Jump to content
iacas

Knee Drop Height - Absurd or Just Something to Get Used To?

Knee Drop Height  

87 members have voted

  1. 1. Which of the following statements most accurately reflects how you think dropping from knee height?

    • We'll get used to it pretty quickly.
      79
    • It's still gonna feel weird in 2021.
      8


96 posts / 9678 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

It literally takes 5 minutes to read why this is the new rule, but none of them will actually bother doing that. Drives me batty.

Exactly right, and screw the press. They'd rather just quote the players and offer a "hot take" than to actually say "well, the reason is…".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

55 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

Not only players, but golf media is playing this up because they don't care to learn about why the rule is necessary:

The media's job is to attract readers/viewers.  I'm sure they'll do that much better by pitting poor Rickie(David in this story) against the big bad USGA (Goliath).  Its a classic underdog story.  I'd say that to present the opposite view, that players don't understand or even know the rules that govern their profession would be much less popular among viewers, potentially pushing them towards a different media outlet, one that's more sympathetic to poor little Rickie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

The media's job is to attract readers/viewers.

Not entirely true. It's also to inform and educate. It's to suss out the details and get to the meat, rather than just saying "player X said this, but we have no idea how much they actually know about the subject matter nor do we care in this clickbait headline-driven age."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, DaveP043 said:

The media's job is to attract readers/viewers.  I'm sure they'll do that much better by pitting poor Rickie(David in this story) against the big bad USGA (Goliath).  Its a classic underdog story.  I'd say that to present the opposite view, that players don't understand or even know the rules that govern their profession would be much less popular among viewers, potentially pushing them towards a different media outlet, one that's more sympathetic to poor little Rickie.

I take your point, but I don't think that's what they're doing here. They're just saying it's dumb and it looks bad. They're not engaging in any depth with it. It's a constant problem the golf media has with the rules. Instead of trying to figure out why the rule is the way it is, they just say it's bad and bash the USGA. I'm not a fan of that. I haven't read one person even explaining why the rule is knee-height. I would have a lot more respect for someone who said they understand the why but still disagree with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, iacas said:

Not entirely true. It's also to inform and educate. It's to suss out the details and get to the meat, rather than just saying "player X said this, but we have no idea how much they actually know about the subject matter nor do we care in this clickbait headline-driven age."

 

1 hour ago, DeadMan said:

I take your point, but I don't think that's what they're doing here. They're just saying it's dumb and it looks bad. They're not engaging in any depth with it. It's a constant problem the golf media has with the rules. Instead of trying to figure out why the rule is the way it is, they just say it's bad and bash the USGA. I'm not a fan of that. I haven't read one person even explaining why the rule is knee-height. I would have a lot more respect for someone who said they understand the why but still disagree with it.

I would love to believe that the media has an interest in educating the viewers as to the actual reasons for the rules, and explaining a reasoned dissent, but I've just never seen it happen.  I think most programming is done assuming the viewing public has the attention span of a flea, and that's simply not long enough to stay on any topic long enough to even start to explain it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I would love to believe that the media has an interest in educating the viewers as to the actual reasons for the rules, and explaining a reasoned dissent, but I've just never seen it happen.  I think most programming is done assuming the viewing public has the attention span of a flea, and that's simply not long enough to stay on any topic long enough to even start to explain it.

Dave you said "the media's job is to…" You didn't say "the media has an interest…".

The two things are unfortunately not the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

17 hours ago, DaveP043 said:

I would love to believe that the media has an interest in educating the viewers as to the actual reasons for the rules, and explaining a reasoned dissent, but I've just never seen it happen.  I think most programming is done assuming the viewing public has the attention span of a flea, and that's simply not long enough to stay on any topic long enough to even start to explain it.

I can't speak for the general public, but I personally can't stand sports media that treat me as if I know nothing and don't care to learn more. This is why I rarely visit/read golf.com or Golf Digest, but will read things on No Laying Up, the Fried Egg, Golfers Journal, etc. Those type of outlets are growing pretty fast, too. Those publications tend to be more educated and less full of hot takes like RORY CAN'T CLOSE that I'm not interested in. And even those outlets are doing the lazy thing. It's just disappointing to me when we've seen a resurgence in high-quality golf media in the past 5 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Is it really that difficult to do? If so, they can practice it for say a whole 3 minutes or so.  Hell, I did not practice it before the first time I had to do it last week.  And, much to my total dismay, it left me with a clear 6i to the green.:~(

These guys claim to be pros.  No sympathy from me.  This has been a known change for months before the end of last season.

Perhaps they simply don't like the fact that, for some of them, their butts stick out a bit while they do it.:bugout:

 

Edited by DrMJG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If the rule is such a big problem for the tour pro, they could have started filing complaints when the final rules were published—last March.  Since the rule is being described as “terrible” or “stupid,” it should have been apparent to them when they looked through the rules (or summaries) or glanced at a couple videos.

Unless they never bothered to look these things over. Nah.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Waist Height? Let me get wasted first. As for looking bad, try this:  Point your toes in a little, so your knees point in. Slowly squat until your hand is at knee height. Look at yourself in the mirror and tell me that does not look silly.😊 Maybe we need a Minister of Silly Looking Ball Drops...   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, AlDena said:

Waist Height? Let me get wasted first. As for looking bad, try this:  Point your toes in a little, so your knees point in. Slowly squat until your hand is at knee height. Look at yourself in the mirror and tell me that does not look silly.😊 Maybe we need a Minister of Silly Looking Ball Drops...   

You could make a drop from shoulder height or over the back of your shoulder look ridiculous too, if you wanted to.

To hear complaints about how awkward the knee height drop is, you’d think tour pros were quite uncoordinated people. I’m pretty sure my knee-height drop looks quite a bit more fluid and natural than my full swing (that’s where I worry about looking silly).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think this isn't a big deal.  The rule has changed, it is simple and clear.  I can understand the reasoning behind it.  Bottom line:  follow the rule and save any concern or frustration for a more critical issue like slow play!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Played my first round today, had a bunch of drops. Not once was remembering to drop from knee height an issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Okay, I know you are getting a whole pile of advice here. I'll throw one more thing at you. Consider doing the "5 minute per day practice challenge" on this forum.  For many people 5 minutes of practice daily can be as effective or possibly more effective than 1-1/2 hour practice sessions once a week.  I tried to do the 5 minutes a day practice challenge a while back, but I kept missing my weekend updates. It may be time for me to try again. 
    • I said 4-6, which is round dependent for sure. If my timing is on I can strike a lot of very solid feeling shots, but the clubs I use could be masking those off center hits with the forgiveness built into them. I can also mishit pretty horribly those same rounds. If I'm having a really bad round I'd probably struggle to hit 1-3, but I don't know that I go a full round without hitting at least one flush shot. Of course, I could be completely delusional too.
    • View this round on GAME GOLF Really my second full individual round(a stroke play event), or 4th if you count scrambles, on the year.  I am actually hitting my driver and irons decently as far as path and face is concerned and for distance as well.  My driver play is going especially well considering the lack of play.  I am definitely struggling a bit with low point but not as much as I thought I would. Had some great shots out of bunkers as well. I can't seem to figure out my wedge distances as is fairly obvious from this round.  My new Glide 2.0 wedges are confusing me a bit on some controlled distance shots.  I kind of miss my Edel wedges for that.  My touch around the greens is just not in form right now as would be expected.  I had some three putts out there but these greens are some of the toughest multi tiered greens I have played on.  We played with a scratch guy out there who shot a 77.  If i catch one thin or toe it a bit the hand also is in a fair amount of pain yet.  I look forward to the continued healing in the hand as far as that goes.   If i can avoid injuring myself this winter I hope to play a lot more next season.  Hopefully I can get out to Erin Hills and Sand Valley.  If anyone would be interested in playing theses courses next year with me, let me know. I am a bit on the fence over if I should work on the swing and try and get rid of the Furyk/Moore like loop or if I should just own it as it seems to be giving me the best face/path relationship I have maybe ever had.  At the end of the day if I can shoot in the low 80's from time to time next season I think it should be a lot of fun to play again.  
    • I’m typically around 4-6 if not even a bit higher. My issues come when I miss I miss big and start bringing big and crooked numbers into play
    • I don't know that that is accurate, and it definitely depends on the state.  In Colorado and California, for example, medical marijuana is exactly the same as the recreational strains available in dispensaries.  The difference is the level of taxation.  I did find one article that stated that 14 states limit THC potency, but after researching state-by-state wasn't able to pin that down.  I don't disagree that it's possible, but will argue the efficacy of doing so.  But to your point - Florida is considering legislation to limit the potency to 10% THC because levels above that "can induce psychosis in some users" (anyone seen Reefer Madness? 😄) A fools errand - the pot our parents smoked was around 7%, with the high-end "sinsemilla" coming in at around 9.5%.  It still gets you high.  Admittedly, the strains produced these days are much stronger, with 18-20% being considered high potency, and 30% being the upper limit for flower.  Extracts from marijuana plants, like hash oil, generally come in between 50 - 80%. To tie it all back together so I'm less off topic - regardless of the THC level, marijuana impairs a person mentally more so today than it did 20 years ago.  Golf is proven to have a significant mental component, aligned closely with the physical aspects of the game.  Thus weed absolutely has a negative impact on ones golf performance - though it might make a shitty round more fun.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AmirReza
      AmirReza
      (32 years old)
    2. BushwoodCC
      BushwoodCC
      (53 years old)
    3. cozelos
      cozelos
      (34 years old)
    4. RollingStoppie
      RollingStoppie
      (50 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...