Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 hours ago, Vinsk said:

Yes. But this has nothing to do with what’s taking place between LIV and PGAT. This is not racial discrimination. 

Besides directly responding to the question in the post, it has everything to do with the issue.... Literally..... Everything.. It is THE argument for LIV. 

Competition is what protects employees and consumers. Competition tends to force better behavior.

 

 

 


Posted
30 minutes ago, GolfSwami said:

Besides directly responding to the question in the post, it has everything to do with the issue.... Literally..... Everything.. It is THE argument for LIV. 

Competition is what protects employees and consumers. Competition tends to force better behavior.

 

 

 

What are you talking about? Blacks being discriminated against in recruiting was the issue. Racial discrimination has nothing to do with what’s taking place with the LIV players complaints. The NFL suit was all about racial discrimination which did cause an effect with competition but it was the racial discrimination that was at point. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
55 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

What are you talking about? Blacks being discriminated against in recruiting was the issue. Racial discrimination has nothing to do with what’s taking place with the LIV players complaints. The NFL suit was all about racial discrimination which did cause an effect with competition but it was the racial discrimination that was at point. 

Radovich was white.

The AFL signed black players because it made their product better not because of a court decision.

 


Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

You’re not.

These 2 quotes are copy pasted directly from the complaint. I'm not asking you if I am using the exact arguments, I'm telling you that I literally pulled them out of the text. I bolded the things I've been re-iterating over and over again. 

"As the Tour’s monopoly power has grown, it has employed its dominance to craft an arsenal of anticompetitive restraints to protect its long-standing monopoly. "
"Before LIV Golf’s entry, golfers who sold their services in the elite professional golf services market had no meaningful option but to play on the Tour if they wanted to pursue their profession at the highest levels. This provided the Tour with enormous power over the players, including the ability to force players into restrictive terms that foreclose them from playing in competing events and the ability to suppress player compensation below competitive levels"

 

1 hour ago, Zippo said:

I don’t think you can have an ad hominem attack against a profession, by definition. 
 

Against my profession. Text book ad hominem - attacking me personally rather than the argument I am making. Maybe you missed the original comment, but he asked what my profession was as evidence that I know nothing about law or economics. Pretty low blow IMO.

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, jshots said:

Before LIV Golf’s entry, golfers who sold their services in the elite professional golf services market had no meaningful option but to play on the Tour if they wanted to pursue their profession at the highest levels

Elite golfers don’t have the right to make millions playing golf. It’s a privilege. How is it the PGAT’s fault that this Tour created by players, provides a means for them to do so yet no one else has? And now LIV comes along to try and do that, and guess what? Nothing stopped them! They have a choice that is meaningful other than the PGAT but now they’re crying that they can’t have both!? WTF can’t you see here that this is ridiculous?

  • Thumbs Up 2

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 hours ago, GolfSwami said:

The competition is already having a positive impact on player payouts. 

To the top players. 

The AFL and NLF are leagues. The AFL and ABA succeeded because there were more markets demanding the team sport. 

Almost certainly, the top PGA Tour players are undercompensated by prize money. Yeah, that's pretty much every league, and pretty much every sport. Even in ones without strict salary caps. It's just how these things work. But they don't work as exhibitions. That's the point.

BTW, why is this being bogged down in some sort of legal discussion about anti-trust law and other nonsense? Let our broken-ass legal system work all that out. In the meantime, f*** LIV.

"Witty golf quote."


Posted
7 hours ago, jshots said:

I'm spewing legal nonsense? Are you a lawyer? I'm basically using the exact arguments in claims from gigantic law firms representing LIV players, stuff that I'm reading all over the place from actual lawyers. Its not as if I just came up with this shit on my own.

So the ad hominem attack on my profession seems undeserved to me.

"As the Tour’s monopoly power has grown, it has employed its dominance to craft an arsenal of anticompetitive restraints to protect its long-standing monopoly. "
"Before LIV Golf’s entry, golfers who sold their services in the elite professional golf services market had no meaningful option but to play on the Tour if they wanted to pursue their profession at the highest levels. This provided the Tour with enormous power over the players, including the ability to force players into restrictive terms that foreclose them from playing in competing events and the ability to suppress player compensation below competitive levels"

There is nothing in that quote that in any way tries to argue that team sport cases provide any precedent for this situation, which is what I challenged you on.  If you are going to cite precedents they need to be on point.  Simply citing a situation involving a sport and antitrust issue doesn't make that a relevant precedent for a case involving qualitatively different sports (i.e., a team sport with employees and an individual sport with independent contractors) and completely different possible antitrust issues.  Football and antitrust therefore golf and antitrust is not a valid implication.  The devil is in the details and none of the details in these two situations are remotely similar.

And there is no ad hominem on your profession, it is a recognition that your profession has not prepared you to do legal analysis.  And that's fine.  But it puts the validity of your legal arguments into context.

Since you asked, I'm not a lawyer but my professional credentials authorized me to represent clients and practice law on certain specific sections of the tax code, which I did for over 20 years.  So I am at least conversant with legal reasoning and have experience, albeit in a different area, with how legal reasoning works.  So, I'm not a lawyer but I am more knowledgeable than the average bear about the law because of that training and experience.  That doesn't make me right, but it does inform my opinion.

  • Thumbs Up 1

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
7 hours ago, jshots said:

I'm not asking you if I am using the exact arguments

I was taking about the football stuff. It’s a lousy legal position that has almost nothing to do with what we have here now.

As Rich said, you need to tie more than just “sports” and “antitrust” together.

Also, where is the NFL now? Oh, even more of a monopoly? Cool.

P.S. Again, being a monopoly alone isn’t illegal.

P.P.S. Asking your profession and pointing out a fact is not ad hominem. Drop it.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, Vinsk said:

What a great finish to the St. Jude Classic…good to see Zalatoris finally win. And once again…just astronomically more entertaining than the LIV nonsense.

Commentators made a comment afterwards along the lines of "what he is feeling now is worth so much more than any amount of guaranteed money."

Was surprised they even made the LIV reference and kinda wish they just wouldn't even acknowledge it.  But at the same time, they're completely right.  

  • Thumbs Up 1

-Eric

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I find the defense of LIV as competition or even healthy competition BS. They are specifically spear fishing players on PGAT with these ridiculous contracts to harness the star power that PGAT created. That is cannibalization. It is hostile. I am not arguing any legality here.

But 'competition makes everything better' crowd need to rethink what LIV is doing. 

Plus, don't the players want more family time? That horseshit disappeared pretty quickly, eh?

  • Thumbs Up 1

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
13 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

I find the defense of LIV as competition or even healthy competition BS. They are specifically spear fishing players on PGAT with these ridiculous contracts to harness the star power that PGAT created. That is cannibalization. It is hostile. I am not arguing any legality here.

But 'competition makes everything better' crowd need to rethink what LIV is doing. 

Plus, don't the players want more family time? That horseshit disappeared pretty quickly, eh?

Agree. Greed is a powerful thing though and will cause people to say stupid stuff.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I actually joined a LIV group on Facebook about a week ago and was amazed at all the negative statements that are being made on that site. What is also amazing is how stupid some of the comments are. It almost looked to me like it was a group of people hired to bash the PGA tour. There was literally nothing posted about any of their players or any news from their tour. Just one post after another talking about how bad the leaderboards looked and "who are these guys?" comments. Nothing but hate for the PGA. One post was fake news from some site saying the Cameron Young was the next to join. I actually replied to that one and pointed out his father is PGA of America...never saw another post after that. 🤣

My bag:

Taylor Made R7 (x-stiff).
Taylor Made Burner 2 irons (stiff)
Cleveland Wedges (gap and 60)
Odyssey two ball putter (white) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
27 minutes ago, Bucki1968 said:

It almost looked to me like it was a group of people hired to bash the PGA tour. 

That's more than a little bit possible. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, Bucki1968 said:

I actually joined a LIV group on Facebook about a week ago and was amazed at all the negative statements that are being made on that site. What is also amazing is how stupid some of the comments are. It almost looked to me like it was a group of people hired to bash the PGA tour. There was literally nothing posted about any of their players or any news from their tour. Just one post after another talking about how bad the leaderboards looked and "who are these guys?" comments. Nothing but hate for the PGA. One post was fake news from some site saying the Cameron Young was the next to join. I actually replied to that one and pointed out his father is PGA of America...never saw another post after that. 🤣

It wouldn't surprise me if many of them are bots, too.

Much of the Twitter stuff is likely Saudi-paid bots.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, iacas said:

It wouldn't surprise me if many of them are bots, too.

Much of the Twitter stuff is likely Saudi-paid bots.

I wonder about some of the folks posting here, with low message counts.  And posting almost exclusively about LIV, with silly arguments in their favor.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, turtleback said:

I wonder about some of the folks posting here, with low message counts.  And posting almost exclusively about LIV, with silly arguments in their favor.

Well for them to make comments such as ‘who are these guys?’ regarding the FEC leaderboards ( St. Jude most recently) is just embarrassingly stupid. Have they seen their leaderboards? Not to mention 14 of the 15 OWGR are on the PGAT. Just asinine.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A nice consistent road is just as satisfying as a round with a few outstanding shots. nice round.  
    • Foundation Session #2  
    • I shot an 85 yesterday without any shots that really stood out as spectacular to me.  On the first nine, the highest SG shots that didn't originate on a tee were a 22 yard chip from the rough to 6' and sinking a 10' putt (not the same hole).   On the second nine, driver 4-hybrid to 17' on a 421 yard par-4 was pretty cool.  Sinking a 15' putt for par on the 420-yard par-4 15th was my largest SG of the day (0.98 vs 10 hcp), and that one goes on my acting resume because when it went in, I acted like I wasn't surprised I made the putt.   I'm a lot happier with that round than this post indicates.  It shows I can play to a pretty good score (a 10-11 handicap shooting 85 on a 70.9 / 125 / 6400 yard is a good performance I think) without having to work miracles. 
    • Shot an 85 yesterday (posts as an 84).  40 first nine, 45 second nine.  Only two holes worse than bogey:  a double on a par-4 and a totally preventable snowman on the par-5 18th (the one where Arnold Palmer once made a 12 during the L.A. Open). Bogeyed every par-3.  Par-5s were 6-6-8 (there are only three).  Lots of work to improve upon these.  Especially performance on 18: wild tee shot, great recovery, good third I thought, but it somehow drew against a left-to-right wind and finished barely in bounds, where all I could do is smack with a putter towards the green.  And I did, leaving it in the rough for my fifth.  Chip way past the hole, putt 5' past the cup, a miss, and a tap in to complete the snowman.  Played the par-4s in a cumulative 5-over (there are eleven), one of which was a double.  Strokes gained: par-4s during the round gains 2.16 over the 5-handicap baseline, that's pretty cool. No birdies.  Only 5 GIR, 7 near-GIR, and one green hit on a full swing that wasn't for GIR (par-4 9th, drive, recovery, sand wedge to the green).
    • I played this course yesterday (casual friendly round, not a tournament) with friends.  I told my playing partners up front I was going to try a second approach shot on #7, the hole I was describing.   I hit my tee shot to where I had 130 or so yards to the green from the fairway (per ShotScope GPS and also laser to a pin near the middle).  There was a decent wind in my face. If we hadn't had this conversation, I would have hit 7-iron (140 yard average under calm and flat conditions).   I played that shot, full normal swing, hit the green 24' short of the pin, made an easy two putt for a par.   My second attempt at the approach shot (which I hit right after my main one) was a 5-iron, using the swing I usually use to hit a 100-yard low shot (I'm not sure if it qualifies as a punch shot) where I'm trying to hit it straight and low, such as if I'm behind trees and attempting a recovery-and-advance.  I hit it decently well and the ball finished at the back of the green.  Incidentally, I've recently started a notebook for this course.  Somehow I don't have a lot written down despite having played this course semi-regularly for almost two decades (minus the times I'm not playing golf, of course).  I added that to my notes for this particular hole.  Next few casual rounds there, I think I'm going to hit an additional approach to that green with different clubs on the low shot and take notes.  It's a small sample size but it seems worth knowing instead of having to guess during an important round. As my handicap edges closer to single digits, I think it's good to have shots like this in the repertoire -- not only mechanically, but knowing situationally what I can do.  I recognize that the really good players tend to hit their stock shot on the vast majority of occasions, and I'm not about to try to shoehorn in punch shots everywhere, but knowing options into the wind and/or to a lowered green beyond "take more (or less) club" seems like a good thing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.