Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

He completes the douchiest current foursome of with Fatrick, Poulter and Sergio. Or in honor of the Olympics, the douchiest relay team. 😂

  • Funny 2

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

He completes the douchiest current foursome of with Fatrick, Poulter and Sergio. Or in honor of the Olympics, the douchiest relay team. 😂

Hey! Perfect LIV team: ‘The Douche Bags’

  • Funny 1

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
35 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

He completes the douchiest current foursome of with Fatrick, Poulter and Sergio. Or in honor of the Olympics, the douchiest relay team. 😂

How did Rahm not make that team?

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

How did Rahm not make that team?

On standby for his invitation.

  • Funny 1

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Rahm makes the team on his face value alone

  • Funny 1

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 hours ago, GolfLug said:

That's my take away. The BS about setting an example for Greyserman does not pass the smell test.

Kuchar is too selfish/self-centered to spend an extra second, let alone hanging around on a Monday to benefit anyone else. It's too much of a stretch for him to do it for sake of a slow-play protest either.

This can't be about anyone but himself.

This..

What a complete lack of consideration for other people, many of whom will be paid a fraction of the money he has pocketed and many who will possibly have been volunteering. In the four ball of douche he is definitely included. 

Just now, Beastie said:

This..

What a complete lack of consideration for other people, many of whom will be paid a fraction of the money he has pocketed and many who will possibly have been volunteering. In the four ball of douche he is definitely included. 

Greyserman did not enjoy the last 6 holes did he.

Stevie T

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why should Matt harm himself for the benefit of the rest of the field or the convenience of the tournament staff? If he considered important the score of the last hole, then it was ok for him waiting until the next day to finish his round. Good for him for standing up for what he believed and not cave under the criticism that was about to fall over him. 
Liked him even more when he said that he wasn't on social media either! 👏 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

Why should Matt harm himself for the benefit of the rest of the field or the convenience of the tournament staff? If he considered important the score of the last hole, then it was ok for him waiting until the next day to finish his round. Good for him for standing up for what he believed and not cave under the criticism that was about to fall over him. 
Liked him even more when he said that he wasn't on social media either! 👏 

He  could  have taken out  his  putter and finished the hole putting from the fairway and  it would  have  made  no difference to him or anyone else. 

Same dumb schtick since joining.


  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, p1n9183 said:

Why should Matt harm himself for the benefit of the rest of the field or the convenience of the tournament staff? If he considered important the score of the last hole, then it was ok for him waiting until the next day to finish his round. Good for him for standing up for what he believed and not cave under the criticism that was about to fall over him.

As someone said above, just because it's your right to do something doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. We live in a world with other people, and it was a self-centered move.

He's being appropriately pilloried for it, IMO.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

Why should Matt harm himself for the benefit of the rest of the field or the convenience of the tournament staff? 

How would him have finishing the hole on Sunday harmed himself? 

As multiple people in this thread have already stated, whether he made birdie par or bogey it would not have affected his playoff positioning, change his ability to support himself/his family financially, and his job security for next season. 

Also you're assuming that had he played it out on Sunday that automatically would have brought "harm" (whatever that means) onto himself. For all we know he might have hit a better shot on Sunday than he did Monday. 

It is a fact that his decision benefitted himself while inconveniencing dozens to possibly 100+ others.

It is not a fact that had he finished the hole Sunday that would have brought harm onto himself. 

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
40 minutes ago, klineka said:

How would him have finishing the hole on Sunday harmed himself? 

As multiple people in this thread have already stated, whether he made birdie par or bogey it would not have affected his playoff positioning, change his ability to support himself/his family financially, and his job security for next season. 

Also you're assuming that had he played it out on Sunday that automatically would have brought "harm" (whatever that means) onto himself. For all we know he might have hit a better shot on Sunday than he did Monday. 

It is a fact that his decision benefitted himself while inconveniencing dozens to possibly 100+ others.

It is not a fact that had he finished the hole Sunday that would have brought harm onto himself. 

How did it benefit him to wait until Monday? Financially? Also, how many ranking points difference would it have made? That's more than a financial gain. That could be the difference between playing in the Masters vs not.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

How did it benefit him to wait until Monday? Financially? Also, how many ranking points difference would it have made? That's more than a financial gain. That could be the difference between playing in the Masters vs not.

@p1n9183 claimed Kuchar would have been harmed had he finished Sunday which is not something we know for a fact.

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
51 minutes ago, klineka said:

@p1n9183 claimed Kuchar would have been harmed had he finished Sunday which is not something we know for a fact.

I don't think we need to know he would have been harmed, just that he might have been. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 minutes ago, Ty_Webb said:

I don't think we need to know he would have been harmed, just that he might have been. 

He weighed his potential (and minuscule) amount of "harm" against the for-certain "harm" to about 70 to 100 other people and came down, in no great surprise, in favor of himself.

Go figure.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, iacas said:

He weighed his potential (and minuscule) amount of "harm" against the for-certain "harm" to about 70 to 100 other people and came down, in no great surprise, in favor of himself.

Go figure.

One shot better would have given him three more OWGR points. 0.06 on his average, which is 4 places higher in the current OWGR (87 vs 91). Depending on how he plays over the next six months, that could be the difference between 50th and 51st come time for the Masters. Do you think that's unreasonable for him to care about that?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 minute ago, Ty_Webb said:

One shot better would have given him three more OWGR points. 0.06 on his average, which is 4 places higher in the current OWGR (87 vs 91). Depending on how he plays over the next six months, that could be the difference between 50th and 51st come time for the Masters. Do you think that's unreasonable for him to care about that?

Given the circumstances, absolutely.

As has been said, it's not like he was guaranteed a bogey if he finished, or a par if he played the next day.

His "reason" was bullshit, too: he supposedly did it as a protest because he wasn't told they were still in the fairway on 18 when he hit into them.

Dude's 46. Late in the back nine of a PGA Tour career. Admirable he's still top 100, but… dude. Get out of the way.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Ty_Webb said:

One shot better would have given him three more OWGR points. 0.06 on his average, which is 4 places higher in the current OWGR (87 vs 91). Depending on how he plays over the next six months, that could be the difference between 50th and 51st come time for the Masters. Do you think that's unreasonable for him to care about that?

What you’re saying is he had a number of personal reasons to ignore the consequences of extending the tournament one more day for other people? That’s pretty much what everyone has said in this thread. I think on that we are all in agreement. Where people stand on different sides is whether his actions were justified or not.

You know what I just realized this reminds me of? People who go into a restaurant five minutes before closing for a full service meal.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

One shot better would have given him three more OWGR points. 0.06 on his average, which is 4 places higher in the current OWGR (87 vs 91). Depending on how he plays over the next six months, that could be the difference between 50th and 51st come time for the Masters. Do you think that's unreasonable for him to care about that?

Right. He could have just said that if these were the reasons he was protecting for and people would find it a bit more palatable. Instead he BSed about a protest, dragging bunch of collateral innocents with him. 

Yes, nobody died or anything but dude is afflicted with serious myopia and is a total Karen. 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.