Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1948 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Depending on where you look, someone's first name is either considered "personal information" or it's considered that only when it can pretty uniquely identify the person, like saying "Randall, who lives in lower Upper Sandusky and owns the shop on 14th Street"…

Anyway, the gist of it is this. On another forum, I said basically "Randall, you and I draw the line at different points." (or some such), using the person's name just as I would in real life. The person's name isn't the same as his username, but those who know who he is know his real name. He's never gone too far out of his way to hide it. It's in public documents on the forum when he signs up for events, or to get packages shipped to him, etc.

I don't consider saying "Randall, blah blah blah" to be "doxxing" but that's what I was then tagged with, even though within about 90 seconds, I deleted the name at the request of the person named.

What gives here? Doxxing is not just saying "Randall…". That's your name. I didn't give his social security number. He can't be uniquely identified. His boss can't search the Internet for "Randall" and find out that he's posting about stuff on company time. His name isn't QX47Petar (or something else pretty unique).

Now, I'm not going to pretend I don't also think "anonymity" online is stupid. I think the Internet would be a better place if, when people are discussing things with one another, they put their name on their opinions. That they manned up and said "here is what I think" and effectively signed their card. (I'm generally against companies being creepy and collecting a bunch of unique data about you, selling it, whatever.) I think if you're going to put your name out there, others can use it to talk to you. It's civil, it's personable. If you're worried about your boss finding out that you're spending all day posting online instead of doing work, that's your problem.

Whatever. Venting over. I'm unconvinced that posting someone's first name is a sin.

P.S. Yeah, this is from 2013:

 

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Maybe Randall, er, the guy, is a little sensitive.  Perhaps he's been burned on the internet before.  Maybe you two were in such strong disagreement he didn't want you getting chummy with him.  There could be a lot of reasons.  Ask him, see if he will tell you.


  • Moderator
Posted
41 minutes ago, iacas said:

Depending on where you look, someone's first name is either considered "personal information" or it's considered that only when it can pretty uniquely identify the person, like saying "Randall, who lives in lower Upper Sandusky and owns the shop on 14th Street"…

Anyway, the gist of it is this. On another forum, I said basically "Randall, you and I draw the line at different points." (or some such), using the person's name just as I would in real life. The person's name isn't the same as his username, but those who know who he is know his real name. He's never gone too far out of his way to hide it. It's in public documents on the forum when he signs up for events, or to get packages shipped to him, etc.

I don't consider saying "Randall, blah blah blah" to be "doxxing" but that's what I was then tagged with, even though within about 90 seconds, I deleted the name at the request of the person named.

What gives here? Doxxing is not just saying "Randall…". That's your name. I didn't give his social security number. He can't be uniquely identified. His boss can't search the Internet for "Randall" and find out that he's posting about stuff on company time. His name isn't QX47Petar (or something else pretty unique).

Now, I'm not going to pretend I don't also think "anonymity" online is stupid. I think the Internet would be a better place if, when people are discussing things with one another, they put their name on their opinions. That they manned up and said "here is what I think" and effectively signed their card. (I'm generally against companies being creepy and collecting a bunch of unique data about you, selling it, whatever.) I think if you're going to put your name out there, others can use it to talk to you. It's civil, it's personable. If you're worried about your boss finding out that you're spending all day posting online instead of doing work, that's your problem.

Whatever. Venting over. I'm unconvinced that posting someone's first name is a sin.

P.S. Yeah, this is from 2013:

 

You didn’t cross any boundaries - he sounds like a guy who likes to hide behind his keyboard; those folks say whatever they want until you confront them personally...while you didn’t remotely get too personal by simply using his first name, he was prob threatened by it as that type typically gets defensive pretty darn quick. 

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm not afraid of using my name on the web...as you can tell.   My caveat,  I don't say anything on the web I wouldn't say to the person if they were sitting next to me.   I've typed many things and deleted them before posting.    Socrates: Is it true; is it kind, is it necessary?

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hi Erik...Pete here.  Oops!

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Using someone’s first name and first name only on the internet isn’t doxxing.

I’m conflicted about internet anonymity. On the one hand it enables people to troll or otherwise behave in a destructive way that they might not in real life. On the other, it allows people to open up about personal issues that they might not be willing or able to do in real life and get support from others who are also more willing to share for the same reasons.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I run a small forum mostly used by members of a fishing club but open to anyone. I require that all registrants use only their real name. No alias’. For one, I need to know who the paid members are and by posting with their real name, they are much less likely to be rude or cause trouble. 


  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Maybe Randall, er, the guy, is a little sensitive.  Perhaps he's been burned on the internet before.  Maybe you two were in such strong disagreement he didn't want you getting chummy with him.  There could be a lot of reasons.  Ask him, see if he will tell you.

Yeah, in case it wasn't obvious, the guy's name wasn't "Randall." 😄

1 hour ago, dennyjones said:

I'm not afraid of using my name on the web...as you can tell.   My caveat,  I don't say anything on the web I wouldn't say to the person if they were sitting next to me.   I've typed many things and deleted them before posting.    Socrates: Is it true; is it kind, is it necessary?

That's a bit similar to how I feel. I would 

1 hour ago, Piz said:

Hi Erik...Pete here.  Oops!

Hi Pete!

10 minutes ago, billchao said:

I’m conflicted about internet anonymity. On the one hand it enables people to troll or otherwise behave in a destructive way that they might not in real life. On the other, it allows people to open up about personal issues that they might not be willing or able to do in real life and get support from others who are also more willing to share for the same reasons.

Yeah, and I appreciate that. But a lot of those forums that deal in those things protect anonymity somewhat. We're just talking about golf here. 🙂

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, ScottF said:

I run a small forum mostly used by members of a fishing club but open to anyone. I require that all registrants use only their real name. No alias’. For one, I need to know who the paid members are and by posting with their real name, they are much less likely to be rude or cause trouble. 

First and last? Or, just first?


Posted

I prefer first and last, but I allow first name and last initial. I need enough to identify the person.  I’m sure it cuts down on the number of registrations, but I don’t care. I really only want our members on the site. If it keeps out the trolls, so much the better 


Posted

I see you're venting but I'm gonna "assume" that you also would like to hear opinions so here's mine:

It's your forum and your rules. You can call someone whatever you please and it's sort of like "excessive" golf fees - if someone doesn't like it there is nothing stopping them from moving on. Do I think it's "doxing"? No. It might be a breach of etiquette, though, given that you're privy to info that maybe hasn't been freely shared by the member - including a first name.

Given that, I would prefer to be known as "Zippo". My username pretty well describes my knowledge on a lot of subjects including golf. If I wanted to be called "Randall" I would log on as Randall, or some derivative if the moniker was already in use. When I participated in a couple of motorcycle forums I was Zippo. I called my motorcycle the "Zipsicle" (except for my Goldwing. That I called the "Bulgecycle").

I am not anonymous here. You know who I am. I gave you that info when I signed up but I did so with the expectation that it would not be shared, except by me. There are only a few forum members that I might ever meet and, if I did, they would certainly learn my name. But I would hope that they would still address me on this forum as "Zippo". Even my hats have "Zippo" on them.

Should I ever use abuse my privilege of "anonymity" I assume that you, or one of the mods, would rightfully limit my use of the forum until I corrected the offensive behavior. I don't expect it to ever come to that, though. I'm here for the fun and the learning - not to be abusing people.


  • Administrator
Posted

@Zippo, two quick notes:

  • I don't know who you are.
  • I am not an admin on the other forum. I said "Randall" the same way I might say "Hey, Matt" in someone named "Matt"'s Member Swing topic.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Whenever I meet someone or an introduced to someone for the first time they shake their hand and give them my name. My real name. More often than not, both my first and last names.

Why would sharing my name on a forum be any different than sharing it verbally to someone I don’t now?

David

...and yep, I live in Florida!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Whenever I meet someone or an introduced to someone for the first time they shake their hand and give them my name. My real name. More often than not, both my first and last names.

Why would sharing my name on a forum be any different than sharing it verbally to someone I don’t now?

David

...and yep, I live in Florida!

When you meet someone for the first time, shake their hand and have a conversation, the scope of that conversation is pretty tightly bounded. The contents will be known to the two parties, maybe a few third parties, and perhaps a bystander or two.

When you engage in a conversation with that same person over the internet, the contents of your conversation are available to just about anyone with a computer and access to the internet.

Now on a golf forum, that's a fairly low risk proposition. Even if someone knows who I am, where I live and what I do for a living, they aren't going to find much on here that could get me into trouble. On a political message board, that's an entirely different story. 

I don't know the type of forum that Erik is referring to above, but I do think it is valid in some cases for people to want to remain completely anonymous online.

Edited by Big C
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There is no anonymous. Once they post or sign up or text it’s grabbed and stored should the need ever arise to use it against them. 


  • Moderator
Posted
6 hours ago, Zippo said:

I see you're venting but I'm gonna "assume" that you also would like to hear opinions so here's mine:

It's your forum and your rules. You can call someone whatever you please and it's sort of like "excessive" golf fees - if someone doesn't like it there is nothing stopping them from moving on. Do I think it's "doxing"? No. It might be a breach of etiquette, though, given that you're privy to info that maybe hasn't been freely shared by the member - including a first name.

Given that, I would prefer to be known as "Zippo". My username pretty well describes my knowledge on a lot of subjects including golf. If I wanted to be called "Randall" I would log on as Randall, or some derivative if the moniker was already in use. When I participated in a couple of motorcycle forums I was Zippo. I called my motorcycle the "Zipsicle" (except for my Goldwing. That I called the "Bulgecycle").

I am not anonymous here. You know who I am. I gave you that info when I signed up but I did so with the expectation that it would not be shared, except by me. There are only a few forum members that I might ever meet and, if I did, they would certainly learn my name. But I would hope that they would still address me on this forum as "Zippo". Even my hats have "Zippo" on them.

Should I ever use abuse my privilege of "anonymity" I assume that you, or one of the mods, would rightfully limit my use of the forum until I corrected the offensive behavior. I don't expect it to ever come to that, though. I'm here for the fun and the learning - not to be abusing people.

I think this is fine and Zippo is a cool nickname too, easy to remember and type. My first name is shown because I am a moderator and I’ve introduced myself on an older thread.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 hours ago, Big C said:

When you meet someone for the first time, shake their hand and have a conversation, the scope of that conversation is pretty tightly bounded. The contents will be known to the two parties, maybe a few third parties, and perhaps a bystander or two.

When you engage in a conversation with that same person over the internet, the contents of your conversation are available to just about anyone with a computer and access to the internet.

Now on a golf forum, that's a fairly low risk proposition. Even if someone knows who I am, where I live and what I do for a living, they aren't going to find much on here that could get me into trouble. On a political message board, that's an entirely different story. 

I don't know the type of forum that Erik is referring to above, but I do think it is valid in some cases for people to want to remain completely anonymous online.

The topic was golf. It wasn’t particularly personal and the first name is a common one.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I post on a small number of message boards, and it is incredibly weak to ban someone (or otherwise penalize them) for using the first name of a poster; especially if that poster has made the information available in other places on that board. Once you post it, it is there forever.
And while I'm in agreement that message boards and social media would be a better place if people used their real names (yes, I get the irony) - but I also remember a board years ago, Bitter Rivals, which someone figured out a way to hack IP information or user registration and went about doxxing a large number of people. At the time I mainly just read the board and didn't post, but it was eye opening and scary to see how vindictive people could be and started contacting peoples employers, family and causing havoc in others lives. 

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1948 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.