Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thought so, but I wanted to ask just to make sure I am not missing any sort of awesome putting drill :-D

I know exactly what you mean. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Awesome thread. As someone who is likely craptacular at putting, I'm happy to have this to practice next time it's raining and I can't practice outdoors. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I took this thread to the golf course with me yesterday.  I had improvement beyond my belief!   I one putted a few.  I two putted all but one hole.  My best putt was 22 feet, one foot or so of break and slightly downhill.  I lined up and looked back and forth between my ball and the hole several times.  I found my line.  I did not even look up at the hole again.  I gauged my pendulum and followed through.

My group hooped and hollered.  I would have too, except I just played it cool.  I was hooping and hollering on the inside.  Thanks iacas. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the difference between good and great possibly just that the "great" putter is hitting the ball with a slight upward angle of attack meaning the pendulum has reached it's peak velocity and is now going back up and slowing down or did the "good" putter have an upward angle of attack just as often?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the difference between good and great possibly just that the "great" putter is hitting the ball with a slight upward angle of attack meaning the pendulum has reached it's peak velocity and is now going back up and slowing down or did the "good" putter have an upward angle of attack just as often?

It's a good question. Can't say I have an answer. Some are hitting up but still accelerating a teeny bit too long. Y'know? Plus if you came to me with "good" I'm probably never touching it unless you bring Kate Beckinsale with you and she asks me to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Great thread.  I have recently been considering myself a pretty decent putter.  However, I just realized that I was never taking the club back far enough.  I've spent my whole life watching crappy putters (dad is the first one that comes to mind) "quit" on the stroke and stop right after hitting it, especially on downhill putts, that I've sort of ingrained the opposite into my stroke.  I make damn sure that I have a long follow-through.  I knew that the adage was to have a pendulum like stroke with same length back and through swings, but I always had a longer through swing.  I'd be willing to bet that if I got on a SAM with my old putter, that it would register me as having a stroke that was not decelerating until after impact.

Now, with the new putter and with this thread and Aimpoint, I'm quickly getting to the point of being cocky and calling myself a really good putter.

Thanks!

EDIT:  My last 6 rounds  (only one since this thread, and only three with the new putter, but still):

6.7 GIR/round

1.85 putts/GIR

29.8 total putts/round

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Definitely gives me something to think about. I've been putting by making relatively the same length backstroke (short) for some time now because I feel it helps me hit the sweet spot more consistently. As a result, I must accelerate through ball at greater speed as the putt gets longer. It's worked for me to some degree but when out of practice, not so much. Had 5 3-putts yesterday, all distance-control related. Very informative, I will use this technique next time out. Tks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It's a good question. Can't say I have an answer. Some are hitting up but still accelerating a teeny bit too long. Y'know?

Plus if you came to me with "good" I'm probably never touching it unless you bring Kate Beckinsale with you and she asks me to.

I've never felt like the ball rolled well off of my club face. How do you know when you're hitting the ball slightly on the upstroke??

Wouldn't we all like to see if Kate Beckinsale has a "good" stroke?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never felt like the ball rolled well off of my club face. How do you know when you're hitting the ball slightly on the upstroke??

Wouldn't we all like to see if Kate Beckinsale has a "good" stroke?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Read this last week and went out and practiced looong putts on Sunday.  Question about increasing the length of the back swing on long putts... What affect, if any, will the increased, upward arc have when descending on the ball? Or, am I supposed to keep my stroke long and low?  Just wondering, as I tried both ways with mixed results.  To rephrase my question, what type of putting stroke do you advocate on long - 30 ft or more - putts?   Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never thought about putting the ball with a positive AoA, just try to think of the pendulum and brush feeling.

Right now I set up aiming for the putter face and the back of the ball to meet right in the middle of my stance (with a slightly open stance).  Might it help get a positive AoA and slight decel before impact to move the ball forward maybe half a ball (I'm thinking how ball forward helps positive AoA with the driver)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Never thought about putting the ball with a positive AoA, just try to think of the pendulum and brush feeling.

Right now I set up aiming for the putter face and the back of the ball to meet right in the middle of my stance (with a slightly open stance).  Might it help get a positive AoA and slight decel before impact to move the ball forward maybe half a ball (I'm thinking how ball forward helps positive AoA with the driver)?

That is exactly what I do.  I figure if I have a fairly "centered" or "symmetrical" stroke, then, theoretically, the bottom is somewhere close to the middle of my stance.  And, if we're nit-picking, that means the face of the putter at the center of my stance, so the ball already has to be a half diameter forward of that.  I add another inch or so to that and put the ball there.

I certainly don't THINK about hitting on the upstroke either, because then you're liable to start doing goofy things like lifting up the putter as you're coming into the ball, or something equally weird.  I just put the ball forward of center, take a smooth stroke and assume that I'm catching it on the upswing slightly.

I believe that there is a place near me with a SAM lab, and every time a subject like this comes up, I remind myself that I want to go get measured, so maybe I'll look into it soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I put with the ball forward in my stance as well, its helped out. I really do like the feel of having my head behind the ball more looking down the line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My old Ping Pal has what looks to be about 4 degrees of loft.  Is this common in modern putters?  If so, aren't we hitting on the upstroke by proxy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right now I set up aiming for the putter face and the back of the ball to meet right in the middle of my stance (with a slightly open stance).  Might it help get a positive AoA and slight decel before impact to move the ball forward maybe half a ball (I'm thinking how ball forward helps positive AoA with the driver)?

That's what you do, yes. Just put the ball a little forward in your stance. Very few people have it middle of stance… that would lead to hitting down slightly, on average.

Read this last week and went out and practiced looong putts on Sunday.  Question about increasing the length of the back swing on long putts... What affect, if any, will the increased, upward arc have when descending on the ball? Or, am I supposed to keep my stroke long and low?  Just wondering, as I tried both ways with mixed results.  To rephrase my question, what type of putting stroke do you advocate on long - 30 ft or more - putts?   Thanks

Not low. Just on the same arc as always.

What do you mean what type of stroke? The same as a six-foot putt, but longer on both sides (still roughly matching).

My old Ping Pal has what looks to be about 4 degrees of loft.  Is this common in modern putters?  If so, aren't we hitting on the upstroke by proxy?

Your pitching wedge has 45+ degrees of loft, yet you take divots.

Get my point? :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's what you do, yes. Just put the ball a little forward in your stance. Very few people have it middle of stance… that would lead to hitting down slightly, on average.

Not low. Just on the same arc as always.

What do you mean what type of stroke? The same as a six-foot putt, but longer on both sides (still roughly matching).

Your pitching wedge has 45+ degrees of loft, yet you take divots.

Get my point?

Har!!  Point well taken. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what you do, yes. Just put the ball a little forward in your stance. Very few people have it middle of stance… that would lead to hitting down slightly, on average.

Is there other similar information like this you can also share with us?

I feel like without more information like this, practice is just a complete waste of time. I'm so glad I haven't yet wasted time practicing putting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • I know  for myself as a golf fan I want to be able to watch golf and have it entertain me.  There's really only three tournaments anymore I pay attention to Masters British and US Open.  The last couple years the US has been a dud but I keep watching hoping it will once again become the ultimate test. I want to see the best quality golf.  I think that's where this whole discussion of distance comes in.  Nicklaus Snead et all for the most part could swing much faster than they did.  Sometimes they would bash one but not usually.  Hogan did some long drive stuff at times early on and he was puttin the wood to it espescially for his height.  In order to score best these guys played a golf swing that was not maxed out because the ball spun so much that slight misfits were truly bad you had to manage the strike just right at high speed to keep spin down and get the launch right or it would be an embarrassing balloon ballflight.   They were playing the game of skill not the game of maximum speed alone.  Very self disciplined approach.  It kinda makes me mad when I hear younger folks say "part of the reason for the distance now is that players understand launch conditions better" Really?  To me it's preposterous to try to assert that modern players only in the last few years learned launch conditions.  It's also arrogant and incorrect.  Like gear effect also.  Heel low cuts and toe draws were shots people practiced with balata back to Jackie Burke! THE BALATA PLAYERS WERE MASTERS OF SPIN COMPARED TO THE GUYS NOW!  TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IS ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY INSULTING TO THEM AND ANYONE WHO IS CONNECTED WITH THEM!   They were masters because the higher spinning ball gave them much better feedback while developing their swings.  You have to know how to create certain launch conditions to get that balata out there like Norman or Nicklaus or whoever.  Maybe they did not know their numbers on Doppler but they ALL knew who could do it and who couldn't and more I,portent how THEY did it.  Now they are all bashing it because there's no reason not to.  The ball  doesn't spin as much and the clubs are forgiving.  The courses are setup so that being in the 'rough' is better than the fairway. You get brain dead robots like DJ out there hitting miles.  Where's the variation and challenge?  Where are the courses made to challenge the modern technology?  It's not good for the tour to make the game into a distance contest.  They are marketing the thing poorly and results have been showing and will show the next few years as more and more courses close. Golf with a higher spinning ball would be so cool to even watch on tv with shot tracer.  That's what golfers used to aspire to the low launch and correct shape.  They might not hit as far as pros but the shaping that's what's been totally lost today. I think with a game focused on power and distance over self control and skill you get a bore.  With most tour stops it's like watching a Ferrari F1 car racing a guy in a Prius.  (The Prius being the course.) A golfer with the skill of Corey Pavin simply couldn't make it today and that's sad.  Guy was a great competitor striker of the ball.  He was shaping fw wood shots into greens.  You don't see that stuff anymore and really the younger crowd doesn't know what they don't know.   To me the whole game of golf boils down to decisions and self knowledge and control and is made more interesting the more difficult the course gets.   With the modern week to week game with older courses and modern clubs it's basically a free minus six or more every week due to par fives alone for a good touring pro. This is a long rant to forgive me.  I just wish golf were more entertaining now.  It's largely not.  I'd like to see the pros have to face the challenge of a higher spinning ball and takeaway Some for and max volume on drivers and fw clubs.  The reason for this is I want to see what kind of level mankind can reach in this game.  I want to see the best quality.  IMO the way the game is goin is wrong for that.  It's a putting contest now.  They all bash it they all hit greens it's just who gets a hot putter. I wanna make it more challenging and truly separate the wheat from the chaff.  To me that would be more interesting. Or we can just leave things as they are and really never know what a great golfer is truly capable of because the game now really doesn't require that skill anymore.  Heck just carry a driver some short irons and wedges and a putter.   Sorry for the rant but many of us get angry when it's said that modern players have been taught new things by trackman.  Sorry guys,  equal some Nicklaus or Hogan or Knudson et all scores with balata then you can talk.  That's real feedback hit ball watch ball.  Ball no do what you want do something else! Happy Holidays!      
    • One thing I like about our semi-private course is that everyone is very friendly and welcoming. Our seniors group is fun to play with, although they sometimes forget that I'm one of the unretired! and have to go to work most days. The course is a Nicklaus design with lots of challenging holes. The drawback is that the developer envisioned Winged Foot Way Out West, sporting a private-equity membership with everyone living in $400,000 homes. Thus, he contracted for an extremely difficult course with lots of bunkers. Legend has it that Nicklaus cautioned the developer against going overboard on the difficulty of holes, and the complexity of the bunkering (as in high maintenance costs). Well, much less $$ showed up than was forecast, and the developer was forced to sell. Fast forward, the greens crew has had a rough job in recent years trying to keep the bunkers in repair. A few pits have been removed as they settled out oddly, or ended up permanently flooded.  But, those remaining really keep the greens crew busy. We just don't have a Winged Foot maintenance budget. One other drawback: the driving range is at the top of a sloping hill, so it's a bit had to determine your true club carries because you're hitting down hill. Overall, I really like the course, the crew and the members.
    • Welcome back then!    This thread has helped me twice get my head back on straight when returning to golf from a stoppage.  I hope it works wonders for you too. By the way, I'm not even convinced that your shot from the bunker was a bad one.  The issue at our level isn't "would a shot with this result make SportsCenter if I were in a pro event?" but rather "did I raise or lower my expected strokes remaining from this spot?" So, if you were short sided in the bunker and holed out, hey, great shot.  But if you were short sided and blasted out to the green and two-putted, there's a pretty decent chances you saved yourself some strokes right there with the bunker shot -- because it's probably an expected value over 3 for an average someone of your skill level to get down from there.
    • Is there an option for irregular?  I still haven't gotten to the point where I can look at a bunker lie and figure out with good regularity if there's sand underneath the ball.  When there is, but there isn't too much (so I guess I don't like "too soft"?) under it, I hit decently good sand shots.  Not "I'm always going to make the save" shots, but enough that I'm confident I'll hit it to within a likely two putt -- something I'm just fine with.
    • I have G400 irons and paid under $700 for six of them (5-P).  I am debating going to go back in a few days and get the UW as well, and I don't expect that to cost much more than $125.  Where are you that MAP is this much?  I bought mine at Roger Dunn and you can bet they follow Ping's rules to the letter.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DeadMan
      DeadMan
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.