Jump to content

525 posts / 25505 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

I enjoyed watching Woodland take the title yesterday. Seems like a great guy, and simply played the best golf in the World at the right time. 

Koepka was oh so close to yet another US Open and major championship. He seemed to really handle the defeat well and likely knows he will be in contention at the next one. He is a special player for sure. 

I never considered Phil or Tiger a real threat to take this championship. I think the last player older than 35 to win this championship in he last twenty years or so was Angel Cabrera. I just don’t see either one of those guys winning another PGA or US Open. Woodland is 35. 

Now I’m ready for the Open Championship!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

By the way, everyone's talking about Woodland's shots on 14 and 17 as the big moments yesterday, but I thought the biggest turning point was the break he got on 13. He hit his shot way off line and just enough to the right that it avoided the thickest of rough. This was just when he was reeling and the lead was cut to 1. He was able to get the ball to the green, make par and then took advantage of 14.

If that ball is just slightly more left and in the thickest rough, he probably makes bogey, the tournament's tied, and mentally, he's a different person going to 14. Huge moment and break there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ChrisP said:

I just wonder how seriously he sees 18. I know it meant a lot when he was younger, but today, it may not mean as much. If he gets it, he gets it. If he doesn’t, he doesn’t. It’s not the end of the world for him. I don’t think he wants to jeopardize his future health by fixating himself on the record. There are other things more important for him now, which sucks for us because we don’t get to see him much and not at his best that often, but it’s good for him.

Would be interesting to hear a completely honest interview with him about such things. I agree that it may be less important today than ten years ago, largely because he's older and gets less opportunities. Majors will for the rest of his career be what matters most, but the family has probably changed him. And age, and health problems. And etc.

He's had an amazing career either way and is the GOAT. Only thing missing on his list is winnings more majors than Jack. 

Is he still behind Snead in number of wins?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, Zeph said:

Is he still behind Snead in number of wins?

Yes - 82 to 81, but that is counting Snead's team wins and some other questionable events.
Here is an interesting article about Snead's 82

190503-tiger-trophy.jpg

How many PGA Tour titles should Tiger Woods have? Using the same 'Sam Snead criteria,' quite a few more

Just like the GOAT discussion - IMO (and many others) 81 > 82

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Interesting that the last two champions at Pebble Beach were McDowell and Woodland. McDowell was ranked #33 in the world when he edged Greg Havret and Woodland #25. Between those two wins at other venues you've got McIlroy, Rose, Kaymer, Simpson, Koepka, Spieth, and DJ, all future Hall-of-Famers (yes, I think Simpson will have a resume good enough when all is said and done to get in). Perhaps Pebble brings in more of the underdog winner? You had a few more big underdog names in contention than usual with Reavie and Hadley in the last few groups. Could just be a total coincidence, too. 

Also, really concerned that this is the "new" U.S. Open. Lightening up on the difficulty to try and make players more happy. Gore being brought in to try and get players' opinions and make changes based on their recommendations. Heard some guys this morning on radio say in their talks with USGA officials that the US Open is going to try and make the US Open more player-happy in the future. T

Edited by ChrisP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ChrisP said:

He’ll get in next year’s Open. He’ll probably get in the British. He’s going to make an impact early as a pro. May even win one of his first few tournaments he plays. I feel like he’s going to make a mark early on Tour. I’ll go on a limb and say he gets a top-15 finish this week.

Question:  he got into the 2019 U.S. Open contingent on remaining an amateur.  His performance at said Open gets him into next year's : is that also contingent on remaining an amateur?  I would guess not.  In other words, when an amateur who got in contingent on amateur status (e.g., U.S. Amateur champion, etc) finishes high enough for the next event, is that invite requiring the same status?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

20 hours ago, HOF19 said:

I have yet to go to my first Golf Tournament …...How does that overhead noise from the motor of the Blimp not bother these guys ?

Fox Sports not using the blimp.  The drones are quiet and far superior to a blimp.  Some amazing footage.  CBS needs to start using drones for their golf tournaments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, HJJ003 said:

 

I never considered Phil or Tiger a real threat to take this championship. I think the last player older than 35 to win this championship in he last twenty years or so was Angel Cabrera. I just don’t see either one of those guys winning another PGA or US Open. Woodland is 35. 

Now I’m ready for the Open Championship!!

I think most expected Tiger to be in the mix this week as the course should have set up well for where his game is at this point in his life. Unfortunately, I think the damn marine layer and cool temps really effect his body and ability to compete (he said as much). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Zippo said:

Kudos to Woodland for a great tournament. Very impressed with how he held off any jitters to play some solid golf. Love that he finished with that birdie instead of a lag and par!

I told my son that he or I could 3 putt from there and win the tournament/

9 hours ago, jamo said:

I swear to god Phil's birth certificate must just say "U.S. Open Sunday." Every single year I read something about how Sunday was his birthday. I know it's not true, but it's 100% true. 

The final day of the U.S. Open falls on a different numbered day almost every year.  So it can't always be Phil's birthday.  But it does always align with Father's Day.  And Phil is a father.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

The final day of the U.S. Open falls on a different numbered day almost every year.  So it can't always be Phil's birthday.  But it does always align with Father's Day.  And Phil is a father.

He also had a father, so it counts double for him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, HJJ003 said:

I enjoyed watching Woodland take the title yesterday. Seems like a great guy, and simply played the best golf in the World at the right time. 

Koepka was oh so close to yet another US Open and major championship. He seemed to really handle the defeat well and likely knows he will be in contention at the next one. He is a special player for sure. 

I never considered Phil or Tiger a real threat to take this championship. I think the last player older than 35 to win this championship in he last twenty years or so was Angel Cabrera. I just don’t see either one of those guys winning another PGA or US Open. Woodland is 35. 

Now I’m ready for the Open Championship!!

Woodland needs to smile more.  Maybe he has bad teeth.  After sinking that birdie on 18 for a big win I would have had a smile on my face for a week!

Edited by Double Mocha Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GolfLug said:

Woodland almost always has chew in his mouth AFAIK. I think that makes it difficult for him to smile wide open.

Ahh, so he has stained teeth.

Phil and Tiger, these days, almost always have gum in their mouth.  Or is it chew?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Phil and Tiger, these days, almost always have gum in their mouth.  Or is it chew?!

Scuttlebutt is CBD gum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

Woodland almost always has chew in his mouth AFAIK. I think that makes it difficult for him to smile wide open.

Geez another similarity win him and Koepka. I guess that one poster who hates guys spitting on the course isn’t a fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which was the tougher shot, Woodland's three wood on 14 or his wedge on 17?

IMO, the three wood was the tougher shot, very high risk reward. That could have easily turned into a bogey or worse. Those guys are all magicians with a wedge in their hands around the green and Woodland said he had almost the same shot on 17 on Thursday and pulled it off then as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I once had a similar shot on a par 3.  I was on the green and had to wedge over the corner of a sand trap to get it close to the hole.  Used a high bounce, wide-soled wedge but, nevertheless, took a divot out of the putting surface.  Seems like a golf course architect wouldn't design a hole like this.

Just now, Double Mocha Man said:

I once had a similar shot on a par 3.  I was on the green and had to wedge over the corner of a sand trap to get it close to the hole.  Used a high bounce, wide-soled wedge but, nevertheless, took a divot out of the putting surface.  Seems like a golf course architect wouldn't design a hole like this.

Which begs the question: Is this a one-putt or two-putt?  I made the 3 footer off the wedge shot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2020 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Agree that I’m adding nothing. I’m just an unbiased bystander interested in the truth. I don’t know enough about the physics of the golf swing to comment - and I’m guessing you don’t either. However, any good science experiment has a hypothesis, control group, and treatment set. Your claims are unscientific, and at worst biased with a pile of dogma.
    • Royal Golf Club in Slidell LA  From the White Tees is 6245 yards  70.10/155 1.  Par 4 386 yds.  Fairly straight forward.  Best to bet is to get around the 150 marker and fly it to the green.  Off the tee box, in the fairway or slightly left is okay, going a bit right can get you in trouble with trees. 2.  Par 3 183 yards.  Straight with water to the left and OB in trees and ditch on right.  Best to be straight and short. 3.  Par 4 387 yards.  Pretty straight with second shot having to carry over water.  Water on right of green so if you are gonna miss the 2nd shot, best to miss a bit left.  Bad tee shot and you will not be able to hit GIR. 4.  Par 4 403 yards.  Straight with trees to the right and a ditch to the left.  A fairly wide fairway but a good shot off the tee is really an asset.  Green is built up a few feet so not gonna get anything to run up, have to pretty much hit the green on the fly. 5.  Par 4 390 yards.  Fairly wide fairway.  Nice drive gets you to the 150 area and you have hit the green because it is also hard to run it up onto the green. 6.  Par 5 483 yards.  Trees on left make it hard to reach the green in 2 or 3 if you are over there.  Humps to the right, but better here if you don't hit the middle of the fairway.  Small ditch runs across the fairway and can come into play on your 2nd shot.  Closer to the green are large oak trees on the left and to the right.  Long and left will put you in the water. 7.  Par 3 128 yards.  Have to carry water to reach the green.  For some reason (for me) the ball seems not to carry so I hit one more club than normal for that distance.  Pin placement is what will dictate what club you will need.  Missing right better than missing left. 8.  Par 4 364 yards.  Dogleg left.  First shot over water .  Safe play is to the 150 marker but you can take a chance and hit driver over water to shorten 2nd shot.  Me, I play to the 150 marker.  Second shot is pretty straight forward but you do not want to miss right as it is harder to get to the normal pin location than from the left side.  When pin placement is in the front, difficult to putt if above the hole or from right side. 9.  Par 5 475 yards.  Dogleg left.  Crucial to hit tee shot past trees on the left and the oak tree to have a good look for 2nd shot to the green.  Trees on left are like a magnet for golf ball.  Preferred shot of the tee is a long draw giving you a chance to hit green in 2.  Second shot that misses left can be big problem.  Best to miss a little to the right. 10.  Par 4 388 yards.  Green is slightly left from the tee but safe play is to the middle to just right of middle of the fairway.  Errant tee shot to the left is trouble into the trees or a blocked shot to the green.  Water protects the front of the green with trees and marshy area to the left of the green.  2nd shot has to hit the green or miss just a little right.  Anything else and you are playing for bogie. 11.  Par 4 280 yards.  Nice hole with a birdie opportunity.  However, miss left and your next shot is your 3rd shot.  Straight off the tee looks good, but a miss to the right brings a tree and a couple of humps into play. 12.  Par 4 327 yards.  Trees down the right side of the fairway and way left brings you into trees and blocked shot into the green. I hit 3W from this tee to gibe me a better chance to stay in the fairway.  In fairway but to the right a bit puts a tree in between you and the green.   13.  Par 4 406 yards.  Looks straight from the tee box, but there is water on the left near the green with a lot of cypress trees and pine trees if you go left off the tee.  Best to be slightly right, but to much right brings you into the trees.  The area to the front of the green seems to stay soft, so any 2nd shot that lands short is not going to make it to the green. 14.  Par 4 360 yards.  Trees to the left and trees and big ditch for lost ball on the right of the fairway.  Hit a long iron to the 150 marker then hit your second shot over a very deep ditch to the green.  Any shot to the right side of the fairway makes is difficult to get to the green in two.  Miss right and your ball is gone,  Miss left and your ball is gone.   15.  Par 3 150 yards.  Not much here other than you really need to hit the green or be straight and short.  Anything else and you will not make par, unless you are lucky. 16.  Par 5 480 yards.  Nice straight hole with trees to the left.  Hit it way right and you are playing out of trees.  To me, it takes a good drive and a good second shot.  A missed shot at the green that goes left leaves you really short-sided and makes for a difficult 3rd shot.  Missing right slightly is tolerable, but a bigger miss to the right is gonna be OB. 17.  Par 3 135 yards.  Green is somewhat elevated.  You better hit it straight off the tee and not be to short.  Hitting it left brings some really tall trees into play and will leave you in trouble whether you clear the trees or not.  Missing right is probably worse because many times you will not find your ball or will find yourself with a very tough 2nd shot. 18.  Par 5 520 yards.  Big dogleg left.  You have to hit first shot off the tee over a big creek with trees on the left.  Miss right and guess what????  More trees.  To long and you are in trouble.  Second shot is going over the creek with oak trees to the left.  Just pick a flat area on the right and settle for getting to the green in 3 if lucky.  If your second shot goes to left of the landing area, you will be blocked by a very large oak tree.  Hit it a little further and you have a nice look at the green.  Pin placement here makes a big difference as to the difficulty of making your putt. Hope this helps and give you a little idea where I play probably 70 of my golf.  It has a driving range, a putting green, a small club house with food and beverage.  Price is good and staff is extremely friendly.  Grounds crews really try hard and it is in better shape now than over the past few years. I have played better and more expensive courses in the area but this course is more difficult because if you are not in the FW off the tee, you are going to have trouble.  There is not sand traps, but who needs them when you live in SE Louisiana where the ground is always wet and many times harder to hit out of than sand.  I looked back and my average score for the past 3 years on this course is +16.  I am 71 years old and am contemplating moving to the Gold tees as I have lost a bit of distance off the tee and with my irons...I love golf though....
    • Having read the entire myself, I entirely agree with your observation. Good job!
    • @Robos: 🤦‍♂️ You're adding nothing here. Again, glad you enjoy the swing. I believe, for reasons based in biomechanics, physics, and simple science, that the swing has an artificial limit or ceiling. But I'm glad you like it.
    • That’s the crux, isn’t it? It’s not on tour. To my knowledge, there has never been a high level golfer that has used a swing similar to this and there have been all sorts of “non-traditional” swings over the years. If it’s the best way to swing the golf club base on biometrics, somebody in the annals of history would surely have stumbled on it. The modern golf swing is a result of many years of evolution. People don’t simply do it that way because of tradition - they do it because these particular movements produce the desired results necessary to compete at the highest level. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Beyersdoerfer
      Beyersdoerfer
      (22 years old)
    2. choppineapple
      choppineapple
      (36 years old)
    3. drewgolfer
      drewgolfer
      (34 years old)
    4. Inferno2ss
      Inferno2ss
      (50 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...