Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2016 British Open at Royal Troon Discussion Thread


Note: This thread is 3463 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, 70sSanO said:

. who knows, in 10 or 20 years it could be a sponsors name tournament like some of the LPGA Majors.  Maybe the BAE Championship.  Then people will be longing for even the use of the word British.

The Taco Bell/Delta Faucets British Open doesn't have a nice ring to it

no sir - no sirree Bob

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Shindig said:

As long as we don't have to watch the Pizza Hut Masters, I think I'm okay with the other three getting presenting sponsors.

If I follow the trend in commercials, it will probably be called the The Cialis Masters Tournament.

They will probably make the winner sit in a bathtub to get the green jacket... lol!

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
On 7/17/2016 at 9:48 PM, saevel25 said:

Stenson was 9 strokes better than the average score on the field. With 15-20 mph winds he hits 79% FIR and 89% GIR! 7 out of the last 9 holes are in the top 10 toughest holes on the course for the tournament and shoots 31. 

I think this round needs to go down as one of the best rounds of major championship golf ever played. 

Let's keep in mind that Stenson and Mickelson got favorable winds on Thursday and Friday and the wind was down on the back 9 on Sunday as compared to the morning. They still would have won by a few strokes because they were clearly the best of the field. But they weren't fighting 20+ winds all four days.

Stenson's GIR was incredible.

13 hours ago, rehmwa said:

The Taco Bell/Delta Faucets British Open doesn't have a nice ring to it

no sir - no sirree Bob

You have to think UK. It would be the Boots/Glenlivet Open Championship

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, boogielicious said:

Let's keep in mind that Stenson and Mickelson got favorable winds on Thursday and Friday and the wind was down on the back 9 on Sunday as compared to the morning. They still would have won by a few strokes because they were clearly the best of the field. But they weren't fighting 20+ winds all four days.

Stenson's GIR was incredible.

You have to think UK. It would be the Boots/Glenlivet Open Championship

There's already Barclay's and RBS. How about the Asda - Marks & Spencer - Sainsbury - B&Q Open Championship? :-P

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
15 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

There's already Barclay's and RBS. How about the Asda - Marks & Spencer - Sainsbury - B&Q Open Championship? :-P

I'd go for the Cadbury Chocolate/Bass Ale Open myself.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That final round really had the feel of Phils last hurrah to me. At his age, to play so well and still lose...thats really mentally damaging. Its happened to me. I dont think were going to see phil contend in a major again. 

  • Upvote 1

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Groucho Valentine said:

That final round really had the feel of Phils last hurrah to me. At his age, to play so well and still lose...thats really mentally damaging. Its happened to me. I dont think were going to see phil contend in a major again. 

Many said that before his last Open win.  Don't sleep on Philly Mick.  He'll be back.  

Edited by Gunther

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Gunther said:

Many said that before his last Open win.  Don't sleep on Philly Mick.  He'll be back.  

I hope so. Pro golf is more interesting when he contends. 

  • Upvote 1

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Groucho Valentine said:

That final round really had the feel of Phils last hurrah to me. At his age, to play so well and still lose...thats really mentally damaging. Its happened to me. I dont think were going to see phil contend in a major again. 

Nah. All he has to do is play a slightly reduced schedule so he has less wear and tear / grind from weekly events and some extra energy for the Majors. Just look how Stricker's been doing with the reduced schedule.

I kinda thought Phil was done in 2015 with his swing being all over the place, but he pulled it back together pretty nicely.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
1 hour ago, Groucho Valentine said:

That final round really had the feel of Phils last hurrah to me. At his age, to play so well and still lose...thats really mentally damaging. Its happened to me. I dont think were going to see phil contend in a major again. 

I was thinking the same thing. Just another era of golf slowly fading away. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Groucho Valentine said:

That final round really had the feel of Phils last hurrah to me. At his age, to play so well and still lose...thats really mentally damaging. Its happened to me. I dont think were going to see phil contend in a major again. 

Don't know about that. I think his window is about closed on the US Open and PGA, but the British Open is the one major where you can contend at a later age. A lot of these Opens are more mental than physical. Look at Tom Watson at 59 and Greg Norman at 53 and even Mark Calcavecchia was up there a few times in his 50s. So I do think he'll have more chances in this major. And I think he will have one more run at Augusta.


Posted

I don't see it that way, I think Phil simply ran into some bad luck with those monster putts that fell for Henrik, he really did play well enough to win and will again IMO, especially in The Open.


Posted

No way  that Phil's last hurrah.His game especially his short game is as good as anyone in the game.He looks like hes finally figured out his putting.He still has  much length as anyone.I think the only thing that will hurt him is those hot summer days.Honestly think the weather screwed him at US Open.When a 46 yr old has to play 36 holes i a day then hes done.He will always be a factor at the Masters.


Posted
28 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

but the British Open is the one major where you can contend at a later age. 

This definitely seems true...I wonder why.  Is it the conditions (wind, etc.) that players with more experience are better equipped to deal with?

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

Don't know about that. I think his window is about closed on the US Open and PGA, but the British Open is the one major where you can contend at a later age. A lot of these Opens are more mental than physical. Look at Tom Watson at 59 and Greg Norman at 53 and even Mark Calcavecchia was up there a few times in his 50s. So I do think he'll have more chances in this major. And I think he will have one more run at Augusta.

True. I'll walk that back some, Phil might be a contender at Augusta until he's 60..lol. None of those guys won, though. But how many tournaments like that the one he just had does Phil have left in him? I would imagine not many. So to play so unbelievably well and come away with nothing has to sting like a bitch. 

Edited by Groucho Valentine

Posted
1 hour ago, Hardspoon said:

This definitely seems true...I wonder why.  Is it the conditions (wind, etc.) that players with more experience are better equipped to deal with?

There's not a premium on length. It's more strategy. The big hitters last week were trying to overpower the course, hitting driver and driving it into fescue and pot bunkers. Mickelson and Stenson kept hitting irons off the tee and playing fairways and greens. Same was when Watson and Norman contended. Same when Clarke won. Not all links courses are for the power boys.


Posted
8 hours ago, Aflighter said:

No way  that Phil's last hurrah.His game especially his short game is as good as anyone in the game.He looks like hes finally figured out his putting.He still has  much length as anyone.I think the only thing that will hurt him is those hot summer days.Honestly think the weather screwed him at US Open.When a 46 yr old has to play 36 holes i a day then hes done.He will always be a factor at the Masters.

I have to agree. Anyone besides me notice the weight he's lost? Remember the set of jiggly man boobs he used to haul around? He looks as fit as when he came out of college. This is important since he's not a spring chicken anymore. And scheduling will be important so he can be at his best for any tournament he cares to enter. He should be a little picky. It's not like he's in danger of losing his tour card or needs the money!

One thing that has bothered me since the conclusion of the Open is that some media commentators seem to want to dance on Phil's grave! They continually point out that Phil has finished second in majors 11 times, while conveniently ignoring the fact that Nicklaus finished second 19 times!

It's called being in the hunt! Being in contention! Giving yourself the opportunity to win! Would they feel better if he finished tied for 15th?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nicklaus weighs in on the quality of the 'Duel in the wind':

Quote

I was fortunate to watch every second of today’s final round of the Open Championship, and I thought it was fantastic. Phil Mickelson played one of the best rounds I have ever seen played in the Open and Henrik Stenson just played better—he played one of the greatest rounds I have ever seen. Phil certainly has nothing to be ashamed of because he played wonderfully. Henrik played well from beginning to end. He drove the ball well; his iron game was great; his short game was wonderful; and his putting was great. Henrik was simply terrific. To win your first major championship is something special in and of itself, but to do it in the fashion Henrik did it in, makes for something very special and incredibly memorable. I'm proud of and happy for Henrik. Some in the media have already tried to compare today’s final round to 1977 at Turnberry, with Tom Watson and me in what they called the “duel in the sun.” I thought we played great and had a wonderful match. On that day, Tom got me, 65-66. Our final round was really good, but theirs was even better. What a great match today.

 

  • Upvote 1

Kevin


Note: This thread is 3463 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.