Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3638 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

merry Christmas to me. my wife has given me the go ahead for a least 5 lessons this year and new irons both, yea. now the problem i'm having is i think i want to get fitted for pings irons im looking at g-30 and the newer gmax .. the g30 are listed as game improvement the gmax super game improvement. i guess my question is why wouldn't everyone want the super game improvement. im liking the gmax on paper, but i will probably get the one that feels best and that the guy giving me lessons recommends. as he will also be giving me the fitting . but i do worry as i think it will be hard to tell from just one use of each club . if anybody has hit both,or even other setups where they have the same name brand but different category of irons. would appreciate your feedback  as i will hope to keep these irons for a long time . also i will be working very hard this year to improve my play not sure if this will matter . will the g-30 give me more room to grow etc ?and for a little info i hit my higher irons pretty well  as far as consistency 7-pw good and 5-6 is hit or miss and 4 iron is brutal to hit of the deck..distances with current clubs are ..pw 100.....9i 110....8i 120....7i 130.....6i-130-160.....5i 130-175....4i 100-160.....so much info its very hard to understand what would be the best club for me .. thanks for any replies ....


Posted

Have you ever thought of getting Hybrids for your 4, 5, and 6 irons? I'm not @Club Rat or @mvmac when it comes to PING equipment, but the GMax irons are good for a player of your caliber, but the G30 irons are just as forgiving and from the little bit of fiddling around with some PING irons, I thought the G30 felt better... I'm a low double digit handicap so I wouldn't know... I play Tour Edge Exotics..  But PING is probably #1 all time on Sales of GI irons... (PING made EYE 2 and EYE 2+ irons from 1983-2002, and are the greatest selling iron set of all time bar none.)

I would go with the G30 irons if you plan on growing in this beautiful game... I think you'll find these irons,in combination with lessons, will definitely improve your consistency and your distance... This time next year you'll be telling us about your 135 yard PW.

So in conclusion, Consider Hybrids for your inconsistent irons (4, 5, 6), if you plan on keeping a set of irons for a while, go with the GI model (G30's in your case), and remember when you get lessons, and are working on the range... Small Successes, small victories, and Golf is Hard.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

To piggyback on this thread - I think the question is also - why would you not want a GI club, what are the advantages (say you can consistently hit it in the middle) of more of a 'players' iron'?

  • Upvote 1

D: Ping G25 Stock S Shaft
3W: Titleist 915F 16.5* Diamana S70 Blue Stiff
3H, 4H: Callaway XR Project X LZ 6.0
5i-PW: Mizuno MP54 Project X 5.5 Shafts
52*, 58*: Mizuno JPX Wedge TT Dynalite Gold AP
Putter: Mizuno MP A306

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, alleztom said:

To piggyback on this thread - I think the question is also - why would you not want a GI club, what are the advantages (say you can consistently hit it in the middle) of more of a 'players' iron'?

GI irons make it tougher to flight the ball lower because of the lower CoG. That's their only downfall.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, SavvySwede said:

GI irons make it tougher to flight the ball lower because of the lower CoG. That's their only downfall.

isn't it better to hit the ball higher though . wouldn't it stop better on the greens etc. as long as you don't loose distance..? and the spin is the same on the ball ? that's what i don't understand.  

14 hours ago, onthehunt526 said:

Have you ever thought of getting Hybrids for your 4, 5, and 6 irons? I'm not @Club Rat or @mvmac when it comes to PING equipment, but the GMax irons are good for a player of your caliber, but the G30 irons are just as forgiving and from the little bit of fiddling around with some PING irons, I thought the G30 felt better... I'm a low double digit handicap so I wouldn't know... I play Tour Edge Exotics..  But PING is probably #1 all time on Sales of GI irons... (PING made EYE 2 and EYE 2+ irons from 1983-2002, and are the greatest selling iron set of all time bar none.)

I would go with the G30 irons if you plan on growing in this beautiful game... I think you'll find these irons,in combination with lessons, will definitely improve your consistency and your distance... This time next year you'll be telling us about your 135 yard PW.

So in conclusion, Consider Hybrids for your inconsistent irons (4, 5, 6), if you plan on keeping a set of irons for a while, go with the GI model (G30's in your case), and remember when you get lessons, and are working on the range... Small Successes, small victories, and Golf is Hard.

yes i may get some of the hybrids as well . as i have some cheaper ones now and don't typically hit 4 or 5 iron . but i thought with the lessons and hard work i could hit the 4 iron and 5 iron . as my hybrids are easier to hit but distance is harder to control and seems harder to hit straight as well . also i do not plan on getting a 3 iron . was thinking to get 4-aw but i  may choose 5-aw with a 4 hybrid in the bag . and that's the problem so many choices . was way easier when i thought all clubs were the same. did you like the g30 when you tried them ? 


  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, SavvySwede said:

GI irons make it tougher to flight the ball lower because of the lower CoG. That's their only downfall.

Performance-wise, that's probably about it. GI irons also tend to have bigger heads and more offset than player's irons and that can be a turn-off for better players as well.

14 minutes ago, esayers said:

isn't it better to hit the ball higher though . wouldn't it stop better on the greens etc. as long as you don't loose distance..? and the spin is the same on the ball ? that's what i don't understand.  

Better players tend to have better swings and don't need help to launch the ball in the air. You don't want to hit the ball too high as it can be harder to control distance and accuracy, and GI clubs also make it harder to flight down shots when you need to do so.

I played G30 irons for an entire season and I liked them a lot, but I switched for the reasons I stated above. If you don'the have any issues with that, they are excellent clubs. The important thing is you get fit and play the clubs that match your swing.

Honestly I don't like the whole player's, GI, and SGI categories that they slot clubs into. Every club is designed with game improvement elements and people should play whatever irons fit their needs the best, regardless of skill level.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I believe in getting all the help technology can provide.  I'd go with Ultra Game Improvement clubs if possible.  As was pointed out, the biggest drawback with the more forgiving clubs is the amount of offset.  I hate offset.  If I were to get conventional clubs, I'd be looking at the Ping lineup first.

Edited by vangator

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


  • Moderator
Posted
52 minutes ago, billchao said:

Honestly I don't like the whole player's, GI, and SGI categories that they slot clubs into.

I get what you mean. There's more and more irons coming out in the "gray area" between all those categories. Apex CF, i E1, MP 25, basically a tour player to a high handicapper can play those irons (and they do).

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, mvmac said:

I get what you mean. There's more and more irons coming out in the "gray area" between all those categories. Apex CF, i E1, MP 25, basically a tour player to a high handicapper can play those irons (and they do).

Yea I really like how they're able to mix the technology to develop progressive sets. It used to be that you had to have a fitter order a blended set if you needed more forgiving long irons and player's short irons, but now most sets are designed with that built in already.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 12/6/2015 at 3:03 AM, alleztom said:

To piggyback on this thread - I think the question is also - why would you not want a GI club, what are the advantages (say you can consistently hit it in the middle) of more of a 'players' iron'?

If you really hit the ball squarely, a Player's iron will offer less range dispersion than a GI or certainly an SGI iron. By this, I mean a well struck shot will have + / - 3 yards in distance variance, as opposed to + / - 7 for a GI iron, and maybe 10-12 yards for an SGI. Ideally, more precise approaches and more birdie putts.

But, this means you hit it squarely in most of the rounds you play. If your swing is off, player's irons really hurt. I had a scramble partner who played small college golf with a scratch handicap. In college, he played blades. A few years later, he had a job, a wife, two kids and a dog, and only got to pick up the clubs once or twice a week. He soon switched from blades to GI, because he didn't have the practice time to keep his swing well grooved. He scored much better with the more forgiving GI irons.

And, don't forget about the shaft. That's half the club, and should be matched to your swing in order to get the most out of your clubheads. And, get fitted!

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The first new set I bought were Callaway Diablo Edges, I hated them but allowed the sales person to convince me they were the right irons for me since I was just starting out.  The loaner irons I started playing with were more GI than SGI and I hated the offset and thickness of the Diablo Edges.

I used them only one season and traded them in for Mizuno JPX-825's.  The 825's still were wider and had more offset than I liked and at the beginning of this year I traded in the 825's for a set of Mizuno 850 Forged irons.  The 850 Forged are probably a little less forgiving than would be ideal for my handicap, but I like how they look and feel confident that the ball will go where I want it to if I swing properly.

The lesson I learned is to buy the set you want to play for a few years that assumes a reasonable amount of improvement based on the time and money you have to dedicate to practice, playing and lessons.  Try out a number of different irons and don't allow the sales person to push you into buying a set that you don't like.  I also agree with @WUTiger make sure you try out different shafts, they have a huge effect on distance and ball flight.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I really regret now not buying the SLDR irons when they were on sale for $300 on Amazon last month. Were beautiful with just the right level of aspiration for growing into them for me. Bah. 

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, dkolo said:

I really regret now not buying the SLDR irons when they were on sale for $300 on Amazon last month. Were beautiful with just the right level of aspiration for growing into them for me. Bah. 

I'm shocked you didn't.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
35 minutes ago, dkolo said:

I really regret now not buying the SLDR irons when they were on sale for $300 on Amazon last month. Were beautiful with just the right level of aspiration for growing into them for me. Bah.

SLDR irons are nice irons, I picked them up used and had them in my practice bag for a while.  I'd say they were probably one of the most under rated irons in recent years.  TM didn't give them a big marketing push but everyone I know that has / had them liked them a lot.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

SLDR irons are nice irons, I picked them up used and had them in my practice bag for a while.  I'd say they were probably one of the most under rated irons in recent years.  TM didn't give them a big marketing push but everyone I know that has / had them liked them a lot.

They were a tweener in their cycle. The opposite of how the SLDR driver was. Where that lasted for a cycle and a half, it seemed like almost immediately after the SLDR irons came out, the 19 different RSi models got released and the SLDRs were redundant. 

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On December 6, 2015 at 5:48 PM, esayers said:

merry Christmas to me. my wife has given me the go ahead for a least 5 lessons this year and new irons both, yea. now the problem i'm having is i think i want to get fitted for pings irons im looking at g-30 and the newer gmax .. the g30 are listed as game improvement the gmax super game improvement. i guess my question is why wouldn't everyone want the super game improvement. im liking the gmax on paper, but i will probably get the one that feels best and that the guy giving me lessons recommends. as he will also be giving me the fitting . but i do worry as i think it will be hard to tell from just one use of each club . if anybody has hit both,or even other setups where they have the same name brand but different category of irons. would appreciate your feedback  as i will hope to keep these irons for a long time . also i will be working very hard this year to improve my play not sure if this will matter . will the g-30 give me more room to grow etc ?and for a little info i hit my higher irons pretty well  as far as consistency 7-pw good and 5-6 is hit or miss and 4 iron is brutal to hit of the deck..distances with current clubs are ..pw 100.....9i 110....8i 120....7i 130.....6i-130-160.....5i 130-175....4i 100-160.....so much info its very hard to understand what would be the best club for me .. thanks for any replies ....

g30's are fantastic, and I honestly think that they would be good for the entire range of handicaps.  I have i20s and am not in the market for new irons, but I hit the G30s earlier this year, and if I WAS in the market, they'd be the front-runners. Not the new i-series, but the G30s.

So, like others have said, I wouldn't really worry much about the categories, just try out a bunch of different sets and get the ones that you like the best.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

SGI clubs for sure - I played TM Burner Plus irons for the first 2 years I played (put over 200 rounds on them) ... they are great.    Actually, they're longer and more forgiving than my current Mizuno's, but are a bit chunkier looking.     GI clubs are just a bit more refined looking, which makes no difference to someone learning to play the game ...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 12/6/2015 at 8:48 PM, esayers said:

i guess my question is why wouldn't everyone want the super game improvement. im liking the gmax on paper, but i will probably get the one that feels best and that the guy giving me lessons recommends. as he will also be giving me the fitting.

1. At higher swing speeds they are hard to control the trajectory on since they are designed to get the ball up in the air, which those golfers do not struggle with. 

2. Aesthetically to some they look too chunky. I for one do not like a lot of offset and thick top lines on an iron. 

3. To some the really SGI irons are not as soft on the strike as other iron. 

On 12/6/2015 at 8:48 PM, esayers said:

will the g-30 give me more room to grow etc 

Sure. You can be a single digit handicap player and play any iron you want. You have plenty of room to grow.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3638 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.