Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2090 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Lesson Rating  

14 members have voted

  1. 1. How would you rate this lesson? Weight heavily the information and delivery, but consider whatever else you want, too.

    • 1 - Horrible
      0
    • 2
      6
    • 3
      8
    • 4
      0
    • 5 - Tremendous
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

I'm presenting this video without any comments. I endeavor to "hang up and listen."

I'm curious what everyone thinks of this video. Chuck posted it on his YouTube channel.

So, post away, and discuss amongst yourselves. I will work very hard to not post in this topic (after this post, of course).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well...I’ll give my novice opinion. First, the guy says he shot a 71 early that day. I’m not really sure what the point of the lesson was nor did the player seem to have any specific question. What CQ was showing him was quite an change for this guy but for what? I never heard the guy say, ‘ boy I’m gaining 10-15 yards with a more consistent ball flight.’ Is that the goal?

Being able to fire a 71 I would think a player at that level would have a pretty good idea what’s needed to go lower yes? Seems a swing overhaul is a bit much. 
 

I don’t have a trained eye at all but the player looked a bit goat-humpy when CQ would say he did a good swing. I wish there had been some data on his ball striking for comparison. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

It took 50 minutes of an almost hour long lesson for him to actually suggest trying a very slow swing and then building up from there.

Also, if I’m the trainee, I’d want to see much more video of myself during the practice session. I want to know exactly what “good” looked like for me and exactly what “bad” looked like for me. There were several cuts of the video so maybe they did that during those, but I doubt it.

Edited by Grizvok

Back in PA!

Driver: :titleist: TSR3, 3W: :titleist: TSR3, Hybrid: :ping: Anser 20, Irons: Takomo 101T, Wedges: :titleist: Vokey SM5 (52, 56, 60), Putter: TBD

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree with @Vinskbut would add that it seemed to me that he started the lesson taking the club back too far to the inside and was still taking it back inside at the end of the video. He also, to me, looked to be flippy, though it was difficult to tell from the down the line video. His follow through looked very abbreviated and not very fluid. I think the closed stance, generally speaking of course, can tend to make the rotation at impact and afterwards more difficult for us older folk though it also makes it a bit easier to rotate back on the takeaway. My tendency would be for a more square stance with the feet a bit flared. Good thing I'm not an instructor or more golfers would probably take up chess! 😄


Posted

I’m not convinced the student was doing the ‘logo to the camera’ as CQ asked him to do from the beginning. I would’ve had him do the takeaway only, slowly and make sure that was being done properly before hitting full shots.

  • Like 2

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I like his hands on approach and positive attitude. He was able to identify an issue and show the student via video. Because the student was a good player, he probably took a different approach to explaining things than he would have for a mid or high HC student. He used video to show the student and stated the feel isn’t real, which was good.

He did use partial swings to help reinforce the feel. My instructors suggest holding at A9 to work on that feel. I’m not an instructor but I think that would have helped this student instead of letting him finish the swing in his reps.

He kept at it with the student the whole lesson and interacted with him the whole time. Crappy instructors don’t do that. He also gave him a feel to think about and use in a mirror. I liked his teaching method for the most part.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I like the hands on approach.   

7 hours ago, Vinsk said:

I’m not convinced the student was doing the ‘logo to the camera’ as CQ asked him to do from the beginning. I would’ve had him do the takeaway only, slowly and make sure that was being done properly before hitting full shots.

+1

I liked the way he backed down and slowed the swing down to reinforce something that wasn't clicking for the student.     I don't know the guy's priority pieces (seemed to be a few)  but Chuck seemed confident he can get the guy to where he needs to be.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
53 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

Chuck seemed confident

Seldom an issue with him....lol.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, dennyjones said:

I like the hands on approach.   

+1

I liked the way he backed down and slowed the swing down to reinforce something that wasn't clicking for the student.     I don't know the guy's priority pieces (seemed to be a few)  but Chuck seemed confident he can get the guy to where he needs to be.

If this was my lesson, what I personally would like more of is “why” the changes will help and then a plan on how to practice it, film it to see if I am making the changes. Chuck didn’t show the student enough before and after stuff. I would want more then a plan on how to change.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I haven’t watched the full video yet, only ~11 minutes, but so far it seems like the guy doesn’t turn enough and CQ wants him to turn more while restricting his hips. Not really the way to do it IMO. Shoulder turn is limited by hip turn. Needs a little more hip tilt as he turns back, that’s going to require the hips turning on a tilt as well.

  • Like 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Just jotting as I go along, In the beginning,  I like his quick bio, but I would have asked more about the students current goals in the swing, current ball flight, feels, etc.  I'd want to know how my student thinks before I jump into it.

I like that he was quick to work on something, but besides the comment of having "good player problems" he didn't say a lot of positives about the swing.  I like to start with something I like, then move to where it could go.  

He asked how the guy felt after 1 swing on a golf ball.  I don't know, I guess I'd let him hit a few before seeing how it feels.

So, 14min, two things to think about, and then on to something else? A lot and fast.  He didn't really ask either, to see if he is ready to move onto the next piece.  My thoughts on his back swing were similar. Didn't quite finish the turn and stood up by way of the arms at the top.  By feeling a bigger turn, he didn't allow his arms to prop him up.

I don't know about the left leg extending on the down swing as early as he said, but I wonder if he said it to exaggerate the feel?

I'm stopping at 20min for right now.  The initial work with finishing the turn was lost as they transitioned into the hip rotation.  No toys or training aids, just hands on and verbal.  The guy obviously had trouble with the hands on approach.  I'll label this a 2 for right now.  I'll finish later and see if it changes.

58 minutes ago, billchao said:

I haven’t watched the full video yet, only ~11 minutes, but so far it seems like the guy doesn’t turn enough and CQ wants him to turn more while restricting his hips. Not really the way to do it IMO. Shoulder turn is limited by hip turn. Needs a little more hip tilt as he turns back, that’s going to require the hips turning on a tilt as well.

I was definitely a little confused as he was trying to hold his left knee in place as he made a backswing and telling him to rotate more.  Once again, maybe it was the exaggeration to help?  

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I just got back from the range after playing nine. There was an “instructor“ there giving a lesson. He was the awful pro that I’ve seen so many times and lead me to The Sand Trap. No video. No basics of the golf swing. Just a random comments and tips from magazines. The video above is a far better lesson, but I would still want more.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

After watching the complete video, it looks to me that that golfer was more confused than when he started.    I've always had lessons that end with a lesson plan (priority piece) and drills to help achieve my priority piece.   A video is always sent my way with comments during the video of a before and after swing.   

If this was the end of the lesson, I would have left overwhelmed and confused.  

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

After watching the complete video, it looks to me that that golfer was more confused than when he started.    I've always had lessons that end with a lesson plan (priority piece) and drills to help achieve my priority piece.   A video is always sent my way with comments during the video of a before and after swing.   

If this was the end of the lesson, I would have left overwhelmed and confused.  

Absolutely. My understanding was that the other instructor "Aaron" that they mentioned works under Chuck as an instructor for RotarySwing. To hear that an instructor from the same company (a company that teaches a model swing mind you) has such a drastically different take on what should be prioritized would have me running for the hills.

Edited by Grizvok

Back in PA!

Driver: :titleist: TSR3, 3W: :titleist: TSR3, Hybrid: :ping: Anser 20, Irons: Takomo 101T, Wedges: :titleist: Vokey SM5 (52, 56, 60), Putter: TBD

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yea, it was a bit disjointed. He gave a little bit of time to the backswing, but then switched focus. If the entire lesson was just on that front side extension it probably would have been better. 

As for the information, I think it was OK. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I’m pretty sure he could’ve done the whole lesson on the takeaway or turning / loading better, but I don’t know.

At the 20 min mark, I feel bad for the guy. It was some lead knee stuff in backswing, then lead knee stuff in transition/ downswing while posting. Now he’s getting on him for having his legs go all over the place. He wants him to squash grapes now with lead foot. They are kind of related, but that’s a lot of moving parts

I’ll watch more in the morning. I wonder what the message will be at the end? 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
11 hours ago, billchao said:

I like to know why

Exactly. 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2090 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.