Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

I believe Tiger may already be the greatest player of all time; it's close, whether or not he gets 18.

I think, however, that he nowhere approaches Jack in terms of overall legacy. Sure, there's 30 years to go but I don't see Tiger 3 decades from now with the same influence Jack has today. From his design work to charities to The Memorial, Jack has put a huge footprint on the game.

Could there be a time when people get excited about playing a TW-designed course as they (I) do with Jack's many treasures? Perhaps but I don't see it.

Could one day the World Challenge have the same prestige as The Memorial? I suppose so but doubt it.

So, I may give Tigs an edge on the field of play but Jack far surpasses him from a world of golf standpoint.

Maybe no one in all of sport has ever transferred such greatness on the field to such success and recognition off it. So when I see GOAT references I'm inclined to give it to Jack. Add a "P" after the G and Tiger is right there.

Dumb argument? Too early to call? Perhaps but that's how I see it.

First of all, Tiger's legacy has already dwarfed Jack by dominating a sport as a black man that is primarily white. Argument already over.

Tiger also changed golf in terms of athleticism, literally changed the way the game is played. Dustin Johnson, Gary Woodland; those guys aren't playing golf without Tiger coming first.

The course designing thing means literally nothing. Hogan didn't design any courses of note, Vardon didn't design any courses of note. It's arbitrary. Plus, Jack is in his 70's; he's had much more time to design courses.

And to say that Jack surpasses him worldwide is ludicrous. Everyone knows Tigers name, even if they don't follow golf.

Jack has a large footprint on the game, but it's nowhere near the size of Tigers.

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I believe Tiger may already be the greatest player of all time; it's close, whether or not he gets 18.

I think, however, that he nowhere approaches Jack in terms of overall legacy. Sure, there's 30 years to go but I don't see Tiger 3 decades from now with the same influence Jack has today. From his design work to charities to The Memorial, Jack has put a huge footprint on the game.

Could there be a time when people get excited about playing a TW-designed course as they (I) do with Jack's many treasures? Perhaps but I don't see it.

Could one day the World Challenge have the same prestige as The Memorial? I suppose so but doubt it.

So, I may give Tigs an edge on the field of play but Jack far surpasses him from a world of golf standpoint.

Maybe no one in all of sport has ever transferred such greatness on the field to such success and recognition off it. So when I see GOAT references I'm inclined to give it to Jack. Add a "P" after the G and Tiger is right there.

Dumb argument? Too early to call? Perhaps but that's how I see it.

Seems to me like you laid out an argument that says Jack is the greater humanitarian than Tiger, which I don't think anyone would argue with you.

You can't put things like charities, hospitals, course design and giving back to communities and human welfare as reasons for being the greatest of all time.

There is no doubt in anyone's minds that Jack was the great humanitarian who ever played the game but that can't fall into the realm of who was the better golfer or left a bigger influence on the game and how its changed.

Undoubtedly no one has had a bigger impact on the game from how its played, to how golfers train and to how golf is covered than Tiger Woods. I think even Jack Nicklaus himself would agree with that.


Posted

I remember back in the good old days when Tiger fans told everyone that it was but a matter of time until Tiger broke Jack's record of 18 majors. Seems now the argument often begins with "Whether Tiger ever breaks Jack's record or not ....."


Posted

http://tracking.si.com/2014/04/01/tiger-woods-out-of-masters/

holy shit

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
[COLOR=32363F]Tiger is out of the masters, will undergo surgery for a pinched nerve, first Masters he'll miss since 1994. [/COLOR] [URL=https://twitter.com/GolfChannel/status/451028993396199424/photo/1]https://twitter.com/GolfChannel/status/451028993396199424/photo/1[/URL] EDIT: @jbishop15 beat me to it ;-)

I like to thank my American lit prof for this victory; his boringness allowedme to be on my laptop to break this news.

Hunter Bishop

"i was an aspirant once of becoming a flamenco guitarist, but i had an accident with my fingers"

My Bag

Titleist TSI3 | TaylorMade Sim 2 Max 3 Wood | 5 Wood | Edel 3-PW | 52° | 60° | Blade Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I can safely say I have heard enough about the injury on the golf channel. Geez it's like CNN when the planes hit the WTCs. Non stop yakety yak and speculation. I think it is time to move on and let him heal and wait to see what happens.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Just wanted to throw my two cents into the ring here:

As much as I fear Tiger is done, I still believe deep down that one major victory somewhere, anywhere is enough to kick start the hype of another run at Jack's record. If he can somehow just get one, it could change the whole picture. Who knows what kind of momentum he could take from it. Because if he can get one, then he can get two, etc.

Sadly however, this "getting just one" theory of mine is not looking so hot at this current moment.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Since this is now the Tiger catch all thread, I just found this and thought it was pretty cool.

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138


Posted

Haha @Crim it's funny you brought up that video. The last two weeks I've been studying it a bit with the help of analyzr. Definitely a cool look.

With this view, it's interesting to see his knees square up in the early downswing, which then leads to the extension pieces starting to kick in, and the right foot banking. Plus it's cool to see just how long he keeps the hitting area in his central vision.

Constantine

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Since this is now the Tiger catch all thread, I just found this and thought it was pretty cool.

They could do that really easily now with a GoPro. Surprised we haven't seen something like that from a player yet.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
First of all, Tiger's legacy has already dwarfed Jack by dominating a sport as a black man that is primarily white. Argument already over.  Tiger also changed golf in terms of athleticism, literally changed the way the game is played. Dustin Johnson, Gary Woodland; those guys aren't playing golf without Tiger coming first.  The course designing thing means literally nothing. Hogan didn't design any courses of note, Vardon didn't design any courses of note. It's arbitrary. Plus, Jack is in his 70's; he's had much more time to design courses. And to say that Jack surpasses him worldwide is ludicrous. Everyone knows Tigers name, even if they don't follow golf.  Jack has a large footprint on the game, but it's nowhere near the size of Tigers.

I hadn't commented on the OT Tiger love fest that was going on earlier until I saw the "master catch all thread" part, now that I've seen that I'll respond. First of all: Tiger himself has mentioned that him being African/American is not a big deal because he is just as much Thai as he is African. Secondly: I would argue that there were other great athletic players before Tiger. Third: Course design has a lot to do when talking about "legacy", maybe not playing legacy but definitely on overall golf legacy. I don't think that you can argue against Jack's course design contributing to his legacy and to keeping his name in the minds of players and fans alike. Fourth: @Gunther didn't mention anything about Jack surpassing Tiger worldwide, he simply added that there is more to a legacy than on the field (course) play.


Posted
I hadn't commented on the OT Tiger love fest that was going on earlier until I saw the "master catch all thread" part, now that I've seen that I'll respond. First of all: Tiger himself has mentioned that him being African/American is not a big deal because he is just as much Thai as he is African. Secondly: I would argue that there were other great athletic players before Tiger. Third: Course design has a lot to do when talking about "legacy", maybe not playing legacy but definitely on overall golf legacy. I don't think that you can argue against Jack's course design contributing to his legacy and to keeping his name in the minds of players and fans alike. Fourth: @Gunther didn't mention anything about Jack surpassing Tiger worldwide, he simply added that there is more to a legacy than on the field (course) play.

Concur. Relative to race, I'd say Tiger's Thai half has been more significant. I believe the explosion in Asian golf can be in large part attributed to Tiger. He has always been committed to honoring his mom by traveling to Asia once or twice a year. This may be the most important non-playing impact he's made on the game, if that makes any sense. I actually did not think about this until jbish mentioned race. There's been no such increase in black golf participation. Relative to off the field contributions, Jack's have been so great that he would receive Hall of Fame consideration without his playing records, I believe. So, I stand by my assertion, notwithstanding the passionate arguments made here.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Haha @Crim it's funny you brought up that video. The last two weeks I've been studying it a bit with the help of analyzr. Definitely a cool look.

With this view, it's interesting to see his knees square up in the early downswing, which then leads to the extension pieces starting to kick in, and the right foot banking. Plus it's cool to see just how long he keeps the hitting area in his central vision.

I think this is one area where most mid to high handicappers can improve. Too many golfers pick their heads up very early, many times before they have even hit the ball!


Posted
According to Jeff Rude of GolfWeek, Tiger Woods has a bulging disc in his back that won't require surgery. You can read the full report [URL=http://golfweek.com/news/2014/mar/20/tiger-woods-bulging-disc-back-source-pga-tour/][U][COLOR=0066CC]here[/COLOR][/U][/URL]. Rude lays out the ramifactions: "Tiger Woods has been diagnosed with a bulging back disc and won't need surgery, someone with knowledge of his condition said Thursday.  It could have been much worse, the person said, because Woods doesn't have the kind of herniated disc that likely would require an operation." Yes, surgery is never good, but neither is a lingering back injury for a 38-year-old golfer trying to grind his way to five more majors.

Pinch nerve, not bulging disk[quote name="Valleygolfer" url="/t/72993/tiger-woods-master-catch-all-thread-was-injury-thread/270#post_970045"] He said it was his lower back and a disc bulge? Do you think it really matters any more than that? [/quote] newtown and Valley, Will you be retracting your comments now? He has been diagnosed with a pinched nerve[quote name="Gunther" url="/t/72993/tiger-woods-master-catch-all-thread-was-injury-thread/288#post_971261"] Concur. Relative to race, I'd say Tiger's Thai half has been more significant. I believe the explosion in Asian golf can be in large part attributed to Tiger. He has always been committed to honoring his mom by traveling to Asia once or twice a year. This may be the most important non-playing impact he's made on the game, if that makes any sense. I actually did not think about this until jbish mentioned race. There's been no such increase in black golf participation. Relative to off the field contributions, Jack's have been so great that he would receive Hall of Fame consideration without his playing records, I believe. So, I stand by my assertion, notwithstanding the passionate arguments made here.[/quote] The explosion of golf in the PAC rim, not just certain country's is a direct reflection of a robust economy AND consumerism by those citizens. You could say they are now far more open to western ideas and in this case recreation in the past decade than they have ever been in their history. They are consumers now. Tiger increased viewership and made the networks rich but did not enhance participation of golf in this country in gender, age, ethnicity or income level. In 1997 the golf population was 27million, it has decreased each and every year ( never going up), we are now at 20.9 million- the drop last year was the most significant. This was especially concerning because " golf weather days " was 20% greater than previous years. Please read: I am not blaming Woods for the decline, woods just has not influenced participation nor has a very good influence in equipment sales either. golf shirts yes, but not clubs. Source NSGA.


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by newtogolf

According to Jeff Rude of GolfWeek, Tiger Woods has a bulging disc in his back that won't require surgery.

You can read the full report here. Rude lays out the ramifactions:

"Tiger Woods has been diagnosed with a bulging back disc and won't need surgery, someone with knowledge of his condition said Thursday.  It could have been much worse, the person said, because Woods doesn't have the kind of herniated disc that likely would require an operation."

Yes, surgery is never good, but neither is a lingering back injury for a 38-year-old golfer trying to grind his way to five more majors.

Pinch nerve, not bulging disk

Quote:

Originally Posted by Valleygolfer

He said it was his lower back and a disc bulge? Do you think it really matters any more than that?

newtown and Valley, Will you be retracting your comments now? He has been diagnosed with a pinched nerve

Didn't the bulging disc cause the pinched nerve?

  • Upvote 1

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Spitfisher, the bulging disc is what caused the pinched nerve. It is the disc itself that is/was pinching the nerve.


Posted

Pinch nerve, not bulging disk

newtown and Valley, Will you be retracting your comments now? He has been diagnosed with a pinched nerve

Ignorance is bliss.  I just wanted to say that I'm envious of you, because based on these comments, you obviously don't know much about back injuries, and if you don't know much about them, it's probably because you don't have any.  Consider yourself lucky. :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am going to try to try to have more intent with my shot routines. I saw this process in a YouTube video I watched last night.  Decide what you want to happen - Yardage, shot shape, start line Visualize what you want to happen - Straight forward, but one tip he suggested was while focusing the shot take in a slow deep breath (like 4 seconds in duration), hold for 1 second, then exhale slowly (like 4 seconds again). There is some evidence to show that this rhythmic style of breathing can help in calming heart rate and improving focus.  Feel what you want to happen. - Your 1-2 practice swings. Like if you need to hit your PW at 90%, feeling that.  Commit to what you want to happen on the ball.  Post-shot routine, where you either gain confidence from a good shot or learn from a mistake to foster a growth mentality. - If it was a good shot then give yourself some good vibes/feedback. If the shot didn't turn out, then access why to learn from it. I am going to add, don't get negative. 
    • I mean, if you like GZ, and would drink it more often during a round than water, then keep drinking that. If you walk 18 holes, on a hot summer day, and drink 2 20-oz waters or 4 20-oz GZ. You will benefit more from the 4 20-oz GZ because it's like 99.99% water, lol. Yea, if flavored water makes you drink more water, then that works better.  I would just monitor the salt intake relative to your own health. I am sure some people might have to be careful. GZ is 280 mg salt. So, 4 of those is over 1000 mg. It is over 4 hours. That is like half the daily recommended intake of salt. You are probably losing some of your salt reserves playing golf. Long winded way of saying, it depends on the person.   
    • My first few years playing golf, I'd take a 32 oz Gatorade (probably pre-zero;  almost certainly Gatorade Tiger when that was a thing) with me in my bag, but I'd otherwise take water (in about the volumes I take now).  From your post, it seems like going back to something like that might be a better idea for me -- primarily water (maybe with some fruit or mint leaves thrown in for flavor) and one bottle of sports drink, rather than a diluted sports drink across all I'm drinking?
    • Yesterday evening, I watched The Gentlemen, a Guy Ritchie film from 2019 that I evidently missed on first pass.  It's a par, but it's a par on one of those long par-4s where the par feels like a birdie. It's in a similar vein to some other movies like Lock Stock, Snatch, or Layer Cake (which was Vaughn, not Ritchie).  If you liked those, I think you'll like this.   A friend suggested it a few months ago, and I started it one night and couldn't finish because I was having trouble following.  In retrospect, that was an artifact of trying to watch the movie too late in the day.  I started the movie at the beginning earlier yesterday and got to enjoy the full thing very much, but unlike some other movies, I encourage anyone to watch this when they're awake enough to catch which characters are which.  In my case, watching with subtitles helped me understand what some characters were saying. 
    • Sweat contains about 800 to 1500 mg per liter. For me, about 45 minutes of moderately intense workout had me lose about 3-lbs of water weight. That is about 1-liter. Now, a thing you need consider how much salt you are getting from food. Humans have been perfectly fine eating food with extra salt added. Typically, people would get 500 to 1000 mg of salt just from eating whole foods. Most people eat processed foods, which have more salt. So, we probably are not salt deprived. We are constantly digesting food we eat and taking in that salt. Unless you are fasting, and working out, you probably are slowly getting salt back into your body.  I will say electrolyte powder is probably beneficial for people for intense training or long endurance activities in the perspective of improving fluid retention (helps in recovery) and preventing cramping. I would say, just drinking water is way more important in general. For something like running marathons, absolutely beneficial. For golf, this is a marginal benefit.  In terms of ideal electrolyte ratios, you want to be in the 2:1 to 4:1 sodium to potassium ratio. Though, I have also seen ratios closer to 20:1. This mechanism is vital for nerve impulses, cell volume control, and kidney functions. Potassium is essential for muscle contractions. Magnesium is good for muscles function as well.  Ultima Replenisher: 55mg salt, 250mg potassium, 100mg magnesium.  *Probably good for people who don't eat a lot of whole foods, or foods with a lot salt. Probably one in the same, lol.  LiquidIV: 500mg salt, 370mg potassium, no magnesium.  LMNT: 1000mg salt, 200mg potassium, 60mg magnesium. Skratch: 400mg salt, 50mg potassium, 50mg magnesium.  Transparent Labs: 500mg salt, 250mg potassium, 50mg magnesium. If I had to choose one, I would probably go with Skratch. My diet isn't 100% whole foods, so I get plenty of salt.  Note, if you have kidney issues, I would be wary of adding excessive salt. Salt can be very hard on the kidneys, and you might be negating the benefits of drinking that water. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.