Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2692 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

We've had an unusual amount of storms and rain in upstate New York the last few weeks and the courses are saturated. I really struggle with ball contact in such conditions, much worse than usual. I guess I'm looking for quick fixes or basic stock advice. How do people adjust their swing to play better under such conditions? Should I swing with a more sweeping motion, or steeper into the ball? What do people normally do to play better under such conditions? 

 

  • Like 1

Posted

In situations like that I will tend to use my 4 hybrid instead of my 5i or even 6i. Just choke down and hit it easier and hope for a gir or a ngir. There is a better chance the club won't take too much soil. On closer approach shots I will be careful to take a few practice swings and feel how the turf interaction will be. I may also want to take a little extra club and try to take a little off the shot , since swinging hard can tend to cause me to have less control and perhaps hit it a little too fat, which is disaster with saturated soils. Around the green I will also keep my 54* and 58* wedges in the bag and opt for my UW or PW that has a wider sole and won't want to dig and grab too much sod. On sloped or higher ground that has better drainage, I go back to regular club selection. 

Would love to hear what better players do, as this is a great question.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I asked @iacas this many moons ago and I believe his suggestion was to play the ball more forward than normal and take an extra club.  

  • Like 1

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I tend to play my metal woods more than irons in wetter conditions. I will also use my Ironwoods more than my regular irons. 

The wider soles don't tend to dig into the softer turf, and I use more of a "sweeping" swing to help my cause. 

  • Like 1

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'll defer to more expert opinions, but my first instinct would be to play it like I do fairway bunker shots - further back in my stance to try and give myself a better chance at hitting the ball before I hit any ground.

Around the greens I'd be more inclined to hit more lower lofted chip type shots and fewer pitches where my club would just dig underneath everything and chunk it.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

I'll defer to more expert opinions, but my first instinct would be to play it like I do fairway bunker shots - further back in my stance to try and give myself a better chance at hitting the ball before I hit any ground.

Around the greens I'd be more inclined to hit more lower lofted chip type shots and fewer pitches where my club would just dig underneath everything and chunk it.

That sounds about right to me.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/20/2018 at 7:08 PM, LeftyWhiff said:

We've had an unusual amount of storms and rain in upstate New York the last few weeks and the courses are saturated. I really struggle with ball contact in such conditions, much worse than usual.

Hit the small ball first. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I feel the need to get my weight far in front of the ball and hit a 'flighted' shot with a low trajectory. This tends to get me hitting down more and more likely to strike ball before standing water. Also looks cool and makes a cool splash when you hit the turf.

D: Ping G25 Stock S Shaft
3W: Titleist 915F 16.5* Diamana S70 Blue Stiff
3H, 4H: Callaway XR Project X LZ 6.0
5i-PW: Mizuno MP54 Project X 5.5 Shafts
52*, 58*: Mizuno JPX Wedge TT Dynalite Gold AP
Putter: Mizuno MP A306

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 hours ago, dennyjones said:

From AMA:  @iacas replied to my query:

 

Capture.PNG

I could be wrong, but it sounds more to me like he was giving you a swing tip that isn't really related to the fairways.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 hours ago, dennyjones said:

From AMA:  @iacas replied to my query:

 

Capture.PNG

Thanks for digging that up. I'll have to keep that in mind next Spring.

To the OP, I honestly don't know what to tell you since I hate playing in those kinds of conditions! But there we are every Spring, mucking around in the slop because we're Jonesing for golf so bad! After a period of frustration, I tell my buddies that I'll wait for the courses to start to dry out.

I think the variability in my performance comes from a lack of confidence in striking the shot. Some I'll hit well, others thin, and some I'll dig up a yard of turf. And it just occurred to me that I'm coming off of a several month layoff from golf, depending upon how severe the Winter has been. I have no idea where the bottom of my swing is.

I would suppose, or hope, that I would do better in soft conditions in mid-season.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Golfingdad said:

I could be wrong, but it sounds more to me like he was giving you a swing tip that isn't really related to the fairways.

Very well could be..

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm assuming the fairway is soaked, but without casual water. You have to sweep the ball. Pinching the ball between the clubface and the ground doesn't work to well in these conditions. And if you're even a hair fat, you get nothin'.


  • Administrator
Posted
6 hours ago, The Recreational Golfer said:

I'm assuming the fairway is soaked, but without casual water. You have to sweep the ball. Pinching the ball between the clubface and the ground doesn't work to well in these conditions. And if you're even a hair fat, you get nothin'.

This post confuses me and seems to propagate a myth.

Good golfers never "pinch the ball between the clubface and the ground." You can hit down (not sweep) the ball off a wet fairway… because you're hitting the ball first, and the ball is gone before the clubhead is affected by the wet turf.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks for all the replies. Seems the consensus is, whether you club up, sweep, or hit down on the ball, don't hit fat, hit ball first. I think my tendency is to hit fat and have been working on getting weight forward on the range. Fairways are drying out a bit now.


Posted
On 8/21/2018 at 4:59 AM, Patch said:

I tend to play my metal woods more than irons in wetter conditions. I will also use my Ironwoods more than my regular irons. 

The wider soles don't tend to dig into the softer turf, and I use more of a "sweeping" swing to help my cause. 

I struggle in these conditions, but this is about the best thing that works for me - I have a 28 degree hybrid and a 22 degree 7 wood that cover a good range for these shots, and can pitch and run when appropriate from shorter distances. As well as friendly soles, for one reason or another, I tend to be more likely to catch these clubs thin rather than fat. Of course, if caught fat, even these clubs will lose a lot of speed. 


Note: This thread is 2692 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.