Jump to content
IGNORED

Technology does change the game


Bucki1968
Note: This thread is 2573 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Bryan Kasper said:

 

i don know that i would chalk that up to technology...its an iron. other than making it easier for the average player to keep distance on off center hits, irons cant really change all that much. i have read  couple of articles(which i am currently trying to revisit) that test older model irons vs. newer model irons that show that when struck in the center of the clubface (which all tour players do about 90% of the time) there is no difference in distance. workability might be a little difference story. Im not so sure how you would test that. but the restrictions on head weighting for irons hasnt changed, so Cog meeting COG will carry similar results.

I watched this a couple months ago as it was on my home page in Youtube. Kind of reinforces what you stated. . .

 

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The golf ball appears to make more difference than the golf clubs.  I watched a guy, on Youtube, hitting 260+ drives with a modern ball and an 1880's era, wooden, play club.  With a modern driver he gained about 30 yards.  Not much improvement over a chunk of wood on the end of a stick.  The two most famous 1 irons, Nicklaus and Hogan, were struck using golf balls we would now label "restricted flight."

  • Upvote 1

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

45 minutes ago, Lihu said:

I watched this a couple months ago as it was on my home page in Youtube. Kind of reinforces what you stated. . .

Precisely! i think that video was what sparked my search. I always knew that they juiced the lofts of clubs, but i didnt realize that newer clubs werent actually going farther, adjusting for loft. COmpanies tend to trick you with that in their marketing, it wasnt until i started working in marketing that i realized how much BS it entails haha 

"Swing with a Purpose" 

What's In The Bag:
Woods: Driver: RBZ stage 2 10* 3 wood: RBZ 15* 5 wood: NIke vapor speed 19*
Irons/ wedges: Rbladez tour 4-PW; Mizuno MP-T4 52*, 56*, CG11 60*
Putter: Odyssey White ice #9
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 minutes ago, Bryan Kasper said:

Precisely! i think that video was what sparked my search. I always knew that they juiced the lofts of clubs, but i didnt realize that newer clubs werent actually going farther, adjusting for loft. COmpanies tend to trick you with that in their marketing, it wasnt until i started working in marketing that i realized how much BS it entails haha 

For sure, it doesn't improve the distances or flights for a good player like Randy, but they are much better for off center hits which most of us do.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
22 minutes ago, Piz said:

The golf ball appears to make more difference than the golf clubs.  I watched a guy, on Youtube, hitting 260+ drives with a modern ball and an 1880's era, wooden, play club.  With a modern driver he gained about 30 yards.  Not much improvement over a chunk of wood on the end of a stick.

30 yards is a pretty significant increase!

"Distance balls" have always been legal (I'm talking since the 1950s or so… before that, yeah, golf balls sucked pretty hard. :-D).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, Lihu said:

I watched this a couple months ago as it was on my home page in Youtube. Kind of reinforces what you stated. . .

 

I was going to post this video, but you already did. I think this video sums up technology in clubs very well. Its hard to argue it when the numbers never lie. I have seen a few SLDR vs the 2017 M1 videos going around lately and they prove the same thing. Its the player not the club. I feel manufactures really hate these types of videos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


8 hours ago, Bryan Kasper said:

Precisely! i think that video was what sparked my search. I always knew that they juiced the lofts of clubs, but i didnt realize that newer clubs werent actually going farther, adjusting for loft. COmpanies tend to trick you with that in their marketing, it wasnt until i started working in marketing that i realized how much BS it entails haha 

It's a little bit of everything put together. Yes, the club companies have been jacking up the lofts for years. Today's 7 iron is yesterdays, oh, about a 5.5 iron. Shaft technology is improved, as is ball technology. The ball is hotter, and ball speed off the face, aided by 120+ mph clubhead speeds w/the driver, will translate into additional height.I saw DJ at the WGC Bridgestone hit his driver higher than I can hit a full wedge. Bubba is the same way. I saw him hit driver a mile over 80 foot tall oaks on the corner of a dog leg par 4.

And one more thing about clubs. If you think the clubs you play are the same as the pros, then you might as well believe that the car you drive is the same as the ones Dale Earnhardt Jr. and his buddies are blasting around a Nascar track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

along with substantially improved physical conditioning.

A huge difference. Two clubs, perhaps. These guys aren't smoking Camels on the tee box.

I'm guessing here, but I think club technology has helped the duffer far more than the pros. The sweet spot on those old clubs was the size of a pinhead.

12 hours ago, JxQx said:

tons of practice

Hard to overestimate this, too. To become a professional golfer takes an enormous amount of time. Practicing hours every day. Again, if handicaps improve, it's probably the technology, because very few have the time, much less the desire, to improve very much. Which is good for them. I'm not so sure my obsession is a good thing for anyone but me. 

But have handicaps improved as much as the technology? Could Nicklaus be as dominant with the current equipment? That's a pretty good argument to me, and both sides have good reasoning.

Interesting thread.

Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
16 hours ago, Bucki1968 said:

I was watching the Pebble Beach Pro Am on Sunday. I'm watching Dustin Johnson hit a 7 iron on #17. I played Pebble Beach about 10 years ago and hit a four iron on that hole (about 200 yards, virtually no wind). Now I'm not any where near Dustin Johnson's ability...but I'm a pretty good player (I would like to think). I hit it the ball further now than I did 10 years ago, but a 7 IRON? Are you kidding me?

The 17th isn't 200 yards, it's in the 175-ish range. 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Blackjack Don said:

 

I'm guessing here, but I think club technology has helped the duffer far more than the pros. The sweet spot on those old clubs was the size of a pinhead.

 

Guess what? It still is! The COG is the size of a pinhead and will always be so. It can't get larger or smaller. All this talk about "larger sweet spots" is marketing hype from the manufacturers, yet it is not entirely erroneous!

What they are really talking about is increased "Moment of Inertia", or MOI. This, I suppose, really got started with the Ping "Eye" series irons. With weight moved from the center of the club head out to the margins (toe, heel, sole, top line), this configuration would better resist twisting from an off center hit.

And this is not a criticism. What Ping did was completely sound physics and engineering! But the problem was how to sell it? Since most golfers don't really care to learn that much about physics, they sold it with the term COG, which most golfers could recognize.

Source: "The Search for the Perfect Golf Club" by Tom Wishon.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

And one more thing about clubs. If you think the clubs you play are the same as the pros, then you might as well believe that the car you drive is the same as the ones Dale Earnhardt Jr. and his buddies are blasting around a Nascar track.

How are they that much different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, Jakester23 said:

How are they that much different?

From what I've been told by a fitter friend, every single club is perfectly matched for their swings.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Improvement in technology has helped everyone's distance and for today's pros their physical conditioning and training has allowed them to max out the limits.  But lets remember that Jack hit one 341 yards in 1963 at the PGA Long Drive Contest using a persimmon driver and wound ball, so the big boys always had some length. 

I believe that the biggest impact technology has had in distance is for the average amateur.  I started at age 40 with hand me down persimmons and blades and a drive that carried 200 was a good poke.  Today at age 65 a good drive for me will carry 210 - 215 yards.  My swing is slower yet a 460cc titanium driver combined with today's ball keeps me in the game.  Sure, pros get a bump from today's equipment, but IMO not as much as the typical golfer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote

I believe that the biggest impact technology has had in distance is for the average amateur.  I started at age 40 with hand me down persimmons and blades and a drive that carried 200 was a good poke.  Today at age 65 a good drive for me will carry 210 - 215 yards.  My swing is slower yet a 460cc titanium driver combined with today's ball keeps me in the game.  Sure, pros get a bump from today's equipment, but IMO not as much as the typical golfer.

That's a good poke for a persimmon driver.

One of my old club fitter friends said that when he was young he could average 280 yards total with his old persimmon clubs, but there was a lot more roll involved. He didn't actually know his average carry distance, but he guessed in the 220-ish range because he's made many thousands of forced carries? He was a really good player for that era, like a scratch or better? He still hits pretty far for a 70+ year old golfer, or anyone for that matter.

I carry my driver about 245 yards, and probably could barely carry a persimmon 1 wood 200. I know a 3 wood from that same era carried a bit less than 200-ish on one entire round (on my reasonable shots), even though it rolled another 50-60 yards for a "reasonable shot" average. Loved the fact that there was no sound from the strike. Totally quite, but I missed the sweet spot too often. That and my playing partner who played in that era, told me to "get that stupid thing out of my bag". :-D

So, I'd guess that if you had a modern driver back then you'd also have gotten about 245 carries or possibly more? Which is like a 30-45 yard increase?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
8 hours ago, Lihu said:

From what I've been told by a fitter friend, every single club is perfectly matched for their swings.

I wouldn't go that far and even if they got a set off the rack they would still be able to shoot under par.

There really isn't that much difference between what the pros play and what you can buy, it's not like the material is any different. The biggest differences are in the customization. they have an unlimited budget so they can test a few combinations of shaft/head with their ball on Trackman and they can have 2 or 3 versions of the same club built and see which one works best (mostly for driver). There are fitters out there that will fit you as if you were a tour player, obviously costs more than your average fitting.

I'm getting a set of i200 irons and they are built the same as it would be for a tour player. The heads are coming from the same place, they match the swing weight to what I want, and digitally check the loft and lie. I check everything when I get it and I've never had a set of PING irons be off from what I ordered.

  • Upvote 2

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
17 hours ago, Blackjack Don said:

I'm guessing here, but I think club technology has helped the duffer far more than the pros.

You would be correct. COR limits put a cap on how much designers can do with a club, but it's not like irons were getting to those numbers anyway.

What improvements in iron technology are mostly about is increasing ball speed on off-center hits so you lose less distance when you miss the sweetspot, something pros generally aren't worried about.

It's also why modern blades aren't much different than older blades. Not really much to do with them other than change the shape of the head, amount of bounce, rounding the leading edge, etc. 

15 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Guess what? It still is! The COG is the size of a pinhead and will always be so. It can't get larger or smaller. All this talk about "larger sweet spots" is marketing hype from the manufacturers, yet it is not entirely erroneous!

What they are really talking about is increased "Moment of Inertia", or MOI. This, I suppose, really got started with the Ping "Eye" series irons. With weight moved from the center of the club head out to the margins (toe, heel, sole, top line), this configuration would better resist twisting from an off center hit.

And this is not a criticism. What Ping did was completely sound physics and engineering! But the problem was how to sell it? Since most golfers don't really care to learn that much about physics, they sold it with the term COG, which most golfers could recognize.

Source: "The Search for the Perfect Golf Club" by Tom Wishon.

Technically speaking, the COG of a club is smaller than a pinhead. It's a single point in three dimensional space and it's not even located on the club face.

What you're referring to is the sweetspot and yes, it can be made effectively larger by moving mass to the perimeter of the club head (among other things).

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2573 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 76 - Pretty sore today, so I opted for putting over my Stack session. Primary focus was on starting line, as my putting has been pretty poor this year. 
    • Been a bit of delay in updates but I needed to come back east as my mom's health has taken a serious turn for the worse. In a 3 day span we learned she had a tumor to she has stage 4 cancer and stopped eating and drinking for the most part. She has had a rough 3 months but certainly didn't think we'd be at the point of setting up hospice for her. My mom was never into any sports really other than following the Red Sox because my dad was a big fan. She always cared about what we were involved in including asking about how golf went.  I have kept up with my 5 minutes of daily practice and will go to the gym here in NH tomorrow morning. Despite the somber nature of this trip my family has commented more than a few times about my weight loss so it's important to me to keep it up. I know my mom always wanted us happy in whatever we did so I'll continue with my fitness journey keeping that in mind. 
    • Day 109- Putting drills on a putting green for 20 minutes. 
    • Day 252: did a stack session. Did some slow rehearsal swings during breaks. 
    • Day 82: 3/18/24 Tried a Stack session but could not certify my warmup. Finished with indoor chips and putting. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...