Jump to content
Note: This thread is 2337 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

My skycaddie watch has died and I'm looking for a replacement device. What's people's thoughts on another watch or range finder? My watch just had front,middle and back yardages so is it worth spending the extra?


I use a watch and rangefinder, the watch gives you general yardage numbers so you know how far you are from the green on your 2nd shots and rangefinders can give you exact distance for approach shots.  

I'm not good enough to care if the flag is 100 yards or 105 yards but it helps me mentally to know the exact distance to the flag rather then estimate it based on the numbers the watch provides from front, middle and back of green.  

If I had to pick one, rangefinder.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

I use a watch and rangefinder, the watch gives you general yardage numbers so you know how far you are from the green on your 2nd shots and rangefinders can give you exact distance for approach shots.  

I'm not good enough to care if the flag is 100 yards or 105 yards but it helps me mentally to know the exact distance to the flag rather then estimate it based on the numbers the watch provides from front, middle and back of green.  

If I had to pick one, rangefinder.  

Which watch or range finder would you recommend?


I love my rangefinder. I can hit the flag and then get front or how much to cover a bunker. It is also very useful on new courses to catch distances to hazards, trees, etc.  It has helped me more than any club purchase for sure!  I have never used a watch, so I can't really offer much there. 

Cobra LTDx 10.5* | Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4-23* | T100 5-P | Vokey SM7 50/8* F, 54/10* S, SM8 58/10* S | Odyssey 2 Ball Blade | Vice Pro Plus  


3 minutes ago, Davie81 said:

Which watch or range finder would you recommend?

I use the Garmin S4 and for rangefinders I use Leupold GX-4i2 and Bushnell Tour X

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There are several threads on this subject that you might also find interesting, but as someone who has owned both, it's not even close for me.  The rangefinder wins hands down.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

52 minutes ago, TourSpoon said:

I love my rangefinder. I can hit the flag and then get front or how much to cover a bunker. It is also very useful on new courses to catch distances to hazards, trees, etc.  It has helped me more than any club purchase for sure!  I have never used a watch, so I can't really offer much there. 

This.  You can shoot pretty much anything you need a distance for with a laser so to me it's a little more useful. Sometimes I just want to know how much fairway I have before the corner on a dog leg. I think it's definitely helped me drop a few strokes per round. 


I played with my grandfather this summer and he uses a watch because he is getting a little older and he struggles holding it straight and using it with his glasses.  He attaches the watch to his golf bag so when he is picking out his club, he knows what to grab.

I have used the Bushnell Tour V3 for a year now and love it.  I have some experience with the watch and am very glad I got the product I did.  I think the rangefinder is going to cost more but for me, it is definitely worth it

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I started with a rangefinder (Bushnell Tour V3) and moved to a watch.  I like the convenience of being able to make a quick glance at my wrist to get distances.  Note that my watch gives me front, center, back, and distances to hazards and other distances like end of fairway.  But mostly I just use the first screen which is always on display which is front, center, back.  I like the flow of a round with minimal distractions/overhead.

 I'm not fond of 1) opening the case (which I admit is really easy) 2) bringing it to me eye, 3) pushing the button 4) sighting the target and holding down the button 5) putting the rangefinder back in the case... and then sometimes doing it all again to make sure I didn't bounce off something in the background.

For me there is no comparison, I use my watch.  The rangefinder is still attached to my bag and I use it once in a while when I'm trying to get the distance to something that my watch is not showing (on average less than once a round, as I think about it I can remember I didn't use it at all on my last two rounds).

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 hours ago, newtogolf said:

I use a watch and rangefinder, the watch gives you general yardage numbers so you know how far you are from the green on your 2nd shots and rangefinders can give you exact distance for approach shots.  

I'm not good enough to care if the flag is 100 yards or 105 yards but it helps me mentally to know the exact distance to the flag rather then estimate it based on the numbers the watch provides from front, middle and back of green.  

If I had to pick one, rangefinder.  

Same here.  I have a MS Band which I use for tracking fitness on the course, but generally happy with as a Golf buddy.  I also have a cheaper Nikon Rangefinder for exact distances.  I use the Band to check my front and back, and the Nikon to check my distance to pin placement.  Before I got the Nikon, I wasn't making the adjustments to club selection I am now -- which has really helped save a couple strokes.  Don't underestimate the value of both; I never wanted a RF before.  Now I use both regularly (or an app in place of the band when I forget it).


Id vote rangefinder, they even work at the practice range. At present though I'm using a GPS app on my phone. More info than a watch as fast as a rangefinder but probably slightly less accurate. The apps are cheaper or free

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I previously had a skycaddie (not the watch, but the handheld) and I decided to go with a range finder this time. Best decision hands down! It's nice, like mentioned above, being able to shoot different targets to get various distances. I also like the fact that I can shoot the poles at the driving ranges to know the distances for practice. They have colored poles and a plaque indicating the distances, but they change so much by moving the teeing area around that I prefer using the range finder. I originally purchased the range finder for my boy to use in his high school matches, but I love the thing. I'm not a big watch guy anyway.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If you are kind of lazy and do not have a precision game, which is my situation, then a GPS works.  One glance and you are good to go.  A laser rangefinder gives superior information but as some have said and as I have observed, using the laser takes a bit more effort.

I have used a Garmin G3 (older handheld device) for several years.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've had a watch and sold it to get a range finder, I would go range finder. Because with the cheaper models are not much more, and you can find the distance to anything on the course pretty much, with a watch you dont have that option.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have the newer Leupold GX-2i2.   It has an option to use slope or turn it off within the rangefinder.   It becomes a good learning tool in practice and can be used in tournaments.   I can use it to target something not on the normal cell phone app or watch.  

Whether it be a Leupold or some other, I highly recommend a rangefinder.  

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I use a watch, easier for use and enough for me (and it´s faster which is important these days when we are trying to avoid horrible 5,5 hours matches). I don´t have level yet to use a range finder... By the way, and I don't want to bother no one, when I see a guy using a range finder, and then hitting an ugly shank, I laugh. It doesn´t make sense in my humble opinion.. I mean, it´s just reserved for really good players. Maybe if I were a single digit player, I would buy one. But again, if you are 30 handicapper, and want a range finder, go for it!

:nike:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have a rangefinder and a voice caddy.   In general when the greens are weird shapes and I don't feel that front/middle/back tells me enough I use the range finder.   Otherwise I feel that center of the green tells me enough on many courses.   Voice Caddy is pretty much the same information as a GPS watch.   I happen to already wear a watch on both wrists, so I don't have room for a third.

 

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2337 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I agree in general. The one way in which the viewer will notice the pace of play is just that "it's been an hour and Nelly Korda or Scottie Scheffler have only played four holes." Or if for some reason they show a lot of shots of players just standing around when they could be showing golf shots. But I think Andy Johnson said it most recently/best, playing fast is a skill, too. I would love for pro golfers to play faster. You'd see the players you want to see hit more shots in the same time than they do now. So I don't disagree with the pace of play stuff, and hope they can find ways to do it. Heck, the LPGA should leap at the chance to differentiate itself in this way, IMO. So: I stand by what I said in that the TV viewer really doesn't notice much about pace of play. It's rare when they do. I support increasing the pace of play wholeheartedly. But my top five reasons don't include TV ratings or viewership.
    • I don't think the viewer at home can pick up on pace of play, unless the announcers mention something. The telecast has the luxury of bouncing from player to player, which ensures we the viewer always have something to watch.  I think we would notice pace of play if the camera just followed one golfer for an entire round. Or  You were actually golfing behind the slow group Or  The slow group is the last to only group left to finish the tournament.  I like the idea of having a person carrying a digital clock, following each golfer. When the golfer gets to the ball and the group in front of them has cleared they have 60 seconds or they get a penalty stroke. Maybe a second violation is a 2 stroke penalty.  Or as I have said before, every golfer wears a shock collar!!!!! at 1 min 1 second that golfer if going to drop. It will take them a good 30 second to recover, leaving them with another 30 seconds to hit the shot. The course would be littered with golfers just convulsing on fair way from an endless cycle of shocks because they cant seem to hit their ball and keep pace of play. 
    • This isn't the same thing.  This is entirely a time of year thing. Not a trend.  This is the COVID year.  There are many who think the Masters viewership was actually way up. The 2024 ratings being down is only for CBS televisions. It doesn't include anyone (including me) who watched it online. 
    • Ha, I didn't even notice that "NFL competition" part… I just dismissed it on face because pause has very little if any role in TV ratings.
    • Wait a second. That is a bit misleading to drag a 4 year old headline about the ratings when the Masters was delayed during the pandemic. The 2024 ratings were down but not to the extent that this headline would imply. Also, @iacas is correct. Any ratings drop has very little, or perhaps, nothing to do with pace of play.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...