Jump to content
IGNORED

Are you spending 70% of your practice time on your short game like Michael Breed implies you should?


RFKFREAK
Note: This thread is 3275 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I play about 100 rounds per year and average about 5 GIR. Therefore, I would say that I practice my short game 13/18 ths of the time!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I play about 100 rounds per year and average about 5 GIR. Therefore, I would say that I practice my short game 13/18 ths of the time!

Your practice time might be better spent improving the quality of your missed greens, and hitting more in the process. You'll be left with far more easy short game situations, necessitating even less practice time [i]and[/i] resulting in more saves.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

From SIGolf+ magazine, "Top 100 Teachers Poll"

:doh:

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

From SIGolf+ magazine, "Top 100 Teachers Poll"

76% of your time spent on bunker play, chipping and putting with 0 % spent on driver. Yep, that'll work :loco:

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missouri Swede

From SIGolf+ magazine, "Top 100 Teachers Poll"

76% of your time spent on bunker play, chipping and putting with 0 % spent on driver. Yep, that'll work


Makes you wonder if their Top 100 Instructors all work exclusively at executive/par 3 courses. :-)

"Never mind that it took you 8 strokes and 3 lost balls to get from the tee box to the green - think of all the strokes you'll save getting up and down in 2!!!"

Mac

WITB:
Driver: Ping G30 (12*)
FW:  Ping K15 (3W, 5W)
Hybrids: Ping K15 (3H, 5H)
Irons: Ping K15 (6-UW)

Wedges: Cleveland 588 RTX CB (54*, 58*)

Putter: Ping Scottsdale w/ SS Slim 3.0

Ball: Bridgestone e6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

From SIGolf+ magazine, "Top 100 Teachers Poll"

76% of your time spent on bunker play, chipping and putting with 0 % spent on driver. Yep, that'll work

Makes you wonder if their Top 100 Instructors all work exclusively at executive/par 3 courses.

"Never mind that it took you 8 strokes and 3 lost balls to get from the tee box to the green - think of all the strokes you'll save getting up and down in 2!!!"

Seriously.

This is def a wtf?  Man, it's like they're on a different universe.

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I spend almost all my time on my short game which of course includes putting. I spend most of my time on the putting green since it is the weakest part of my game.

Your an 11 HC though? I would think for you to bring it down you would want to hit a few more GIRs no?

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missouri Swede

From SIGolf+ magazine, "Top 100 Teachers Poll"

Quote:

Originally Posted by mvmac

76% of your time spent on bunker play, chipping and putting with 0 % spent on driver. Yep, that'll work

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac62

Makes you wonder if their Top 100 Instructors all work exclusively at executive/par 3 courses.

"Never mind that it took you 8 strokes and 3 lost balls to get from the tee box to the green - think of all the strokes you'll save getting up and down in 2!!!"

Seriously.

This is def a wtf?  Man, it's like they're on a different universe.


Taking the devil's advocate position, I think we need to read that poll carefully.  It was actually "what do amateurs need to spend more time practicing?"  It was not "what percent of your time should be spent practicing what?"  They gave no reference point as to what amateurs currently spend their time practicing, and it's possible that many perceive that amateurs already use their driver a lot.

So perhaps the previous questions were: "Amateurs love to go to the range and pound buckets and buckets using their driver. Is this the right approach?"  Then they're in the frame of mind that these dumb amateurs just go to the range and use the big stick.  Or maybe it was after some short game clinic. The point is: who knows what they were influenced by right before they answered, and who knows what assumptions the person answering was making.

It certainly wasn't a questions like "what is the proper mix of practicing long game, short game, putting?"  That would be more in depth of an answer, and I'd hope then we'd get an answer that looks a bit closer to what we are discussing on the thread. At first, the answers looked to me like nobody thinks anybody should even practice with the driver (not a single answer lists the driver), but then a closer read of the question made me realize it said no such thing.

  • Upvote 1

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Taking the devil's advocate position, I think we need to read that poll carefully.  It was actually "what do amateurs need to spend more time practicing?"  It was not "what percent of your time should be spent practicing what?"  They gave no reference point as to what amateurs currently spend their time practicing, and it's possible that many perceive that amateurs already use their driver a lot.

I get what you're saying but the instructors are still wrong. The poll is still representative of the outdated advice that golfers should practice the short game equal to or more than the long game because the short game is where 70% of your shots come from. "With putting you can drop four to six shots in two lessons."

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I get what you're saying, @RandallT . You're saying that they asked the question, and maybe the 100 respondents were asked to give one answer, and those are the answers they give. The question was just "what one thing do amateurs need to practice more?"

I'd agree that it makes the poll a better example than it currently is, but it's still not a very good set of answers.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandallT

Taking the devil's advocate position, I think we need to read that poll carefully.  It was actually "what do amateurs need to spend more time practicing?"  It was not "what percent of your time should be spent practicing what?"  They gave no reference point as to what amateurs currently spend their time practicing, and it's possible that many perceive that amateurs already use their driver a lot.

I get what you're saying but the instructors are still wrong. The poll is still representative of the outdated advice that golfers should practice the short game equal to or more than the long game because the short game is where 70% of your shots come from. "With putting you can drop four to six shots in two lessons."

I get what you're saying, @RandallT. You're saying that they asked the question, and maybe the 100 respondents were asked to give one answer, and those are the answers they give. The question was just "what one thing do amateurs need to practice more?"

I'd agree that it makes the poll a better example than it currently is, but it's still not a very good set of answers.

Yes, if I were asked in a poll whether those answers by professionals were just mildly ridiculous or extremely ridiculous, I would lean toward only "mildly ridiculous."

(ala Colbert Report frequent riff: "George W: great president or THE GREATEST president?").  I agree it's still coming from a place that seems similar to where Michael Breed is coming from. Just wanted to temper it a bit based on the wording.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Well if the question was "what do amateurs need to practice more" and they went to a couple of full practice facilities I've been to, and answered "the short game" they'd probably be right.

1) the short game areas are almost always empty. Hardly anyone grabs a shag bag and spends even 15 minutes chipping or hitting out of the bunker unless they're taking a lesson.

2) the putting green is almost always vacant. You can always find two holes to practice on during the busiest times, and during the day it's empty.

As a rule these areas only get used when high school teams show up for practice, especially the short game area.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1) the short game areas are almost always empty. Hardly anyone grabs a shag bag and spends even 15 minutes chipping or hitting out of the bunker unless they're taking a lesson.

Not disagreeing per se, but this isn't indicative of anything.  I practice my short game as much as I feel is necessary - perhaps 25% of the time - but I practice it at the "short game area" ZERO percent of the time.  There's no rule that say you can't pitch on the range. :-P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I go to the same range usually, and I've become a range rat of sorts. I think the ratio of practice time spent on driver/irons should be the greatest by far, but I do notice that a great deal of people I see there often practice short game NEVER, and "work" on putting by slapping the ball around for a half hour with no plan for improvement or whatever. I think this poll is probably like @RandallT says i n response to a simple question for the casual golfer who, like me once, hadn't practiced chipping more than 5 minutes in his life but hit drivers all day long with his buddies. I think that every person who is on TheSandTrap.com knows this poll is hogwash as a representative of what you should practice, but I wonder if these "Top 100" pros know that the majority of their students spend pretty much no time at all on short game/putting and it makes for good reading in a popular golf magazine. Those things aren't trade journals, they're like "Reader's Digest." Just a harmless thought...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

To play devil's advocate against the people playing devil's advocate (a little): the people senselessly bashing drivers on the range aren't "practicing" at all. They're just taking out some aggression with the driver. :)

Ya get what I'm sayin'? :)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

the people senselessly bashing drivers on the range aren't "practicing" at all. They're just taking out some aggression with the driver. :)

In fairness, doing exactly that for that reason while studying for the bar is how I got into golf in the first place, haha. So there's some virtue in that, I suppose.

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

To play devil's advocate against the people playing devil's advocate (a little): the people senselessly bashing drivers on the range aren't "practicing" at all. They're just taking out some aggression with the driver. :)

Ya get what I'm sayin'? :)

The driver just pisses me off ;)


In  terms of golf instruction, to not have driver even listed is just insane. To dedicate that much time to short game is way over exaggerating the importance of the short game. I guess Iron/Wedges might account for some % of the long game. Maybe they were thinking full wedge shots, not partial. I do give credit to the 2% who said, "how to practice". I actually like that answer for part of it.

I think a lot of the instructors just didn't want to think hard on the question and went back to the old adages in golf. Who really likes to spend time on a survey?

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3275 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Iacas- Can you please post all the data behind field strengths? Thank you very much!
    • New 3W is pretty good  I hit a good drive actually but straight into a headwind so it left me far enough back from the trees to attempt something stupid. So naturally, with a new 3W in the bag, I wanted to see what it could do. Hit a high draw directly over the trees and couldn't see where it ended up from the fairway, but I knew I hit it well. I doubt that's the optimal play for scoring well in the long run but it felt good to do.
    • I'm sure you've read this, but I just have to post it, here, again, for everyone who hasn't. It changed my thinking forever and irrevocably on this exact topic:  "We don't say "the golfers are more talented" today. We say "there are more talented golfers today." "More" meaning they are far more numerous, not more talented. Talent is random. Only a small percentage of people win the talent lottery --- for world class golf, way less than 1%. And there's no telling whether the most talented player of any period, including this one, was more talented than Jack, or Jones, or Vardon. It's absolutely unknowable. What IS knowable, though, is that the base population is larger, so whatever percentage of people are born with golf talent, there are a lot more of them today than there were 50 years ago. What is knowable is that training and coaching is vastly improved. Hogan had to, in his words, "dig his swing out of the dirt" by hitting millions of golf balls. Today, they have radar and laser and the Minolta super duper high speed swing cam, and they know exactly how every little swing tweak affects their spin rate and launch angle and apex height -- stuff nobody had any clue about in Jack's day. So 50 years ago, if you had 100 guys born with golf talent take up golf, maybe 30 of them would find their optimal swing. Today, it's probably over 90. What is knowable is that the huge purses, and the fact that Tiger was the world's richest and most famous athlete, and not just the world #1 golfer, is making golf the first choice of more young athletes, rather than just the guys who couldn't make the "real" sports teams in school. So if you had 100 guys born with multi-sport talent 50 years ago, most of them played golf for fun, if at all. Today, a lot more of them concentrate on golf as their main sport. And what is knowable is that travel is much faster and cheaper now, so almost every world class player shows up for almost every major and WGC, and for many of the regular PGA events. 50 years ago, the second or third best player in, say, Australia, often didn't even play in the British Open, let alone a PGA event. So all the PGA events, and three of the four majors, had only a handful of international players, and the fourth major had only a handful of Americans. None of that is speculation. It is a verifiable fact that there are over twice as many people in the world today than there were 50 years ago. It's a verifiable fact that the purses today are hundreds of times as high as they were 50 years ago --- Tony Lema got about $4200 for winning the 1964 Open; today, it's about $3.5 million. It's a verifiable fact that virtually all the world top 100 play every major they are eligible for, instead of only a handful playing any events that require overseas travel. It's not knowable exactly how all of that combines, but a good indication is the number of entries in the US Open. To enter the US Open requires both top 1% talent for the game, and a serious commitment to it. There were about 2400 entrants per year 50 years ago. This century, it's consistently over 9000, well over three times as many. It's true that, mostly because of the time and expense, the number of duffers recreational players has declined, but they never had any influence on field strength, anyway. High school kids on the golf team still play all they want, for free. What do you have to counter that? Nothing but your belief that there were half a dozen golf phenoms all at the same time in the 60's, and none today, now that Tiger's past his prime. You're entitled to that opinion, but what facts do you have to back it up? Only the number of majors they won. But how many majors would Phil have won if the fields were like they were 50 years ago? Mickelson finished second in the US Open to Goosen in 2004, to Ogilvy in 2006, and to Rose last year. 50 years ago, odds are that none of those guys would have even tried to qualify for the US Open, since it required shutting down their schedule for a minimum of three weeks to travel to the US for sectional qualifying, with no guarantee that they would make it into the actual tournament. Michael Campbell, who beat Tiger with some amazing putting down the stretch in 2005, said that he would not have entered that year if the USGA hadn't established overseas qualifying sites, so he didn't have to travel to enter. How would Phil look next to Arnie with those three US Opens? Eight majors, and a career Grand Slam. And how would Tiger look if Michael Campbell, Trevor Immelman, Angel Cabrera, and YE Yang had stayed home, like most international players did in the Jack era? I'll make it even simpler for you, since you follow women's golf. How much better would the US women look today, if there were no Asians on tour? Or even just no Koreans? Well, it looks like you're going to crow about the lack of current talent every time a guy backs into a win for the foreseeable future, but come on. The Valero was a 40-point tournament, which makes it one of the weakest regular PGA events, barely above the John Deere Classic. And the tournament committee knows that most top players don't like to play right before a major, so they try to attract the few who do by making it as close to major conditions as possible, to help them fine tune their games. A weak field facing a tough setup is not a recipe for low scores, but you still insist on taking one bad week and comparing it to the majors of your hazy memory, even though you seem to have forgotten epic collapses by the likes of Arnie, who managed to lose a seven shot lead over the last 9 holes of the 1966 US Open. And who knows how often something like that happened in a low-rent event? I don't know if Tiger was more talented than Jack, or even Trevino. All I know is that there are many solid reasons to believe that in order to win a tournament, he had to beat around three times as many talented golfers, even in most of the regular tour events he's won, as Jack did in a major --- especially the Open, where Jack only had to beat as few as 8 other Americans, at a time when probably 60-70 of the world top 100 were Americans.  I don't say it's true by definition, as you claimed, but I say it's the way to bet, based on facts and logic."  
    • Shot 50/41 today. I didn't hit the ball particularly well but not as poorly as the score would indicate. I just happened to hit it in some really punishing places that wound up taking one or two strokes just to hit back into play. The undergrowth and the fescue are really growing in at the course. Lipped out and burned a few edges on putts, too. I always say when I miss putts by that small a margin that they're eventually going to drop as long as I don't deviate from the process and that's exactly what started happening on the back 9. I ended up making a couple of mid-length putts. Five over on the back included a triple bogey on 17.
    • Birdied the par 5 #14 at Quail Brook GC. Hit a high draw 3W just short of the green on my second shot, chipped just right of the back right flag to about 12' and made the putt. It's starting to look like I'm going to get at least 20 rounds at Quail Brook for it to qualify as my home course but I've been adding the birdies there to my away composite for so long that I don't feel like separating it all now. So the away composite will simply be an aggregate of all my birdie holes for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...