begin with it would be more difficult but as time went on and you learned to understand the feelings, pressures etc you'd be perfectly fine with the swing itself.

Like me (no binocular vision) you'd benefit greatly from using a laser range finder with no depth perception.

I can give this eyes closed practice a try, which would be what looks like a small extension of

trying to emulate the cognitive processes of a sightless golfer.  I say "what looks like a small extension"

because in trying to understand the cognitive processes of a sightless golfer, I had my cognitive processes

analyzed (tested) by a cognitive psychologist, and they turn out to be almost exactly the opposite of

those that would be theoretically used by a sightless golfer.  Fortunately, I have been assured that a person

is able to learn to use his/her opposed cognitive processes--it's just that it won't come naturally.  Sounds a little

far fetched, but the models are a close match to how I learned other sports, depending more on the eyes than

visual imagery.


  • 2 weeks later...

I think some people might find that their hamstrings stretch when they get into a proper posture.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Yes, this is the 2024 model. DSG ruined what Callaway perfected for most golfers. A darn good 3 piece golf ball. Now it's a 2 piece cheap ball. To me a 2 piece ball is fine and a 3 piece budget ball is better. I prefer a slightly harder ball, something in the 65-75 compression range that will perform similar to the old Gamer. The Titleist tru-feel is pretty good. I planned on giving Maxfli straightfli a try.
    • Is that the current generation Gamer? Another old standby for a firm and inexpensive ball is Pinnacle.  There are two models, the Rush and the Soft, but I don’t know what compression they are.
    • Good advice, but according to DSG website it is a 45 compression ball. My current ball is the Top-flite Gamer at 70. 45 is too low for me to go.
    • The 3 piece Maxfli Trifli is 2 dozen for $35.  The Trifli does not feel as soft as the Maxfli Softfli, which is why I like it. Other options would be one of the Srixons, which have a buy 2 get 1 free offer.
    • I have been carrying a 7 wood more often this year.  It’s especially handy if you have a downhill lie to an uphill green.  It’s also handy if the rough on the course is deep.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...