Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

what is your go to shot from 100 yards in the fairway?


Note: This thread is 3548 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

It depends if I have to fly the ball over a hazard, or if I have clear sailing to my target. 

AW to fly the ball 100 yards. 8i if I can roll it there. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Depends but in calm conditions where it's just a yardage thing either 54 or 58. Recently reconfigured so my most lofted club is a 54 and full on its my 110-115 club but inside 125 I hit a lot of flighted/partial shots. 

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I like a full swing into my target, im not consistant enough when shortning my backswing i guess its a rtyhm thing, It maybe a good enough excuse for a new wedge my 60 good for about 90 and my 56 is about 110

O.E.F VET 11B East Texas!


Posted
1 hour ago, No Mulligans said:

PW mostly, or a 9i or 8i... it depends.

I wouldn't be taking a full swing with any of them.  A full swing with my SW is about 90 yards.  

Regardless, why would someone take a full swing from 100 yards?

First of all, 100 yards is still a pretty significant full shot for most people. Second it's for more spin.

The main reason is to create enough spin to stop on the green from close up. You can't bump and run everything.

For example, I actually pulled one off a flop shot today getting me over a high bunker onto an island green stopping close enough for the up and down. It was only 30 yards or so, but still a pretty aggressive swing with a nearly 30 degree open face on my 60 wedge. It's a really tough shot for me, but I've been practicing it for the past few months or so. My 70 to 100 yard approach shot is somewhere between nearly or actually a full swing 56 to 60 depending upon the situation.

Open the face and try to hit your 60 10-40 yards, it will pretty much stop on a dime, but you make a pretty aggressive swing. You can also change the angle that you open the face to help change the distance.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Gap Wedge (50°). Just a bit under a full swing.

If there are branches overhead to worry about, I've had pretty good luck hitting 100 yards or less with a gripped-down 5iron punch.

I haven't learned how to flight my wedges yet.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ive found my dispersion left and right is better when I hit a flighted GW instead of trying to hit my 54 degree 100 yards.  I can hit it that far but that requires a perfect strike with a lot of speed. Im much more confident hitting the flighted shot.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It depends. I can hit ~100 yards with my 52, PW, or 9 iron.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Anything from a 7-iron to a sand wedge.

  • Upvote 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, No Mulligans said:

Regardless, why would someone take a full swing from 100 yards?

Because I suck at golf.  ;-)

From 100 yards, I'm hitting a "full" sand wedge (54-degree).  I can hit it about 105, so 100 is a perfect distance for a full swing without swinging out of my shoes.

I'm not good enough where I should be introducing more variables, so I try to take full swings whenever possible (for now). 

 

  • Upvote 2

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Most typically an "A" wedge ... 

Ken Proud member of the iSuk Golf Association ... Sponsored by roofing companies across the US, Canada, and the UK

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
30 minutes ago, Lihu said:

First of all, 100 yards is still a pretty significant full shot for most people. Second it's for more spin.

The main reason is to create enough spin to stop on the green from close up. You can't bump and run everything.

 

I'm more accurate with a 3/4 or a 1/2 swing and I can get enough spin with a 3/4 PW to stop it on a green almost as well as a full SW.  For me, at 100 yards and less a full swing is the exception not the rule.

A full out of your shoes swing with a LW moonshot,  it's just harder to be accurate.  Isn't that why @iacas recommends and often flights his wedges.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

I'm more accurate with a 3/4 or a 1/2 swing and I can get enough spin with a 3/4 PW to stop it on a green almost as well as a full SW.  For me, at 100 yards and less a full swing is the exception not the rule.

A full out of your shoes swing with a LW moonshot,  it's just harder to be accurate.  Isn't that why @iacas recommends and often flights his wedges.

Never said that. Always controlled.

100 yards is still a pretty long way to be controlling a 1/2 swing. Interesting. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Well assuming the ground is level and there are no trees, probably a PW or 9.  If I am swinging well that day, definitely the PW.

Also I don't about everyone else, but half swing versus full swing is only about 10 yds.  The ball just flies higher with the full swing.  If I want more distance, and lower trajectory, set the ball back in my stance and then distance will change more.


Posted

Because I don't know how to get spin (much less control it), I prefer a high shot that doesn't roll out much. it's simply the best I can do with my skill level and swing speed. I'm in the same mindset as @Hardspoon.

I've seen my ball spin backwards on the green a couple of times and thought, "well that's a kind of cool". But it wasn't anything intentional or repeatable.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, JonMA1 said:

Because I don't know how to get spin (much less control it), I prefer a high shot that doesn't roll out much. it's simply the best I can do with my skill level and swing speed. I'm in the same mindset as @Hardspoon.

I've seen my ball spin backwards on the green a couple of times and thought, "well that's a kind of cool". But it wasn't anything intentional or repeatable.

Completely agree, and this is a good option to have. You can control distances reasonably with this method as well from closer up. You can't bump and run every thing.

Flighting a club is useful in some situations and flopping is useful sometimes. The more options you have in your bag the better. The standard pitch and chip shots per the methods described on this site are a good stock method for me, and everything else is icing on the cake.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 minutes ago, Lihu said:

Completely agree, and this is a good option to have. You can control distances with this method as well.

You can't bump and run every thing. Flighting a club is useful in some situations and flopping is useful sometimes. The more options you have in your bag the better.

 

There is a wide array of shots between a full LW and a bump and run. I will pretty much never make a full swing with a LW unless it is out of the rough. With a clean lie a well struck 3/4 SW or GW will drop and stop on just about any green.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, SavvySwede said:

There a big array of shots between a full LW and a bump and run. I will pretty much never hit a full swing with a LW unless it is out of the rough. With a clean lie a well struck 3/4 SW or GW will drop and stop on just about any green.

Sure, and looking at my GG stats I pretty much never do as well. However, I like to have the option for 70-80 yard shots even though it's rare that I end up at that distance. I also employ 52, 56 and my PW sometimes an 8i or whatever if I need to duck a shot under a tree. I consider those shots a variant of bump and run. I suppose I "flight" my clubs without knowing the term as well.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, JMHARDING said:

I like a full swing into my target, im not consistant enough when shortning my backswing i guess its a rtyhm thing, It maybe a good enough excuse for a new wedge my 60 good for about 90 and my 56 is about 110

Interesting. I'm thinking a shorter swing means more control for most here....

So with that 56, that's a very lofty 100 yards?

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


Note: This thread is 3548 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.