Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I like all the changes the tour announced it is making. The only disagreement I have is with them not welcoming back LIV players. I think if you truly want the best players in the world in your top tier events, you have to welcome back those LIV players who are in that group. Otherwise you don't have _all_ the best players. Enticing these great players to abandon LIV and return to the PGA Tour also has the effect of driving the proverbial wooden stake into the heart of the beast. 

Even the Prodigal Son was welcomed home 🙂

 

JP Bouffard

"I cut a little driver in there." -- Jim Murray

Driver: Titleist 915 D3, ACCRA Shaft 9.5*.
3W: Callaway XR,
3,4 Hybrid: Taylor Made RBZ Rescue Tour, Oban shaft.
Irons: 5-GW: Mizuno JPX800, Aerotech Steelfiber 95 shafts, S flex.
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM5 56 degree, M grind
Putter: Edel Custom Pixel Insert 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
57 minutes ago, Big Lex said:

I like all the changes the tour announced it is making. The only disagreement I have is with them not welcoming back LIV players. I think if you truly want the best players in the world in your top tier events, you have to welcome back those LIV players who are in that group. Otherwise you don't have _all_ the best players. Enticing these great players to abandon LIV and return to the PGA Tour also has the effect of driving the proverbial wooden stake into the heart of the beast. 

Even the Prodigal Son was welcomed home 🙂

 

 

But what if happens if these new "top tier" events fail to generate expected revenues?  

What about if these "top tier" events reduce viewership of the lower tier events and prize money goes down accordingly? 

They maybe shooting themselves in the foot.  


Posted
2 hours ago, Big Lex said:

The only disagreement I have is with them not welcoming back LIV players. I think if you truly want the best players in the world in your top tier events, you have to welcome back those LIV players who are in that group.

I agree that having all the best players makes for a more compelling product. On the other hand, allowing LIV players back into the PGAT punishes the guys that didn't leave. If all the LIV players who grabbed $30, 40, 50, 100 million dollar payouts are just welcomed back for the sake of having the best players, I bet there would be some pissed off PGAT players wondering what the point of their loyalty was.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, Big Lex said:

The only disagreement I have is with them not welcoming back LIV players.

Yeah… no.

1 hour ago, Dinglegolf said:

What about if these "top tier" events reduce viewership of the lower tier events and prize money goes down accordingly?

They're non-existent (basically) already.

13 minutes ago, Darkfrog said:

I agree that having all the best players makes for a more compelling product. On the other hand, allowing LIV players back into the PGAT punishes the guys that didn't leave.

Yeah. And it's still a player's tour.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, iacas said:
6 hours ago, Big Lex said:

The only disagreement I have is with them not welcoming back LIV players.

Yeah… no.

What if you welcome them back and then schedule all the Elite events to conflict with the LIV Events.  Now you can say "We welcomed them back" ending any anti-trust challenges, but they would not be able to participate in the Elite events because they have contracts with LIV.  I do not think many would want to breach their contract with LIV and risk the consequences of that action.   This is more sarcasm then an actual idea, but what if? 😜

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, StuM said:

What if you welcome them back and then schedule all the Elite events to conflict with the LIV Events.  Now you can say "We welcomed them back" ending any anti-trust challenges, but they would not be able to participate in the Elite events because they have contracts with LIV.  I do not think many would want to breach their contract with LIV and risk the consequences of that action.   This is more sarcasm then an actual idea, but what if? 😜

To what end? Now you're scheduling events against theirs, just to try to trap some people who willingly left your Tour? Why? That's just ten levels too far. It does nothing to really HELP the players who are still ON your Tour.


Also, this was a pretty good podcast that addresses A LOT from the PGA Tour player's side of things:

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My thought about welcoming back LIV defectors was that it constitutes a real, post-war "reconstruction" of sorts...demonstrates goodwill...ensures the best of the best are all back in one place. 

But yeah, it sort of glosses over the whole "I took $200 million and F-you" thing. It would undermine the loyalty the non-defectors have shown to the tour. I can't see any tour player being ok with LIV'ers coming back. 

It's all really sad...if the Camerons actually jump, we would be losing 2 huge talents in the golf world. Hopefully the announced changes to the PGA Tour will cause some of these rumored soon-to-be defectors to reconsider. 

JP Bouffard

"I cut a little driver in there." -- Jim Murray

Driver: Titleist 915 D3, ACCRA Shaft 9.5*.
3W: Callaway XR,
3,4 Hybrid: Taylor Made RBZ Rescue Tour, Oban shaft.
Irons: 5-GW: Mizuno JPX800, Aerotech Steelfiber 95 shafts, S flex.
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM5 56 degree, M grind
Putter: Edel Custom Pixel Insert 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, iacas said:

Yeah… no.

They're non-existent (basically) already.

Yeah. And it's still a player's tour.

I'd be in favor of letting LIV players back.  On the condition that they pay a fine to the PGAT in the amount of any sign on bonus they received from LIV plus 50% of their cumulative winnings in LIV events.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
40 minutes ago, turtleback said:

I'd be in favor of letting LIV players back.  On the condition that they pay a fine to the PGAT in the amount of any sign on bonus they received from LIV plus 50% of their cumulative winnings in LIV events.

Ha ha.

Plus they have to pay LIV to get out of their contracts.

I assume you weren’t being serious but that ain’t happening.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I wonder if these changes have the ‘7 defectors’ to be announced after the FEC some second thoughts?

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Vinsk said:

I wonder if these changes have the ‘7 defectors’ to be announced after the FEC some second thoughts?

I bet they've already signed contracts, if they're putting such a definitive number out there, they need to be certain it won't go down.

 

As for letting guys back in, I personally don't want them back and neither should the Tour.  I would accept a one time offer to buy their way back in for 100% of all the money they have earned from LIV...good will goes both ways right?  The message that should be sent is that no one is above the rules, doesn't matter if you're second in the world or 200th, rules apply to everyone the same.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1

-Eric

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, turtleback said:

I'd be in favor of letting LIV players back.  On the condition that they pay a fine to the PGAT in the amount of any sign on bonus they received from LIV plus 50% of their cumulative winnings in LIV events.

The Saudis behead infidels for much less.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 8/25/2022 at 7:39 AM, Dinglegolf said:

Hi there, new poster who was looking for some interesting insights into this topic.

I agree with the majority about the obvious intentions of LIV golf and do not have anything to add.  I am interested though about the dynamics/business end of the PGA Tour in a vacuum and the suggested changes being put forth.  

I personally only make an effort to watch the majors and the Ryder Cup while spending a lot of time on many other tournaments when surfing on a Sunday afternoon.  Personally, the WGC events and the Fedex Cup do nothing for me as a viewer as I am an old school "sports" enthusiast who appreciates uncompromised competition.  

I found the comment by Rory that "the top players do not get together enough" interesting as it is basically saying "the top players do have to get together as much given how much money we make".  I have no issue with players wanting more money and leveraging their star power to do so and do not care to see things as "growing the game" or not. 

I am interested on people's thoughts as to whether the proposed changes are really good for the PGA Tour business-wise. 

Cheers

I'm unlikely to tune in more to the new events. I still can't be bothered to care about the "playoffs" anymore than I am a good tournament like The Memorial. My sports calendar is full. Just because we have something closer to 20 premier events on tour on par with The Memorial does not mean my viewership is going up a tick. It's all convenience and time for me. My viewing may go up in July & August, because the sports calendar is dead. That's it. 

So I doubt these changes will make any significant difference. Of course, this also means that LIV won't do any better, either. It's the majors. Everything else is for scraps and is local.

"Witty golf quote."


  • Administrator
Posted

The only one that really matters: Cam Smith. And he matters, but also… don't let the doorknob hit you in the ass on the way out.

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Funny 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

HV3 is leaving? Wow. I wonder if Michael Jordan is okay with that? I think I would have gotten his okay first. 😃 Oh...and as stated earlier, don't the door hit you in ass on the way out. 

My bag:

Taylor Made R7 (x-stiff).
Taylor Made Burner 2 irons (stiff)
Cleveland Wedges (gap and 60)
Odyssey two ball putter (white) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think Niemann matters a little bit, too. He's 23 and won twice on the PGA Tour. He doesn't fit the profile of the others moving to LIV. That said, he hasn't done anything notable in majors, and I doubt the average fan really cares that much about him.

But, for all the smoke about players moving over the past couple of weeks, to only get Niemann isn't great for LIV. Cam Smith is definitely a big get, but we've known he's moving since the British Open. But the other names? Meh. Cameron Tringale? Nobody cares. Marc Leishman? I liked him, but not a big loss. Anirban Lahiri? Meh.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And the participation award league keeps moving forward. All about the money. There is no other explanation. Just be honest about it. 

  :sunmountain: eco lite stand Bag
:tmade: Sim 2 Max driver
 :callaway: Mavrick 20 * hybrid
:tmade: M2 3HL                               :mizuno: JPX 923 5-gw                           

 Lazrus 52, 56 wedges

:scotty_cameron:
:true_linkswear:-Lux Hybrid, Lux Sport, Original 1.2

:clicgear:


Posted

I will miss HV3.  I liked him.  

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A nice consistent road is just as satisfying as a round with a few outstanding shots. nice round.  
    • Foundation Session #2  
    • I shot an 85 yesterday without any shots that really stood out as spectacular to me.  On the first nine, the highest SG shots that didn't originate on a tee were a 22 yard chip from the rough to 6' and sinking a 10' putt (not the same hole).   On the second nine, driver 4-hybrid to 17' on a 421 yard par-4 was pretty cool.  Sinking a 15' putt for par on the 420-yard par-4 15th was my largest SG of the day (0.98 vs 10 hcp), and that one goes on my acting resume because when it went in, I acted like I wasn't surprised I made the putt.   I'm a lot happier with that round than this post indicates.  It shows I can play to a pretty good score (a 10-11 handicap shooting 85 on a 70.9 / 125 / 6400 yard is a good performance I think) without having to work miracles. 
    • Shot an 85 yesterday (posts as an 84).  40 first nine, 45 second nine.  Only two holes worse than bogey:  a double on a par-4 and a totally preventable snowman on the par-5 18th (the one where Arnold Palmer once made a 12 during the L.A. Open). Bogeyed every par-3.  Par-5s were 6-6-8 (there are only three).  Lots of work to improve upon these.  Especially performance on 18: wild tee shot, great recovery, good third I thought, but it somehow drew against a left-to-right wind and finished barely in bounds, where all I could do is smack with a putter towards the green.  And I did, leaving it in the rough for my fifth.  Chip way past the hole, putt 5' past the cup, a miss, and a tap in to complete the snowman.  Played the par-4s in a cumulative 5-over (there are eleven), one of which was a double.  Strokes gained: par-4s during the round gains 2.16 over the 5-handicap baseline, that's pretty cool. No birdies.  Only 5 GIR, 7 near-GIR, and one green hit on a full swing that wasn't for GIR (par-4 9th, drive, recovery, sand wedge to the green).
    • I played this course yesterday (casual friendly round, not a tournament) with friends.  I told my playing partners up front I was going to try a second approach shot on #7, the hole I was describing.   I hit my tee shot to where I had 130 or so yards to the green from the fairway (per ShotScope GPS and also laser to a pin near the middle).  There was a decent wind in my face. If we hadn't had this conversation, I would have hit 7-iron (140 yard average under calm and flat conditions).   I played that shot, full normal swing, hit the green 24' short of the pin, made an easy two putt for a par.   My second attempt at the approach shot (which I hit right after my main one) was a 5-iron, using the swing I usually use to hit a 100-yard low shot (I'm not sure if it qualifies as a punch shot) where I'm trying to hit it straight and low, such as if I'm behind trees and attempting a recovery-and-advance.  I hit it decently well and the ball finished at the back of the green.  Incidentally, I've recently started a notebook for this course.  Somehow I don't have a lot written down despite having played this course semi-regularly for almost two decades (minus the times I'm not playing golf, of course).  I added that to my notes for this particular hole.  Next few casual rounds there, I think I'm going to hit an additional approach to that green with different clubs on the low shot and take notes.  It's a small sample size but it seems worth knowing instead of having to guess during an important round. As my handicap edges closer to single digits, I think it's good to have shots like this in the repertoire -- not only mechanically, but knowing situationally what I can do.  I recognize that the really good players tend to hit their stock shot on the vast majority of occasions, and I'm not about to try to shoehorn in punch shots everywhere, but knowing options into the wind and/or to a lowered green beyond "take more (or less) club" seems like a good thing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.