Jump to content
IGNORED

My Flagstick In vs. Out Data


iacas
 Share

Recommended Posts

Nice Erik. Did you email this to your friend who had asked you your thoughts on putting with the flag stick in? I think this is pretty well done and presented experiment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas pinned this topic

Nice test @iacas. It definitevely shows us that leaving it in help us.
Don´t get me wrong but I still think it is incomplete. It will be complete when we know how much strokes saves us over a round or season in average. As i said in another post, in january over 6 rounds I never hit a putt with that conditions, so living it in didn´t help me at all (just visually). Obviously 6 * 18 = 108 greens played is such a small sample to make conclutions. There is data that show us how many putts a scratch or a 10 handicapper hit the flag with a speed over 3 feet each round?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 minutes ago, p1n9183 said:

Don´t get me wrong but I still think it is incomplete. It will be complete when we know how much strokes saves us over a round or season in average.

I disagree. Not only are different people going to see different rates (my kid plays 3x as much golf as I do, maybe more, so it's going to save her more than it saves me, and that's if we're equally skilled putters).

This - as well as all of the other studies showing the same thing - show that leaving the flagstick in is an advantage, which the USGA/R&A said it was not when they both proposed and issued the Rules change.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
18 minutes ago, gbogey said:

Not surprised by the speed results but the off center putts results are surprising, at least to me.  Didn't realize there would be that much of a benefit there.

I believe that some of that benefit is due to the ball being near the capture speed of the hole, and the flagstick scrubbing just enough speed from the ball.

Plus, a lot of the tests included the (IMO somewhat ridiculous) putts that roll nine feet past the hole. Those are going to heavily favor center strikes, as off-center strikes are still going to miss with that much speed.

Plus, 1/2" off the center of the hole is not that far off-center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

This - as well as all of the other studies showing the same thing - show that leaving the flagstick in is an advantage, which the USGA/R&A said it was not when they both proposed and issued the Rules change.

Is it a possibility that they all know its an advantage, but they are claiming its not? My thought is they know one of the biggest complaints from golfers is slow play. So, they are trying to find ways to speed up the game. Then perhaps they are claiming no advantage because they don't want to anger the older guys? … I don't know, it seems obvious to me that it has to be an advantage. But they are still sticking to the "no advantage" line. Which to me seems weird. I mean these aren't dumb people, right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

Is it a possibility that they all know its an advantage, but they are claiming its not?

They didn't test. They assumed.

4 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

My thought is they know one of the biggest complaints from golfers is slow play.

Maybe, but this is a ridiculous way to do it. At most it's going to save a few seconds, and that's only if everyone just leaves it in the whole time, for every putt. And at worst it delays or slows play more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
8 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

Is it a possibility that they all know its an advantage, but they are claiming its not?  I mean these aren't dumb people, right? 

I don't get it.  They can't be that unknowing. But if they did know it was an advantage, why not admit to it and tell everyone to use the stick so as to speed up play? Maybe weighing the opinions on the skill of putting versus pace of play? So stay quiet and play ignorance? Who knows, but I feel something has to be off internally about how they made this call.

I like the delta chart.  

11 hours ago, iacas said:

(again, though, a pesky 1/100 putts went in).

With both pin in and out, how many putts went in that you thought shouldn't have (other than maybe the 2 1/100s)? With pin in, how many if any, putts hit pin and popped out that probably would have gone in had the pin been out (or was it just the one you mentioned above with the wind)?  The latter question is one I feel a lot of people are worried about happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, phillyk said:

With both pin in and out, how many putts went in that you thought shouldn't have (other than maybe the 2 1/100s)?

I have no idea, and the thought never occurred to me except in those incredibly rare cases. For example on the 33/100, I could see after rolling a ball or two that some percentage would go in, even though the first two missed… they didn't miss by much.

2 minutes ago, phillyk said:

With pin in, how many if any, putts hit pin and popped out that probably would have gone in had the pin been out (or was it just the one you mentioned above with the wind)?

Like I've said, it's in the very low single digits per 100 range - nowhere near enough to offset the gains.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
10 minutes ago, Lihu said:

The data makes sense. People will tend to hit more aggressively, and I can only imagine that hitting short will be a little less common?

I don't know. Not really something the study was designed to test, as you know. 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

This data I can believe and it is along the lines of the data from Edoardo Molinari's testing.

Basically, putts that graze the flagstick but are still going at a speed at which they might be holed can be kicked out of the hole occasionally. Which makes sense, really - at speeds where the ball would go in the hole every time, the flagstick can only match at best and hurt at worst if the bar is set at "100%."

I did not test "breaking" putts on the idea that for a short enough distance - i.e. when the putt is entering the hole - it's not "breaking" at all - it's traveling in a pretty straight line. Yes, a 2% slope at the hole lowers the bottom lip of the hole slightly, but only 0.085 inches, and that's from top to bottom, not edge of the flagstick to the bottom of the cup.

At the end of the day, though, I believe this zone of putts would be pretty small. They have to be just the right speed (still capable of going in), and just the right amount off-center. I've never said the flagstick always helps, only that over a normal distribution of putts (various speeds, various entry points), it's going to provide an overall advantage.

This is likely one of the times when it can hurt.

It'll be interesting to see the full data when they publish (assuming they do - they rolled nine putts in the one example they gave), and interesting to see if they roll putts at speeds where the balls wouldn't go in without the flagstick. Otherwise I fear people are going to misread the study as proof the flagstick hurts overall.

Unless of course it shows that overall, it hurts. But I'd doubt that. (And I'm not counting the stupid 9' by distances from studies like the MyGolfSpy tests or Dave Pelz's earlier chipping study.)

I'll go where the data says we should go.

P.S. Watch the video and notice two things… One, if the flagstick is centered or if it's leaning, and two, watch the entry points even from 32" away - some of them are different than others. The putts rolled from even 32" away can hit different bumps and change directions a small amount a hundred times between the roller and the hole.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Erik -
Thanks for the data and the study, I haven't been able to put any of this into practice yet (thanks winter!)
But the data certainly shows keeping the pin in is going to be a huge advantage, by huge I mean maybe up to a couple of strokes a round.
Your comment about breaking putts intrigues me even more, as I can see players taking a slightly more aggressive approach to breakers if they leave the pin in. It will be interesting, at least to me, to see how this affects a course like ANGC, and some of the pin placements with severe breaks, as not only will it allow more putts to go in, but it will stop some putts that might have gone 4' or more past the hole and make the next putt a tap-in vs. a much more challenging attempt.

I can see this changing the target speed for the first putt, to expand an 'acceptable' miss to include distances further from the hole because a) they have a better chance of going in if they hit the pin and go in, b) they have a better chance of being close if they hit the pin and stop close to the hole and c) the come back putt should be easier to make from say 3-4 feet because you can leave the pin in for that as well.
I can imagine the data will show not only statistically significantly more 1-putts, but also a significantly fewer 3-putts. Time, and data, will tell - do you have a feel or gut instinct on this as well.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
29 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Could they do this test on an artificial surface to take out the variance of green irregularities?

That would not do that. Our artificial surface has variances. Unless it was a perfectly smooth surface, it's going to have irregularities, and the balls will take different paths. I tested from 18" to minimize these, but they still existed, I'm sure.

And an artificial surface probably wouldn't have the consistency (when the ball hits the far lip) of dirt and grass.

Just now, Wally Fairway said:

Thanks for the data and the study, I haven't been able to put any of this into practice yet (thanks winter!)
But the data certainly shows keeping the pin in is going to be a huge advantage, by huge I mean maybe up to a couple of strokes a round.

Highly unlikely it's going to be a couple strokes a round on average. There are going to be people who smash the stick a few times and gain even four or five shots a round (particularly if they're poor putters from, say, six feet), and there are going to be people who go months without the flagstick helping them. See my last note for more.

Just now, Wally Fairway said:

Your comment about breaking putts intrigues me even more, as I can see players taking a slightly more aggressive approach to breakers if they leave the pin in.

If you want to putt with the flagstick in from short range, there are times it can help:

  • the more aggressive line
  • when the flagstick helps you aim
  • when the shadow of the flagstick helps you aim

That's about it, and if you take the more aggressive line, it looks like you don't really want to miss low, because there's a sliver of speed/off-centered-ness where the flagstick can hurt you.

I also don't recommend taking the more aggressive line. Make the hole bigger. Play a bit more break and make the hole bigger.

I've only recommended leaving the flagstick in from 25+ feet or so.

Just now, Wally Fairway said:

ANGC, and some of the pin placements with severe breaks, as not only will it allow more putts to go in, but it will stop some putts that might have gone 4' or more past the hole and make the next putt a tap-in vs. a much more challenging attempt.

Few holes are cut on areas of severe break at ANGC… it's just that the turf between the ball and the hole is sloped quite a bit. It'd be pretty nuts to put a pin at Augusta National on a 4% slope. Though we probably see a few 3% holes on occasion, like on #9.

Remember, too, every putt is going straight when it hits the lip of the hole. It can't and doesn't break "in the air." And the lip is not significantly lower just because the hole is cut on a slope.

Just now, Wally Fairway said:

I can see this changing the target speed for the first putt, to expand an 'acceptable' miss to include distances further from the hole because a) they have a better chance of going in if they hit the pin and go in, b) they have a better chance of being close if they hit the pin and stop close to the hole and c) the come back putt should be easier to make from say 3-4 feet because you can leave the pin in for that as well.

I don't think that it should do that, because the vast majority of the time your ball does not pass within the middle 2.18" of the hole where it could touch the flagstick.

Just now, Wally Fairway said:

I can imagine the data will show not only statistically significantly more 1-putts, but also a significantly fewer 3-putts. Time, and data, will tell - do you have a feel or gut instinct on this as well.

So here's the crux of anything, as it's easy to lose sight of the forest for the trees when you get into this:


At the end of the day:

  • ~94% of the putts hit from 25’+ won’t hit the hole at all (5.6% were made in 2018 from 25+ feet on the PGA Tour).
  • Of the ~6% of the putts that hit the hole, a good number of them will either:
    • Not hit the flagstick (they'll hit outside the middle 2.18") or
    • Will be going at a slow enough speed that the flagstick won't change the fate at all.
  • Of those that remain:
    • The majority will be helped by the flagstick.
    • A minority will be harmed by the flagstick.

We're focused right now in golf on the last little bit, but we're talking about maybe 1% of putts… from outside of 25', which is already probably less than 1/3 of the putts we take. So, 1% of 10 putts per round?

  • Upvote 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 1/29/2019 at 8:37 AM, iacas said:

I disagree. Not only are different people going to see different rates (my kid plays 3x as much golf as I do, maybe more, so it's going to save her more than it saves me, and that's if we're equally skilled putters).

This - as well as all of the other studies showing the same thing - show that leaving the flagstick in is an advantage, which the USGA/R&A said it was not when they both proposed and issued the Rules change.

I can only imagine that the USGA/R&A  did thorough testing to get their conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • iacas unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct links for Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package. Save 10% on Mevo with coupon code "IACAS" as well.
  • Posts

    • Three months in, so time for an update. When I wrote these goals, I anticipated that I would be playing from the white tees, but have subsequently moved up to the gold (senior) tees as my average drive is 175-180 (long around 195). The Good:  I am tracking results using a Shot Scope V3, which for shots gained comparison purposes I use a 15 Hcp (my index is currently 22.8) and as of Friday night's round, my most recent 5 rounds indicated 4.44 shots lost to a 15, down from 5.93 shots lost for the first 5 rounds, for an improvement of 1.49 shots. I am now hitting 4-5 greens per 18 and while moving up tees has clearly helped, the quality of my approach shots from 100-160 yards has clearly improved as well.  Additionally, I am hitting  wedges and short irons with much better distance control than how I ended last season and chipping better as well. I remain distance challenged with my tee shots (hence the move up) but get FIR 50% of the time, with misses generally in pretty good shape. The Bad:  Putting is actually worse than last season as I'm now averaging 34.4 putts/18 and about 8 holes per 3 putt. My assessment of my problems is that while "Bead" is pretty good, "Read" is only OK (I read the direction of the break correctly, not the amount) and "Speed" is poor.  Will be focusing on drills to improve "Speed" first and then "Read". Scoring goals: Since moving up tees, I now typically shoot 86-88 so new scoring goal is 82-84 and to break 80. 
    • Meh. 44-49 for 93 at The Neuse yesterday. My third straight round where I’ve had to fight to put up a decent number. I was able to stay around bogey golf until 18 when, for the third time that day, I put a ball OB off the tee and made triple. Not much else to say apart from that except for the fact that I got up and down for par on the par-3 7th after an awful tee shot.  My plan is to hit the range tomorrow and prepare for Tuesday, when I’m playing with my boss and another coworker.
    • Thank you for walking the line without crossing over. I see what you did there.
    • I still use my Bushnell and/or Leupold rangefinders mostly. The ShotScope one is fine… except that the eye cup is pretty "deep" so if you wear glasses to play it's a bit of a tunnel, like a rifle scope. You have to be aligned quite precisely to look down it, or else you get a strong vignetting effect. The slope feature and the measurements seem just fine. Plus, tapping your club to your rangefinder (if you put the GPS thingy there) is weird… particularly for putts. But you don't have to use it for shot tracking, I guess. You could just enable "GPS" mode.
    • Wordle 372 2/6 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dick Kusleika
      Dick Kusleika
      (53 years old)
    2. jakegolf
      jakegolf
      (26 years old)
    3. Jeff Christiansen
      Jeff Christiansen
      (69 years old)
    4. Mitch Cumstein
      Mitch Cumstein
      (50 years old)
    5. The_real_floah
      The_real_floah
      (22 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...