Jump to content
IGNORED

The Main Difference Between Good and Bad Golfers…


Vinsk
Note: This thread is 806 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

AgEXQU5MZ1BUdWZlUnpDOS1OT1BrcFAyMGcAMA

According to Top 100 Teacher Martin Chuck, the biggest difference between good and bad golfers can...

I disagree. I’ve known and played with many golfers who had consistent ( sometimes aggravating ) pre-shot routines and were all still poor golfers. Thoughts?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

43 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

I disagree. I’ve known and played with many golfers who had consistent ( sometimes aggravating ) pre-shot routines and were all still poor golfers. Thoughts?

The biggest difference between Top 100 Teachers and bad ones, is that stupid statements by bad teachers don't end up in Golf Magazine, while...

  • Funny 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think the biggest difference is that good golfers have an understanding of what it is they are doing.  Golf requires a modicum of discipline and judgement.  It requires a modicum of skill.  Bad golfers complain, or joke, that they play poorly; but ignore the steps necessary to improve.

  • Like 1

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The more I think about this, the more I question the title of the article. The idea that there could be one thing that separates good from bad is really silly. Who defines good? Is good touring pro? If so, there are about 20-30mph of swing speed that separates us plenty.

This article would be better served being titled,  "One thing that could help you play your best more often". Not exactly catchy, but would have been a more accurate title.

51 minutes ago, chspeed said:

The biggest difference between Top 100 Teachers and bad ones, is that stupid statements by bad teachers don't end up in Golf Magazine, while...

Not really fair. Martin Chuck is a pretty good teacher. We don't know what the magazine told him, or how they potentially twisted what he said.

However, rating golf coaches is blasphemy. There is absolutely no point, and it is all bullsh*t. Similar to US News and their completely bogus college rankings.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, mchepp said:

rating golf coaches is blasphemy

It's not good, no.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
15 hours ago, Vinsk said:
AgEXQU5MZ1BUdWZlUnpDOS1OT1BrcFAyMGcAMA

According to Top 100 Teacher Martin Chuck, the biggest difference between good and bad golfers can...

I disagree. I’ve known and played with many golfers who had consistent ( sometimes aggravating ) pre-shot routines and were all still poor golfers. Thoughts?

I think you would be better served re-reading old Highlights magazines in your office waiting room than reading Golf magazine. Pete and RePete was my favorite.

  • Funny 4

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 hours ago, Vinsk said:
AgEXQU5MZ1BUdWZlUnpDOS1OT1BrcFAyMGcAMA

According to Top 100 Teacher Martin Chuck, the biggest difference between good and bad golfers can...

I disagree. I’ve known and played with many golfers who had consistent ( sometimes aggravating ) pre-shot routines and were all still poor golfers. Thoughts?

There is an entire 222 page book dedicated to this subject.

1379096987_41d1DHM7gGL._SX311_BO1204203200_.jpg.0241aa9228da5cce55047850f0dcd714.jpg

In this book the author goes into great detail talking about how having a very consistent AND a very GOOD pre-shot routine will lead you to finding and staying in "The Zone". He puts some research in there about the pros playing their best when their pre-shot routines are very consistent, even down to the quarter of a second. He also talks about how when things went off the rails for players, their pre-shot routine would change. Sometimes taking much longer, sometimes much shorter. He never really "proves" that the lack of a consistent pre-shot routine causes the player to go off the rails. Or whether going off the rails causes the pre-shot routine to change. But I honestly don't think he tries to. He just tries to prove correlation, not causation. 

I will say that the author stresses 4 things over and over.

  1. Your pre-shot routine must be consistent
  2. You pre-shot routine must be a good one. (He gives lots of information about what a good pre-shot routine is. He also gives a lot of information about what makes a bad pre-shot routine.) 
  3. Using your pre-shot routine before every shot will allow you to play "your best golf". What "your best golf" is will be defined by some combination of your natural abilities, the quality of your instruction, and your practice habits. 
  4. Using a high-quality, consistent pre-shot routine before every shot will help you fine "The Zone" easier, and stay in "The Zone" longer. 

Overall, the book is a descent read. It's not particularly long. I've actually read it twice. 

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 3

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Anytime you use phrases like "Exhibit A" and then use Tiger to get you are going to lose credibility (at least in my eyes). I don't think that I would be fooled by anyone with a solid pre-shot routine that skanks it 7 times reaching the par 5. I think we all have seen that guy. His pre-shot routine is so US Open, wears the pro-style garb, and takes 3 hours to play 9 holes. He left out the putting pre-shot routine, which when 4 putting, is crucial to preventing the dreaded 5 putt. 

Now this critique is not really fair for the caliber of pro that was trying to get the idea across that pre-shot routines are important and I am sure someone wrote this piece for him to be relatable to the general public. But if you are a 25 capper, just get on with it please. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Funny 1

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5*| Rad Tour 18.5*  | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Interesting how the article emphasizes mental with this with the phrase "calms the mind and puts you in a mental state for a solid swing."  

There is probably a difference between a consistent pre-shot routine and a good pre-shot routine. Experienced bad golfers (like me) generally do the same things each time before a shot. Those things may or may not be a bigger part of our problem. It's not inconceivable to think that we are consistently making mistakes in our setup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, TourSpoon said:

Anytime you use phrases like "Exhibit A" and then use Tiger to get you are going to lose credibility (at least in my eyes). I don't think that I would be fooled by anyone with a solid pre-shot routine that skanks it 7 times reaching the par 5. I think we all have seen that guy. His pre-shot routine is so US Open, wears the pro-style garb, and takes 3 hours to play 9 holes. He left out the putting pre-shot routine, which when 4 putting, is crucial to preventing the dreaded 5 putt. 

Now this critique is not really fair for the caliber of pro that was trying to get the idea across that pre-shot routines are important and I am sure someone wrote this piece for him to be relatable to the general public. But if you are a 25 capper, just get on with it please. 

I find it interesting that everyone assumes that if you have a good consistent pre-shot routine, (whether you are a poor or great golfer) people assume that means you are going to play slower. Having a good consistent pre-shot routine can actually make you play faster-Sometimes a lot fast. If your routine is check the line, stand over the ball, raise your eyes to the target one more time, look at the ball and pull the trigger. Doing that every time will be a lot faster than if sometimes you stand over the ball and take a practice swing, sometimes 2, sometimes 3 or 4 or 9, then you look at the line, but then sometimes you back away to re-look at the line and then sometimes you add a waggle, other times you don't. 

Knowing what you are going to do each time will speed up play. Being consistent will speed up play. The problem isn't in having a good consistent pre-shot routine. The problem is either having a wildly variable pre-shot routine, which slows everything down, because nobody (including you) knows what you are going to do. Or having a ridiculously long pre-shot routine. Which is the same as not having a "good" pre-shot routine. 

If your pre-shot routine is 10 seconds long and very consistent. Even if you shoot 120, that's still only 20 minutes. That's not what makes players slow. Not knowing where to put their bag. Not picking up on a hole. Hunting for balls. Counting up their score standing on the green. That's the kind of stuff that makes a player slow. 

I fully agree, that some folks have a pre-shot routine which is way too long. But the discussion with them is not to go without a routine, but to learn to have a "correct" routine. My putting routine used to be much too long. Somebody told me about it and I've trimmed it down to the essentials and now I'm probably one of the fastest players on the green you will ever play with. 

  • Thumbs Up 4

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I find it interesting that everyone assumes that if you have a good consistent pre-shot routine, (whether you are a poor or great golfer) people assume that means you are going to play slower. Having a good consistent pre-shot routine can actually make you play faster-Sometimes a lot fast. If your routine is check the line, stand over the ball, raise your eyes to the target one more time, look at the ball and pull the trigger. Doing that every time will be a lot faster than if sometimes you stand over the ball and take a practice swing, sometimes 2, sometimes 3 or 4 or 9, then you look at the line, but then sometimes you back away to re-look at the line and then sometimes you add a waggle, other times you don't. 

Knowing what you are going to do each time will speed up play. Being consistent will speed up play. The problem isn't in having a good consistent pre-shot routine. The problem is either having a wildly variable pre-shot routine, which slows everything down, because nobody (including you) knows what you are going to do. Or having a ridiculously long pre-shot routine. Which is the same as not having a "good" pre-shot routine. 

If your pre-shot routine is 10 seconds long and very consistent. Even if you shoot 120, that's still only 20 minutes. That's not what makes players slow. Not knowing where to put their bag. Not picking up on a hole. Hunting for balls. Counting up their score standing on the green. That's the kind of stuff that makes a player slow. 

I fully agree, that some folks have a pre-shot routine which is way too long. But the discussion with them is not to go without a routine, but to learn to have a "correct" routine. My putting routine used to be much too long. Somebody told me about it and I've trimmed it down to the essentials and now I'm probably one of the fastest players on the green you will ever play with. 

Good points, I was just going on the target audience that the article was written for. Using Tiger as the example just makes this a generic article targeted for the masses. The masses then relate to their PGA Tour viewing experience of what a pre-shot routine looks like and how long it should be. Talk to the caddy, reference the yardage book, throw up some grass, talk over the shot, take some practice swings, step in and go. If the article was actually written for actual golfers, he would have been specific about the process. 

If we are writing a meaningful article, I would like for it to talk about pre-shot routine as part of your responsibilities as soon as it is your turn. The yardages and wind calculations should be done before that to give you the mental picture of what you are envisioning. Then when its your turn, execute the routine in a timely manner as not to delay. If you want to look at a player to emulate, look at Matt Jones. Here is an article that I just found. It is written on the same grade level, but I love the quote, "If you play, play fast. If you play badly, play faster." 

GettyImages-1308331038.jpg

PGA Tour commentator Mark Immelman is a big fan of Matt Jones' game. Here's why, and how you can lean from it for your own game.

I agree, having a plan is better than not having one. Even high caps can execute their best games and play quickly. I can play with anyone, as long as they keep pace. 

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5*| Rad Tour 18.5*  | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | Vice Pro Plus  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, TourSpoon said:

The masses then relate to their PGA Tour viewing experience of what a pre-shot routine looks like and how long it should be. Talk to the caddy, reference the yardage book, throw up some grass, talk over the shot, take some practice swings, step in and go.

Where's the poll asking how long our pre-shot routines are???

In the interest of transparency mine is about 2 seconds.  I take a half swing practice swing just to make sure all the muscles and joints haven't locked up.  Then I move to the ball and hit it.  I've already checked the wind, lie, slope, yardage, etc. while others are hitting their shots, with 27 second pre-shot routines, no less.

Good thing the best 3 point shooters in the NBA don't have a pre-shot routine...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, TourSpoon said:

I can play with anyone, as long as they keep pace. 

Ding! 

This is the correct answer. In casual rounds I'm pretty sure I don't have any idea what my playing partners shot unless we are betting on something. I can, however, tell you which ones I don't want to play with ever again because they simply take so G.D. long to hit. 

4 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Good thing the best 3 point shooters in the NBA don't have a pre-shot routine...

The best free throw shooters do. Somebody did a study on Steph Curry's pre-shot routine when shooting free throws. It probably doesn't surprise you that for all of his free throws the time it takes from the time the ref hands him the ball to the time he releases it is nearly exactly the same every single time .... He's over 93% from the line. Without a doubt he has a pre-shot routine. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, ChetlovesMer said:

The best free throw shooters do. Somebody did a study on Steph Curry's pre-shot routine when shooting free throws. It probably doesn't surprise you that for all of his free throws the time it takes from the time the ref hands him the ball to the time he releases it is nearly exactly the same every single time .... He's over 93% from the line. Without a doubt he has a pre-shot routine. 

Well, then the NBA needs to change the rule and allow a free-throw shooter to be guarded.  😀

Bet you if Steph shot his free throws as fast as he puts up a 3 pointer he'd have a 93.5 average from the line.  He doesn't use that same routine on the golf course, does he?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


43 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Well, then the NBA needs to change the rule and allow a free-throw shooter to be guarded.  😀

Bet you if Steph shot his free throws as fast as he puts up a 3 pointer he'd have a 93.5 average from the line.  He doesn't use that same routine on the golf course, does he?

That's funny. 🤣 Would it still be called a "free throw", or would it then be called a "Unfree throw"

I hear that he's a good golfer. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That article is interesting. I'm not an expert, but I think the main difference between good and bad golfers is that good golfers tend to be closer to the hole than bad golfers after a shot.

  • Like 1
  • Funny 3

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

That article is interesting. I'm not an expert, but I think the main difference between good and bad golfers is that good golfers tend to be closer to the hole than bad golfers after a shot.

Nice.

 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Re: pre-shot routines

Surely the point is that all good players have a consistent pre-shot routine. Not that it's the way to make you a good player.

It does not imply that anyone who has a consistent pre-shot routine is a good player.

Not everyone who smokes a packet of cigarettes a day gets smoking induced lung cancer. But all people who do contract smoking induced lung cancer are smokers.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 806 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I did read the fine print tonight. It said replace with “similar features & function”.  8 yeas ago my purchase had features that today are available on the lower end models and the current version of my model has more “bells & whistles” than what I got 8 years ago.  So I am thinking they honored the agreement and I can’t argue the offer. since getting a credit for the full purchase price all I am really out over the past 8 years was the cost of the extended warranty, which was less than a low end  treadmill would have cost me. now the question is which model to replace with.  I’ll stay with Nordic Track or I forfeit the $1,463 credit so I will get Nordic Track.  And they honored the warranty and were not hard to work with which is a plus.
    • Generally speaking, extended warranties are a terrible deal and should almost always be avoided. They are a huge profit center for the companies that offer them, which should tell you almost everything you need to know about how much value most consumers get when purchasing them.  This is correct, and the old adage applies - only buy insurance when you can't afford the loss. This usually doesn't apply to most consumer goods.  To your second question, no I don't believe the offer is fair. They are replacing it, but it is not being replaced at "no cost to you". Since the amount being disputed (over $500) is non-trivial, I would probably push the issue. Don't waste your time on the phone with a customer service agent or a supervisor. They have probably given you all they have the authority to do. Rather, I would look at the terms of your agreement and specifically legal disputes. The odds are you probably agreed to binding arbitration in the event of a dispute. The agreement will outline what steps need to be followed, but it will probably look something like this.  1. Mail the Nordic Track legal department outlining your dispute and indicate you are not satisfied with the resolution offered.  2. Open up a case with the AAA (American Arbitration Association), along with the required documentation. 3. Wait about 4-5 weeks for a case to be opened - at which point someone from Nordic Track's legal department will offer to give you the new model at no cost to you.  They certainly don't want to spend the time and energy to fight you over $500. 4. Enjoy your new Nordic Track at no cost to you. I recently entered binding arbitration against a fairly large and well known company that screwed me over and refused to make it right. In my demand letter, I made a pretty sizeable request that included compensation for my time and frustration. Once it hit their legal department, they cut me a check - no questions asked. It was far cheaper to settle with me than to send their legal team to defend them in the arbitration.
    • I never thought of looking at it on multiple purchases like you said.  Yes, the extended may help me on 1 or 2 items but not the other 5 or 6.
    • Day 84 - Forgot to post yesterday, but I did some more chipping/pitching.    Back/neck were feeling better today, so I did a much overdue Stack session. 
    • Wordle 1,013 4/6 ⬛⬛🟩🟨⬛ 🟩⬛🟩⬛🟨 🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...