Jump to content
IGNORED

"Five Lessons: The Modern Fundamentals of Golf" by Ben Hogan


Note: This thread is 2206 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I purchased this book last night from Amazon and read it twice already.  Mr. Hogan's book filled in a lot of the gaps in my understanding of the fundamental mechanics of the golf swing.


  • 7 months later...

Which one do you prefer, Five Lessons or the Impact Zone ?? :hmm:

:nike:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I only post on this thread because it is near and dear to my heart. I have always loved Ben Hogan's Five Fundamentals while I've embarked on the search for my swing. It is a technical manifest on the principles of the golf swing. The details are true. I have often discovered them through the exercise of practice through feel (oh, that's what he meant!).

With that being said, I unexpectedly found Bryon Nelson's "Shape Your Swing the Modern Way" to be my respite in the discovery of my swing. It wasn't anticipated; but then it occurred. His instruction and explanations were so succinct. Whether it was the front-side dominate explanation of the takeaway or the downswing in unison concept; it all worked for me.

Please understand, I was a Ben Hogan disciple. But the concepts that fired the neurons in my brain in regards to the golf swing were predominately those of Iron Bryon. The reality for me was that Bryon's descriptions tied the four parts of the golf swing (takeaway, backswing, downswing, follow-through) into one fluid motion.

My last hurdle now seems to be the apprehension that I have to make a full, solid golf swing. But I'm sure that won't be as much of an obstacle as it used to be.

To close, here's my quote..."Becoming better at golf mentally and physically has quite an unforeseen impact on your ability to improve at life in general. A golfer is not the master of their souls until they can control their thoughts, emotions, and abilities. Own Your Game Within Yourself"

Jim


  • Moderator

I only post on this thread because it is near and dear to my heart. I have always loved Ben Hogan's Five Fundamentals while I've embarked on the search for my swing. It is a technical manifest on the principles of the golf swing. The details are true. I have often discovered them through the exercise of practice through feel (oh, that's what he meant!).

With that being said, I unexpectedly found Bryon Nelson's "Shape Your Swing the Modern Way" to be my respite in the discovery of my swing. It wasn't anticipated; but then it occurred. His instruction and explanations were so succinct. Whether it was the front-side dominate explanation of the takeaway or the downswing in unison concept; it all worked for me.

Please understand, I was a Ben Hogan disciple. But the concepts that fired the neurons in my brain in regards to the golf swing were predominately those of Iron Bryon. The reality for me was that Bryon's descriptions tied the four parts of the golf swing (takeaway, backswing, downswing, follow-through) into one fluid motion.

My last hurdle now seems to be the apprehension that I have to make a full, solid golf swing. But I'm sure that won't be as much of an obstacle as it used to be.

To close, here's my quote..."Becoming better at golf mentally and physically has quite an unforeseen impact on your ability to improve at life in general. A golfer is not the master of their souls until they can control their thoughts, emotions, and abilities. Own Your Game Within Yourself"

Jim

Thanks for posting.  I will check out the Byron Nelson book.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

When Hogan stated on page 39 that we should start at address with both knees pointed in; does that mean close together or what? You certainly can't point both knees toward each other.  Can someone explain?


Not in my book, luggage.  Probably due to differences in publication date, reprints, etc.  My book, First Fireside Ed. 1985, page 39, has only a drawing of Ben at address and a short para, "The proper stance...interrelated assignments correctly".

However, in the review section, my page 118, we find a drawing of Ben in his underwear at address. With the para "There is one correct basic stance:...It is extremely important to keep the elbows and arms as close together as possible. Remember, too: the knees point in'.

So yes, Ben wants our knees pointing inwards, and looking at the illustration we can see that his knees are that way.  Take a look at your book, luggage and then your knees.


  • 9 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I just keep wading through all the content.

The thing about Hogan's contention that the elbows and forearms need to kept close together may stem from his particular build. I read an article where this claim was made. With most people when you look at them face on, standing erect yet relaxed, you will see just a bit of the backs of their hands. According to the author of this article, this was not the case with Hogan. When you looked at him in the above manner, you would see his elbows pinched in towards his ribcage, and see just a bit of the palms of his hands. Whether this was pre or post-accident, or just pure invention, I have no way of knowing. I was always taught to stand erect and look down at my left hand. However many knuckles I saw then, was how many knuckles I should see at address.

I will say this, Hogan's admonition to have both V's pointing at the chin is certainly not the current doctrine! Perhaps that is the "hook fighting" grip!

As far as having the knees pointed inward, how would that compare to the "Sam Snead squat"!

As always, golf swings are as individual as the individuals making them! But, Hogan has many valid ideas to offer that should be paid attention to. Maybe most importantly, his ideas about dedication to practice. An interviewer asked him how he developed his swing, and Hogan said, "I dug it out of the dirt!"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
(edited)

I've just started reading this book.  As a complete beginner, I figured it'd be worth reading some of the classics, so I've bought this and the Little Red Book.

I have a question about the grip... it says in the book:

 

1) The back of my left hand should face the target

2) The club should be in the general position it would be in at address

 

Since I am not aiming at anything - I'm just trying to learn how to hold the club, the back of my left hand isn't facing anything in particular.  I also don't understand what general position the club should be in at address.  I also don't understand where the club face should be pointing.  If I stand with my feet square, and ensure that if I drew a line pointing at an imaginary target, like this:

Quote

  <===========
   .oooO    Oooo.
   (       )    (        )
    \     (      )    /
      \ _)     ( _ /

 

And my club were to point at 90 degrees to the angle, if I rotate the club in my hands, the face opens and closes.  At one extreme, if I continue to turn the club clockwise, the face opens until at points to the sky.  At the other extreme, if I rotate the club counter-clockwise, the face starts to point down and to the left, towards the ground.  If I make the foot of the club perfectly straight, parallel to the ground, and at right angles to the line I drew above, the club shaft is pointing at an angle away from me:

 

Quote

     [)
    /
   /
  /
 /

Is this normal and ok?  I'm holding a 7I at present!

Edited by Dornenglanz
Add feet!

Cobra F-Max Driver | Ping Karsten 3H, 4H, 5H | Titleist 690MB 5-PW | TaylorMade ATV 52* 56* 60* | Odyssey White Hot #1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Another question on grip: do you think a glove makes it harder or easier to grip the club as described?  Does the glove mean you lose some touch?  But does it help with grip?  I found an old B&W video of Hogan playing, and he wasn't wearing a glove.  Are gloves just fashion, or do they actually help?  Or indeed hinder?

Cobra F-Max Driver | Ping Karsten 3H, 4H, 5H | Titleist 690MB 5-PW | TaylorMade ATV 52* 56* 60* | Odyssey White Hot #1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

My brother gave me a Hogan gift pack that had this book and a dozen golf balls many years ago.  I was more excited about the balls than the book, at the time.  After about 6 months, I figured I should probably read the book.

It did more for my game than I ever imagined.  My grip/stance/setup were terrible beforehand.  It was super awkward at first, but became more natural the more I played after reading.  My consistency improved greatly.

This was almost 20 years ago.  I've still yet to hit the balls, and probably never will.  One sleeve was balata balls; their covers have yellowed a lot over time.

I've recently started David Leadbetter's 'companion' book, The Fundamentals of Hogan.  I have mixed feelings about it, so far.

:cobra:  :wilsonstaff:  :cleveland:

  • Cobra Fly-Z+ Driver (10*), 3/4 Fwy (15.5*)
  • Adams Red (20*)
  • Wilson Staff FG Tour V4 4-GW (24*,27*,31*,35*,39*,43*,47*, 51*)
  • Cobra Trusty Rusty (51*,55*,59*)
  • Cleveland TFI 6.5
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Leadbetter's book is an excellent "companion" to the Hogan classic.  He presents a "then/now" appraisal of the work that serves to amplify the man's genius.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

I've been playing golf for more years than I care to admit and just decided to read Ben's book again from cover to cover tonight for about the 100th time (It doesn't take long) because I realized that as your game improves over the years, your understanding of common faults and pitfalls improves also and, as Ben Hogan said in his book, refer back to the five lessons on occasion to brush up on the fundamentals which will help to keep your game sharp.   I have a very good game because of this book, and one of the main reasons for this is I have always been able to resist the temptation to "Tinker" with my game and instead, just paid attention to the important basic fundamentals which are so beautifully laid out in Five Lessons.  It really is the "Bible" for most of us who love the game. :content:

  • Upvote 1

Everything in Moderation, Keep it Simple, Less is Best

Ping G10 clubs:   D-9*, 3W-15.5*, H-18*, Irons-4 thru PW, W-50/ 54/ 58*, P- Redwood Zing 

Ball-Pro V1

 

 


This thread really belongs in the reading room forum. There is already a thread in there about this book. It's always good to search for a topic to see if it exists before starting a new thread. ;-)

  • Upvote 1

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

22 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

This thread really belongs in the reading room forum. There is already a thread in there about this book. It's always good to search for a topic to see if it exists before starting a new thread. ;-)

Granted I am relatively new on this forum, but I have posted over 2000 times on Golfwrx since 2006.  Are you suggesting that before anyone posts something on this forum, they should check 20 other forums to see if anybody else has ever posted something on the same subject?

Everything in Moderation, Keep it Simple, Less is Best

Ping G10 clubs:   D-9*, 3W-15.5*, H-18*, Irons-4 thru PW, W-50/ 54/ 58*, P- Redwood Zing 

Ball-Pro V1

 

 


  • 4 months later...
  • Administrator
Quote

IS BEN HOGAN'S Five Lessons: The Modern Fundamentals of Golf still relevant? No. I've read it hundreds of times, and it's increasingly clear that what Hogan thought he did in the swing isn't what he did at all. It's a smart book, and I can absolutely see how he arrived at his beliefs, but that doesn't make it a good how-to manual. Coaches who know what to look for can derive value from it, but average students, no. It will only confuse them.

http://www.golfdigest.com/story/the-best-teacher-no-one-knows

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

This is a great book. I got it as an audio book to listen to while I was on a long car trip. Highly recommend the book. I'm a fairly novice golfer and I found it helped me tremendously. I've already listened to it once and I'm on my second pass at the book. I'm guessing I'll go through this book a dozen times and learn something new each time. 


Note: This thread is 2206 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I agree, until we are watching the 18th hole in the dark or waiting for the champion to finish and it's been 5+ hours
    • Question for the group. The course I normally play at has 27 holes - 3 9s that they use to for 18 in the various combinations. Is it okay to declare* if I’m playing front or back when I play 9 on this course? I’m figuring I need to declare before I play a shot. *meaning just say to myself that this is the back 9. Curious what people think. Of course, my only holes left are 13 and 17, so I’m going to declare the back 9 for the rest of the year. Probably only one or two more rounds though. 
    • This is my opinion as well. I would love to see the LPGA take the lead on this.    This.
    • I agree in general. The one way in which the viewer will notice the pace of play is just that "it's been an hour and Nelly Korda or Scottie Scheffler have only played four holes." Or if for some reason they show a lot of shots of players just standing around when they could be showing golf shots. But I think Andy Johnson said it most recently/best, playing fast is a skill, too. I would love for pro golfers to play faster. You'd see the players you want to see hit more shots in the same time than they do now. So I don't disagree with the pace of play stuff, and hope they can find ways to do it. Heck, the LPGA should leap at the chance to differentiate itself in this way, IMO. So: I stand by what I said in that the TV viewer really doesn't notice much about pace of play. It's rare when they do. I support increasing the pace of play wholeheartedly. But my top five reasons don't include TV ratings or viewership.
    • I don't think the viewer at home can pick up on pace of play, unless the announcers mention something. The telecast has the luxury of bouncing from player to player, which ensures we the viewer always have something to watch.  I think we would notice pace of play if the camera just followed one golfer for an entire round. Or  You were actually golfing behind the slow group Or  The slow group is the last to only group left to finish the tournament.  I like the idea of having a person carrying a digital clock, following each golfer. When the golfer gets to the ball and the group in front of them has cleared they have 60 seconds or they get a penalty stroke. Maybe a second violation is a 2 stroke penalty.  Or as I have said before, every golfer wears a shock collar!!!!! at 1 min 1 second that golfer if going to drop. It will take them a good 30 second to recover, leaving them with another 30 seconds to hit the shot. The course would be littered with golfers just convulsing on fair way from an endless cycle of shocks because they cant seem to hit their ball and keep pace of play. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...