Jump to content
Note: This thread is 3295 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

No Laying Up calls out CBS for their coverage of golf, basically pointing out how little live golf is actually shown and the 30+ minutes gap between Golf Channel coverage and CBS broadcast.

I noticed how poor the announcers were - comparing a shot Sung Kang hit in Monday/Tuesday qualifier to Tigers shot at 16 in the Masters and saying how Fluff was on the bag for both; which someone else quickly corrected pointing out it was Williams on Tigers bag at that Masters.

http://nolayingup.com/2016/02/21/eye-on-cbs-an-intervention/

 

  • Upvote 1

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The golf shot:commercial ratio is something that has annoyed me with CBS and NBC/GC.  I only watch DVR'd golf now and I'm constantly FFng.

This is why I was so impressed with the Fox coverage.  I don't know the actual numbers relative to that ratio but to my eye, it sure seemed Fox covered about 15 golf shots per commercial break vs. 4 or 5 for CBS and NBC/GC.

Lots of great points raised in the article.  Sure hope someone takes it to heart.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

agreed. I was so frustrated with them showing Bubba stand around waiting for a rules official; I never want to see a putt less than 4ft again unless it's the 16th hole and beyond. Thank goodness for DVR and other sports.


  On 2/22/2016 at 3:45 PM, jgreen85 said:

agreed. I was so frustrated with them showing Bubba stand around waiting for a rules official; I never want to see a putt less than 4ft again unless it's the 16th hole and beyond. Thank goodness for DVR and other sports.

Expand  

I agree, unless it's the final putt of the round, don't waste my time for 4' or less putts.  I know the putt is the equivalent to "scoring" in golf but no one wants to see short putts.  

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 2/22/2016 at 3:53 PM, newtogolf said:

I agree, unless it's the final putt of the round, don't waste my time for 4' or less putts.  I know the putt is the equivalent to "scoring" in golf but no one wants to see short putts.  

Expand  

They can always show the replay in the rare occurrence that a player misses a virtual tap-in.  Watching players line up 2 footers is utter tedium.

  • Upvote 1

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Good article with many, many valid points and criticism.
For the record I want the shot tracer on every shot, maybe even puts.
Since I watch the majority of golf in my kitchen on a small screen, while cooking it is impossible to see the shotBut I realize I am in the minority!

It is funny, every time I turned from the stove to the TV there was a commercial on!

In my Grom:

Driver-Taylormade 10.5 Woods- Taylomade 3 wood, taylormade 4 Hybrid
Irons- Callaway Big Berthas 5i - GW Wedges- Titles Volkey  Putter- Odyssey protype #9
Ball- Bridgestone E6
All grips Golf Pride

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As someone who grew up watching golf on TV, the focus sure has changed, especially with CBS.

Nantz is the star, the show is about him, there didn't use to be a "star" as the non-golfer emcee, it was someone understated like Pat Summerall. When Nantz was young it wasn't bad, but now he's so self important. ("By the way Jim, nice job on the Super Bowl!" Thanks Nick. Oh, vomit!) Buck is the same way, though no one on NBC seems like that.

Since the demographics for golf shows are relatively unique, seems like sponsors fall all over themselves to be a part, between the medical commercials and the trust fund baby commercials it's too much. Over and over with the same commercials: the one with the 40 somethings swimming with turtles for their life mission was bad enough the first time. It's almost like watching SportsCenter, in that they don't expect folks to watch more than 30 minutes without re-rolling the same commercials.

It just seems that CBS is no longer interested in the casual golf fan, since they can sell the commercial time to a captive audience they are more interested in blowing smoke up the sponsor's asses and rubbing elbows. The golf is secondary to the personalities and the sponsors.  Since that's where the money is, I guess it shouldn't surprise me. Kind of like politics, it seems.

  • Upvote 2

Steve

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Imho, both channels, CBS, NBC, the reporters inject themselves into the events way too much. We are a captive audience. There's only one place to watch the PGA Tour and we're forced to watch through this stuff. You can switch away or fast forward, but it takes time away from actual golf shots.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 2/22/2016 at 4:29 PM, Elmer said:

Good article with many, many valid points and criticism.
For the record I want the shot tracer on every shot, maybe even puts.
Since I watch the majority of golf in my kitchen on a small screen, while cooking it is impossible to see the shotBut I realize I am in the minority!

It is funny, every time I turned from the stove to the TV there was a commercial on!

Expand  

The commercials were totally out of control.  I watched the final round and managed to read half a book during the breaks.  Really pathetic, without even Feherty to provide some comic relief.

  • Upvote 1

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Flipping between CAVS / OKC basketball game and golf found commercials on the golf coverage nearly every time.  Got to watch the end because the basketball game ended.

No wonder the Masters on CBS is 'with limited commercial interruption.' Nobody would watch under NORMAL, (every 4 minutes!) commercial interruption.

Give me another network, Johnny Miller and David Feherity any day!

dave

The ultimate "old man" setup:

Ping G30 driver
Ping G Fairway woods - 5 and 7 woods
Callaway X-Hot #5 hybrid; Old school secret weapon
Ping G #6-9 irons; W and U wedges
Vokey 54 and 58* Wedges
Odyssey Versa Putter
Golf Balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The flip side, the excessive amount of commercials are a benefit to me. By using the DVR and fast-forward through commercials and some of the fluff, I'm able to watch the tournament in a much more reasonable amount of time.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I gave up this weekend when they came back from a commercial break, showed one putt (!), and then went back to commercials.  Even watching on the DVR, it was annoying.

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 2/22/2016 at 6:59 PM, No Mulligans said:

The flip side, the excessive amount of commercials are a benefit to me. By using the DVR and fast-forward through commercials and some of the fluff, I'm able to watch the tournament in a much more reasonable amount of time.  

Expand  

I agree with all of the complaints, but this is a good "glass half full" way to look at it.  The downside to them simply showing more golf means that they're showing shots of people who we really might not care about because they aren't in contention.  So a good answer to taht would be to simply watch it on tape I guess.

I prefer my sports live when I can get them though, so like all of you I'd just rather they show more shots, less commercials, skip the gimme putts unless they miss, and I could really do without the Kostis critique of Marky Marks golf swing.:-P

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 2/22/2016 at 6:59 PM, No Mulligans said:

The flip side, the excessive amount of commercials are a benefit to me. By using the DVR and fast-forward through commercials and some of the fluff, I'm able to watch the tournament in a much more reasonable amount of time.  

Expand  

That being what little part of the action they deign to actually show.  If they are going to mostly focus on the leaders, I'm okay with that, but lets see some of the side stuff that we see in other tournaments.  Stuff like what was mentioned in that article, like the player and caddie discussing options, and maybe a bit more of the ball flight and terrain contour information.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
  On 2/22/2016 at 7:34 PM, Golfingdad said:

I agree with all of the complaints, but this is a good "glass half full" way to look at it.  The downside to them simply showing more golf means that they're showing shots of people who we really might not care about because they aren't in contention.  So a good answer to taht would be to simply watch it on tape I guess.

I prefer my sports live when I can get them though, so like all of you I'd just rather they show more shots, less commercials, skip the gimme putts unless they miss, and I could really do without the Kostis critique of Marky Marks golf swing.:-P

Expand  

I agree with you, but if you look at Sunday's leaderboard, a lot of guys who didn't get any airtime had good rounds. Kuchar, Laird, Martin, Hadwin, List (he's a bomber, show him), Appleby and some lesser known players broke 70. I think showing a wider variety of players makes for a more interesting telecast. When there are fewer players on the course, instead of playing stupid s****y f***ing BS commercials, they could recap good rounds by promising or lesser known players. I just find the format so stale and creaky.

I think these guys don't have to do much to keep their stranglehold on the telecast, so they don't do much to innovate. The fact that one of the announcers said Watson's apex was as high as he hits it when it isn't according to PGA stats makes me think they don't do much to prepare, asides from the fact that they repeat a lot of what they say over and over again.

  • Upvote 1

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  On 2/22/2016 at 6:59 PM, No Mulligans said:

The flip side, the excessive amount of commercials are a benefit to me. By using the DVR and fast-forward through commercials and some of the fluff, I'm able to watch the tournament in a much more reasonable amount of time.  

Expand  

I would agree - when I tell the wife I'm going upstairs to watch the CBS golf tournament recording I can get through it a lot faster now. 

Also agree about Nantz's sense of self-importance - its grown quite a bit over the years to the point now where it seems like he really feels he is the star of the show and not just a presenter of what is going on on the course. Will be interesting to see how things go at the Masters this year as August folks can turn on a dime if they think somebody is stealing their show from them.

An aside note: aside from one lousy Sunday at Torrey Pines, CBS had great luck this year with spectacular weather in California - can't remember any time in the past decade or even two that all 4 tour events in California had it so good weatherwise.


CBS is crap. They all are sort of. My golf watching has slowly receded to background noise in the last year or so. I can see the commercial go only one way - up. Although, even with all the commercials of US tourneys, in comparison European golf is even more of a guaranteed snooze fest even though you get much more golf per minute.

Honestly only thing I enjoy watching now is shots with pro-tracers or if the course is extremely scenic.   

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3295 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • But what about the guys on that other forum who are all hitting it like 405? .... For them that's going to take 20 yards! 🤣 Seriously though, I heard like most of the balls sold today are already compliant. So, if you are using one of those (as I think I am), there will very literally be no difference. 
    • Yea, I think something like 5% to start out with is good. See how that works out.  Majority of people are not playing PGA tour courses, so I doubt they will feel bad for clubbing up one club on their approach shots. 
    • I'll be pretty quick in saying that I was against the roll-back when they were talking about 20% or even 10%. I didn't think it was necessary to regulate the entire game based on the top 0.1%. I was also (and remain) against bifurcation, as it harms everyone just below the line striving to get to the point above the line. But this is like a 4% rollback, and it relieves some stress from courses and people and finances… without really affecting 95% of golfers much at all… so yeah, shut up. It's fine. People watching aren't able to tell the difference between a 330-yard tee shot and a 315-yard tee shot.
    • This is an interesting article - it seems like the PGA Tour is going to come out against the rollback: PGA Tour quietly testing golf ball rollback: What do players think? The PGA of America isn’t the only governing body that may be in opposition to the USGA and R&A’s plan for a golf ball rollback. Brian Harman has some interesting and smart quotes in there that mirror what rollback-skeptic people have been saying. But I want to dunk on Lucas Glover: The NBA moved the 3 point line twice in the 90s. The NCAA moved the 3 point line twice in the past 20 years (the last time was for the 2019-20 season). College football narrowed the goal posts in 1991. And the NFL pushed back the extra point in 2015 because kickers weren't missing extra points. Beyond those specific points, sports make rule changes all the time to make the sport better. Baseball is an obvious, recent example. Hockey did things like eliminate the two line pass fairly recently. Soccer had a huge change in 1992 when it eliminated the back pass. So that's pretty ignorant and stupid. But this is even worse: Are you f***ing kidding me? You make millions for hitting a tiny ball in on a grass field. Boo f***ing who.
    • Wordle 1,360 3/6 🟩⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...