Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

From How Far Away Could You Win the Masters?


Note: This thread is 1181 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I saw this on TikTok and I'll post the link, but I thought it was an interesting question. From how far away from (close to) each hole would you have to start to be able to win The Masters? Would it be off the green?

 

c7ead2d7c1d245ee905814e391d28ba4_1665539

How close would you have to start on each hole? #golf #hypothetical #themasters

 

  • Thumbs Up 2

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think 100 yards. I have a decent wedge game and potentially could play some of the par 5’s and 4’s under par. Presumably I would have a caddie to give me sound targets and I would have played some practice rounds.

Of course the pressure of playing in front of thousands of patrons and millions of TV viewers might result in a mental melt down.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If I had a few practice rounds?  Definitely from the tips!
 

For real though, with a couple practice rounds and an experienced caddy like Pappy Stokes, I would say 135 and in I’d have a fighting chance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ok, now that I started to think about it, this is tricky. 

Winning score is usually -12 to -16. 

I am thinking, what gets me pars on every hole, and lets me birdie every par 5. 

Like at 190 yards, I could hit 6 iron into every green. I am putting for double eagle or getting up and down for eagle on every par 5. Maybe I take this back to like hybrid into the holes? It makes every hole drivable. So, like 230 for the hybrid? Even if you miss he green, you are getting up and down for birdie, not par. Odds of making a bogey are very low, as long as you avoid the water hazards. Then, on the par 5's you might putt for double eagle a few times, and getting up and down for eagle most of the time. I think that a lone can win. You end up -3 to -4 every round just on the par 5s. You get a few birdies on the par 4's. 

I will say 230 yards. Let me hit my hybrid on every hole for the par 4's and par 5's. Maybe I could be completely off. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

1 foot from the hole.

Jokes apart, maybe a 100 yards in since I would be hitting a PW and can hopefully hit the green every time.  Not that it would guarantee me victory given my putting is the weakest part of my game but with some practice and reasonably close shots to the pin, I might have a chance

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Realistically, thinking of my best ever, when I was 6-7 index, I might have a chance from say 20-50 yards from every green. Might even need to be on every green, I don't know. Those greens are insanely fast and sloped, and it's possible to putt off them, to 5 and 6 putt if you are in the wrong location, etc. Even from a distance as short as 100 yards, single digit players are maybe hitting 60% of greens? Tour pros hit 75% of greens from 100 yards. So any of us are going to WIN the masters hitting from 100 on every hole? I don't think so. For the handful of eagles we might make on the par 5s - if we can putt those greens - there'll be an offsetting number of bogeys and doubles. 

Edited by Big Lex

JP Bouffard

"I cut a little driver in there." -- Jim Murray

Driver: Titleist 915 D3, ACCRA Shaft 9.5*.
3W: Callaway XR,
3,4 Hybrid: Taylor Made RBZ Rescue Tour, Oban shaft.
Irons: 5-GW: Mizuno JPX800, Aerotech Steelfiber 95 shafts, S flex.
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM5 56 degree, M grind
Putter: Edel Custom Pixel Insert 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Quick thoughts… I'm going with @saevel25 on this one. Just let me hit a hybrid to just about everything and I could win. Maybe a bit more — I'm a better putter with a better short game than Matt.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Tap ins.

  • Like 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah I feel like if you put me more than a few steps off the green, in the heat of competition, in tournament conditions, I could very easily be chipping over the green or laying sod on every other chip.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I would need to be 40 yards in for every tee shot on par 3s and 2nd shots on par all 4s and 5s. 

I can bunt it within makeable range at least 25% of times. Par 5s would be all but guarantee birdies with some eagle opportunities. My putting has been a tad bit better. 

Working backwards, that puts me at 250-260 yards for par 4s and par 5s so can hit hybrids or try to swell up on a downhiller like 11th with a driver.

I am a 42S for sizing (snug fit please). Wife frowns up on frumpy fitting jackets. Just saying..

Edited by GolfLug
  • Funny 1

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

My brother, who is 71 years old and a 7-handicap player, was lucky enough to play Augusta back in February. He said that from tee to green, it isn't really all that hard compared to many other places he has played (he has played most of the top 20 courses in America). 

He says the difficulty is the greens and the green complexes. Even when you hit the greens, avoiding a three putt is a challenge. He said it is the hardest putting golf course he has ever played, so take that into consideration when you do your calculations for this exercise.

Edited by phan52

Bill M

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, phan52 said:

He says the difficulty is the greens and the green complexes. Even when you hit the greens, avoiding a three putt is a challenge. He said it is the hardest putting golf course he has ever played, so take that into consideration when you do your calculations for this exercise.

I can see that for those who maybe have not played older courses like Augusta. 

My equation does assume using Aimpoint, and that the greens will be perfect, which helps out versus lower end golf courses. I have played a good number of Donald Ross courses, that have diabolical green complexes, so the shock will not be there. 

I still think, if people had a hybrid or long iron into the green, they would not get boggy and have huge advantage on the par 5's. The question is, to win, so I could see that hitting the green would be a highest priority, and maybe a mid iron would be a more correct. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 hours ago, phan52 said:

My brother, who is 71 years old and a 7-handicap player, was lucky enough to play Augusta back in February. He said that from tee to green, it isn't really all that hard compared to many other places he has played (he has played most of the top 20 courses in America). 

He says the difficulty is the greens and the green complexes. Even when you hit the greens, avoiding a three putt is a challenge. He said it is the hardest putting golf course he has ever played, so take that into consideration when you do your calculations for this exercise.

I have. Oakmont, etc. have difficult greens, too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am also of the opinion that regardless of reasonable length, you still have to place your ball in the correct spot on the green and putt. That seems to be key. I would love to give this a try so that I can hit from 90 yards on the par 3s, 225 on the par 4s, and 400 on the par 5s. I am not sure I would take a green jacket, but it would be a blast trying! 

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

Pains me to say it but I'm gonna go with 50 yards right now. I'll reply again in a year and hopefully that number is farther back! 😄

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
11 hours ago, JetFan1983 said:

Pains me to say it but I'm gonna go with 50 yards right now. I'll reply again in a year and hopefully that number is farther back! 😄

I would say 100 yards, a partial PW shot to each green. I was going to say 8 iron, but I can pull that and it would be bad for holes like 11.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
On 10/14/2022 at 6:47 AM, pganapathy said:

maybe a 100 yards in since I would be hitting a PW and can hopefully hit the green every time.  

Such an unrealistic expectation.

In the 2022 PGA Tour season, the PGA tour GIR average from 100-125yds was only 75%, and some very very good players, Reed, Hatton, Hovland, etc were under 70%. Think about that. Patrick Reed hit less than 7 out of 10 greens from 100-125 and you expect to hit the green every time from 100yds at Augusta as a 12 handicap?? 

Edited by klineka

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1181 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.