Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2710 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Maybe you, or a beginner that you know, has also misinterpreted these?

(And maybe you don't agree with my revised interpretations!)

Interlock grip - at first I thought that meant fingers really, er, interlocked, i.e. meshed together tightly, resulting in a very weak left hand and inflexible wrists. In reality it's more just "in between" than "inter locked"!

Grip the club as if you were holding a baby bird - well I've never held a baby bird, but I took this to mean a very light and therefore loose grip. I now think it means a grip that is gentle but immovable - maybe like you'd hold a small child's hand while crossing the street.

Restrict the hips - doesn't mean prevent your hips from moving - I think means feeling a connection through your core like you would if you were restricting your hips.

Lead with the hips - doesn't mean that your hips lead in the sense of going out first, like a dog on a leash! Actually means more like the way a horse leads a carriage. They both start moving at the same time, but the horse provides the force.

Make a full turn - doesn't mean turning around and away from the ball - really just means remembering to turn your shoulders rather than just using your arms.

Weight shift - doesn't mean mass (body) shift! It means moving your weight in the physics sense of weight (force), e.g. putting more pressure through the leading foot through impact.

Maintain lag - doesn't mean trying to actually hold (maintain) the lag using your wrists. It just means do other things, e.g. accelerating through impact, that cause lag to be maintained.

Can anyone offer up other examples of misinterpreted tips and advice?


Posted

Fun - The act of paying money, to go out on a big lawn, hit a little white ball with a crooked stick, go find it, then hit it again.

Always remember, the same country that invented golf and called it a game, invented bag pipes and called it music.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, Coder said:

Interlock grip - at first I thought that meant fingers really, er, interlocked, i.e. meshed together tightly, resulting in a very weak left hand and inflexible wrists. In reality it's more just "in between" than "inter locked"!

I would take it as something that is definitively on the extreme like that. As long as the pinky finger of the right and index finger of the left are in the gaps between the finger then it is interlocking. 

6 minutes ago, Coder said:

Grip the club as if you were holding a baby bird - well I've never held a baby bird, but I took this to mean a very light and therefore loose grip. I now think it means a grip that is gentle but immovable - maybe like you'd hold a small child's hand while crossing the street.

Most people misinterpret the degree in which they can hold the club tightly. I never believed in this old tip. It came from golfers who played golf their whole lives. They have built up hand strength. Gripping gently might be pretty firm for us. 

8 minutes ago, Coder said:

Restrict the hips - doesn't mean prevent your hips from moving - I think means feeling a connection through your core like you would if you were restricting your hips.

Yea, don't do this. Let the hips turn

8 minutes ago, Coder said:

Lead with the hips - doesn't mean that your hips lead in the sense of going out first, like a dog on a leash! Actually means more like the way a horse leads a carriage. They both start moving at the same time, but the horse provides the force.

Could be a feeling, could not be a feeling someone focuses on. The hips do slide towards the target in the downswing. All good players do this. They also have their hips open at impact. Much more rotated than amateurs. 

9 minutes ago, Coder said:

Make a full turn - doesn't mean turning around and away from the ball - really just means remembering to turn your shoulders rather than just using your arms.

Shoulders turn about 90 degrees. So some part of the back is turned completely away from the target. 

9 minutes ago, Coder said:

Maintain lag - doesn't mean trying to actually hold (maintain) the lag using your wrists. It just means do other things, e.g. accelerating through impact, that cause lag to be maintained.

You can add accelerating through impact. The club is near max velocity, so an acceleration of zero, at impact. 

Lag happens naturally, and it varies depending on the golfer. 

I think there might be another thread like this somewhere on this forum. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

now now.....

if people start having a common understanding of trite golf expressions instead of subjective confusion.....

why, thousands of instructors will lose out on thousands of McLesson opportunities to explain them, assign a drill, and then explain it differently on the next visit

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Way back, when I was getting instruction, my swing guru and I discussed all these items as I recall. Just enough to understand them, in as much as they all had something positive to do with the swing. 

I remember we laugh about the baby bird thought. What if that baby bird was an albatross?

 

 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
41 minutes ago, Coder said:

Grip the club as if you were holding a baby bird - well I've never held a baby bird, but I took this to mean a very light and therefore loose grip. I now think it means a grip that is gentle but immovable - maybe like you'd hold a small child's hand while crossing the street.

Yes;  there's all sorts of problems with holding the grip like a baby bird.  Check out this thread:

One of my favorite golf books includes this passage:

Someone once wrote that you should grip the club as lightly as you would if you were holding a baby bird in your palm, and you were trying to keep it from flying away without crushing it to death.  Obviously, this person was a lunatic.  

  • Thumbs Up 1

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

For 40 years, I taught a physical activity (singing) by using a LOT of imagery as many small muscle activities were internal and could not be seen.  We often joked about weird things teachers said that were misinterpreted or even misunderstood. So this got me to wonder if it would be of interest to have people discuss what statements from an instructor must confused them or set them back.  So far I understand what my coach says I need to do to improve my golf game; I am just not consistent to see my mastery of the points just yet.

 

In My BELDIN Green Bay Packer 1999 SUPER BOWL CHAMPION bag :  :ping: G410 Plus Alta Red CB 55 sr,  GX-7  (acting as a 3 wood)  :ping: 4H, 5H. Sr Flex   :ping:  G400 6i Sr Flex, G-Max 7i. 9i Sr Flex , Glide 2.0  Wedges (50º, 56º, 60º)  :touredge:  Chipper  :ping: Putter: Cadence Mid-TR 350g:bridgestone:  e12 for the items I try to hit on purpose.  :footjoy: on my feet and hands, US Embassy-Singapore hat on my head (with PACKERS, Brewers or UW-Badgers hats as options).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

One instructor I use to visit had this on his wall:

 

20180226_174851~2[1856].jpg

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎7‎/‎13‎/‎2018 at 12:28 PM, saevel25 said:

I would take it as something that is definitively on the extreme like that. As long as the pinky finger of the right and index finger of the left are in the gaps between the finger then it is interlocking. 

Most people misinterpret the degree in which they can hold the club tightly. I never believed in this old tip. It came from golfers who played golf their whole lives. They have built up hand strength. Gripping gently might be pretty firm for us. 

Yea, don't do this. Let the hips turn

Could be a feeling, could not be a feeling someone focuses on. The hips do slide towards the target in the downswing. All good players do this. They also have their hips open at impact. Much more rotated than amateurs. 

Shoulders turn about 90 degrees. So some part of the back is turned completely away from the target. 

You can add accelerating through impact. The club is near max velocity, so an acceleration of zero, at impact. 

Lag happens naturally, and it varies depending on the golfer. 

I think there might be another thread like this somewhere on this forum. 

You want your upper back to be turned towards the target, no?  Did you mean towards the target, or am I reading into this the wrong way?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 7/13/2018 at 1:17 PM, Coder said:

Maybe you, or a beginner that you know, has also misinterpreted these?

(And maybe you don't agree with my revised interpretations!)

Interlock grip - at first I thought that meant fingers really, er, interlocked, i.e. meshed together tightly, resulting in a very weak left hand and inflexible wrists. In reality it's more just "in between" than "inter locked"!

Grip the club as if you were holding a baby bird - well I've never held a baby bird, but I took this to mean a very light and therefore loose grip. I now think it means a grip that is gentle but immovable - maybe like you'd hold a small child's hand while crossing the street.

Restrict the hips - doesn't mean prevent your hips from moving - I think means feeling a connection through your core like you would if you were restricting your hips.

Lead with the hips - doesn't mean that your hips lead in the sense of going out first, like a dog on a leash! Actually means more like the way a horse leads a carriage. They both start moving at the same time, but the horse provides the force.

Make a full turn - doesn't mean turning around and away from the ball - really just means remembering to turn your shoulders rather than just using your arms.

Weight shift - doesn't mean mass (body) shift! It means moving your weight in the physics sense of weight (force), e.g. putting more pressure through the leading foot through impact.

Maintain lag - doesn't mean trying to actually hold (maintain) the lag using your wrists. It just means do other things, e.g. accelerating through impact, that cause lag to be maintained.

Can anyone offer up other examples of misinterpreted tips and advice?

I’m still misinterpreting things people say, but some people are also misinterpreting what they are saying so I guess it’s okay 🤪

The great thing about golf is so many people do it The there are bound to be different opinions on just about everything.

One famous instructor says his swing is “effortless”, but when you see him hit a shot he’s all sweaty, hair disheveled and out of breath when he’s saying how little effort it took. 😂

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, Grinde6 said:

You want your upper back to be turned towards the target, no?  Did you mean towards the target, or am I reading into this the wrong way?

You're saying the same things in different ways.

The torso turns so the back faces the target, but if you feel it's turning "away" from the target, you can understand what he means there too. Obviously you don't turn your back so it points "away" from the target on the backswing.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, dennyjones said:

One instructor I use to visit had this on his wall:

 

20180226_174851~2[1856].jpg

I guess that's like his updated version of the power accumulators.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/25/2018 at 8:09 AM, dennyjones said:

One instructor I use to visit had this on his wall:

 

20180226_174851~2[1856].jpg

No. 4 is confusing. Lot of folks interprete that as rolling right hand/forearm over left actively. I think lots of golfers stall and goat hump all day trying to do that. I imagine I still do it to some extent. 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 7/25/2018 at 9:21 AM, Grinde6 said:

You want your upper back to be turned towards the target, no?  Did you mean towards the target, or am I reading into this the wrong way?

No, I saw that myself. The back needs to be turned toward the target, not away from it. Unless you're swinging in reverse, which would be interesting!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2710 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.