Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Collared shirt? Where did this start?


Note: This thread is 3572 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

Is dressing nicely to go to church also to "keep the riff raff out?"

How about when attending a funeral or wedding? Also about keeping out the riff raff?

At the church that my wife plays piano and organ for, about half the men on any given Sunday are wearing jeans.  I can assure you that nobody would be turned away for their apparel - I can't imagine that God cares what you wear.  

The same is true for those other events.  When my cousin got married about 12 years ago, the groom and his men all wore white shirts and black jeans.  I wore slacks and a short sleeve shirt, but I was slightly overdressed.

Wearing more casual clothes for golf just makes sense.  The plus 4's and jacket worn by the Scots in the 19th century were not chosen specifically for golf.  Those were what they wore for hunting and other outdoor activities, so it was just logical to carry it over to golf.  There was nothing posted or written down or mandated.  They happened to be mostly well-to-do men, so their choice of field wear was more upscale than that of an ordinary working man, but nothing about it was golf specific.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
9 hours ago, onkey said:

Why impose a dress code upon your customer? 

My point is that some of the customers might want that dress code. Having the dress code might be good for their business. They might have fewer golfers wanting to play there if when they show up the last time people are dressing in tank tops and cutoff jeans.

It may not be "imposed" on the customers. They might actually want it.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There is a public course near me that requires a collared shirt.   If you don't have one, one is available to purchase or you don't play.   I always wear a collared shirt but have been known to wear anything from dress slacks to cargo shorts depending upon the course I play.   

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think the collar thing came from golf being a "gentlemens game". The old prim and proper scenario. 

Myself, I will practice wearing just about anything. However, when I play, I always have a collar. As for pants, it's usually Cargo Shorts. I like the pockets.

I wore some blue jeans to the Silverstone course in Vegas once. The counter guy took my money after I asked about my jeans. When I got to the starter, he said blue jeans were not allowed. This even though he was wearing blue jeans himself. Took some doing, but I got my $45 back, and have never been back. That was in 2004.

Of course in today's economical enviroment, it not too much of a stretch to think most medium, and lower end courses will take your money regardless of what is being worn. They need the revenue. I do believe that quite a few courses do not hold women players to the same dress code as men. 

I know my home course, which is kept in great shape year around, and is as good as any other course in the area,  will allow non collared golfers to play. Shorts, and a tee shirt are acceptable. I suspect the main reason is that it is a smallish town, and everybody pretty much knows each other. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, iacas said:

My point is that some of the customers might want that dress code. Having the dress code might be good for their business. They might have fewer golfers wanting to play there if when they show up the last time people are dressing in tank tops and cutoff jeans.

It may not be "imposed" on the customers. They might actually want it.

I've belonged to three different county clubs and the membership was always in favor of dress codes.  I don't consider Bermuda shorts and a collared golf shirt to be oppressive or uncomfortable.

In my experience dress codes are a safe form of diplomacy to ensure no one dresses in an offensive manner.

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I like wearing a collared shirt to play and even to the driving range.  I also tuck my shirt in and avoid wearing jeans even if the courses I play do not have that dress code.

Driver: Nike SasQuatch 460 Tour Graphite
Irons: Titleist CB 712 Dynamic Gold
Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX Black Pearl Steel Wedge 50° and 54°, Cleveland 588 RTG 60°
Putter: Nike Method Matter M4-12


Posted

You never can tell what offends the sensibilities of some people.  A tee shirt advertising a brand of beer may be fine but if the course is supplied by a competitor brewer then without knowing it you may be offending. Silly but true.  Golf during Bobby Jones' s era. began to relax.  The coats were off in America because of the heat. Ties were a natural extension of a man's wardrobe. You wore it to work to church to bowl, to go the movies, and to baseball and hockey games. along with your hat. The relaxing of rules regarding dress have really changed and it will keep evolving. Tiger's use of the collared t-shirt, initiated another change and made people have to alter their perception of what constitutes a collared shirt.  In my life I no longer go to too many places where the jacket and tie is a must. It just doesn't seem important enough any longer.  The last time I saw everyone wear a jacket and tie was my Mum's funeral. And that was only for the service portion, The visitation was quite casual.  As it should be.

In golf for me, comfort is paramount. Jeans are not comfortable for me.  Because I brace and bandage my legs, I wear pants all the time playing golf. I don't need to constantly explain and it is like taking off the old florsheim bluchers with spikes, it feels really good at the end of a round to cool off.  Modern moisture wicking  shirts are so light it really compensates and then you can go anywhere knowing you are always within anyone's, but the most snootiest , dress code.

  • Upvote 1

Posted
On 12/31/2015 at 0:51 PM, Dave325 said:

 My home course is a fairly rural course that has very few dress code restrictions. However, there are a number of other shwanky courses near me that have the ubiquitous collared shirt/no jeans restrictions. I can respect that... But just curious where these type of restrictions came into the game. It's not like having dressed in certain clothes makes me play any better, even though I try to sport my lucky Callaway pullover in cooler weather. If this started with the Scottish originators of the game, then shouldn't we be required to wear kilts? Just curious... And I love history too.

Firstly, the kilt actually originated in England, but the sweaty socks made it famous. 

I am a believer in some sort of dress code, but also believe it shouldn't go to far. I don't like jeans and T Shirts on a golf course, but some of the dress codes of old were going to far. My course allows jeans, but I really don't like it. 

In my bag (Motocaddy Light)

Taylormade Burner driver, Taylormade 4 wood, 3 x Ping Karsten Hybrids, 6-SW Ping Karsten irons with reg flex graphite shafts. Odyssey putter, 20 Bridgestone e6 balls, 2 water balls for the 5th hole, loads of tees, 2 golf gloves, a couple of hand warmers, cleaning towel, 5 ball markers, 2 pitch mark repairers, some aspirin, 3 hats, set of waterproofs, an umbrella, a pair of gaiters, 2 pairs of glasses. Christ, it's amazing I can pick the bloody thing up !!


Posted
On 2/6/2016 at 2:51 PM, iacas said:

My point is that some of the customers might want that dress code. Having the dress code might be good for their business. They might have fewer golfers wanting to play there if when they show up the last time people are dressing in tank tops and cutoff jeans.

It may not be "imposed" on the customers. They might actually want it.

Well said. I dont think a simple dress code of a collared polo and trousers/smart shorts is a bad thing and i agree that if my homwe course had a lot of people playing in ripped jeans a t shirts it would make me think twice about playing there.

Dress codes are important, a school uniform does not discriminate between children from a wealthy family or one on the breadline, in schools all puplis should be viewed as equals.

In work adress code shows a level of profesionallism. We have recently allowed jeans as part of the code (im not a fan other than on dress down days) and its being abused.

I think the golf dress code is a little like the school uniform (in my head anyway!). Player A may have a £70 ralph Lauren polo shirt and player B has a £5 costco polo but they both look smart regardless of how much cash they may have. Level;s the playing field (until the golf starts!)

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I dress smartly for golf, because I feel good looking good, but I do not agree with imposing my taste or standards on others, and am convinced that golf clubs need to take a more flexible approach to this question if they want to attract younger generation golfers.

However, a couple of things which are sometimes listed in dress codes appear to me to be downright ridiculous: I once declined to play at a course in the UK because they allowed golfers to wear shorts, but insisted that the socks had to be "knee-length white sports socks". I also feel it is stupid to insist that a cap is worn with the brim to the front. First of all, it is none of my business how somebody wears their hat, and secondly, I know some golfers (and tennis players) who wear the cap the "wrong" way round to stop their neck getting burnt. The dislike of cargo shorts goes in the same direction: this has nothing to do with the comfort or functionality of the garment, but simply expresses disdain for a certain type or person or at least image. That is not what golf should be about!


Posted (edited)

The course where I play has a dress code which I abide by.  But I often swing by for a quick session at the practice green or driving range wearing my jeans.  (I generally wear jeans to work.)  Some of the older, fuddy duddy members will give me a sideways look once in a while.  But so far no one has said anything.  btw, I asked about the dress code for the practice green and driving range.  The head pro told me that jeans are fine.   Just no jeans out on the course is all.    

Edited by Volkey

Posted

Let's be honest, golf attire is fully dependent on the course you are playing that specific day. When given the amazing opportunity to experience a country club, we should be decked head to toe in the finest apparel. But on the reverse side of things, when playing a round at a lackluster public course on a steamy hot day in July, it would be nice to be able to sport a bro tank (tank top) if you will along with basketball shorts.

Subtle changes like that could not only help with comfort, but eases the invisible barriers to entry for new golfers. The decline of Tiger Woods has taken a hit on golf in the main stream public view. This whole "gentlemen's game" definition may be doing more harm than we think.


Posted

Walked into the pro shop yesterday to find three rows of nice embroidered course name and CO flag hoodies. Very sweet wearing it to the course later to play.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A couple of public courses have a code of no denim of any kind. For women, the code is no tank tops. I don't know about country clubs because I don't make $2000 a week.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3572 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.