Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3558 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I was at the range Saturday morning, and from where I was at I had a good view of the first tee.  This course happens to have 5 sets of tee's.  The first hole is a par 5 and if you play the yellow (the first inside the back tee's about 6500 yards) you need to carry your tee shot about 120 yards over water, with the driving range to the right and OB left.  Out of all of the groups that chose to play the yellow, half didn't clear the water and the other half put it in the range.  You can drive 50 yards to the next set and the water and range are almost out of play.It just got me wondering why is there a need for 5 sets of tee's, or even two sets that are over 6500 yards on a normal public golf course?

I know in tournament play your tees are based on handicap, but I always question whether there could be a different way.  If I can shoot an average of 85 at 6000 yards, doesn't mean I want to start playing 6500 and shoot 95, my drives aren't going to start going further because I moved back.  What ever happened to the "tee it forward" thing from a few years ago?   


Posted

Five sets seems high unless the course is really long.  I usually see four, 2 mens tees, ladies tee and senior tee.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've played a course with six sets. Probably one too many but I really don't see the issue as long as people choose the right one for their skill set. Biggest issue I have is that the course designers don't bother extending the cart paths to the back tees and you have to waste time hiking back to find them.

1. 7101y
2. 6623y
3. 6429y
4. 6066y
5. 5638y
6. 5038y

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Just now, SavvySwede said:

 Biggest issue I have is that the course designers don't bother extending the cart paths to the back tees and you have to waste time hiking back to find them.

That's never a problem with me, I usually don't play those back tees!  

 

35 minutes ago, Bill926 said:

.It just got me wondering why is there a need for 5 sets of tee's, or even two sets that are over 6500 yards on a normal public golf course?

This isn't an issue with the course itself, I think its good to have appropriate tees for all levels of ability.  The bigger problem, and I don't know that it'll ever go away, is the egos of the players who want to play a long course, whether it fits their skill level or not.  Hand in hand with that issue are the "go-along" guys, who don't want to make a stand about playing appropriate tees, and so trudge along to the back tees with their ego-driven buddy.

  • Upvote 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, SavvySwede said:

Biggest issue I have is that the course designers don't bother extending the cart paths to the back tees and you have to waste time hiking back to find them.

I wish that were my problem!  (Guess I'll keep working until it is ... )  ;-)

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
43 minutes ago, Bill926 said:

So I was at the range Saturday morning, and from where I was at I had a good view of the first tee.  This course happens to have 5 sets of tee's.  The first hole is a par 5 and if you play the yellow (the first inside the back tee's about 6500 yards) you need to carry your tee shot about 120 yards over water, with the driving range to the right and OB left.  Out of all of the groups that chose to play the yellow, half didn't clear the water and the other half put it in the range.  You can drive 50 yards to the next set and the water and range are almost out of play.It just got me wondering why is there a need for 5 sets of tee's, or even two sets that are over 6500 yards on a normal public golf course?

I know in tournament play your tees are based on handicap, but I always question whether there could be a different way.  If I can shoot an average of 85 at 6000 yards, doesn't mean I want to start playing 6500 and shoot 95, my drives aren't going to start going further because I moved back.  What ever happened to the "tee it forward" thing from a few years ago?   

Because choice is a good thing.  At most courses with only 3 sets, even the shortest tees are not really positioned to be fair for women or seniors.  When there is only 10-15 yards between the tees, men playing from the middle tee have a huge advantage over the forward tees for the simple reason that the players who choose those mid tees are usually 40 or 50 yards longer with the driver than than the women or seniors teeing only 15 yards ahead.  

Offering 4 or 5 sets gives every level of player the opportunity to play the tees that best suit his game and to be competitive with a buddy who correctly plays a different set.  My home course has 4 tees, from 6920 to 5362.  I play several courses with 4 or 5 tees and I like being able to choose from a wide selection.

  • Upvote 1

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yeah, most courses don't have a tee that is appropriate for women in the first place, so more tees are good for that. The negative is the extra course maintenance that comes with the tee boxes. I see a lot of courses around here have combo tees, where half the time you'd be on the back tees and half the time on the middle tees, for example. I really like that, because it gives more choice without he extra maintenance.

  • Upvote 1

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
34 minutes ago, Fourputt said:

Because choice is a good thing.  At most courses with only 3 sets, even the shortest tees are not really positioned to be fair for women or seniors.  When there is only 10-15 yards between the tees, men playing from the middle tee have a huge advantage over the forward tees for the simple reason that the players who choose those mid tees are usually 40 or 50 yards longer with the driver than than the women or seniors teeing only 15 yards ahead.  

Offering 4 or 5 sets gives every level of player the opportunity to play the tees that best suit his game and to be competitive with a buddy who correctly plays a different set.  My home course has 4 tees, from 6920 to 5362.  I play several courses with 4 or 5 tees and I like being able to choose from a wide selection.

I see this a lot when I play with my wife. Her drives max out at 130, but the tees are only 10-20 ahead of mine. On some par 3 holes she is using driver and I am using 7 iron. Some courses are starting to add new tee boxes, so the mind set may be changing.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
37 minutes ago, Fourputt said:

Because choice is a good thing.  At most courses with only 3 sets, even the shortest tees are not really positioned to be fair for women or seniors.  When there is only 10-15 yards between the tees, men playing from the middle tee have a huge advantage over the forward tees for the simple reason that the players who choose those mid tees are usually 40 or 50 yards longer with the driver than than the women or seniors teeing only 15 yards ahead.  

Offering 4 or 5 sets gives every level of player the opportunity to play the tees that best suit his game and to be competitive with a buddy who correctly plays a different set.  My home course has 4 tees, from 6920 to 5362.  I play several courses with 4 or 5 tees and I like being able to choose from a wide selection.

I think I'm pretty much here. What's the problem with having more tees? What's the downside?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, jamo said:

I think I'm pretty much here. What's the problem with having more tees? What's the downside?

Absolutely nothing.  I found myself questioning why the OP would find it odd or unusual.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

IME a high number of tee choices is good. Tends to discourage male golfers from taking on too much course without feeling like they are on the kiddie tees.

Two courses I play at have 5 sets of tees rated for men.

  • 7676 yds 75.5/144 par 72
  • 7404 yds 74.3/140
  • 6897 yds 71.9/132
  • 6617 yds 70.7/128
  • 6230 yds 68.7/118

This course has a handicap recommendation for each tee.

  • 7435 yds 74.7/131 par 72 handicap range 0-4
  • 6950 yds 72.3/128 range 5-11                          
  • 6589 yds 70.9/125 range 12-17
  • 6032 yds 67.7/115 range 18-30
  • 5305 yds 65.7/112 range 31+

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
40 minutes ago, Dave2512 said:

IME a high number of tee choices is good. Tends to discourage male golfers from taking on too much course without feeling like they are on the kiddie tees.

Two courses I play at have 5 sets of tees rated for men.

  • 7676 yds 75.5/144 par 72
  • 7404 yds 74.3/140
  • 6897 yds 71.9/132
  • 6617 yds 70.7/128
  • 6230 yds 68.7/118

This course has a handicap recommendation for each tee.

  • 7435 yds 74.7/131 par 72 handicap range 0-4
  • 6950 yds 72.3/128 range 5-11                          
  • 6589 yds 70.9/125 range 12-17
  • 6032 yds 67.7/115 range 18-30
  • 5305 yds 65.7/112 range 31+

I agree.  My home course actually has 6 sets of tees, 4 rated for men, ranging from 73.8/136/7003 yds down to 67.8/119/5797 yds, and two rated for women at 70.7/129/5130 yds and 60.1/100/4105 yds. (That front set is also designed for kids).

When I play with my dad, I will play either the 7003 or the 6580 tees and he'll usually play the 5797 tees.  When I take my son, I'll play the same, and he'll play the 4105 tees.

The extra sets of tees, IMO, are most helpful for those men like my dad who would be stuck playing the whites on a more traditional type course with 3 sets of tees.  At his advanced age, the whites are usually too long for him.


One other thing:  If I was a member of a course to the point where I played all of my golf there because it was "free," then I would really appreciate the choices.  I feel like I'd get bored after awhile of playing the exact same course all of the time so it would be nice to mix it up and try all of the different tees.  I know of a lot of courses that not only have 5 or 6 sets of tees but they also offer "combo" sets in between each of those.  I'd ran the gamut on my home course for variation.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, DeadMan said:

... I see a lot of courses around here have combo tees, where half the time you'd be on the back tees and half the time on the middle tees, for example. I really like that, because it gives more choice without the extra maintenance.

Agree 100%.  By mixing & matching a course can create 5-6 different length courses with only 2-3 physical tee boxes.  Our state rating organization will rate all the sets of tees so one can easily pick their own poison. 

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In Norway we got five primary tee boxes:

Black - The longest tees. Very few courses has these.
White - Championship tees. More common than black, but not found everywhere.
Yellow - Men's tees. This is where almost all men tee off from, at any age. Most tournaments are held from these.
Blue - Not that common. Wikipedia says it's championship tees for women,
Red - Women's tees. Found on most courses. Also often used for juniors.

I've also seen green, which is even shorter than red and used for juniors or maybe the very young ones.

We don't pick tee boxes in Norway as much as you do in USA, so it's not much of a discussion on picking the proper ones. 99.99% of all rounds are played from yellow for men and red for women. Some senior men also play from reds, but most use yellow. I would encourage more to play from other tee boxes if their length suggest it's useful, but I think most will stick to the yellow ones. 

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
39 minutes ago, Zeph said:

In Norway we got five primary tee boxes:

Black - The longest tees. Very few courses has these.
White - Championship tees. More common than black, but not found everywhere.
Yellow - Men's tees. This is where almost all men tee off from, at any age. Most tournaments are held from these.
Blue - Not that common. Wikipedia says it's championship tees for women,
Red - Women's tees. Found on most courses. Also often used for juniors.

I've also seen green, which is even shorter than red and used for juniors or maybe the very young ones.

We don't pick tee boxes in Norway as much as you do in USA, so it's not much of a discussion on picking the proper ones. 99.99% of all rounds are played from yellow for men and red for women. Some senior men also play from reds, but most use yellow. I would encourage more to play from other tee boxes if their length suggest it's useful, but I think most will stick to the yellow ones. 

This is exactly why many courses in the US are getting away from the "Men's" and "Women's" tees and going to a more generic designation.  Because red has traditionally always been synonymous with "Women's", when my home course opened a 4th set of tees and then mixed them in so that all of the previous tee lengths changed, they eliminated Red tees completely so that men don't have to feel a stigma associated with playing a more forward tee.

Typical use, but no official designation, are: Black (6920) championship Men's tee; Blue (6578) regular Men's tee; White (6103) forward Men's and Championship Women's; and Gold (5362) regular Women's, Junior, Senior, and anyone else who wants to play them.  

The Men's club also uses a specified mix of the Blue and White, and Blue and Black for tournament tees for some of their competitions.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I just hate how courses have gone away from the traditional "Black, Blue, White and Red" tee boxes.  Now courses have Gold, Bronze, Silver, Maroon... And they all look very similar on a scorecard or the tee marker.

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted

Probably the wrong forum to bring up this topic because everyone here knows what yardage they should play from.

33 minutes ago, Zeph said:

In Norway we got five primary tee boxes:

Black - The longest tees. Very few courses has these.
White - Championship tees. More common than black, but not found everywhere.
Yellow - Men's tees. This is where almost all men tee off from, at any age. Most tournaments are held from these.
Blue - Not that common. Wikipedia says it's championship tees for women,
Red - Women's tees. Found on most courses. Also often used for juniors.

This seems like a good example.  Since most groups are going to play from the same tee anyway you can have the men's tees that get moved around for variety day to day or whatever while keeping the yardage the same for the most part.  And then have the championship tee's next, well behind the men's.  If anything give more shorter options to the ladies, juniors or beginners.


Posted
44 minutes ago, pumaAttack said:

I just hate how courses have gone away from the traditional "Black, Blue, White and Red" tee boxes.

I very much (respectfully ;)) disagree, and the reason is in @Fourputt's post that immediately precedes yours:

51 minutes ago, Fourputt said:

This is exactly why many courses in the US are getting away from the "Men's" and "Women's" tees and going to a more generic designation.  Because red has traditionally always been synonymous with "Women's", when my home course opened a 4th set of tees and then mixed them in so that all of the previous tee lengths changed, they eliminated Red tees completely so that men don't have to feel a stigma associated with playing a more forward tee.

Yes.  At courses that still just have blue, white, red, you will find way too many men playing white tees that are simply too long for them.  It's a very smart move to add more sets and specifically to make a point to make the red tees something that is clearly not the obvious ladies tees.

In fact, I think if I was creating a course from scratch, I might just flip everything backwards.  Tournament tees are red, next set up yellow, then white, then blue and then black.

Also, I wonder how much cost or effort is involved in rating a set of tees?  Because, if it was not totally uneconomical, I'd also make sure all tees were rated for both men and women.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3558 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.