Jump to content
CarlSpackler

Ian Poulter Has Fan Ejected for Yelling "Get in the Bunker!"

66 posts / 4156 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, rob0225 said:

The issue I have is why go straight to ejection?  How about a warning first?

The warning is on the ticket.

And, seriously, how are they going to know who has been warned? Put a scarlet "A" on his forehead?

5 minutes ago, rob0225 said:

If the PGA is going to eject viewers for this type of behavior than they need to enforce the rule equally at every PGA event.  Look at the fan behavior at the WM Phoenix Open, but they accept it there because it's "part of the tournament".   

It is different there, and no, they don't need to enforce the rules equally there as they do at a regular PGA Tour event. Nobody goes to the Phoenix Open with the expectation that they'll not hear anyone yelling all day.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

On 7/29/2019 at 3:51 AM, rob0225 said:

The issue I have is why go straight to ejection?  How about a warning first?

If the PGA is going to eject viewers for this type of behavior than they need to enforce the rule equally at every PGA event.  Look at the fan behavior at the WM Phoenix Open, but they accept it there because it's "part of the tournament".   

Would seem sensible.

Too many people with a stick up their butt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Jay28 said:

Would seem sensible.

Too many people with a stick up their butt.

What would you suggest, some kind of on-site detention center for a limited "time out", and then release the guy back into the pack of fans?  I don't see a practical way to enforce reasonable discipline without ejecting the guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

What would you suggest, some kind of on-site detention center for a limited "time out", and then release the guy back into the pack of fans?  I don't see a practical way to enforce reasonable discipline without ejecting the guy.

I actually like Erik’s....stick a scarlet ‘A’ on their foreheads. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

What would you suggest, some kind of on-site detention center for a limited "time out", and then release the guy back into the pack of fans?  I don't see a practical way to enforce reasonable discipline without ejecting the guy.

That’s why he conveniently ignored my question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 7/29/2019 at 12:51 PM, rob0225 said:

The issue I have is why go straight to ejection?  How about a warning first?

 

Reminds me of the episode of The Young Ones where Rick was annoyed because the instructions didn't specifically tell him not to put a videocassette in a toaster.

If you need to be warned, you need to be elsewhere. Being a human being of more than 5 years of age indicates you have had fair warning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I actually like Erik’s....stick a scarlet ‘A’ on their foreheads. 

“A” For asshole in this case...  :-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On ‎7‎/‎29‎/‎2019 at 1:07 AM, saevel25 said:

 

I agree. I don’t pay money to go to a PGA Tour event to listen to idiots like that.

 

^^ Spot on. I think its often overlooked that its not just the player that is affected but all the people who have paid a fair bit of money to enjoy watching golf and its even worse when there are kids in the crowd. What kind of example are these muppets setting for kids?

The players want the crowd to cheer, clap and, when appropriate, have a laugh. But it's not one when the hecklers do it out of spite or dislike for a golfer.

It's tough to enforce but needs to be done even if that means the players take the lead.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, RussUK said:

^^ Spot on. I think its often overlooked that its not just the player that is affected but all the people who have paid a fair bit of money to enjoy watching golf and its even worse when there are kids in the crowd. What kind of example are these muppets setting for kids?

The players want the crowd to cheer, clap and, when appropriate, have a laugh. But it's not one when the hecklers do it out of spite or dislike for a golfer.

It's tough to enforce but needs to be done even if that means the players take the lead.

 

Hey, don't be giving the Muppets a bad name! My solution is not to kick the guy off the course but rather assign him to follow Sergio Garcia only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Drunk idiot gets ejected for being a drunk idiot. Really no discussion to have here. It is one thing to cheer for someone but to actively cheer against someone is in poor taste. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Hey, don't be giving the Muppets a bad name! My solution is not to kick the guy off the course but rather assign him to follow Sergio Garcia only.

Is that kind of like making them sit on the naughty step? :-P

"you've been very naughty so you must follow Sergio till you learn your lesson"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

 My solution is not to kick the guy off the course but rather assign him to follow Sergio Garcia only.

 

12 hours ago, RussUK said:

Is that kind of like making them sit on the naughty step? :-P

"you've been very naughty so you must follow Sergio till you learn your lesson"

Now that’s just mean!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/1/2019 at 10:01 AM, Double Mocha Man said:

Hey, don't be giving the Muppets a bad name! My solution is not to kick the guy off the course but rather assign him to follow Sergio Garcia only.

laugh laughing GIF

Poulter hit it into a bunker!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 7/31/2019 at 11:18 PM, DaveP043 said:

What would you suggest, some kind of on-site detention center for a limited "time out", and then release the guy back into the pack of fans?  I don't see a practical way to enforce reasonable discipline without ejecting the guy.

Just don't see an issue as long as the shouting is not during a pre shot routine/ swing.

If someone is being abusive and shouting out crap on a consistent basis, then sure, get rid of the person.. however the odd shout here and there shouldn't be a problem.  I see it for what it is.  Poulter was getting upset with his game and wanted someone to take out his anger on.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jay28 said:

Just don't see an issue as long as the shouting is not during a pre shot routine/ swing.

If someone is being abusive and shouting out crap on a consistent basis, then sure, get rid of the person.. however the odd shout here and there shouldn't be a problem.  I see it for what it is.  Poulter was getting upset with his game and wanted someone to take out his anger on.

No. What if the “odd shout here and there” is a racist one? A sexist or nationalistic one? An inappropriate one?

In golf, what the guy did was inappropriate. Golf ain’t football.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, Jay28 said:

I see it for what it is.  Poulter was getting upset with his game and wanted someone to take out his anger on.

 

You don't know what "it is".

Please present the evidence of "Poulter getting upset with his game and wanting someone to take out his anger on." You weren't there and there is no video of it.

How about this: A guy was being a complete jerk and got booted and most likely the other fans applauded whoever carried/walked him out.

Irrespective of what you might think of Poulter, the story is about a moron in the gallery, not Poulter.

 

Are you going to blame Rory for this one?

 

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, did the ball actually "get in the bunker"?..........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, iacas said:

No. What if the “odd shout here and there” is a racist one? A sexist or nationalistic one? An inappropriate one?

In golf, what the guy did was inappropriate. Golf ain’t football.

Nationalistic??  Like "U-S-A"?

With you on racist or sexist chants... as long as they really are.

But regardless, we're talking about someone shouting 'get in the bunnker'.

 

1 hour ago, leftybutnotPM said:

You don't know what "it is".

Please present the evidence of "Poulter getting upset with his game and wanting someone to take out his anger on." You weren't there and there is no video of it.

How about this: A guy was being a complete jerk and got booted and most likely the other fans applauded whoever carried/walked him out.

Irrespective of what you might think of Poulter, the story is about a moron in the gallery, not Poulter.

 

Are you going to blame Rory for this one?

 

Yeah, Rory should have ignored it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • I had two friends that played Founders Clubs.  I have never heard of them being a club made by Langert. How ever a search did bring up some info on those clubs. Is this the item you are referring to? eBay has a listing for this driver. My friends played this driver.  
    • I watch GSK just because I like watching him play.  But he is a scratch player so he can get away with hitting three 6 irons on a 540 yd par five.  Me, I have to get max distance on every shot because I know that I will probably mis-hit 1/3 shots.  So his divide and conquer strategy wont work for me.  Fun videos tho. 
    • Another idea is to make your own shaft flex board. Maltby sell one for $180. I once made one for free using a scrap of plywood, and some 2", 1/4" dowell material. Hung it on my garage wall.  I marked known  clubs flexes on the board as reference points, using a consistent weight. The board also gave me other info besides flex.  It was crude looking, but did the job.  It mattered little what the manufacturer's rating on the shaft was, which was usually different from each company. What ever my flex board showed me, was what the actual flex was when compared to the known flexes I used.   Maltby probably has a picture of his flex board on his website. Probably other sites have picts available too. With a little self ingenuity, a person can study the picture, and build their own. It's pretty easy. 
    • I thought about this a while, and then had an epiphany last night.  Without a perfect test, the answer is almost definitely no. It's a fairly simple statistical calculation called Bayes' Theorem. The end result is that you'll end up preventing more people from driving when they aren't drunk than preventing drunk drivers. I'm going to plug in numbers, but since I'm (likely correctly!) assuming drunk driving is a rare event, the numbers don't really matter that much. I'm also going to assume the test is extremely accurate. Let's say that in 1/10,000 car trips, the driver is too drunk to legally drive. This is probably an underestimation by a factor of 100, if not more, if you think about how many car trips there are in a day. Let's assume that the when the test is positive, the driver is drunk 99.9% of the time. And then assume that when the test is negative, the driver is sober 99.9% of the time (in other words, if the test is negative, the driver is drunk 0.1% of the time). We can use this to plug in probabilities for each event. Probability that a driver is drunk: .0001 Probability that a driver is sober: .9999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a positive test: .999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a negative test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a positive test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a negative test: .999 Bayes' Theorem applies here. It says: The probability that someone is drunk driver given a positive test is equal to the probability of a drunk driver gets a positive test times the probability of a drunk driver; that divided by the following: the probability of a drunk getting a positive test times probability of a drunk driver plus the probability of sober driver getting a positive test times the probability of a sober driver. In mathematic terms (DD=drunk driver; SD = sober driver; + = positive test): P(DD | +) = (P(+ | DD)*P(DD))/((P+ | DD)*P(DD)+P(+ | SD)*P(SD)) Plug in the numbers: P(DD | +) = ((.999)*(.0001))/((.999)*(.0001)+(.001)*(.9999)) P(DD | +) = .0908 In other words, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 9%. Meaning that out of a 100 people that test positive under this test, 91 of them would actually be sober. Because the test is imperfect and drunk driving is rare, it's going to impact more sober drivers than drunk drivers. Even if the test is 99.99% accurate and as a false positive rate of 0.01%, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 50%. Note that I'm assuming that 1/10,000 car trips is one by a drunk driver. If you assume 1/100,000 car trips are by a drunk driver, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is 0.9%. (You can also use this calculate to find out the odds that a drunk driver will have a negative test, but I have other stuff to do now...) So, without a nearly perfect test, it's a bad idea for the entire population. If drunk drivers were more frequent, then it would make more sense. Hence, it makes sense for someone who is more likely to drive drunk, and why the current policy probably makes sense. 
    • Hey Ben, good to see you’re still around!   I remember those irons. They’re beautiful! Sorry, I can’t help with the driver though…
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Edsland
      Edsland
      (65 years old)
    2. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (37 years old)
    3. snowbeast
      snowbeast
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...