Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Stubbornness on Short Game vs Long Game


Note: This thread is 771 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't understand why so many players and coaches still think the short game (shots from inside 100 yards) is more important than the long game... Is it because of Dave Pelz and his research in the 90's?

Because in his Short Game Bible, he lists Tom Kite as his best player (before Mickelson) but he won 12 PGA Tour events and one major compared to Lee Trevino, who he lists as the most accurate long game player and he won 29 events with 6 majors! Statistically in his playing career, Phil Mickelson is so accurate with his approach shots when he's in the fairway, second only to Tiger, he's not just a great wedge player.

Even the Division I golf team coach of the college I go to (NMSU) believes that the short game is the most important part but they didn't even make the NCAA team championship this year. Why is it that so many people are stubborn about this and refuse to change their opinion, even when presented with completely objective evidence??? 

  • Like 1

Frankie


Posted
24 minutes ago, golfdu said:

I don't understand why so many players and coaches still think the short game (shots from inside 100 yards) is more important than the long game... Is it because of Dave Pelz and his research in the 90's?

I have no clue if that originated with Pelz. 

27 minutes ago, golfdu said:

Why is it that so many people are stubborn about this and refuse to change their opinion, even when presented with completely objective evidence??? 

A lot of people like to refuse to accept they are wrong. How many people hold on to old beliefs just because its what they have always thought they knew was right. I put it down as just being human ;) 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
11 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

A lot of people like to refuse to accept they are wrong. How many people hold on to old beliefs just because its what they have always thought they knew was right. I put it down as just being human ;) 

I think it's this.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

This might be relevant. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance

 

Edited by saevel25

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
49 minutes ago, golfdu said:

I don't understand why so many players and coaches still think the short game (shots from inside 100 yards) is more important than the long game... Is it because of Dave Pelz and his research in the 90's?

It's not that people are stubborn or are "clinging" to the old belief; they just don't care enough to actually research the facts.  It's just a truism that you hear and it sounds sort of logical so you don't ever question it.

There are a ton of much stupider facts that people still believe for the same reason...a lot of people think that we only use 10% of our brains, for example.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I was almost surprised to get an e-mail from Hank Haney the other day, where he said that those advocating that the short game governs scoring are all wrong! He put driver distance and accuracy at the top of the list, and made some very convincing arguments for his thoughts.

Obviously all parts of the game are important, but getting off to a good start seems elemental!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
29 minutes ago, Hardspoon said:

It's not that people are stubborn or are "clinging" to the old belief; they just don't care enough to actually research the facts.  It's just a truism that you hear and it sounds sort of logical so you don't ever question it.

There are a ton of much stupider facts that people still believe for the same reason...a lot of people think that we only use 10% of our brains, for example.

I used to think that, but not anymore. I've seen lots of people who continue their disbelief in spite of being presented with the research and evidence.

I have met people who know very little or possibly nothing about something form quick judgments about it and be impossible to convince that their assumptions which were founded upon nothing are actually wrong. It's more than simply that they don't know any better or need to be better informed. That's overly optimistic, IMO. I'd love to think everyone would make better informed decisions if they were better informed, but that hasn't been my experience. 

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here's why:  recency bias.  You hit a meh drive, a meh approach, a meh chip to 16' and then miss the putt.  Why did you bogey?  Because you're a bad putter, you tell yourself.  Or someone tells you.  If only you were a better putter, you could erase all those mistakes with one grand putt. 

Bad math is also to blame.   You've seen the stats.  I shot an 87 today with 37 putts.  Clearly putting is 42% of my game, so I should spend 42% of my practice time putting!  I had I think 13 tap-in putts today, too... maybe I should spend 15% of my time practicing tap-ins!

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Shindig said:

Bad math is also to blame.   You've seen the stats.  I shot an 87 today with 37 putts.  Clearly putting is 42% of my game, so I should spend 42% of my practice time putting!  I had I think 13 tap-in putts today, too... maybe I should spend 15% of my time practicing tap-ins!

This does it for me. 50% of your shots are from within 100 yards is also an easy mantra to fall for. I do believe that when Pelz started doing what he was doing, it was a major leap forward, but now, pretty much everyone does it, so it won't have the separation effect.

Currently focusing on: Key 4 - shorter backswing.

What's in the bag: Callaway X2 Hot Driver, Titleist 915F 3 wood, X2 Hot 3 Hybrid, 3, 5-AW Apex Pro irons, 54*, 58* Cleveland RTX, Odyssey Versa 1 Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It isn't three-putts that kill an otherwise good round...it's all those damn two-putts.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's just so frustrating because I'm a recent PGM student and I've studied so much on golf, looking past the lies and getting the facts and I love doing it so much, been doing it since I was 12.

But no one listens to me because I'm only 21, they don't want to learn from a 21 year old college student who's not on the golf team or playing professionally. I know TGM, MORAD, S&T, 5SK, TPI3D, AimPoint, advanced statistics, golf club design, mental game, golf course management, among so many things in golf that I love... And I still don't feel heard and it hits me hard because I'm hard of hearing and I want to be heard more than I want to hear. That's all I have to say.

Frankie


Posted
13 hours ago, Shindig said:

Bad math is also to blame.   You've seen the stats.  I shot an 87 today with 37 putts.  Clearly putting is 42% of my game, so I should spend 42% of my practice time putting!  I had I think 13 tap-in putts today, too... maybe I should spend 15% of my time practicing tap-ins!

I once heard a commentator say something like: all pros get on the green in the same number of strokes so what differentiates them is their putting.   

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

In addition to some of the answers given above (and to repeat some):

  • Recency bias plays a role. Even though you're 50/50 to make an eight-footer, people will often blame their putting when they fail to get up and down for par.
  • It's tough to appreciate, for most people, partial shots, and the differences between them. A drive 10 yards farther leaves an easier second shot. Play from there 100 times instead of 10 yards back and you'll save strokes, but that's over 100 rounds.
  • People intuitively understand that putting is relatively easy, and enjoy fooling themselves that they could be pretty good if they just devoted time to putting.
  • People have been told wrong information for years and decades and even centuries.
  • People don't understand statistics. If Donald Trump was given a 16% chance to win the last election, too many people acted as if that was basically "never gonna happen" when really he would win once if you conducted six elections under roughly similar situations.
  • People don't play the "long game" and by that I don't mean the full swing, I mean understanding that it's going to take employing a change in strategy over a good period of time to see results. And even then you have to do a good bit of measuring to see the results.
  • People are stupid. Some just are. They're also biased, as Pelz would be (and I'd argue should be… if he's not entirely stupid), and push things that benefit them.
  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
7 minutes ago, krupa said:

I once heard a commentator say something like: all pros get on the green in the same number of strokes so what differentiates them is their putting.   

Ugh. That's not even partly accurate. Not only do all pros not get on in the same number of strokes, but their proximity to the hole is different, too. Proximity is a huge factor in putting.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, billchao said:

Ugh. That's not even partly accurate. Not only do all pros not get on in the same number of strokes, but their proximity to the hole is different, too. Proximity is a huge factor in putting.

Yeah it was a huge generalization and the guy made some caveat that he was talking about the people at the top of the leaderboard.  But it perpetuates the "work on your short game" mentality that so many people have.

Edited by krupa

"No man goes round boasting of his vices,” he said, “except golfers." 

-- Det. Elk in The Twister by Edgar Wallace

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The way I see it everything counts....of course! But the closer I can place myself for each shot it gets exponentially easier/probable that I will score better. An oversimplification perhaps but... that's how it feels and if I'm feeling better and more confident about a shot it's good. Confidence is big!

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think golfers don't want to admit how bad their full swings are.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 771 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.