Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1967 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I think I am experiencing a brain fart.  Ball comes to rest some 20 yards off the green, maybe 15 feet of green to work with after that.  It's maybe 4 feet elevated.  No other obstacles.  Let's say a flat-ish green. Medium rough lie and the same stuff to up to the fringe.  Decent lie in that rough.  I hope I covered enough detail.  I am not great at chipping that far with the sand wedge. I am so tempted to try to flop something with the sand wedge or maybe a tiny pitch because I do not want to deal with rolling through the rough with a pitching wedge so close to the top of the arc.  Insufficiently loft just a bit and I will end up parking the ball before it gets to the green.  Somehow, with no specific obstacles in the way, the shot options all seem so risky.  I seem to be encountering this scenario a lot these days.  I feel like this should not be such a difficult decision, but I just do not see what the conventional wisdom would dictate.

What would you do?  What am I not seeing clearly here?

Edited by Cantankerish
clarity
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As a 15.4 cap....just hit a normal pitch onto the green.....make sure to hit enough to land the ball on the green and not leave it short....hopefully the worse you'll be 20 ft past the hole.

You want to make sure you get up and down in no more than 3 strokes...obviously 2 strokes is ideal.

Yes, if you have the skill to flop it...then do so...again not leaving the ball short.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2

Posted (edited)

If I have only 15 feet to work with and I’m hitting from rough to an elevated green, I’d probably hit a 58-degree pitch shot, maybe open it up a degree or two. My wedges are rock-solid right now.

Edited by dagolfer18

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, Mr22putt said:

As a 15.4 cap....just hit a normal pitch onto the green.....make sure to hit enough to land the ball on the green and not leave it short....hopefully the worse you'll be 20 ft past the hole.

You want to make sure you get up and down in no more than 3 strokes...obviously 2 strokes is ideal.

Yes, if you have the skill to flop it...then do so...again not leaving the ball short.

This, exactly.

Err long.  Do NOT leave it short of the green.  

  • Like 1

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Probably a stock chip with a SW. I wouldn't try to hit a flop. Too risky for me. As one guy already said, I'd make my miss long. At least I'd give myself a putt to get up and down. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Posted
4 hours ago, dagolfer18 said:

If I have only 15 feet to work with and I’m hitting from rough to an elevated green, I’d probably hit a 58-degree pitch shot, maybe open it up a degree or two. My wedges are rock-solid right now.

Just remembered that I ran into a situation similar to this in my round yesterday. Like the OP, this was an elevated green, but the main difference was that I had to pitch over a bunker to a semi-tight pin, a pitch shot of probably fifty feet. I opened up my 58 a little and hit a decent shot to five feet.

  • Thumbs Up 1

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
9 hours ago, Cantankerish said:

I think I am experiencing a brain fart.  Ball comes to rest some 20 yards off the green, maybe 15 feet of green to work with after that.  It's maybe 4 feet elevated.  No other obstacles.  Let's say a flat-ish green. Medium rough lie and the same stuff to up to the fringe.  Decent lie in that rough.  I hope I covered enough detail.  I am not great at chipping that far with the sand wedge. I am so tempted to try to flop something with the sand wedge or maybe a tiny pitch because I do not want to deal with rolling through the rough with a pitching wedge so close to the top of the arc.  Insufficiently loft just a bit and I will end up parking the ball before it gets to the green.  Somehow, with no specific obstacles in the way, the shot options all seem so risky.  I seem to be encountering this scenario a lot these days.  I feel like this should not be such a difficult decision, but I just do not see what the conventional wisdom would dictate.

What would you do?  What am I not seeing clearly here?

Seems like a standard short pitch shot to me. Do you have trouble getting height on your pitches? Four feet isn’t a lot of elevation.

  • Like 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If I understand the scenario, it's 25 yards to the pin, but lots of space behind the pin.  I'd hit a 30 yard pitch.  Why 30?  I know my swings to various increments, and while I have one that is about 25 yards if I have a little bit of non-green to cover and then lots of rollout, I don't trust that it'd finish on the green when I'm short sided.  I'd far rather ensure I'm on the green than being just off.  That's a situation where I limit damage rather than going for the marginal chance of getting up and down versus a chance of taking a big number.  Get it on the green, even if it's 20 feet past the pin, and sharply reduce the chance that it takes you more than three strokes to get down.

  • Informative 1

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As a 16 HCP it would be pitching wedge onto the green with as much elevation as possible so the ball does not run out too far.  Likely 3 shots into the hole.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/22/2020 at 8:54 PM, Cantankerish said:

What would you do?  What am I not seeing clearly here?

I'll second what some others are saying here. For me this would be a pitch onto the green, probably with a high lofted wedge, with the main goal to not leave a second short game shot to get on the green. Seems like missing long and being on the green is better than leaving it short and having a second pitch or chip.

  • Thumbs Up 1

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It all depends on the lie. Mediocre lie or if there's any concern that there's going to be grass between my club and the ball, I'd use my 58, square the face, and pitch to the edge of the green but erring on being long over short. My expectation is to be 10-20 feet from the hole, anything within 10 feet is going to be pretty good. If I know that I can get the club on the ball without interference, particularly if the ball is sitting up, then I'd be more aggressive. In this case I'd open the 58 and hit a lofted pitch / lob shot - I don't like the term flop, that's what pros do and it's much more aggressive and vertical than my lob. In this case, given the right lie and green speed,  I have pretty good confidence of getting it to 10 feet and sometimes closer. If I come up short, I should be close enough to the green to use putter and have a routine two putt.

As a warning: 1. the pros swing hard when hitting a flop - that's why the ball goes straight up and stops - I swing much slower and the ball goes lower, so it doesn't stop near as fast but I also don't have the bladed flop shot; 2. A flaw is to swing only using your arms - swing your body with the arms; 3. Practice on the range a few times before putting into play - I've practiced this a lot.

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Posted

I truly appreciate the thoughtful responses.  I learned a lot from them.  In particular, I have been choosing the tiny pitch shot, figuring a lot like what gbogey says here.  (I don’t flop well.)  But I was not sure that was the smart call.


Pitching is a relatively new skill for me, and I am still feeling out it’s best applications.  This confirms one for me.

So again, thank you all 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Get comfortable with this technique posted here.

Quickie Pitching post

That should basically be your "go to" shot for the situation described here.

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

 

7 hours ago, Darkfrog said:

I'll second what some others are saying here. For me this would be a pitch onto the green, probably with a high lofted wedge, with the main goal to not leave a second short game shot to get on the green. Seems like missing long and being on the green is better than leaving it short and having a second pitch or chip.

So I played in a group Sunday with a scratch and a 3 along with myself and an 8. The 3 and the 8 both short sided themselves like you are describing with a bunker short and the 8 hits it 20 past the pin and the 3 hits it 15 feet past with a safe high lofted wedge shot. The scratch says good shot, you couldn't do much better. So lets look at that statement coming from a really good player. Both guys hit the shot they knew they could hit. They both had a putt to save par. They didn't hit the hero shot and leave themselves with an even worse predicament, they got it on the green and gave themselves a chance. It was just a reminder that sometimes the smart play is to take what the course gives you and do something you can pull off 95% of the time and you will at worse walk off with bogey. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Note: This thread is 1967 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.