Jump to content
phillyk

Conservative play versus Aggressive

0  

27 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you play mostly conservatively, mostly aggressive, or a little bit of both depending on situation?

    • Mostly conservative
      20
    • Mostly aggressive
      21
    • A bit of both
      47


Recommended Posts

I said a bit of both, but as Dirty Harry would say a mans got to know his limitations.  I will play careful strategy with hopefully aggressive shots when I need to.  The one thing I rarely do is try the hero recovery after a bad tee shot.  Its one thing to pin hunt on a short hole or easy pin position, but turning a bogey into a triple by deluding myself I have phil the thrill or tiger skills is just stupid golf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!



Originally Posted by plugged

For a high HC'er, aggressive play is stupid play.  I still play that way sometimes, but the more confident I get in my game, the less I do this.



I agree. the worst thing for golfers like us, is to try to pull off shots that we know deep down we can't make.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I tend to play aggressively as I'm the sort of person that if I try to lay up short of a lake in front of the green, will inevitably knock it in the middle of the lake! I'm also horrible taking anything less than a driver off the tee for some reason. I'll always find trouble hitting a 3 or 4 iron off the tee! I think it's psychological more than anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play again on monday and I plan on going out there and play mostly aggressive with my shots. I just want to see how things go. try a new approach to how I normally would play which is conservative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted for 'a bit of both".  For me I let the situation and the day (how I'm doing that day & weather) determine the next shot I attempt.  Having said that I do, almost always, never try a shot I don't believe I can make more than 50% of the time even if I'm down 2 with 3 to play.  I do tend to be aggressive when putting as I'd rather have 3 feet coming back than be 1" short.  But even on the greens I try to not be stupid and don't putt aggressively on a slick downhill putt that can leave you chipping the next shot if you don't take care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted aggressive, but I will lay up in certain situations. For the most part I try to overpower most courses. I love going after Par 5's in two.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a fairly new golfer, I don't have the confidence most of the time to attack the pin the majority of the time. I try to get it on the green and two putt. I figure if I can hone-in my accuracy a little more I will be fairly aggressive in my game play and lower my score. Until then, par is a great hole for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it depends on what you are trying to accomplish that round or what type of golfer you want to become. If I'm a weekend golfer out to swing for the fences and have a great time with guys, lay up isn't in my vocab. But if I'm trying to build a good handicap or prepare myself for tourny playing a mix of both is a must. I'm a firm believer in gut feeling, if you think your gonna hit it short and in the hazard don't let a Tiger wanna be talk you into a snow man. Just be you and do what you know you can do. If it doesn't work out you'll live and learn for the next situation . That is the great thing about this game, no one is there to tell you what to do (just suggest) and if something goes wrong it's your fault.

don't the golf rules also say that it's forbidden to give advice to players?

so if some dude is just trying to mess you up with his "tips" that's a penalty stroke isn't it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of it has to do with how I'm swinging on a given day, and my shot trends for the month.

If my fade has been working for my irons, I may try for a pin or two. If I'm spraying the shots, I likely will play for a safer line to keep misses away from bunkers and such.

There's also weather and course factors. One uphill par 5 has OB left, hazard and bunkers right of landing area, and often a crosswind or a headwind. The green, with front and side bunkers, sets on a shelf-top. On windy days, I will just hit back-to-back 4Hs and get to a flat spot going uphill. Then, I take a 3/4 6i to keep it low and hopefully end up on the back half of the green, or maybe the back fringe. From there, I can get par or maybe a 6 - which is much better than an 8 when things really go wrong on the hole.

If the weather's nicer, and I'm swinging well, I might try Driver + 7W to allow a wedge approach from where I can see the pin. ( Secret : You have to fly the ball into the green. Try to bounce on, and it's in the sand).

Also, grass length can vary. If the crew mowed that morning and I pull a drive into the light rough on a longer par 4, I might try a 5i to put it on the green. If it's been rainy and the rough is a bit shaggy, I would chop out with a hot 8i and run it up in front of the green - see if I can get up and down.

So, it depends on how I'm swinging, the weather, and the turf conditions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Cool old thread, will have to read all of it at lunch. Put me down for bit of both. I try to hit the ball as far as I can while avoiding trouble. Really depends on the hole. Couple weeks ago I play a par 5 hitting 5i 5i 9i, hit GIR and had a makeable birdie putt that I just missed. Because of the way the hole sets up it was a bit of both. It kept me in play but required good execution to pull it off. I've been hitting more long irons and fairways from the tee lately and scoring better. Not sure if that is aggressive or conservative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I didn't go back and read what I wrote back when, but for me it's case by case.  Everything depends on the circumstances - lie, amount of risk, state of the match or score, how I'm swinging that day - it's all part of using good course and game management.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm in the bit of both camp for the most part. I usually start my rounds playing relatively aggressively and adjust depending on how I'm hitting the ball that day. A lot also depends on how familiar I am with the course. If I know the layout well, then I find that I actually play more conservatively because I know where the trouble and/or good lay-up spots are and can factor that into my club/shot selection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a beginner, I know that I have to play to the biggest target I have. I try to play conservative to give myself the best, worst case for my next shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes.. I am an aggressive player who goes for broke and probably pay for it most of the time..

I think there is a book coming out soon to discuss strategy or something on a course, maybe that will help me out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I chose mostly conservative, which is how I play, but I found that most better players on this thread (handicaps from 7 downward) tend to play more aggressive. Either that or they play aggressive on shots that are open to it, whereas on danger shots they'll play more conservative. Most of the lower HC's say a bit of both, which means they're choosing their shots depending on the situation. I see on this thread 20 HC's saying they play conservative, and it makes me think that if they were to go after a few flags and make more birdies, they'd naturally improve their score. Just something I've noticed, don't know if anyone else has though.

 

I'm a 10 handicap, and I don't go after any pins, so that must mean my short game is either really good, or my ball striking is good enough to where I can control my flight and choose where I hit the ball.

 

I normally shoot low 80's, and have broken 80 four times this year, not even playing for the green sometimes. I can control my flight, so I need to be going after flags if I'm to make more birdies and pars and get my HC down. My coach keeps telling me to go for flags and take driver off the tee, and I just don't have the guts to do it.

 

When I did end up breaking 80 those four times, I averaged three birdies a round and 11 greens in regulation. I was going for the flag when I made those birdies, so maybe this is something I need to do more often.

 

Sorry to bring back up an old thread, I hope this doesn't get too many complaints. Just found it and wanted to offer my two cents.

 

I'm new to golf forums, but not forums in general. Let me know if there's anything I need to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play by the "rules" I set out in Lowest Score Wins, of course. Generally speaking, this means fairly aggressive at going for greens (drivers off many tees, longer clubs for second shots on par fives, etc.) and then conservative at flags to hit the greens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • I know  for myself as a golf fan I want to be able to watch golf and have it entertain me.  There's really only three tournaments anymore I pay attention to Masters British and US Open.  The last couple years the US has been a dud but I keep watching hoping it will once again become the ultimate test. I want to see the best quality golf.  I think that's where this whole discussion of distance comes in.  Nicklaus Snead et all for the most part could swing much faster than they did.  Sometimes they would bash one but not usually.  Hogan did some long drive stuff at times early on and he was puttin the wood to it espescially for his height.  In order to score best these guys played a golf swing that was not maxed out because the ball spun so much that slight misfits were truly bad you had to manage the strike just right at high speed to keep spin down and get the launch right or it would be an embarrassing balloon ballflight.   They were playing the game of skill not the game of maximum speed alone.  Very self disciplined approach.  It kinda makes me mad when I hear younger folks say "part of the reason for the distance now is that players understand launch conditions better" Really?  To me it's preposterous to try to assert that modern players only in the last few years learned launch conditions.  It's also arrogant and incorrect.  Like gear effect also.  Heel low cuts and toe draws were shots people practiced with balata back to Jackie Burke! THE BALATA PLAYERS WERE MASTERS OF SPIN COMPARED TO THE GUYS NOW!  TO SAY THAT THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT THEY WERE DOING IS ABSOLUTELY VERY VERY INSULTING TO THEM AND ANYONE WHO IS CONNECTED WITH THEM!   They were masters because the higher spinning ball gave them much better feedback while developing their swings.  You have to know how to create certain launch conditions to get that balata out there like Norman or Nicklaus or whoever.  Maybe they did not know their numbers on Doppler but they ALL knew who could do it and who couldn't and more I,portent how THEY did it.  Now they are all bashing it because there's no reason not to.  The ball  doesn't spin as much and the clubs are forgiving.  The courses are setup so that being in the 'rough' is better than the fairway. You get brain dead robots like DJ out there hitting miles.  Where's the variation and challenge?  Where are the courses made to challenge the modern technology?  It's not good for the tour to make the game into a distance contest.  They are marketing the thing poorly and results have been showing and will show the next few years as more and more courses close. Golf with a higher spinning ball would be so cool to even watch on tv with shot tracer.  That's what golfers used to aspire to the low launch and correct shape.  They might not hit as far as pros but the shaping that's what's been totally lost today. I think with a game focused on power and distance over self control and skill you get a bore.  With most tour stops it's like watching a Ferrari F1 car racing a guy in a Prius.  (The Prius being the course.) A golfer with the skill of Corey Pavin simply couldn't make it today and that's sad.  Guy was a great competitor striker of the ball.  He was shaping fw wood shots into greens.  You don't see that stuff anymore and really the younger crowd doesn't know what they don't know.   To me the whole game of golf boils down to decisions and self knowledge and control and is made more interesting the more difficult the course gets.   With the modern week to week game with older courses and modern clubs it's basically a free minus six or more every week due to par fives alone for a good touring pro. This is a long rant to forgive me.  I just wish golf were more entertaining now.  It's largely not.  I'd like to see the pros have to face the challenge of a higher spinning ball and takeaway Some for and max volume on drivers and fw clubs.  The reason for this is I want to see what kind of level mankind can reach in this game.  I want to see the best quality.  IMO the way the game is goin is wrong for that.  It's a putting contest now.  They all bash it they all hit greens it's just who gets a hot putter. I wanna make it more challenging and truly separate the wheat from the chaff.  To me that would be more interesting. Or we can just leave things as they are and really never know what a great golfer is truly capable of because the game now really doesn't require that skill anymore.  Heck just carry a driver some short irons and wedges and a putter.   Sorry for the rant but many of us get angry when it's said that modern players have been taught new things by trackman.  Sorry guys,  equal some Nicklaus or Hogan or Knudson et all scores with balata then you can talk.  That's real feedback hit ball watch ball.  Ball no do what you want do something else! Happy Holidays!      
    • One thing I like about our semi-private course is that everyone is very friendly and welcoming. Our seniors group is fun to play with, although they sometimes forget that I'm one of the unretired! and have to go to work most days. The course is a Nicklaus design with lots of challenging holes. The drawback is that the developer envisioned Winged Foot Way Out West, sporting a private-equity membership with everyone living in $400,000 homes. Thus, he contracted for an extremely difficult course with lots of bunkers. Legend has it that Nicklaus cautioned the developer against going overboard on the difficulty of holes, and the complexity of the bunkering (as in high maintenance costs). Well, much less $$ showed up than was forecast, and the developer was forced to sell. Fast forward, the greens crew has had a rough job in recent years trying to keep the bunkers in repair. A few pits have been removed as they settled out oddly, or ended up permanently flooded.  But, those remaining really keep the greens crew busy. We just don't have a Winged Foot maintenance budget. One other drawback: the driving range is at the top of a sloping hill, so it's a bit had to determine your true club carries because you're hitting down hill. Overall, I really like the course, the crew and the members.
    • Welcome back then!    This thread has helped me twice get my head back on straight when returning to golf from a stoppage.  I hope it works wonders for you too. By the way, I'm not even convinced that your shot from the bunker was a bad one.  The issue at our level isn't "would a shot with this result make SportsCenter if I were in a pro event?" but rather "did I raise or lower my expected strokes remaining from this spot?" So, if you were short sided in the bunker and holed out, hey, great shot.  But if you were short sided and blasted out to the green and two-putted, there's a pretty decent chances you saved yourself some strokes right there with the bunker shot -- because it's probably an expected value over 3 for an average someone of your skill level to get down from there.
    • Is there an option for irregular?  I still haven't gotten to the point where I can look at a bunker lie and figure out with good regularity if there's sand underneath the ball.  When there is, but there isn't too much (so I guess I don't like "too soft"?) under it, I hit decently good sand shots.  Not "I'm always going to make the save" shots, but enough that I'm confident I'll hit it to within a likely two putt -- something I'm just fine with.
    • I have G400 irons and paid under $700 for six of them (5-P).  I am debating going to go back in a few days and get the UW as well, and I don't expect that to cost much more than $125.  Where are you that MAP is this much?  I bought mine at Roger Dunn and you can bet they follow Ping's rules to the letter.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DeadMan
      DeadMan
      (31 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.