Jump to content
IGNORED

600 Golf Balls in Your Back Yard = $5 Million


iacas
 Share

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Darkfrog said:

Just speculating, but maybe the club's lawyer(s) weren't very good/prepared for the case.

Yeah, but still.. I mean the club lawyers could have sat there picking their noses throughout the hearing but it still seems crazy excessive at face value. SMH. 

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Had I been playing this course they would’ve been awarded $6mil.

  • Funny 2

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
3 hours ago, boogielicious said:

I have no sympathy for these people. Their builder probably had to clear out bushels of golf balls when prepping the lot. They should also be included in the blame here. But FFS, you bought a house on a course! WTF were you thinking?

Yep

Driver: :callaway: Rogue  /  Woods: :tmade: M2 3&5W’s / Hybrid: :tarmour: 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*

Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5W  Ball: :titleist: AVX optic yellow 

 -Jonny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One could make the argument that Tiger Woods could be a co-defendant in the lawsuit. Without his influence in growing the game through his massive popularity over the last 25 years the ball count would undeniably be closer to 200. I would attribute fault to a 33-66 split.  Obviously he gets the larger portion for not just moving the needle, but for being the needle.  

 

Cobra LTDx 9* | Rad Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4-23* | 718 AP2 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | ProV1  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What bothers me a little here is that sets a bad precedent. Every person that lives 200 yards up the right side of a fairway is going to see this and think they can cash in. How many more golf courses are going to get sued because of these two idiots winning this absurd amount of money.  

This whole thing is ridiculous, you bought a house on a golf course for crying out loud. It's like buying a house on a beach in Florida then getting bent out of shape when a hurricane shows up. You knew the risks!

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer golf bag

Driver:   :ping: G425 LST X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :callaway: JAWS MD5 52°, 56°, 60° 
Putter: :scotty_cameron:  Phantom X 5.5                              Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
9 hours ago, NM Golf said:

What bothers me a little here is that sets a bad precedent. Every person that lives 200 yards up the right side of a fairway is going to see this and think they can cash in. How many more golf courses are going to get sued because of these two idiots winning this absurd amount of money.  

This whole thing is ridiculous, you bought a house on a golf course for crying out loud. It's like buying a house on a beach in Florida then getting bent out of shape when a hurricane shows up. You knew the risks!

It's not decided yet. The appeals will last awhile, and they may not actually win in the end. They may just be out a lot of legal fees.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instructor Development, 5 Simple Keys®/Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins • Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 • "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 • Penn-State Behrend Head Coach • • • • • • • • • • :aimpoint: :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | 5SK.com | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 4/28/2022 at 8:26 PM, iacas said:

It's not decided yet. The appeals will last awhile, and they may not actually win in the end. They may just be out a lot of legal fees.

Big pockets usually outlast small ones. The only ones winning are the attorneys! 

Cobra LTDx 9* | Rad Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4-23* | 718 AP2 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | ProV1  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, darthweasel said:

there is a better article about the case available that I came across. The course suggested a line of play in cutting the dogleg that brought the house in question into play, the course was asked multiple times to install a net, refused, the club failed to adhere to their legal obligation under Massachusetts law and basically ignored them repeatedly, they did not ask for any set amount but simply safety remediation and that was the amount awarded. Like many people, when I first heard it I thought it was ridiculous and the more I read up on it the course was willfully negligent and dismissive while actively encouraging that line of play. The amount seems high to me but there is definitely some merit to the case. 

pexels-pixabay-33478.jpg?w=640

The story of the Tenczar family, who sued a country club and won nearly $5 million after too many golf balls damaged their house, struck a nerve with Golfweek readers. Several were quick to point o…

 

There's always more to the story, isn't there?
Thanks for posting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow, that puts it in a completely different light.   Glad someone followed up on the story.   Basically under Mass law, clearly the course needed to do something and they ended up in court.  

—Adam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Interesting, there is a very similar situation that I know of here where people used to cut a dog leg by aiming over houses. The course eliminated that issue by erecting a net down the entire left side of the tee box. I don't think in the situation here it came to need litigation. 

Danny    In my :ping: Hoofer golf bag

Driver:   :ping: G425 LST X-Stiff.                        Irons:  :callaway: 4-PW APEX TCB Irons 
3 Wood: :callaway: Mavrik SZ Rogue X-Stiff                            Nippon Pro Modus 130 X-Stiff
3 Hybrid: :callaway: Mavrik Pro KBS Tour Proto X   Wedges: :callaway: JAWS MD5 52°, 56°, 60° 
Putter: :scotty_cameron:  Phantom X 5.5                              Ball: :titleist: ProV 1

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)

After reading the article it is safe to say that the homeowner's request was justifiable in asking for reasonable (and legally sound) measures to be put into place and the course blew them off. That picture of that house is ridiculous in showing that this is beyond a casual nuisance and a real safety issue. You would have to wear a helmet to mow your yard! INCOMING!!! 

EX.-13A-Picture-Showing-all-Broken-Windows-and-Deck.jpeg

Edited by TourSpoon
grammar

Cobra LTDx 9* | Rad Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4-23* | 718 AP2 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, 58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback No. 1 | ProV1  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 5/4/2022 at 11:38 AM, darthweasel said:

there is a better article about the case available that I came across. The course suggested a line of play in cutting the dogleg that brought the house in question into play, the course was asked multiple times to install a net, refused, the club failed to adhere to their legal obligation under Massachusetts law and basically ignored them repeatedly, they did not ask for any set amount but simply safety remediation and that was the amount awarded. Like many people, when I first heard it I thought it was ridiculous and the more I read up on it the course was willfully negligent and dismissive while actively encouraging that line of play. The amount seems high to me but there is definitely some merit to the case. 

pexels-pixabay-33478.jpg?w=640

The story of the Tenczar family, who sued a country club and won nearly $5 million after too many golf balls damaged their house, struck a nerve with Golfweek readers. Several were quick to point o…

 

Reading some earlier stories and seeing how when the course changed the tee, the problem stopped, I assumed that it was poor hole design. Reading this one I see that it was poor design, combined with minimal effort on the course's part, and even encouraging people to take a bad line. While it theoretically could set a precedence, I don't think it will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


18 hours ago, NM Golf said:

Interesting, there is a very similar situation that I know of here where people used to cut a dog leg by aiming over houses. The course eliminated that issue by erecting a net down the entire left side of the tee box. I don't think in the situation here it came to need litigation. 

course across the river  from me in Vancouver just closed and rightfully so. At one time it was a mediocre course that had its fans and actually had a couple of pretty cool holes...like the Trestle hole... but they kept selling off bits and pieces of land and then slightly rerouting holes. The first couple of holes got much, much worse.

One in particular ended up as something like a 250 yard hole....if you hit it directly over the dogleg and the multiple houses you now crossed. It was a blind shot going that way. The redesign of the hole was intended to hit maybe 140-180 yards out to the right, then approach the hole from there but I am guessing a lot of people, many of questionable abilities, attempted to drive the green. 

It was a redesign that made a mediocre but playable course into one that was legit dangerous. The Cedars...gone, not lamented. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct links for Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package. Save 10% on Mevo with coupon code "IACAS" as well.
  • Posts

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. 65ross
      65ross
      (73 years old)
    2. Billsy
      Billsy
      (54 years old)
    3. Casey 5-Strokes
      Casey 5-Strokes
      (45 years old)
    4. djfajt71
      djfajt71
      (51 years old)
    5. golden_boar
      golden_boar
      (63 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...