Jump to content
IGNORED

Does Your Responsibility to "Protect The Field" Extend Beyond Your Group?


Golfingdad
Note: This thread is 3587 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Here's what happened:

There was a bit of a backup on a par 3, and we pulled up behind the previous group before they hit, and waited in our carts while they teed off.  The green complex isn't visible from where we sat so we didn't see the results of any of their shots.  After they drove off, we walked out onto the tee to get ready.  The right half of the green has water in front and while we were there waiting, it was apparent that one of the guys in front of us, based on where they were all looking, just didn't quite clear the hazard.  After looking for a few minutes, and all three of them discussed it, he dropped just to the left of the hazard at that point.  We found that odd, because it's not a shaved bank or a steep bank, so it seemed unlikely to us that it would have carried over the hazard and then fallen back in.  But we also didn't see the shot, and it's not our group, and he certainly consulted with his two other group members before continuing.

We just shrugged our shoulders and let it go.  Should we have done more?  Should we have yelled at him then, or confronted him after the fact, or a third thing?  Just curious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Here's what happened:

There was a bit of a backup on a par 3, and we pulled up behind the previous group before they hit, and waited in our carts while they teed off.  The green complex isn't visible from where we sat so we didn't see the results of any of their shots.  After they drove off, we walked out onto the tee to get ready.  The right half of the green has water in front and while we were there waiting, it was apparent that one of the guys in front of us, based on where they were all looking, just didn't quite clear the hazard.  After looking for a few minutes, and all three of them discussed it, he dropped just to the left of the hazard at that point.  We found that odd, because it's not a shaved bank or a steep bank, so it seemed unlikely to us that it would have carried over the hazard and then fallen back in.  But we also didn't see the shot, and it's not our group, and he certainly consulted with his two other group members before continuing.

We just shrugged our shoulders and let it go.  Should we have done more?  Should we have yelled at him then, or confronted him after the fact, or a third thing?  Just curious.

Unless you are in a competition, don't bother. There isn't anything on the line. I am not big on forcing the rules of golf onto casual players. Basically I don't want to be a rules nazi!

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Unless you are in a competition, don't bother. There isn't anything on the line. I am not big on forcing the rules of golf onto casual players. Basically I don't want to be a rules nazi!

Sorry, I thought that was a given. Yes, we are talking about a tournament here ... I could give a rat's ass what some random group in front of me is doing in a casual round, lol!! :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't know the answer. I can tell you I probably wouldn't have said something, but that's just because I tend to be non-confrontational and (to a fault, probably) want everyone to like me if I don't necessarily have all the facts. But I don't know what the "proper" thing to do it, so I'm interested to see what others say.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Unlike Saevel, I'm assuming that it is a competition, otherwise there is no reason for the question. To answer the title question, yes.  You have a responsibility to the field to ensure that any breach you are aware of is dealt with properly.

As far as the original post, I'd have to know the exact circumstances before I could give you a meaningful ruling.  If you are certain that the drop was incorrect, then you should bring it to the committee.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Unless you are in a competition, don't bother. There isn't anything on the line. I am not big on forcing the rules of golf onto casual players. Basically I don't want to be a rules nazi!

Pretty sure Drew is referring to a tournament setting or there is no "field" to protect. I have ZERO tournament experience so take my thoughts for what they're worth ;-) I would say that your responsibility is to protect the field regardless of groupings, after all, all groups are in the field. However, given that your group didn't see what happened and are going on assumptions I would probably have done the same thing as you unless it was feasible to boot out there in your cart and ask some questions. Definitely not worth punching anyone in the face. :w00t: :-P

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sorry, I thought that was a given.  Yes, we are talking about a tournament here ... I could give a rat's ass what some random group in front of me is doing in a casual round, lol!!

If the guy hit a slice into the water then it could have entered on the left side. If the pin was right, then wouldn't that put the left side inline with the pin for the drop? I am not sure there is enough information to make a judgement call on that. Unless I witnessed the shot bounce in, and then proceed to witness them dropping incorrectly, you have every right to call them out on it.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Probably the right thing to do would be to bring it up to them or the committee.  I can't say I would have done either.  I am thinking like @jamo here.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't know the answer. I can tell you I probably wouldn't have said something, but that's just because I tend to be non-confrontational and (to a fault, probably) want everyone to like me if I don't necessarily have all the facts.

This is me to a tee.

If you are certain that the drop was incorrect, then you should bring it to the committee.

We weren't certain it was incorrect ... we didn't see his previous shot at all.  It just seemed really unlikely to us that a shot could have entered the water from that angle.  I suppose he could have hit a wicked worm-burner slice to that point, but he would have had to have done it with a 7 or 8 or 9 iron because the hole was playing 155 to the pin.  And he'd have had to have hit that slice 120.  Or he could have hooked one off a tree trunk 40 yards right of the green than carromed to that point.  Again, highly unlikely, but ... we didn't see anything, so I feel like we'd have been out of line to say anything.  I certainly don't want to be "that guy."

If the guy hit a slice into the water then it could have entered on the left side. If the pin was right, then wouldn't that put the left side inline with the pin for the drop? I am not sure there is enough information to make a judgement call on that. Unless I witnessed the shot bounce in, and then proceed to witness them dropping incorrectly, you have every right to call them out on it.

Check this out: http://thegolfchannel.bluegolf.com/bluegolf/thegolfchannel14/event/thegolfchannel14221/course/oakcreekgc/aerial.htm?next=..%2F..%2Findex.htm #

Click on hole #12.  Pin was a little further back and a teeny bit further right of the "12" in the picture.  They were looking for it on the bank of the hazard just short of the green (by a yard or two) and then dropped just to the left of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Your responsibility to protect the field is absolute and extends to anything you see. But, given that you didn't see the shot, only the result, and that you're sure that other FC's that did see the shot were consulted, I'd say that you were correct to leave it as is. I also firmly believe that karma exists in golf, and is one unforgiving bitch! ;-)

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

... and that you're sure that other FC's that did see the shot were consulted ...

100% sure.  The only problem with this that kind of frightens me - and I think I've said this before - is how very little your average golfer knows of the rules.  I consider myself relatively UN-knowledgable in this regard.  (Although that might be because I'm comparing myself to you and @Fourputt ;))  I know the basics, and I'm learning more and more from you guys all the time, but overall, there is a hell of a lot more that I don't know than I do know.  Yet, it seems like in every one of these tournaments, I seem to know way more than my playing partners, like, every single time.

I'm hoping that that will get better as I move up flights (fingers crossed that actually happens) and I start playing with better and better players, but I'm not optimistic at this point.

I also firmly believe that karma exists in golf, and is one unforgiving bitch!

Ha ... agreed.  I believe it exists everywhere. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

While I agree with @David in FL ... I am more like jamo ... [quote name="jamo" url="/t/75798/does-your-responsibility-to-protect-the-field-extend-beyond-your-group#post_1020227"]]I can tell you I probably wouldn't have said something, but that's just because I tend to be non-confrontational and (to a fault, probably) [/quote]

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Based on what you said you "did not see" you did the right thing by not going any further with it. I am trying to visualize this hole. I  am probably wrong, but could this be considered a lateral water hazard?

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Click on hole #12.  Pin was a little further back and a teeny bit further right of the "12" in the picture.  They were looking for it on the bank of the hazard just short of the green (by a yard or two) and then dropped just to the left of that.

Based on what you said you "did not see" you did the right thing by not going any further with it. I am trying to visualize this hole. I  am probably wrong, but could this be considered a lateral water hazard?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Your responsibility to protect the field is absolute and extends to anything you see. But, given that you didn't see the shot, only the result, and that you're sure that other FC's that did see the shot were consulted, I'd say that you were correct to leave it as is.

I also firmly believe that karma exists in golf, and is one unforgiving bitch!

I agree you did the right thing.  If you saw the shot go into the hazard then you would be obligated to say something.

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sounds like it was discussed amongst the group and determined to be proper. The guy probably hit a slice but perhaps not as dramatic as he thought. Since you didn't see it, I believe you were right to let t lie.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Given the uncertainty in your description of the situation, I don't believe that you could have called them on anything.  I don't see enough evidence to call a foul here.  I would have to see how the ball tracked into the hazard to be able to say anything.

That said, it wouldn't be the first time I saw someone give himself the benefit a doubt that didn't actually exist.  I've assisted many players make correct drops from water hazards or obstructions when they would have incurred a penalty if left to their own devices.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Given the uncertainty in your description of the situation, I don't believe that you could have called them on anything.  I don't see enough evidence to call a foul here.  I would have to see how the ball tracked into the hazard to be able to say anything.

That said, it wouldn't be the first time I saw someone give himself the benefit a doubt that didn't actually exist.  I've assisted many players make correct drops from water hazards or obstructions when they would have incurred a penalty if left to their own devices.

Just wanted to point out that I was only asking the question to find out what I was required to do or what I should do, not what I could do.  I'm not looking to try and call people out, but just trying to learn what I'm responsible for. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3587 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Why should SuperSpeed get 3x of Stack's profits? I get the part about SuperSpeed wanting damages sustained as a result of Stack, but I don't get why SuperSpeed feels that they're entitled to both Stack's profits and damages.   Does anyone know/think SuperSpeed actually has a case here?
    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...