Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Question for older golf fans, re: golf media


Note: This thread is 3492 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Tiger's rise came in my mid-teens, so I was a little too young to remember the "post-Jack, pre-Tiger" golf era all that well.  My question for some of you older posts is this --- was there as much obsession with up-and-coming great players being hailed as "the next Jack" or "next Arnie" and there is today with story after story hoping/describing Rory, Spieth, Day or even Fowler as "the next Tiger"?  I realize it may be different now since there's the internet and so much more chatter out there, but back in the day, were golf pundits a little more circumspect before hailing a guy as the next GOAT just for winning one major, or one big event?

It seems like the golf media is beyond desperate for a next Tiger in the sense of a singular, clear-cut world #1 that dominates the sport as Woods did.  In my opinion, isn't it better to have three or four huge guys (Rory, Spieth, Day, maybe Fowler if he nabs a major) to spread the wealth and attention a little bit, rather than pin all the focus on one guy?

From what I know of old-time golf media, there was certainly "next Nicklaus" buzz given to Tom Watson, Johnny Miller, Lanny Wadkins, etc. but at least those guys actually had multiple spectacular seasons or victories under their belts before the hype train really took off.


The media was not as pervasive and suffocating in the 60's-80's as it is now.

You are correct, they did talk about the next "one" and compared and waited for accomplished players to assume the mantle. I remember them guessing on a few young guys, too.

But the media has changed over the last 15 years ... they now create and drive the story, and there is so much media, that it suffocates and spreads gossip like a CA wildfire.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I probably paid more attention to the golf media 10-15 years ago than I do today. Today's Media I don't put much stock in. For the most part I think they are more "gossip mongers" than journalists. In golf there is just not enough news to go around for all the golf journalist out there trying to sell a story, so they tend to be too creative for my liking. I don't think prying into athlete's personal lives is good journalism.

  • Upvote 1

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah if by some miracle I found a way to shave 20 strokes off my game and join tour and won one if my first tournys I played in then the media would say wow, this guy is gonna be good.

  • Moderator

I'm one of the older golf fans.  I remember when Tom Watson was labelled a "choker" who couldn't win a big tournament.  Obviously that turned out to be wrong.  I remember when Greg Norman was on top of the golf world, but his record in majors never quite lived up to his hype.  David Duval was thought to be destined to dominate golf, but couldn't quite hold on.  I think the media has always been looking for the next great player.  This difference now is that instead of just a couple of golf magazines and network television, we now have dozens of magazines, hundreds of blogs and websites, and full-time sports and golf channels on TV.  Instead of perhaps a dozen voices, we now have hundreds, and every one of them wants to say something that stands out.  The end result, nothing stands out.

  • Upvote 2

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I always wondered what kind of info/dirt was in some of the golf media's closets. Too bad we don't have a branch of media who investigates, and reports on the media folks who are reporting to the public. :bugout:

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When Tiger hit the scene everything was about him. Big hype for good reason he was inspiring and good for golf at that time. He made a fortune for the tour players by doubling+ the purses at the tournaments. You couldn't turn on the TV without something about this young player.


  Dave2512 said:

Pre Tiger golf wasn't as talked about. Less talk about everything.

That is true, but it isn't just because of the media.

The internet has a lot to do with it, and the advent of blogs, on-line reporting and (of course) messageboards

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

From what I remember, Arnold Palmer, and television were made for each other. He was the darling of golf fans and television just loved him. As his persona grew, so did the attention around Nicklaus and other pros. I remember a few headlines that were, "Palmer Loses Another......", rather than (pick a named pro) won the tournament. It was a phenomenon. And a few pros were jealous of him, but when they saw the winnings increase, they began to enjoy the spoils. Same as when Nicklaus began to dominate, and as Palmer didn't win the majors, the media began the search for a "next Nicklaus". There was Weiskopf, Miller, Watson, Norman, just to name a few prominent ones. The television age always wanted to find the next exciting golfer that would break all the records and win dozens of major tournaments. Remember, Jack played against and won against these guys. He remained on top for a long time.

Golf will always want for heroes. The larger than life pro that can accomplish all this and have an over abundance of personality and charm. It is the nature of the game now.


Not as much 20+ years ago, but that's a function of the news media needing to endlessly fill news cycles and having to drum up interest more these days.

The "Next Nicklaus" and "Best player to never have won a major" have been overdone as long as I can remember.

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave2512

Pre Tiger golf wasn't as talked about. Less talk about everything.

That is true, but it isn't just because of the media.

The internet has a lot to do with it, and the advent of blogs, on-line reporting and (of course) messageboards

Very very true.  I do not think that the younger guys can really appreciate how incredibly LITTLE we heard about these guys in any context other than golf, and how incredibly little we actually got to see them play.

Consider that in most tournaments, if they were televised at all we generally only saw holes 15-18.  When in his prime, we saw every shot Tiger hit for 72 holes for every event he entered.  When Jack was in his prime we saw a few of his shots on the last 4 holes of some of the events he entered.

In some cases there was a little more, but not early in his career.

  • Upvote 1

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  turtleback said:
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wally Fairway

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave2512

Pre Tiger golf wasn't as talked about. Less talk about everything.

That is true, but it isn't just because of the media.

The internet has a lot to do with it, and the advent of blogs, on-line reporting and (of course) messageboards

Very very true.  I do not think that the younger guys can really appreciate how incredibly LITTLE we heard about these guys in any context other than golf, and how incredibly little we actually got to see them play.

Consider that in most tournaments, if they were televised at all we generally only saw holes 15-18.  When in his prime, we saw every shot Tiger hit for 72 holes for every event he entered.  When Jack was in his prime we saw a few of his shots on the last 4 holes of some of the events he entered.

In some cases there was a little more, but not early in his career.

true dat, i really think many don't understand how good we have it now...  back then, holes 16-18 only, and no coverage on weekdays...  you would sit there through the entire coverage to watch the leader hit 6 shots...

something that cannot be forgotten though...  all the sportswriters were buddies with (most of) the players (same as in other sports), and even though they knew the dirt, they certainly didn't dish it...


I was born in 1950. When I started as a caddie in 1963, Snead and Hogan were elder statesmen, Palmer was still hot, and Nicklaus had just arrived on the scene..

Nicklaus was the dominant player from about 1964 until 1986 (his final Masters), with a couple of career slumps during the time. In 1990 he started playing the Senior Tour, won several of its majors, and had his 100th and final career pro win at the Tradition in 1995. Along the way, different groups of players were on the "short list" to probably win a tournament if Nicklaus didn't.

From 1958 to 1966, the Masters was largely a Palmer and Nicklaus saga. Palmer won it in 1958, 1960, 1962 and 1964. Nicklaus won it in 1963, 1965 and 1966. Art Wall won it in 1959, and Gary Player won it in 1961.

Media coverage tended to be breaking news (tournaments) and thoughtful features about golfers, equipment and golf courses. There wasn't much of the gossipy stuff you see today.

Also, you didn't see all the hyperbole and overblown pronouncements you see today. TV had far few hours of broadcast of actual tournaments, so there was "less air to fill."

And, journalists past of all media were much more happy to tell the story, not be the story.

The arrival and rocketing of Tiger Woods was unbelievable. He just had it all for awhile. It had to end sometime, especially with all the "Tiger 2.0" players that began emerging about 2005.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Golf media just gets in the way of golf. If I turn on the tv to watch a tournament,95% of the time I'm watching adverts or a talking head.....and the talking head is usually talking shite!!

Note: This thread is 3492 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 197 - 2025-04-15 Played 18 holes at Yeaman's Hall Club.
    • Day 13 (15 Apr 25)- late afternoon session with 6i full swings into the net and short pitches in the yard, before moving to Sw for controlled up and downs.  For kicks broke out the DCI 16° 1 iron and hit a few as into the net.  Definitely different beast. 
    • Day 24: Tax Day Stack Training Session for Full Speed Spectrum. Good session!
    • Very respectfully, I disagree.  I still believe there’s a small kernel of truth to my theory.  Hey, you, iacas and many others here are extremely knowledgeable, know the game inside out, know the tour inside out.  I’m just a schmuck who posted a take, admittedly unsupported and not up to reasonable high standards. There’s a background to my take - I’ll attempt to briefly describe it.  Back when Rory first came on tour, I thought he was great - most folks did, his talent was undeniable, and his youthful happy go lucky looking demeanor made him even more likable.  And he won early, fast - at the highest levels. And then the physical workouts started.  That was cool, man he’s looking good.  And as it went along, was even a bit shocking.  But all was still good in the Rory fan club. But as a few years rolled along and the majors stopped, folks like me started to question the effect of the physical build up.  (raising my hand here - - folks like me were probably concentrating 95% on the majors record, and failing to acknowledge his stellar play overall) The matches with Patrick Reed...  Somewhere around that time, Patrick became “the most hated man on tour”.  Raising my hand again, not sure if that timing is accurate, or even if that moniker was deserved.  But when Rory got into the screaming flex-off, it definitely detracted from the earlier Rory likability.  It’s kinda like he was lowering himself to Patrick’s level.  Not so great, for me at least. As the mid 2010s rolled along, and the majors drought continued, and the near misses at the Masters happened, the dreaded ‘choke’ perception inevitably raised its head and persisted.  I joined in with the chorus, not disliking Rory, but certainly questioning his ability to close the Masters or any other major.  Rightfully or wrongly, it was there. Then LIV came along.  As that developed, I saw the anti-LIV sentiment develop along with it, and I took offense to it.  My thought - these guys are being offered life changing $$, and the anti-LIV folks are trying to stop them from getting it. And then when Rory rose to ‘lead’ the anti-LIV sector, that really rubbed me the wrong way.  The press conferences, the parking lot shouting match - it just all seemed really distasteful to me.  And it seemed far far away from the early Rory, who I really liked. So all that (in my own mind) led me down the “Rory will never win.. yada yada”.  Not based on any real statistical analysis.  Not taking into account the incredible stats and winning record he had amassed. Purely based on perception and cultural silliness.  AND - the physical thing, which as I mentioned, I think there’s a tiny kernel of merit there. So - fast forward to Rory’s post win press conference.  THAT was the old Rory I remembered!  The totally cool guy, humble, forthright, honest, self deprecating.  He’s probably been like that all along.  And he’s certainly backed off the hard core anti-LIV persona, at least in public. That’s it.  Just a stupid unsupported take from a dumbsh*t golf fan.  For me, this was the most exciting major since the Tiger era. I really thought it would be a gladiator death match between Rory and Bryson.  I’m surprised that Bryson fell off - - I thought he was well-set-up to handle the pressure.  I’m sure he’ll be there many times in the future, along with Rory.
    • I've been watching golf for 35 years and I've seen my fair share of exciting events, but I cannot recall ever watching so much up and down in the fortunes of one player in one round of golf. How good the good shots were and how bad the bad shots were and how he was leading, then not, then leading again, then way clear, then tied, then behind, then leading, then in a playoff, then winning. Heck I aged just watching it on the TV - Rory must have gone through some stuff out there. Just incredible. Consider that Rory had two double bogeys, three bogeys, six birdies, and Rose made only 4 pars, 4 bogeys, and 10 birdies. 10! Round that place? Mind officially blown.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...