Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3896 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Divot tool?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you use a divot tool?

    • Yes
      72
    • No, I use a tee
      9


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Am I wrong here?  Is a divot actually defined as ANY kind of club or ball damage.  I thought it was just that strip of sod I take when I hit a good shot or a heavy shot. 

I'd love to see someone use a pronged ballmark repair tool and fix one of those beaver pelts I take when I hit a wedge shot fat.

When vendors take a "ball mark repair tool" and call it a "divot" repair tool, I wonder if they are knowledgable enough to be making or selling the thing.

 

that said - attached is my ball mark repair tool.  I like the compact form and the integrated marker (WinCraft makes these)

 

 

MWSnap 2015-10-05, 10_09_23.jpg

MWSnap 2015-10-05, 10_16_10.jpg

Edited by rehmwa

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To me divots are not the same thing as pitch/ball marks.  I always carry my pitch fork and repair my and others marks.  Most golfers do as I have seen.

Divots on the other hand, most golfers I have seen just leave the big holes in the fairway.  You should find it, put it back in the hole, or at the very least fill it with sand.

 

Driver: TaylorMade Aeroburner;  9.5* S-Flex
3-Wood: TaylorMade Aeroburner;  15* 
S-Flex
Hybrids: Nike Vapor Speed 3-5 Steel Stiff
Irons: Nike Vapor Speed 6-Pw Steel Stiff
Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX 2.0 Satin Black; 52, 56, 60
Putter: Odyssey Works 2-Ball
Grips: Good Grip Tour Wrap Medium 
Ball: ProV1


Posted

And for divot repair, from the USGA:

 

  • Upvote 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Divots on the other hand, most golfers I have seen just leave the big holes in the fairway.  You should find it, put it back in the hole, or at the very least fill it with sand.

I am a firm believer that if you take a big divot, you should fill the flaw with sand/seed mix, and then wear the pelt like a toupee for at least one full hole of play.  Large ones should be brought home and mounted on a plaque above the fireplace.

  • Upvote 2

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Sure I fix a couple on every green even if I don't make a mark, which is often. The sharp, two pronged thin metal type works best. My pre-round routine includes exchanging all my non-golf items from my pockets for my repair tool. Those are usually inexpensive. The course logo funky faux brass ones are always overpriced. I have a couple switchblade one too.

Edited by Dave2512

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I always fix my bask mark, any around it, and any bear the line of my putts. It's just considerate for the next golfer and each one takes five seconds, tops.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

IMHO a divot is any damage  caused by club, or ball to the playing turf. Fairway or green it is damage to the playing surface. I supposed it could be argued that the two prong tool we use on the green should be called a "dent fixer".    :-D:-D

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

IMHO a divot is any damage  caused by club, or ball to the playing turf. Fairway or green it is damage to the playing surface. I supposed it could be argued that the two prong tool we use on the green should be called a "dent fixer".    :-D:-D

I don't think it's an official definition just because it's in italics......:-D

here's one from the top of a search on it.  your mileage might vary

But the history of the term came from when Scots used a square of turf (a divot) as roofing materials.

Divot from a dictionary site

 

 

 

MWSnap 2015-10-05, 10_16_10.jpg

Edited by rehmwa

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Pitch mark tool. Like most others, I fix mine and those of others who are less considerate. I'd learned the way shown above and believe it to be the correct method. 

I like having to use the tool, it's usually the result of a successful approach shot.:dance:

Interesting conversation with the manager (an ex tour player) and head groundskeeper at a local course about fixing ball marks. When I mentioned there was a right way and wrong way to fix pitch marks, the manager said "yeah, you just pry up to get rid of the indentation". I didn't want to get into an argument (WTF do I know?), but simply said I thought that did more damage to the roots than simply pushing the grass back towards the center (usually it's built up on one side). The groundskeeper seemed hesitant to say anything.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I have 3 or 4 in my golf bag, and always fix my mark and a couple more.  If you're a member of USGA, they'll send you a new one every  spring, along with a hat and a new copy of the rules.  Mine are all the 2-prong variety, and I don't think I've bought one for decades.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I actually collect repair tools (from courses I play)... I'll pay about $15 for good ones.  I prefer the ones that have a ball mark and clip.  I keep it on my right pocket it makes for super easy access without digging in the pocket and the ball mark is already right there.  I feel stupid without one on my pocket and I always use it!

Kudos to @Mr. Desmond for posting those Videos.  I wish more people fixed their marks properly.  It really does help the greens. 

I like the ones like this:

227x213xgd0961f-2.jpg.pagespeed.ic.eYs_a

Edited by JP golf
  • Upvote 1

JP

In the bag:  R1 Diver, Rocketballz 3 tour spoon (13*), Adams A12 pro 18* hybrid, 4-P Callaway Razr x black (dg s400 shafts), 50* & 58* Ping Tour S, and TM Ghost Manta Putter cut down to 32". and my Tour V2 Rangefinder (with extra batteries of course)!  Ball - Srixon Z Star XV

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

but of course.

I've got a Swiss army knife type of divot tool that I got as a gift.  It retracts and also has ball marker.  Because it retracts when not in use, it does not damage the inside of my pant pocket.

Don

:titleist: 910 D2, 8.5˚, Adila RIP 60 S-Flex
:titleist: 980F 15˚
:yonex: EZone Blades (3-PW) Dynamic Gold S-200
:vokey:   Vokey wedges, 52˚; 56˚; and 60˚
:scotty_cameron:  2014 Scotty Cameron Select Newport 2

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This smells like spam or fishing or whatever. @TigonWoods is probably going to begin selling a pitch mark repair tool.

Yep. I was thinking the same thing. No doubt it's coming.


Posted

Yep. I was thinking the same thing. No doubt it's coming.

or maybe it's a prelude to someone requesting our input for a 'college paper'..........THEN a stupid sales pitch

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use this style divot tool.  I think they are 2 or 3 bucks at many of the golf courses I play. 

divot tool.JPG

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.


Posted

What is the most you would pay for a divot tool?

I have a friend that bought one for $69 but it's pretty high end and he tells me it adds a little something to his green game.

-Tigon Woods

 

This is his post in the club cleaning thread. Sales pitch definitely incoming.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I use the ones like Rickk posted.

I am glad to see that I was taught correctly when I first started.


  • Moderator
Posted

I have always fixed my ball marks. I use a tool and a tee. Just depends on whether I remember to put the tool in my pocket or not. Most of the time, I will always fix extra marks while I'm waiting on others to put or while they are reading their putts.

 

I'm also big on fixing divots in the fairway since I'm usually the unlucky one in the group to land in them...frustrating.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3896 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.