Jump to content
turtleback

Cutting the Cord…

278 posts / 35014 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

When I retired a few months ago we moved, so we bought one of those Blu-Ray players that lets you access a variety of online streaming services, including Amazon Streaming.  And since we already have Amazon Prime, there is a lot of the Amazon streaming we get for "free".

And now I can see how people can talk of cutting the cord  Like a lot of others about the only holding me is live sports, NFL, BPL, and golf.  Other than that my wife and I prefer watching stuff we pick out.  So far we've had no need to venture beyond Amazon for video and Pandora for music.

Anyone out there cut the cord?  Anyone solved the live sports problem?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

We just went with a satellite service provider, wireless internet,  and a ROKU device. The whole thing cost us about $80 a month. My wife wants the local news in the evenings, and I like to watch some MLB, and NFL every so often, so that why we have the sat dish. The ROKU device is my favorite because I can watch movies, and some of the old stuff. I am not much a fan of most of today's TV programming.

I also have a 200 mile, over the air TV antennae, and a converter which can receive up to 50+/- free channels depending where we are located at the time.

The best part of all these contraptions is I don't have to pay for electricity. I make my own using the sun. :dance:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We just went with a satellite service provider, wireless internet,  and a ROKU device. The whole thing cost us about $80 a month. My wife wants the local news in the evenings, and I like to watch some MLB, and NFL every so often, so that why we have the sat dish. The ROKU device is my favorite because I can watch movies, and some of the old stuff. I am not much a fan of most of today's TV programming.

I also have a 200 mile, over the air TV antennae, and a converter which can receive up to 50+/- free channels depending where we are located at the time.

The best part of all these contraptions is I don't have to pay for electricity. I make my own using the sun.

Your internet is satellite or just a wireless p2p? I'm not sure I'd ever be able to go with either option due to the limited bandwidth and restrictions on usage I've read for every company I've seen that offers it. The local company here that does wireless internet has a maximum bandwidth of around 2.5 mbs... I will admit my area isn't exactly the highest of tech when it comes to internet technologies, we don't even have fiber to home service yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When I retired a few months ago we moved, so we bought one of those Blu-Ray players that lets you access a variety of online streaming services, including Amazon Streaming.  And since we already have Amazon Prime, there is a lot of the Amazon streaming we get for "free".

And now I can see how people can talk of cutting the cord  Like a lot of others about the only holding me is live sports, NFL, BPL, and golf.  Other than that my wife and I prefer watching stuff we pick out.  So far we've had no need to venture beyond Amazon for video and Pandora for music.

Anyone out there cut the cord?  Anyone solved the live sports problem?

Paging @nevets88.

Ha ha. The sports problem. In a nutshell, not solved , but @dsc123 can help you out with the NFL. BPL, that's NBC Sports Live Extra, but you need a cable subscription to stream it. Golf, you need Golf Channel and ESPN and Fox subscriptions to stream as well. No go.

Now there are illegal streams for BPL and golf, but the picture quality can suck, or it can be decent, probably 360 to 480p, maybe 720p but who knows what malware you're dragging into your machine. I use a PC, a Mac Mini, to stream. It might be harder or not possible at all to find these streams on a Roku.

Now I'm a cordcutter and I get BPL and golf. How? My parents have cable, so I use their login to get access. Maybe you have a family member or close friend and you can offer him/her something in return for using his/her account. The picture quality is not bad, 480p ish or better, but if you have a big screen, gonna be a little lacking. I'll use OTA transmissions when I can on the weekend to get a sharper picture. Also, sometimes the stream might just stop or there might be technical problems and you get pixellation. What if you can't get access to an account? You have to keep using cable, thus, the not solved .

That's pretty much it, tl;dr if you want no technical issues sharp picture sports, stay with cable. If you can piggyback a cable account, are willing to deal with issues and the occasional blackout, attach a PC to the big tv, then it's doable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

NFL:  If you're in your local team's market a $35 antenna will get you all the networks.  That gets you almost all the NFL you'd get with cable.  The only thing missing is the NFL network and ESPN.  If you're in a remote location you might need to get something bigger, but antennas are cheap.    If you're out of market your pretty much SOL even if you have cable.  I found a pretty simple way to purchase the online equivalent of Sunday Ticket, but it does require a minor and simple work-around that is likely not legal.  PM me if you want more information.

Using someone else's cable log in gives me, HBO, Showtime, AMC, FX, ESPN and others.  I pay for netflix ($8/mo) and hulu plus ($8) and I otherwise have amazon prime anyway.

For anything that doesn't work through your DVD player you just need to get a chromecast for $35.  Then you can stream anything from a computer/tablet/phone.  For example, FX and AMC don't have roku apps and you probably can't get it on your dvd player.  But I just go to their website on my phone and stream that to my TV.  Its actually easier than navigating most cable company menus.

I cut the cord in August.  My wife was a hard sell.  Last week we decided that after 3 months, we really didn't miss much and were very satisfied with the decision.  If I didn't have someone else's cable log in, I would definitely miss cable.  Not sure if I'd miss it enough to go back, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I cut the cord and went with an antenna and Roku about 18 months ago.  I do occasionally miss watching live sports, but much less than I thought I would.  Honestly, I realized how much time I was wasting watching sporting events that I had no control over.  I have spent the time saved reading, golfing, exercising, and sleeping more.  My quality of life has improved greatly since I dropped cable.  I still watch NFL games via antenna, and I'll go to my parents' house or a bar to catch a big playoff game now and then.  Otherwise I am content with my choice and will never go back.  Why spend precious time on this earth watching others do great things when I can go out and do my own.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Patch

We just went with a satellite service provider, wireless internet,  and a ROKU device. The whole thing cost us about $80 a month. My wife wants the local news in the evenings, and I like to watch some MLB, and NFL every so often, so that why we have the sat dish. The ROKU device is my favorite because I can watch movies, and some of the old stuff. I am not much a fan of most of today's TV programming.

I also have a 200 mile, over the air TV antennae, and a converter which can receive up to 50+/- free channels depending where we are located at the time.

The best part of all these contraptions is I don't have to pay for electricity. I make my own using the sun.

Your internet is satellite or just a wireless p2p? I'm not sure I'd ever be able to go with either option due to the limited bandwidth and restrictions on usage I've read for every company I've seen that offers it. The local company here that does wireless internet has a maximum bandwidth of around 2.5 mbs... I will admit my area isn't exactly the highest of tech when it comes to internet technologies, we don't even have fiber to home service yet.

Our internet is separate from our satellite. I don't know what p2p is. Sat cost us $39 a month, and our internet, (DSL) which is provided by the phone company is $35 a month. ROKU works off our internet, and we pay $16 a month for Netflix, and Hulu Plus. We are out in the sticks so to speak, and our long distance phone service is by Magic Jack @ $2.25 a month.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Our internet is separate from our satellite. I don't know what p2p is. Sat cost us $39 a month, and our internet, (DSL) which is provided by the phone company is $35 a month. ROKU works off our internet, and we pay $16 a month for Netflix, and Hulu Plus. We are out in the sticks so to speak, and our long distance phone service is by Magic Jack @ $2.25 a month.

p2p is "point to point" but that doesn't matter because what you have is a wired internet connection into a wireless router. While I'm not a huge fan of DSL it's far superior to the two other things I mentioned. I've been away from cable/satellite programming for several years and don't miss it. If anything I wait one day to watch new episodes I like via streaming options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just have an antenna for over the air channels. I've been using my Xbox 360 more often. I've heard good stuff about plex as a way to stream from computer to the TV. More sports channels might jump to streaming more on the internet. HBO is doing their own non TV subscriber internet streaming next year. So the dominos might fall on that. Still, i don't miss TV at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I haven't totally cut the cord, but I do love my Roku. Get good internet service from Comcast, and have cut back to only the basic channels over cable. Netflix works great, and I get the MLB package every year, which has a Roku channel as well (and not a fan of the local team, so local game blackouts don't usulally matter to me). I get both of those in good quality high definition. Occaisionally there's an issue where I have to reboot my router, the roku device, or the cable modem, which takes a couple of minutes. Other than that, if cable works, so does the internet.  The NBA seems to have similar options to MLB, but I wasn't enough a fan to pay for it.

I'll miss Golf channel and TCM a bit. Not much else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the above Fire TV stick and gave it the full run during the Thanksgiving holiday. It's fast, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon video, Showtime, WatchEspn, YT all work well. Not bad for $20. The Roku stick has more options though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I got the above Fire TV stick and gave it the full run during the Thanksgiving holiday.

It's fast, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon video, Showtime, WatchEspn, YT all work well. Not bad for $20. The Roku stick has more options though.

What is the advantage (if any?) of things like the Roku and the Fire Stick over a Blu-Ray player like the Sony that have the built-in streaming capablity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by nevets88

I got the above Fire TV stick and gave it the full run during the Thanksgiving holiday.

It's fast, Netflix, Hulu, Amazon video, Showtime, WatchEspn, YT all work well. Not bad for $20. The Roku stick has more options though.

What is the advantage (if any?) of things like the Roku and the Fire Stick over a Blu-Ray player like the Sony that have the built-in streaming capablity?

Portability and imho, the interface is better and probably faster, less laggier. If you need it away from home or want to put it on a tv in another room, real simple. I'm guessing you probably can't download a remote app to your Android/iOS phone to use on your BR player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I purchased the GoogleCast a while back and use it to cast Google sites to the TV.

I use Windows, so not sure if Mac's OS works.

For watching live sports I've searched for live streams and found it difficult to actually get a stream.

Fumbled through mostly Adware and Malware redirects from many of the sites.

Others require joining a site and pay a fee of various sorts.

Recently I stumbled upon a site which does provide live streams without all the BS.

I also learned it is best to install "adblocker software" and I also installed "adfender"

These software apps will slow down a page load slightly but not terribly.

For sport streams - multimlg.tv has most all sports both US and international.

For movies - veehd

If you fumble through these like I did, you may acquire malware and/or other nasty's.

Keep your OS clean. I regularly run online scans, malware scans and anti-virus scans.

Once I have the stream on the PC, I simply cast it to the TV.

Sometimes I DL a movie and share it to the TV using DNLA sharing.

Club Rat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What is the advantage (if any?) of things like the Roku and the Fire Stick over a Blu-Ray player like the Sony that have the built-in streaming capablity?

I have a roku tv, a chromecast, a vizio with built in apps, and a dvd player with various apps.

The TV with apps is by far the worst.  The connectivity isn't very good, even though my other devices get great reception, and the navigation is painfully slow.  I have a chromecast on that TV and if I want to watch netflix I will use that over the vizio netflix.

The dvd player is the next to worst.  Its really fine, but the menus are slow and the interface isn't the best.

The chromecast and roku tv are pretty close.  They are both fast and don't lag, but the roku is probably a tad faster.  The chromecast can access more content, but the roku is more seemless.

I suppose portability can be an advantage, but that's not something I take advantage of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I went to do this last year. I bought a Roku and ordered Amazon Prime. I'm not real crazy about the selection available. I bought a TiVo to record live TV and didn't think too much of it and cancelled the $15 per month service. They hit me with a cancellation fee to boot. I definitely wouldn't recommend them to anyone. When I went to cancel my UVerse, they cut my monthly rate to $50 for a year and added Showtime/Starz. That postponed my mission for a while, but starting to think about it again since the deal will be up in Feb. I know I could get them to extend it. Not sure what I'm gonna do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • during edit it became a double post, so ive deleted all from this one  
    • Make sure you can see where you make impact on the face. The numbers above is form a impact LOW on the face, where launch is low and spin is high. In your case there is room for improvement if you can dial in a better impact position, so make sure impact is on the upper 1/3 of the face. If your preference for ball flight is a draw, the upper 1/3 and 3/8 to 4/8" against the toe side is what makes the longest carry. The same club, shaft player and swing, might see spin levels from 4000 to below 2000 ALL depending on where we make impact (height) Launch angle might vary by up to 4* from low on the face to the upper 1/3, so just by dialing in a better impact, you can both gain a few miles ball speed, get launch angle 2 or maybe 3 higher, and cut spin levels below 2400. AS average we see a difference of 240 rpms of spin for each 1/8" we go up or down on the face, so to get below 3000, we need to move impact 3/8" higher than its now, but i suspect it to be way down, so your potential for improvement is very good. For ball speed, 154 is within reach, and if we say launch goes up by 2* and we  raise impact by 6/8 we should see 1400-1500 as drop in spin, and if we enter those numbers on Flightscope optimizer (who give shorter return numbers than Trackman), it will look like this. All numbers from Flighstscope so we get the DIFFERENCE right. 151.5 Ball speed - 10.7 Launch - 3667 spin = 234 carry - 251 Total 154 Ball speed - 12.7 Launch - 2250 spin = 251 carry - 278 total About 16 yards more carry...total is depending on fairways, and lower spin is always more roll. Its still more than "1 club shorter inn" to get from the same club and swing. Both Trackman and Flightscope has CHANGED their algorithms lately, Trackman return numbers has become longer than they was, Flightscope has gone the other way and return shorter numbers, but dont ask me why, its just a observation where i notice that Flightscope has shrink-ed their numbers average about 5%, i dont have a number for Trackman, but i seems like 3-4% longer, so they are now close to the generous distances we might see from CG2,   I made this chart using Flighscope optimizer a few years ago, and they are more inline whit what Trackman returns now. They was made to illustrate what we could gain simply by dialing in a better impact, so start numbers for spin and launch comes from Trackmans Optimum charts, but ive used 1.5 as smash instead of 1.48 as they use on their charts as the max for 100 mph club speed.
    • It should apply to anything you order from them, but you don’t need that thing and I recommend just kneeling on a towel or something.
    • To make this right, club length alone is not enough, we need "the 3 holy" parameters set right for the actual player, and those are Play length, Total weight, and Balance or how the player feels the weight distribution between head shaft and grip. Way to many player has the idea that the longer the shaft is, the more club speed are we able to generate, but thats not true at all, since its also a question of total weight and balance or resistance if you like. At some point we can no longer gain club speed, and all we get going longer than that is inconsistent impact. No drivers has the same BALL speed all over the face, so unless we are able to make impact where COR is at the max, we loose ball speed and distance, and impact who is to far out from VCOG puts horizontal gear effects to play, so we also loose directional dispersion. Thats why Tour players dont play standard, they loose directional dispersion and cant choose what side of the fairway they wants their lay up, so a potential few yards longer as max cant pay back what we loose on dispersion. Ive wrote a DIY driver tune up guide, who is the same method ive been using during fitting of players of all levels, and it works. You WILL improve both your average distance, AND dispersion, and thats good for scoring, so unless the club we make is for LONG DRIVING, most players benefit from going shorter than standard. If you fit to play "standard" length irons, 44.00" is a good match on the driver, and if your irons is plus 0.5" you might add the same to the driver who then becomes 44.50". Elite amateurs and PROs with a very good eye to hand coordination might add up to 0.5" inch on those numbers. ONLY players with a natural flat swing plane, with a very good eye to hand coordination will benefit from a driver longer than this, and thats why i never made a driver longer than 45.00"  When we go shorter we loos SW or feel of head weight, but DONT reset the original value, but use this opportunity to find what works the best for you, and that might be both lower or higher than standard, so dont trace "standard values", its not the same as that they work for you.  During this testing, lead tape is a must, and if you dont want to play with lead tape there is other options when you know how much weight is needed, but until then lead tape is whats needed so we can dial in what works the best. Total weight is also important, and when we go shorter, we can use 5 grams pr inch UP on shaft weight as rule of thumb, so if we have a club thats 45.00" who feel right on shaft weight, that shaft is not ideal at 44.00", so when going shorter, we should start from a shaft weight ABOVE our needs. About distance and ball speed. Many players who plays a standard length driver has a average PTR or Smash factor below 1.44 (on Trackman or Flightscope), and if this player has 100 mph as measured club speed he gets average 144 mph ball speed. If he can keep the same club speed, and improve his impact, he should be able to see a PTR of 1.50 to 1.52 as the max, (or 150 to 152 ball speed in this case), and for each mpg ball speed we can gain, we get average 2 yards more carry. The average player has the potential to improve ball speed from 144 to 150 or 152, so thats 6-8 Mph ball speed or 12-16 yards more carry, but now with better dispersion side ways. Some player will actually GAIN club speed going shorter, AND improve impact at the same time, so its all about finding the players limit for how long a club he should play, what total weight that club should have, and what balance, the rest is feel, and LOFT to get ball flight as we want it. Those who doubt this should give it a try them self, and pay attention to impact pattern on the face. Ideal for a draw is on the upper 1/3 of the face, 3/8 to 0.5" against the toe side, but to really make it right, we should start by finding where VCOG i located on the face. .
    • I’ve lifted weights for years, long before I ever played golf. I can only assume it helped because I always get complimented on my power. I hit it further than anyone I play with (just not straight lol) I weight train for strength and size primarily 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. ghphjuriya
      ghphjuriya
      (27 years old)
    2. GolfGuy1980
      GolfGuy1980
      (39 years old)
    3. RyckyRych
      RyckyRych
      (50 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...