I've created a way to build a golf swing!!!!!

[JoeB from Tennessee]

1 hour ago, iacas said:

Hmmm.

Completely stable 

[JoeB from Tennessee]

The first picture of stackman and pro 1st pic. Both have head over right foot, hands and shaft points to left knee. He is striking more to trail side. The second I'm releasing around myself because of where I stabilized, he's going more targetward because of where he stabilized. I never said it's pretty but a wise man told me "what happens after impact is irrelevant ". It's only a counterbalance or reaction to precedent force. To those who dislike my 3/4 backswing ever heard of JB Holmes. 3/4 and goes a mile. I guess he'll never do much. 

[No Mulligans]

Almost all the really good players have inline impact and look pretty similar around impact.  JB Holmes you say:

 

[David in FL]

18 minutes ago, JoeB from Tennessee said:

Completely stable 

I can sink your feet in concrete, and you'll be plenty "stable".  But you'll never generate any power...

 

[JoeB from Tennessee]

It's all at impact. Stabilizing and counterbalance, pushing down my eye line. It's true. No reason to make it up. 

[JoeB from Tennessee]

I'm inline at impact. I really appreciate all the positive feedback from some asking questions. To all the positions gurus, I'm not looking for a swing coach. I know it works. Am I super flexible, no. Is my swing pretty, no. I'm the kind of guy needing this. I'm long enough to play any course and enjoy it. My short game,  putting and long game revolve around a few simple concepts. That's what golf needs, not more still pics being picked apart of  a swing  that can be taught simply and help handicaps drop. If you need me I'll be on most repeatable move in golf. Don't worry it's not a business it's YouTube. Adios 

really positive forum even from being "allowed " to take part but we're watching you. 

This is why Golf can't grow.

[Valleygolfer]

Got any trackman data?

[iacas]

1 hour ago, No Mulligans said:

That's the opposite of stable there, IMO.

18 minutes ago, JoeB from Tennessee said:

I'm inline at impact.

Maybe with the ball well back in your stance, and about a 10-11° launch angle with your 4-iron.

18 minutes ago, JoeB from Tennessee said:

To all the positions gurus, I'm not looking for a swing coach. I know it works.

You're an 8 index…?

18 minutes ago, JoeB from Tennessee said:

really positive forum even from being "allowed " to take part but we're watching you. 

This is why Golf can't grow.

Nobody's being negative. I've seen people asking you questions. People asking you to demonstrate or explain some things.

[Hacker James]

Not sure what the main point is, but all I can get out of it is simply "keep your eye on the ball" .  Other than that, "There is no there, there...."       From what I can observe from the static photos his weight is on the trail foot, little transfer.  If the object is to keep a consistent contact point, this is governed by how you set up and the natural bottom of the swing arc without manipulation of arm length.  As for whether or not it works for the OP, we can only take his word for it and if so, great.

Not unlike other posts in the past that went on and on and regardless of people genuinely trying to help, seemed to end up with the OP going into Charlie Brown mode :  "Why's everybody always pickin on me".  Now, NOT saying that is necessarily what is happening here, only in that there is similarity and it reminded me of the other thread(s).

[mvmac]

@JoeB from Tennessee, thanks for posting your swing and an explanation video.

Do you have any Trackman data to share? Path, dynamic loft, smash factor?

With your impact position, I would think your smash and dynamic lofts numbers have some room for improvement. 

I agree with @No Mulligans pics, basically every good player is inline at or just after impact (shaft inline with their lead forearm). You reach inline well before impact. This is what I would call a "stable" impact.

 

[Alx]

9 hours ago, JoeB from Tennessee said:

positions gurus

Your butt looks excessively tucked under. Its a weak position for the lower back...

Its not just about reaching positions for the sake of looks. There are obvious mechanical advantages with most "pretty" positions.

[Ernest Jones]

11 hours ago, No Mulligans said:

 

Ugh...no thanks. 

[woodzie264]

13 minutes ago, Ernest Jones said:

Ugh...no thanks. 

? - it's all about stabilizing and swinging down the eyeline. 

[Mr. Desmond]

Congratulations on swinging your swing. But a model for others? I mean, I've seen a lot of models and methods over the years by people who have spent years working in golf with others and intense study. Like I said, Congrats on finding something that works for you. Keep on studying.

[David in FL]

58 minutes ago, woodzie264 said:

? - it's all about stabilizing and swinging down the eyeline. 

I think it's releasing down the eyeline.  Just not sure what that means.  Not sure I even want to know...

[zipazoid]

I think there's a difference between 'what works for you' versus 'what works.'

For ex, when I putt, I look at the putterhead thru the stroke instead of the ball. It works for me, but I don't necessarily think it would work universally. 

Edited June 22, 2017 by zipazoid

[mcanadiens]

55 minutes ago, zipazoid said:

I think there's a difference between 'what works for you' versus 'what works.'

For ex, when I putt, I look at the putterhead thru the stroke instead of the ball. It works for me, but I don't necessarily think it would work universally. 

This is more-or-less my thought on the matter. Supposing the 8 HI is legit, it's way better than I do. It's better than the majority of people I play with. Teaching your individual swing to the general populace is another thing altogether. I've had buddies that think they should tell me what to do because they generally card a lower number than I do. Never mind they cheat like hell. What works for them, doesn't work for me.

Didn't watch the video, but the stills above do look funny. 

 

[zipazoid]

1 minute ago, mcanadiens said:

This is more-or-less my thought on the matter. Supposing the 8 HI is legit, it's way better than I do. It's better than the majority of people I play with. Teaching your individual swing to the general populace is another thing altogether. I've had buddies that think they should tell me what to do because they generally card a lower number than I do. Never mind they cheat like hell. What works for them, doesn't work for me.

Didn't watch the video, but the stills above do look funny. 

 

Jim Furyk is US Open champ. He has a swing that works fantastically well for him. But I don't see him, or anyone, advocating standing real close to the ball, looping the club outside & off-plane on the backswing, drop it inside & drastically get the hips out of the way in order to make room for the arms to get thru the ball.