Jump to content
Mr Puddle

Driving for Show, Putting for Dough, or Is It?

153 posts / 9725 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Register for free today and you won't see this ad spot again!

47 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

My typically vital approach shot after an unimportant yet awful drive.

Related image

Sitting up nicely....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

33 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Sitting up nicely....

You could always postpone your round of golf, mark the ball and come back in 100 years... after the tree has fallen down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

You could always postpone your round of golf, mark the ball and come back in 100 years... after the tree has fallen down.

With my luck it’d be a Bristlecone tree.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

With my luck it’d be a Bristlecone tree.

No problem.  Then come back to play the shot in 3700 years.  By that time you might even get more handicap strokes on the hole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveP043 said:

  You didn't make many long putts, obviously, because nobody makes long ones with any regularity.

Yep. But I’m betting he thinks those 7’ putts should be made 80% of the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, edomingox said:

I used to think that too.  So I worked on my chipping.  Then I realized during scrambles, we never chipped because someone always hit the green.  Then I noticed that most of our birdies came from sinking short to mid range putts.  Drives were unimportant.

I would rank the 4 skills as such:

  1. approach
  2. putting
  3. chipping
  4. driving

Out of all these skills, putting is the most convenient and easiest to practice.  Bobby Locke was dangerous because of his putting. 

Again, all of this is debatable and not set in stone.  These are just my priorities now, from experience.

approach

driving

chipping

putting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 hours ago, edomingox said:

You drive for show, but putt for dough

I think it's true.  Though, approach shots I believe are more important.  That is what determines if you have a birdie opportunity or not.

But, if you can't make a 3 foot putt, then you'll never shoot your best.

I would take bad drives (not in a hazard) over missing a 3 foot putts any day.

Though most bogeys can be blamed on any shot, it's more likely blamed on a putt than a drive.  Think about all those people that 4 putt.  Or even 3 putt.  Eliminate all the 3 putts and you'll save strokes. 

Geeeez -  This is not an opinion up for discussion. There is no "I think" about it. It can be statistically proven that poor driving is a determinant of poor scoring MUCH more than putting. You have to drive the ball into play.  Consider the impact on scoring in these scenarios:

A) If a pro drove the ball you.

B) You putted for a pro

If you have to debate the impacts, you have never seen golf played at a respectable level.

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And no, I don't think 7 footers are made 80% of the time.  I believe 6 footers are close to the 50% mark with the pros.

I'm not saying that driving is not critical.  Just like I'm sure you wouldn't say that putting isn't critical.  I just don't think that driving is as critical as putting could be.  And again, we can argue till the cows come home.  But here are some reason I work on putting more:

Bad driving can be more detrimental than poor putting on paper, given that you can drive it into hazard and all.  Though with putting, you don't have wind, hazards, water, sand, etc., to really factor in your shot as much, but you do need to know which way the break goes.   

If you hit every green in regulation and 2 putted, that would be 36 putts.  On a Par 72, that is 50% of your score.  Using these numbers, I would say you are more likely to knock strokes off of putting than anything else.

Having confidence in your putter can also relieve the pressure from the rest of your game.  I would rather face an opponent who lost confidence in his putter rather than his driver.

I have Dave Pelz's Putting Bible.  I don't think he makes a Driving Bible.   

Tiger Woods made more putts at 10 feet to stay with the leaders and missed fairways on a regular basis.  Tiger lead in putting during his 2003-2008 season.

Putting is also the easiest aspect to improve upon.  If you can eliminate all 3 putts, you can save on average about 3-4 strokes per round.  I am more likely to drive into a hazard more times than I am making 3 putts.  This tells me that my putting practice is much better than driving.  Because I do not practice my driving at all.  I mainly practice putting and wedge shots. 

If you are playing a guy for money, would you be more afraid of a guy who drives it long, or sinks all his 5 foot putts?

Would you rather miss every fairway or miss every line in your putt?

If you were to choose which of the shots to re-hit, would it be a drive or a putt?  And keep in mind with putts, that would include getting a re-hit with your 2nd putt.  If it were my choice, I would rather re-hit every putt I made than every drive I made.

I know that many of the questions may not be fairly comparable.  And to be honest, I believe that every aspect of the game (approach, putting, driving, chipping) are all nearly equally important.  I just think that some might just edge out the other when it comes to lowering scores the quickest and easiest way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 minutes ago, edomingox said:

And no, I don't think 7 footers are made 80% of the time.  I believe 6 footers are close to the 50% mark with the pros.

I'm not saying that driving is not critical.  Just like I'm sure you wouldn't say that putting isn't critical.  I just don't think that driving is as critical as putting could be.  And again, we can argue till the cows come home.  But here are some reason I work on putting more:

Bad driving can be more detrimental than poor putting on paper, given that you can drive it into hazard and all.  Though with putting, you don't have wind, hazards, water, sand, etc., to really factor in your shot as much, but you do need to know which way the break goes.   

If you hit every green in regulation and 2 putted, that would be 36 putts.  On a Par 72, that is 50% of your score.  Using these numbers, I would say you are more likely to knock strokes off of putting than anything else.

Having confidence in your putter can also relieve the pressure from the rest of your game.  I would rather face an opponent who lost confidence in his putter rather than his driver.

I have Dave Pelz's Putting Bible.  I don't think he makes a Driving Bible.   

Tiger Woods made more putts at 10 feet to stay with the leaders and missed fairways on a regular basis.  Tiger lead in putting during his 2003-2008 season.

Putting is also the easiest aspect to improve upon.  If you can eliminate all 3 putts, you can save on average about 3-4 strokes per round.  I am more likely to drive into a hazard more times than I am making 3 putts.  This tells me that my putting practice is much better than driving.  Because I do not practice my driving at all.  I mainly practice putting and wedge shots. 

If you are playing a guy for money, would you be more afraid of a guy who drives it long, or sinks all his 5 foot putts?

Would you rather miss every fairway or miss every line in your putt?

If you were to choose which of the shots to re-hit, would it be a drive or a putt?  And keep in mind with putts, that would include getting a re-hit with your 2nd putt.  If it were my choice, I would rather re-hit every putt I made than every drive I made.

I know that many of the questions may not be fairly comparable.  And to be honest, I believe that every aspect of the game (approach, putting, driving, chipping) are all nearly equally important.  I just think that some might just edge out the other when it comes to lowering scores the quickest and easiest way.

Seperation value, Homie.  that is clearly what you are missing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, lastings said:

Seperation value, Homie.  that is clearly what you are missing. 

How so?  I stated that I believe that every aspect of the game (approach, putting, driving, chipping) are all nearly equally important.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, edomingox said:

How so?  I stated that I believe that every aspect of the game (approach, putting, driving, chipping) are all nearly equally important.
 

They aren't.   We literally have Strokes gained statistics.   they exist.  they are measured.  

A scratch golfer gains more stokes on a 10-handicap off the tee than on the green. 

A Pro golfer gains more strokes on a scratch golfer off the tee than on the green.   

Again, we know this.  there is statistical evidence to back it up.   it is not an opinion.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

here's a nice little article that compares 8,360 rounds of scratch golfers compared with 14,557 PGA pros from the same season.  

The PGA players gained 2.5 strokes on the scratch golfers off the tee.   The PGA players only gained 1 stroke on the green.   on average.  

On Average, Driving is 2.5 times more important than putting.   

Scratch_Tour_Pro.png

You might ask: How would I know the differences between a scratch golfer and a PGA Tour player? Well, it is my full-time job to know these type of things about golf. I have been studying the game from a statistical...

 

And, that is the difference between PGA players and scratch golfers.   When you compare scratch golfers to 10-handicaps, those figures are wildly inflated (in favor of off the tee).   

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

32 minutes ago, edomingox said:

I have Dave Pelz's Putting Bible.  I don't think he makes a Driving Bible.

Dave Pelz is a short-game guy.  He pretty much says so in his Chipping and Putting books. 

 

29 minutes ago, lastings said:

If you are playing a guy for money, would you be more afraid of a guy who drives it long, or sinks all his 5 foot putts?

The guy who drives it long. He's going to have easier/closer approach shots which means he'll be at or inside 5 feet more often than me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

50 minutes ago, edomingox said:

I just don't think that driving is as critical as putting could be.  

The stats say that you are wrong.

50 minutes ago, edomingox said:

 If you hit every green in regulation and 2 putted, that would be 36 putts.  On a Par 72, that is 50% of your score.  Using these numbers, I would say you are more likely to knock strokes off of putting than anything else.

But of those 36 putts, at least 15-16 of those are likely to be within 2 feet, or tap ins, so now that is only 20-21 putts at the very most that require skill/practice.

52 minutes ago, edomingox said:

Tiger lead in putting during his 2003-2008 season.

This is straight up wrong. If you are going to make claims, at least make sure they are factually accurate. Can you cite your source? This table suggests otherwise, and actually indicates Tiger never lead the field in putting in any season from 2003-2012.

 

55 minutes ago, edomingox said:

If you are playing a guy for money, would you be more afraid of a guy who drives it long, or sinks all his 5 foot putts?

The guy that drives it long, because he is going to be hitting a 7 iron into the green when I'm hitting a 4 iron. He's reaching a par 5 in 2 shots while I'm laying up. He's hitting a mid iron into a long par 3 when I'm hitting hybrid. He's carrying bunkers that I have to play around.

The guy that hits it way past me would have an advantage on every single hole. He might only have 2-3 5 footers over his entire round. Over the entire round, the 20+ yds extra on each hole would add up to more of a gain for him than it would for the guy who makes 3 5 footers.

59 minutes ago, edomingox said:

And to be honest, I believe that every aspect of the game (approach, putting, driving, chipping) are all nearly equally important. 

They aren't. The stats prove it. There have been entire books about this topic. Just because you believe it doesn't mean it's true.

1 hour ago, edomingox said:

I just think that some might just edge out the other when it comes to lowering scores the quickest and easiest way.

This is correct and accurate, and much different that what you have been stating before. Nobody here will disagree with this one. It is quicker and easier to lower your score via putting/short game, but you can lower your score more over the long term by improving your full swing including approaches and drives. 

Please do some research and learn more about strokes gained data and how important driving and approach shots are, it's only going to help your game

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

At the danger of sounding like a troll:

Any klutz can learn how to putt.

Klutz = Unathletic.  Grew up not particularly enjoying sports nor playing them.  Couldn't make a 3 point shot if his mother's life depended on it.  Has to ask, "What is a 3 point shot?"

A klutz can have fun (and frustration) playing golf but he/she will rarely drive the ball down the middle 260 yards.  And when they do they will tell friends at that evening's dinner party that they hit a 300 yard drive.

I have some klutz golf friends.  Love 'em all.

There will be exceptions...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • KC to FL, then Springfield, MO to FL, twice a year for more than 20 years. Our key was to time it so we did not go through Atlanta at rush our, so our overnight going down was one of the first exits after Atlanta.  Coming back, same thing going the other way. Then, Atlanta got so bad that we don't ever go that way any more. Also 30 years ago I got a call on a Saturday morning that I needed to deliver a vehicle to Miami at 7:00 Monday morning.  Sure thing, I told them, easey  peasey. Not!
    • That's not true. I don't give absolute weight to "18 > 14" or 15 but it's a "valid argument." Just not one that sways me. There is, both theoretical and actually practical. At the same time, the odds of a strapping 25-year-old from Siberia becoming a world class golfer are also lower than from, say, Florida, so the practical is much lower than the theoretical. Yes. @klineka quoted an old post I made, and I was reminded of things like 49 players in Q-School and stuff like that. Stuff I'd looked up once but have long since forgotten since nobody's made a compelling (to me) argument in favor of Jack since.
    • Yup . . . "Too many golf courses completing for golfers." A general answer to some of the replies, to try to explain why we run our business the way we do . . . we are in a small regional tourist area that has become a hotbed of excellent golf courses.  Three of Golfweek's Top Ten in the State are here.  It is highly competitive between us and 6 other courses, and, frankly, the market is not big enough to keep all of them busy. "Running people off" would not be in our best interest.  We have as a last resort, but it's not high on our list.  "Running people off" would likely get us the reputation of "running people off." As I have said a few times, I prefer us being out there on the course, being encouraging, supportive, and diplomatic, and, when that does not work, to offer the victims of slow play a chance to come back and experience our #1 course under better conditions, at a discount. Turning Lemons into Lemonade. But, understanding my role, it's not my call, and will be what will be.
    • Unless you have figured out something that I haven't, which is certainly possible, there's no way to move a shot from one hole to another, without deleting it and adding a new one.  Getting it in the right spot is a bit iffy at that point.  I've had cases where it puts an entire hole one the next hole, and skips a hole entirely.  I have not seen any means to even add the missing hole, the round will claim to have 17 holes.  As I mentioned, it never did this before that update (that was in preparation for PRO, I believe).  It doesn't always happen, even on the same holes, it doesn't happen on all rounds on the same course.  It's a puzzler.  The part that disturbs me the most is that even a tiny amount of software intelligence would eliminated it most of the time.  If the previous shot was a putt on a green, and the next shot some other club from thirty yards off the green, it's probably a new hole.  If not, that mistake would be way easier to understand. It happens to me when I've tagged every shot.  I live with the results, and usually don't bother trying to edit it out.  If I want to see, I can see where the shots were taken, and I know the total.  It is frustrating when it shows my drive going back to the previous green, though. I could see that, but it doesn't seem to me what is happening in my case.  As something of a engineer geek, it just seems sloppy.
    • This is a completely separate discussion, but I'm not a big fan of South Carolina mustard-based BBQ sauce.  I'd suggest stopping in NC for some vinegar-based sauce on smoky pork BBQ. As for the drive, I routinely go from Northern Virginia as far as Rocky Mount in NC, and we see the wotrst backups consistently between Fredericksburg VA and Washington DC.  If you can avoid being southbound in the after-lunch hours, or northbound on Sunday afternoon, you'll usually avoid the worst of it.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Andrew Jacks
      Andrew Jacks
      (35 years old)
    2. donnyrichardson
      donnyrichardson
      (30 years old)
    3. Olliesmucker
      Olliesmucker
      (53 years old)
    4. PATRICK WILSON
      PATRICK WILSON
      (70 years old)
    5. PHILIPNB
      PHILIPNB
      (68 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...