Jump to content
IGNORED

Brandel Gives Tiger an F/ Tiger's Agent Hints at Legal Action Against Chamblee


Valleygolfer
Note: This thread is 3830 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

For whatever it is worth Brandel didn't say "Tiger was a Cavalier" he said he "was cavalier with the rules".  The un-capitalized word cavalier means showing disregard or acting with disregard for something that is important or serious.

Well, first of all, I wasn't trying to be too technical there, I was just trying to be smart-alecky and funny.  Intentionally going with the wrong definition WAS precisely the point of my silly joke.  Misdirection, if you will.  (Whether or not you find it funny ... well that's a whole different story)

However, since you're nit-picking ;-) ...

According to dictionary.com, what I quoted was the first definition of the un-capitalized version of the word.  The capitalized version, Cavalier, apparently means one thing and one thing only: "a supporter of Charles I during the English Civil War."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 761
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

So what was the point of Brandel's cheating story?

He just needed to get it off his chest. It was eating him up inside!

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well, first of all, I wasn't trying to be too technical there, I was just trying to be smart-alecky and funny.  Intentionally going with the wrong definition WAS precisely the point of my silly joke.  Misdirection, if you will.  (Whether or not you find it funny ... well that's a whole different story)

However, since you're nit-picking   ...

According to dictionary.com, what I quoted was the first definition of the un-capitalized version of the word.  The capitalized version, Cavalier, apparently means one thing and one thing only: "a supporter of Charles I during the English Civil War."

You're probably correct.  I was just going from memory and didn't look it up.  I suspect I was probably off topic in any case and am normally not a grammar Nazi as I'm not an English major and not even sure one could call English my first language.  I guess one of my first however so I should have known better than to comment without looking at a dictionary.

But on topic I'd say from the volume of comments on this thread Brandel did his job and likely get a raise for increasing readership. I don't think he will get sued and if Tiger did sue him he would probably lose (at least in court, not sure about public opinion).  Having said all of that I'll repeat that I don't personally believe Brandel should have implied Tiger cheated, but I doubt (I don't know for sure) Brandel has any personal animosity with Tiger.

Butch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

"Your honor, I object to this entire case and believe it should be withdrawn.  Not only did my client not slander the plaintiff, but the plaintiff is clearly a horseman, a mounted soldier, a knight, if you will."

For whatever it is worth Brandel didn't say "Tiger was a Cavalier" he said he "was cavalier with the rules".  The un-capitalized word cavalier means showing disregard or acting with disregard for something that is important or serious.

Which he didn't necessarily do.  Tiger screwed up, he made a mistake, he didn't know the rules as well as maybe he should have, all of the preceding?  None of those indicates being cavalier, just being human.  Calling someone "cavalier" indicates that here was a certain amount of intent behind his negligence.  Chamblee flat out called him a cheater, but put it in a such a cowardly way that many people will actually defend what he wrote, just as a few are trying to do here.  Chamblee said exactly what he wanted to say, but he wordsmithed himself out of harms way, or so he hopes.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well, first of all, I wasn't trying to be too technical there, I was just trying to be smart-alecky and funny.  Intentionally going with the wrong definition WAS precisely the point of my silly joke.  Misdirection, if you will.  (Whether or not you find it funny ... well that's a whole different story) However, since you're nit-picking ;-)   ... According to dictionary.com, what I quoted was the first definition of the un-capitalized version of the word.  The capitalized version, Cavalier, apparently means one thing and one thing only: "a supporter of Charles I during the English Civil War."

Merriam Webster also says that it is a breed of dog. Maybe he is inferring that Tiger is a dog? ;-)

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@phan52 seriously just admit that you're trolling now. You want us to believe that YOU truly believe that Chamblee's story didn't accuse Tiger of cheating. That the monologue of Chamblee's cheating was meaningless, an that he didn't intend anything more than the strict meaning of only six words of the story. And that it's more reasonable to conclude that Chamblee was calling Tiger a dog than a cheater. You're backed into a logical corner. You can't escape it by digging a hole.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

@phan52@ seriously just admit that you're trolling now. You want us to believe that YOU truly believe that Chamblee's story didn't accuse Tiger of cheating. That the monologue of Chamblee's cheating was meaningless, an that he didn't intend anything more than the strict meaning of only six words of the story. And that it's more reasonable to conclude that Chamblee was calling Tiger a dog than a cheater. You're backed into a logical corner. You can't escape it by digging a hole.

Lol! What, you want me to admit that you are right about what I am thinking? Seriously? Show me the ironclad logic of that when you show me a quote where Chamblee called Tiger a cheater. It is my opinion that he is disappointed in Tiger for being careless about the rules and this is his way of saying it. That is what I think, not what you say I think. Chamblee appears to be more focused on what Tiger did at the BMW where he argued his position even after he saw that the ball obviously moved. I personally would have focused on what he did at the Masters because there, he was truly cavalier. He pretty much avoided being DQed on a technicality. THAT is my opinion on the matter.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hopefully nobody posted this yet but Chamblee apologized on twitter. Im paraphasing but he said he went to far and no golf channel didnt make him apologize. He hopes to apologize to Tiger to his face at some point.

Ron :nike: GOLF Embracing my Angry Black Male :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites


[quote name="k-troop" url="/t/70622/brandel-gives-tiger-an-f-tigers-agent-hints-at-legal-action-against-chamblee/120#post_911459"]@phan52@ seriously just admit that you're trolling now. You want us to believe that YOU truly believe that Chamblee's story didn't accuse Tiger of cheating. That the monologue of Chamblee's cheating was meaningless, an that he didn't intend anything more than the strict meaning of only six words of the story. And that it's more reasonable to conclude that Chamblee was calling Tiger a dog than a cheater. You're backed into a logical corner. You can't escape it by digging a hole.

Lol! What, you want me to admit that you are right about what I am thinking? Seriously? Show me the ironclad logic of that when you show me a quote where Chamblee called Tiger a cheater. It is my opinion that he is disappointed in Tiger for being careless about the rules and this is his way of saying it. That is what I think, not what you say I think. Chamblee appears to be more focused on what Tiger did at the BMW where he argued his position even after he saw that the ball obviously moved. I personally would have focused on what he did at the Masters because there, he was truly cavalier. He pretty much avoided being DQed on a technicality. THAT is my opinion on the matter.[/quote] Which was not his decision... maybe you should just admit you hate tiger and tell us why... Racist? Jealous? Beats your favorite player?

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

OK.  I'll bite ... what do you infer from his comments?

That Tiger was cavalier with the rules.

No, that's not what I asked.  He flat out said that Tiger was cavalier with the rules ... with the last 6 or 7 words of a pair of paragraphs that totaled 175-ish words.  What I want to know is what you honestly think he inferred with the other 165-168 words?  What do you think Brandel means when he explains precisely how the teacher graded his test that they both knew he cheated on (100 crossed out with a F beneath it), and then he graded Tiger with a 100 crossed out with a F beneath.  Nowhere in his story did he mention the word cavalier, but he did mention the word cheat twice (and 'deceive' once as well).

Or, if you don't want to answer for yourself, let's play a game instead.  The Family Feud.

100 random people were polled on whether or not Brandel Chamblee inferred that Tiger was a cheater, and the top 2 answers are on the board.  Survey says!?!?!?!  (How many of those 100 would you think would actually say that he did NOT infer that Tiger cheated?)  I'm gonna say that the number is under 5, and I wouldn't be surprised if (assuming you weren't polled) that the number would be under 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

No, that's not what I asked.  He flat out said that Tiger was cavalier with the rules ... with the last 6 or 7 words of a pair of paragraphs that totaled 175-ish words.  What I want to know is what you honestly think he inferred with the other 165-168 words?  What do you think Brandel means when he explains precisely how the teacher graded his test that they both knew he cheated on (100 crossed out with a F beneath it), and then he graded Tiger with a 100 crossed out with a F beneath.  Nowhere in his story did he mention the word cavalier, but he did mention the word cheat twice (and 'deceive' once as well). Or, if you don't want to answer for yourself, let's play a game instead.  The Family Feud. 100 random people were polled on whether or not Brandel Chamblee inferred that Tiger was a cheater, and the top 2 answers are on the board.  Survey says!?!?!?!  (How many of those 100 would you think would actually say that he did NOT infer that Tiger cheated?)  I'm gonna say that the number is under 5, and I wouldn't be surprised if (assuming you weren't polled) that the number would be under 1.

Whatever you are trying to do, you can stop now. I didn't even bother reading that. I answered the question. Give up already. We disagree.

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

Could we stop using the word infer to mean imply? Brandel implied, readers are the ones who infer (or don't).

And phan, you didn't answer the question. He asked you what was implied, and you repeated only what was outright said.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I answered the question. Give up already. We disagree.

No you didn't.  Why would Brandel include the story about him cheating on a test?  What else could he have been trying to imply?

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Merriam Webster also says that it is a breed of dog. Maybe he is inferring that Tiger is a dog?

This is a Spaniel Cavalier? Don't let your daughters see it, or they might have a cavalier attitude :-P

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hopefully nobody posted this yet but Chamblee apologized on twitter. Im paraphasing but he said he went to far and no golf channel didnt make him apologize. He hopes to apologize to Tiger to his face at some point.

Yes, he did post an apology.

This one went over the line. I fully expect Brandel to apologize for crossing the line calling him a cheater. GC may demand it after the firestorm this will start.

Good news for Brandel after he apologizes, the results will have been the GC gets a bunch of coverage and Tiger gets his apology, everybody is happy.

Like this smart guy said he would.

GC and Golf Magazine got the buzz they wanted and now Brandel must apologize and we can resume our regularly scheduled programming.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Could we stop using the word infer to mean imply? Brandel implied, readers are the ones who infer (or don't).

Actually, Brandel did both.

And for everyone accusing Brandel of a lack of stones, you must think it would have been braver of him to say nothing. I'm not saying he wasn't perhaps cynical in airing his views, but hardly cowardly, compared to the other commentators who think Tiger took a few liberties this year but kept quiet.

As for how clearly Brandel stated his conclusion - you don't think his media outlets vetted and dictated just how close to an outright accusation of cheating he could go? That's just naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


That Tiger was cavalier with the rules.


You make a big mistake then. If that's what he'd wanted everyone to infer, he would have simply (and only) said "Tiger was cavalier with the rules". There is/was no need for the weasel words and story about his own cheating. In fact, if Chamblee had simply said Woods was cavalier he would have achieved exactly what he was after without any of the fallout he's now getting - in fact, the more I think of that, the more I think Chamblee has been really, really stupid here. He wanted everyone to think Woods is a cheat. The story of his own cheating in only an anecdote to make that connection.

TBH, I think I'll simply infer that Chamblee is, in point of fact, a cheat. I'll also infer he cheated at golf as well. As for Woods, again, there is nowhere near enough actual evidence that he cheated i.e deliberately contravened the rules.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3830 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,056 3/6* ⬛🟨🟨⬛🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟨⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,056 3/6* 🟦🟧🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟧🟧🟦⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,056 2/6* ⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 You and me both @StuM
    • Wordle 1,056 2/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Eagle 😀
    • Feel free to read or not, this is more of a benchmark post for me but I wouldn't mind questions and feedback either. In the words of Arnold Palmer, "Swing your swing". So much easier said than done. Videos to come soon (to the probable horror of most of you here lol), but man: this took along time. Hogan wasn't kidding when he said the secret was in the dirt. Can't say I'm not happy about it though. So here was my situation: My first (and only) post here was back in 2019 about trying to game a new 3-wood to replace my old 2008 Taylormade Burner (which I loved but only carried 208 yards with a stupid-high spin rate).  At that time I had been golfing for about 8 years., I was hitting four 80-ball buckets per day (320 total, I'm a psycho) and playing two rounds per week. I was using a "Width Swing" (probably my 15th try at a 'better' swing) from a book and videos called "The L.A.W.S of Golf" by Jim Suttie, TJ Tomasi and Mike Adams. Since I had hardly any flexibility back then at 49 (still don't lol), I had to get my clubhead depth from the width dimension, meaning dropping back my right foot, flaring my feet, and swinging around my body. This took a ton of work, but I got down from a 15 handicap to an 8 by using it, so I was pretty ecstatic. The problem? My lower back hated it, and I mean bad. Really bad. Like pull-out-in-the-middle-of-a-Houston-Amateur-Golf-Tour-tournament bad. Soooo...while playing some of my best golf, I just figured my golf days were over, especially after the Rona hit the next year in 2020 and shut everything down. I figured I would simply be a golf fan for the rest of my life, and that my days of playing (painfully) were done Fast forward three years. I *really* missed playing golf. I started watching (hold your nose) videos of Moe Norman's swing on YouTube and then that led down the rabbit hole of watching videos of Matt Kuchar and Craig Stadler and Bryson DeChambeau and videos by Kirk Junge and Todd Graves...you get the idea. This went on for weeks...and this is how we always get sucked back in, right? Single plane was supposedly the cure for lower back pain because the extension and torque could be mitigated to a degree that might make a golf swing tolerable for someone with lower back issues. I really missed playing the game, so last fall I thought to myself: "Self, you have nothing to lose. Get your clubs out of the trunk (they'd been sitting in there for three years).  Hold your arms straight and look like an idiot at the PGA Superstore in one of the swing bays trying this single plane swing and at least you'll be the only one who has to witness it." I tried it...and it went horribly wrong. I couldn't even get the ball in the air, I was topping everything at first. Then when I tried Moe Norman's famous 'vertical drop' as he called it, I fatted the mat every time. This went on for the hour I was in there. I left there tired, frustrated and about to say 'screw it'. But when I got to my car and went to get in the seat, I noticed something: Even after about a hundred swings, my back was totally fine. I thought maybe it was because I had injured it all those years ago with a rotary swing and now it had healed. Hmmmm...maybe that was it. After a couple days at home, and more video-watching of Moe and Moe alone, I went back to the hitting bay to see if I could find some sort of workable single plane swing based on what I had watched and taken notes on. This session went much better. Pretty straight ball flight (my miss was a slight cut), and no pulls or hooks (my old misses were the dreaded two-way misses, block or pull-hook). I had kinda-sorta figured out the 'vertical drop' deal, but it was too hard to time it consistently. When I did get the timing right, the ball went dead straight. HOWEVER...I was hitting with a 7-iron the whole time and my normal 148-yard shot now only traveled 134. 14 yards is a lot to give up...but I chalked it up to my swinging slower to get the timing down. Plus, I had no idea how the longer clubs would do or if I could even hit, say, a 3-wood with this swing. After another hundred shots or so, I called it a session and went home. So far, all I hit was a 7-iron with this 'swing' of mine. I had completely forgot about my back and didn't think about it until that evening and realized it felt fine. I thought to myself: "Even if you never get your normal distance back...wouldn't it be fun to just play golf again?" Then I thought to myself: "Self, it would be fun to be back on the golf course again." BUT...I was determined not to make a fool of myself out there, so I kept going back to the hitting bay. This third time I went back, I brought in only my Taylormade Burner 7 wood, thinking the shaft length is short enough that I can make contact with the ball, but it's a fairway wood, so I'll see if this swing can handle that. I hit it great...and straight...but the distance was, alas, like the 7-iron...just not there. "You're hitting it *really* straight though", I sad to myself, as if saying that would console a Recon Marine veteran who's ethos is that manly men do manly things...and a 165 yard 7-wood for me is about the furthest thing from 'manly' there can be on a golf course. Ego... I was torn between my love of playing the game on one hand, and on the other hand going out to the course with a swing that would be mocked, ridiculed and laughed at...but would look passable and understandable if I was 75 years old (I'm 54). Decisions decisions... I went back to the drawing board at home and thought "There's got to be some sort of compromise to this swing...some kind of combination of swings...something I can build that would get my old distance back but not destroy the lower lumbar of my spine." In the past 13 years, I had tried it *all*. Conventional swing, modern swing, stack and tilt (my back still hurts when I think of that one), rotary swing (hello shanks), the peak performance golf swing (don't ever fat one while trying that swing, you might break your wrists), 3/4 hold-off swing (great for wedges, not so much a driver), hand-and-arm swing...and on and on. Soooo...I went back to thinking about the width swing I had learned in the L.A.W.S of golf book and videos I had studied, and how I could implement the width element of that swing without destroying my back. It was the only swing technique I ever tried that got me comfortable distance and consistent impact and ball flight while swinging around say 85% or thereabouts. Hmmmm... What if I could combine it with a single plane swing? I know, I know...it sounds loony tunes. But I had already plunked down the $149 for a year's worth of unlimited hitting bay time at the PGA Superstore (commitment, right?), so I figured I had nothing to lose by attempting what would appear to be  moronic and ridiculous-looking setups and stances and swings in a hitting bay all by myself. The results have been nothing less than astounding to me. Setup (after four months of this on an actual driving range and getting *really* strange looks) is as follows (I'll have pics and video soon for whoever can bear to watch it): Grip: Left hand *slightly* strong, right hand neutral (this is to keep the ball from hooking off the planet). Alignment: All irons straight off the nose (I'll explain why in a bit), fairway woods of my left cheek, driver off my left nipple. Posture: *Slightly* hunched over with rounded shoulders (this is to give me room for my arms to come under my chest in the back swing). Foot Position: Left foot flared, right foot flared and dropped back about 12 inches (this gives me room to rotate my thoracic spine and gives the club depth in the width dimension, since I don't have Bubbas Watson's flexibility). Shoulders stay square with the target line. Hands stay high and in line with the lead forearm a la Moe Norman. Slight spine tilt away from the target. Backswing is in and up at a 45 degree angle if looking from behind. I only swing back until my lead forearm is parallel to the ground. I tuck the left elbow on the downswing and let it rip. The reason I play all my irons off my nose? Wait for it... All my irons... 7 iron to Sand Wedge... are single length irons. So I'm using a rotational swing...on a single plane...with single length irons (based off my 7 iron). Never hit my irons better in my life - and hitting just as far now as I was when I started golfing 13 years ago. Also - driver and fairway woods are stupid-easy for me to hit now. My misses are mostly a high cut now, and that only happens when I slide my left hip because I get fast at the top. As long as I keep my lower body quiet until my hands drop (they don't have far to drop, either), then I get a pretty dang straight ball flight. Pull hooks and block are now a thing of the past. Anyhoo, here's the setup of my clubs. I have about a 94 mph driver swing speed. Driver: Ping G410 9 degree cranked up to 10.5 degrees, Alta CB R flex carry is 235-ish  3-wood: Ping G 410 13.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is around 215 5-wood: Ping G-410 17.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 202 7-wood 2008 Taylormade Burner, 21 degrees, stock REAX S flex 49 grams, carry is 192 9-wood Ping G410 23.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 182 6 hybrid Ping G425 31 degrees Alta CB R flex 70 grams, stated loft, flat setting, carry is 158  Irons: are all custom fit Sterling single-length irons by Wishon Golf. 7 146 yds 8 135 yds 9 125 yds PW 110 GW 98 SW 83 Putter: Custom Edel blade I had made in 2012 after golfing for a year and I can't hit the broad side of a barn with it. REALLY interested in getting fitted for a L.A.B DF 3 with a forearm grip...stroked a L.A.B. DF 2.1 at the PGA Superstore they had on the 'pre-owned' rack and it was $519 wuuuuut!!! So that's only 13 clubs...but I am looking on eBay to fill that gap where the 5 hybrid should be, would be a perfect 170 yd club right there I think. Before doing to the single length clubs, I had Ping irons 7-PW and four Vokeys in 48, 52, 56 and 60 in the bag and the single length clubs were gathering dust in the closet for the last 5 years. However, after actually playing a few rounds and seeing where the numbers were adding up, it was missed greens from 150 and in. So, I wanted to take the variable length mid and short irons out the the equation to keep my setup simpler. Gotta say, it worked like a charm.  Same setup as a 7-iron for all my scoring clubs and it keeps everything repeatable. Yes, it feels weird looking down at a wedge with 7-iron length, but I got used to it. The ball goes the same distances as my Ping irons and Vokey wedges used to but flies *way* higher and lands super soft. Also, if I want to chip or pitch with them I just choke down a little, as the swing weight difference won't matter much for those shots. I haven't actually kept score yet, as I haven't even gotten around to really working on my short game or putting at all. Right now, I'm just scoring fairways and greens hit or missed, approaches hit or missed and how many pars per round I can make. So far my best since this 'comeback' started is 8 pars, 1 birdie (almost had a hole-in-one lol), two bogies and seven 'others' (fats, thins, skulled chips across the green and tears may have been involved). I hit 3 of the Par 4 greens in regulation and hit 10 of 14 fairways. The ones I missed were not off the fairway by much and I finished the round with the same Pro V1X I started with - albeit a little scuffed up. Anyway, that's the story and after years of struggle I finally found something that works *for me*. I'll try to get some pics of setup and possibly video if anyone's interested and has a strong stomach haha. I'm gonna start reading the Dave Pelz short game and putting bibles this week, I'm sure that will be an adventure haha! Thanks for the space to write this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...