Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I currently have a set of Ping i15 irons that are 3-4 years old.  I like these irons and I'm not one to upgrade often (I played with my previous set of irons for over 10 years).  However, I can't help but wonder if I could benefit from better and newer technology.  How often should one upgrade their irons?  Has the technology advanced enough in the last few years to justify spending $1200 or more on a new set or is that what the golf industry just wants me to think? 

  • Upvote 1

Upgrade irons when the new product marks a noticeable improvement in your game. Basically, does the improvement justify the cost in money, and time (getting used to the new set).

I was getting good results with both my reshafted X20 Tours and my SLDR irons going into this year. But, I got custom-fitted for some Nike Vapor Speed irons. After nine weeks of pain, I had to admit the VS just didn't work.I couldn't hit anything longer than the 7i with any regularity.

So, I'm back to the X20 Tours.

(Note: The VS irons are about an inch longer than most other iron sets. A couple of HS kids at our club are doing nicely with the VS irons - but, they're 6-foot or over. I'm only 5-foot-8).

HINT: Try out other irons to see what's our there. But, don't dump the i15s on a lark if you hit them well. 

 

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
  On 11/13/2015 at 5:14 AM, Ashley said:

How often should one upgrade their irons?

Expand  

Depends on how much you play and practice. There really is no standard rule. Obviously if the grooves are wearing down it's time to get a new set.

  On 11/13/2015 at 5:14 AM, Ashley said:

Has the technology advanced enough in the last few years to justify spending $1200 or more on a new set or is that what the golf industry just wants me to think? 

Expand  

Technology has improved since the i5 irons came out ('05 I think) but whether it's worth $1,200 to upgrade is up to you. I don't think it's a necessity. Go to a store or demo day and try out some irons to see if they're that much of an improvement for you.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Unless the clubhead grooves are worn out, your swing plane has changed so your clubs don't sit correctly (too steep or too shallow), or your shaft is not suited to your swing, changing clubs is not advised unless you find a set that suits you way better (dispersion and distance).  Technology has not changed that much over the last decade or so anyway.  Most of it is marketing hype

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Soft 500 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Neighbor was a 3 HC now about a 8 HC. He bought his Ping ISI irons new when they came out. He's bought others in the meantime and keeps going back to them. This year he's going to a new set. The grooves are worn out.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

  Reveal hidden contents
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There is not really any such thing as "upgrading" irons if they are less than, say 10 years old. You can change or replace them, yes, but "technology enhancements" in irons are essentially advertising spin.

  • Upvote 3

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


I don't there is a time frame for changing out clubs. I have been playing TE stuff for quite a while and see no reason to change.  I have golfing buddy who is still using persimmon woods, and they are stll playing well for him.

As for newer technology being better, who knows for sure, and if so which brand? I dont think I would know if newer was better with out using them for a few rounds. By then if they were not any better, I am pretty much stuck with them after a sizeable cash lay out.  Buyers have to be careful about claims by others. This is why I think finding a competant club builder is the way to go. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
  On 11/14/2015 at 12:03 AM, Shorty said:

There is not really any such thing as "upgrading" irons if they are less than, say 10 years old. You can change or replace them, yes, but "technology enhancements" in irons are essentially advertising spin.

Expand  

Yes, 9 years old nothing new. 11 years old may want to look into replacing them, Lol.  It's always been an advertising spin but to say. "Technology enhancements" are not there, is not even close to being true.

Edited by Natural Patrick

I disagree that "technology enhancements" for irons is pure advertising spin.  Manufacturers are constantly trying to find ways to add distance and forgiveness.  Irons over the last five years are being made out of multiple compounds, such as Tungsten in the Titleist AP 2's and Boron in some of the Mizuno irons.  Callaway introduced a curved face with their XR irons that they are carrying over to their Apex line.

As someone for follows equipment pretty closely I'd say there are enough technology enhancements every 3-5 years to make it worth while to look at new irons.  If you test them and they don't seem better than your current irons, don't buy the new ones.

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 11/14/2015 at 1:19 PM, Natural Patrick said:

Yes, 9 years old nothing new. 11 years old may want to look into replacing them, Lol.  It's always been an advertising spin but to say. "Technology enhancements" are not there, is not even close to being true.

Expand  

When someone says "say 10 years" it is a way of saying "an indefinite number". It is what English speaking people call "a figure of speech". It means the opposite of what you say I am saying.

Please describe some of the meaningful technology improvements in the past decade.

 

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


  On 11/14/2015 at 6:29 PM, Shorty said:

When someone says "say 10 years" it is a way of saying "an indefinite number". It is what English speaking people call "a figure of speech". It means the opposite of what you say I am saying.

Please describe some of the meaningful technology improvements in the past decade.

 

Expand  

I'm not going to write an essay in hopes of satisfying an Aussi who is FOS.  An English term that means you are "Full Of Shit" just a figure of speech that means exactly what it says. Look no further than the materials used today vs 10 years ago. The Research, Technology and Testing is a little ahead of what was being done 10 years ago. Whether that is Meaningful to the 20 handicap or the Touring Pro. Is really not up for me or you to decide,


  On 11/14/2015 at 9:50 PM, Natural Patrick said:

I'm not going to write an essay in hopes of satisfying an Aussi who is FOS.  An English term that means you are "Full Of Shit" just a figure of speech that means exactly what it says. Look no further than the materials used today vs 10 years ago. The Research, Technology and Testing is a little ahead of what was being done 10 years ago. Whether that is Meaningful to the 20 handicap or the Touring Pro. Is really not up for me or you to decide,

Expand  

Please tell us more.

Multi material irons?

Computer aided designs?

Plastic inserts?

Just a couple of examples that actually do something would be great.

Once again, your aggressive attitude clouds anything you seem to want to say.

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


All I seem to read is that even with all new technology, overall handicaps have not gone down that much, if at all. That answer depends on who you ask. 

Is a 20 hdcpr going to buy the latest game improvement clubs and suddenly become a 17 hdcpr? Will a 6 become a 3? Would they have improved 3 strokes if they would have stayed with their old clubs? Who knows.

If a company would give me a money back guarantee that their new, improved clubs would save me 3 strokes off my hdcp after 20, 18 hole rounds, I would probably buy their clubs. That is if they did not cost an arm and leg in the first place. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 11/14/2015 at 9:50 PM, Natural Patrick said:

I'm not going to write an essay in hopes of satisfying an Aussi who is FOS.  An English term that means you are "Full Of Shit" just a figure of speech that means exactly what it says. Look no further than the materials used today vs 10 years ago. The Research, Technology and Testing is a little ahead of what was being done 10 years ago. Whether that is Meaningful to the 20 handicap or the Touring Pro. Is really not up for me or you to decide,

Expand  

I think we need a forum to discuss why some golf players are so damn arrogant.  They turn people off the sport more than anything.  No wonder there are companies bringing out garish costumes just to upset this uptight establishment.  There is no need to insinuate that someone doesn't know what they are doing because of their nationality.  Australian and proud of it.


  On 11/14/2015 at 10:33 PM, Return2Golf said:

 I think we need a forum to discuss why some golf players are so damn arrogant.  They turn people off the sport more than anything.  No wonder there are companies bringing out garish costumes just to upset this uptight establishment.  There is no need to insinuate that someone doesn't know what they are doing because of their nationality.  Australian and proud of it.

Expand  

There are a couple of members who make posts where they make outlandish claims which are corrected and they have a set against those members for all time. This is what you are seeing. His inability to understand AND explain a metaphor (FOS) is evidence of his form. :-)

Natural Patrick would be better off explaining why clubs that were released 2 years ago and then superseded  6 months after that are not as good as their successors. He talks about the materials having changed. But he makes no comment about how they translate into better clubs/scores. BTW, we are talking about irons, not drivers here.

The OP has been told by several members that essentially, instruction and the player are the road to improvement unless decade old clubs are damaged beyond repair.

For the record, I have had 7 sets of irons over the last decade. None of them possess any design or technology features that distinguish them from any other.

I have had 2 sets of Mizunos, 2 sets of Adams, one set of TM, one set of Bridgestones and one set of Titleists.

All were/are good. All felt great when I hit them in the middle. All felt like crap when I didn't. None gave me forgiveness on poor shots in the way that new drivers do.

  • Upvote 1

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


I don't recall bringing up Drivers at all in this thread. Please provide evidence that proves me wrong. I also don't remember saying a new set of Irons would make you a better player or lower your scores. I think I may have had one to any Fosters, I have only had 3 sets over the last decade, so you got me there


I've been using the same irons since the beginning of 2011, and haven't found anything I like more. Don't plan on changing unless I find something better. 

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 11/14/2015 at 9:50 PM, Natural Patrick said:

I'm not going to write an essay in hopes of satisfying an Aussi who is FOS.  An English term that means you are "Full Of Shit" just a figure of speech that means exactly what it says. Look no further than the materials used today vs 10 years ago. The Research, Technology and Testing is a little ahead of what was being done 10 years ago. Whether that is Meaningful to the 20 handicap or the Touring Pro. Is really not up for me or you to decide,

Expand  

That escalated quickly. Let's maybe take it down a notch.

  • Upvote 2

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Very respectfully, I disagree.  I still believe there’s a small kernel of truth to my theory.  Hey, you, iacas and many others here are extremely knowledgeable, know the game inside out, know the tour inside out.  I’m just a schmuck who posted a take, admittedly unsupported and not up to reasonable high standards. There’s a background to my take - I’ll attempt to briefly describe it.  Back when Rory first came on tour, I thought he was great - most folks did, his talent was undeniable, and his youthful happy go lucky looking demeanor made him even more likable.  And he won early, fast - at the highest levels. And then the physical workouts started.  That was cool, man he’s looking good.  And as it went along, was even a bit shocking.  But all was still good in the Rory fan club. But as a few years rolled along and the majors stopped, folks like me started to question the effect of the physical build up.  (raising my hand here - - folks like me were probably concentrating 95% on the majors record, and failing to acknowledge his stellar play overall) The matches with Patrick Reed...  Somewhere around that time, Patrick became “the most hated man on tour”.  Raising my hand again, not sure if that timing is accurate, or even if that moniker was deserved.  But when Rory got into the screaming flex-off, it definitely detracted from the earlier Rory likability.  It’s kinda like he was lowering himself to Patrick’s level.  Not so great, for me at least. As the mid 2010s rolled along, and the majors drought continued, and the near misses at the Masters happened, the dreaded ‘choke’ perception inevitably raised its head and persisted.  I joined in with the chorus, not disliking Rory, but certainly questioning his ability to close the Masters or any other major.  Rightfully or wrongly, it was there. Then LIV came along.  As that developed, I saw the anti-LIV sentiment develop along with it, and I took offense to it.  My thought - these guys are being offered life changing $$, and the anti-LIV folks are trying to stop them from getting it. And then when Rory rose to ‘lead’ the anti-LIV sector, that really rubbed me the wrong way.  The press conferences, the parking lot shouting match - it just all seemed really distasteful to me.  And it seemed far far away from the early Rory, who I really liked. So all that (in my own mind) led me down the “Rory will never win.. yada yada”.  Not based on any real statistical analysis.  Not taking into account the incredible stats and winning record he had amassed. Purely based on perception and cultural silliness.  AND - the physical thing, which as I mentioned, I think there’s a tiny kernel of merit there. So - fast forward to Rory’s post win press conference.  THAT was the old Rory I remembered!  The totally cool guy, humble, forthright, honest, self deprecating.  He’s probably been like that all along.  And he’s certainly backed off the hard core anti-LIV persona, at least in public. That’s it.  Just a stupid unsupported take from a dumbsh*t golf fan.  For me, this was the most exciting major since the Tiger era. I really thought it would be a gladiator death match between Rory and Bryson.  I’m surprised that Bryson fell off - - I thought he was well-set-up to handle the pressure.  I’m sure he’ll be there many times in the future, along with Rory.
    • I've been watching golf for 35 years and I've seen my fair share of exciting events, but I cannot recall ever watching so much up and down in the fortunes of one player in one round of golf. How good the good shots were and how bad the bad shots were and how he was leading, then not, then leading again, then way clear, then tied, then behind, then leading, then in a playoff, then winning. Heck I aged just watching it on the TV - Rory must have gone through some stuff out there. Just incredible. Consider that Rory had two double bogeys, three bogeys, six birdies, and Rose made only 4 pars, 4 bogeys, and 10 birdies. 10! Round that place? Mind officially blown.
    • Yea it doesn’t suck. I didn’t score well but most of it came down to short game and putting. I had 3 holes I can directly blame bad long game shots on. I’m just trying to hedge my bets. If I don’t make it as a professional golfer, I could be a fitness model as a backup plan.
    • Wordle 1,396 3/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,396 6/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...