Jump to content
IGNORED

University researchers find keeping eyes on target when putting more effective


nevets88
Note: This thread is 2308 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

It's research from Sasho MacKenzie and his student. The tweet below summarizes it. Here's the article

 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Interesting. Could be very useful combined with AimPoint on breaking putts.

Going for a putter fitting tomorrow, so thanks for putting conflicting ideas in my head, @nevets88. If my new putter is no good, I'm blaming you :-P

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They said it is 3% higher success, which surprises me. I have tried it before, and my contact was poor- which is likely a putting stroke issue.

They lost me when they next inferred that for 33 putts, that means one stroke per round (33 x 0.03).  Not true. A significant number of those 33 are gimme putts.

I’d like to know more about the study. What was skill level of golfers? How much practice with eyes up method did the players need? Were people typically similar or did some people far favor one over the other?

 

 

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote

Forty per cent of the putts where golfers looked at the target line went in the hole — three per cent more than when they kept their eyes on the ball. 

They must have all been professionals and putting from 10'.    :whistle:

Quote

They held sessions over four days with 28 experienced golfers

Not a very big sample size.. Call me doubting Thomas.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not surprised.  I have long suspected that allowing one's intuitive sense to take over was the "secret" to playing good golf.  It is no problem to wad up a napkin, after dinner, and bank it off the refrigerator and into the tall, kitchen, trash recepticle.  But doing so when it means the difference between par or bogey can be a bun-puckering trial.  What's going on?  Why is one action sequence so fraught with anxiety while another is a piece of cake?  See it; roll it; hole it.  Eddie was right.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My friend pro from Holland uses has been using this technique for years and swears it is the best way to putt. I've tried it without any progress though.

Mac O'Grady Acolyte, or "Macolyte"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
11 hours ago, billchao said:

Interesting. Could be very useful combined with AimPoint on breaking putts.

Going for a putter fitting tomorrow, so thanks for putting conflicting ideas in my head, @nevets88. If my new putter is no good, I'm blaming you :-P

 

It's like he gave you an earworm for your fitting!

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's an international journal of golf science?  Nice.  

I think Rotella had a story about suggesting people look at the hole while putting.  I wonder if it's something about the speed?

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
13 hours ago, RandallT said:

I’d like to know more about the study. What was skill level of golfers? How much practice with eyes up method did the players need? Were people typically similar or did some people far favor one over the other?

There's a link to the study in the article, but I'll link it here for ease: Evaluation of Near Versus Far Target Visual Focus Strategies with Breaking Putts

It's pretty good. The gist of it is 28 various experienced golfers, handicap range 5-18, putt on an indoor mat set up at a constant 1° slope from an equal number of fixed locations 6, 10, and 14' away. They were instructed to only use the far target strategy at the very last moment in their putting routine, just before their backstroke, so there was no practice time with that method involved. Golfers not only made more putts using the FT strategy, but they also missed closer to the hole.

Their conclusion also addresses some of your questions, saying further studies should be conducted to evaluate differences on the individual level and the effects of  these strategies on longer putts.

  • Informative 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

not unlike Anika Sorenstrom in her driving.

I have found there are times when actually facing the target (putting side saddle) works well for me, but I attribute that to a vision problem that I have. (Hyper vision with double images).

"James"

:titleist: 913 D3 with Aldila RIP Phenom 60 4,2 Regular Shaft,  :touredge: Exotics XCG-7 Beta 3W with Matrix Red Tie Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX8 19 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3 Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX9 28 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3  shaft, / Bobby Jones Black 22 deg Hybrid:touredge: Exotics EXi 6 -PW  w UST Mamiya Recoil F2 Shaft, SW (56),GW (52),LW (60):touredge:  TGS),/ ODDYSEE Metal-X #7 customized putter (400G, cut down Mid Belly)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, billchao said:

Their conclusion also addresses some of your questions, saying further studies should be conducted to evaluate differences on the individual level and the effects of  these strategies on longer putts.

I think that's why Tiger "putts to the picture." It's kind of what I do as well… it gives you the best of both worlds. You are putting to the picture, but you're still also looking at your ball, and the putter head speed and orientation on the downswing, etc.

1 hour ago, Hacker James said:

not unlike Anika Sorenstrom in her driving.

I don't think that's even remotely the same thing.

:hmm:

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
56 minutes ago, iacas said:

I think that's why Tiger "putts to the picture." It's kind of what I do as well… it gives you the best of both worlds. You are putting to the picture, but you're still also looking at your ball, and the putter head speed and orientation on the downswing, etc.

Yea, it's mentioned in the paper: previous studies have shown that looking at your ball while putting results in better control over the clubface and impact position.

I think further study on the subject needs to be done before we can proclaim that heads up is better.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
17 hours ago, billchao said:

Interesting. Could be very useful combined with AimPoint on breaking putts.

Going for a putter fitting tomorrow, so thanks for putting conflicting ideas in my head, @nevets88. If my new putter is no good, I'm blaming you :-P

 

Ha ha. Psych out!

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I saw the same article.   I agree there are some instances where we don't look at the tool to perform the function but I believe my personal experience would disagree with the article.    

When swinging a hammer, we don't look at the hammer.   When shooting a basketball we don't look at the ball.   But...would you use this argument  when hitting a 7 iron?    Would you look at the target instead of the area around the ball when hitting any other club?  

 

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, dennyjones said:

I saw the same article.   I agree there are some instances where we don't look at the tool to perform the function but I believe my personal experience would disagree with the article.    

When swinging a hammer, we don't look at the hammer.   When shooting a basketball we don't look at the ball.   But...would you use this argument  when hitting a 7 iron?    Would you look at the target instead of the area around the ball when hitting any other club?  

 

Well I think when you’re talking about more velocity involved, no. A putting stroke is pretty calm. But I dunno...it’s golf. Do the same exact study with the same participants in a couple days and may get a totally different outcome lol.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 11/25/2017 at 6:11 PM, Piz said:

I'm not surprised.  I have long suspected that allowing one's intuitive sense to take over was the "secret" to playing good golf.  It is no problem to wad up a napkin, after dinner, and bank it off the refrigerator and into the tall, kitchen, trash recepticle.  But doing so when it means the difference between par or bogey can be a bun-puckering trial.  What's going on?  Why is one action sequence so fraught with anxiety while another is a piece of cake?  See it; roll it; hole it.  Eddie was right.

 

On 11/26/2017 at 3:15 AM, Yff Theos said:

My friend pro from Holland uses has been using this technique for years and swears it is the best way to putt. I've tried it without any progress though.

 

I'm convinced it will work for me in the long run, but my putting is quite poor now because I'm just starting to learn this technique.

 

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
2 hours ago, Lihu said:

I'm convinced it will work for me in the long run, but my putting is quite poor now because I'm just starting to learn this technique.

Did you read the study? It's not about learning how to putt with the FT strategy. It supposedly improves results right from the get-go.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2308 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of like this interpretation especially if you think about it the unplayable rule would probably put you in a better spot.  using back on the line releief.  
    • I did not realize that, I was thinking a more traditional golf club.  
    • Thanks for the feedback. @StuM, we are a "club without real estate" so no facilities or pro. We have a membership of around 185 players and we only play together as a group at our tournaments, which are held at public access courses. A group of us setup the tournaments, collect the money and dole out the prizes.
    • In general, granting free relief anywhere on the course isn't recommended.  Similarly, when marking GUR, the VSGA and MAPGA generally don't mark areas that are well away from the intended playing lines, no matter how poor the conditions.  If you hit it far enough offline, you don't necessarily deserve free relief.  And you don't have to damage clubs, take unplayable relief, take the stroke, and drop the ball in a better spot.
    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...