Jump to content
iacas

Bryson Takes 2:15 to Miss an Eight Foot Putt

158 posts / 8468 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, imsys0042 said:

I'm playing a drinking game where he says "and then my caddy pulled me away from that putt"

At least you weren't using the word "walk"... you'd die of alcohol poisoning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

27 minutes ago, krupa said:

At least you weren't using the word "walk"... you'd die of alcohol poisoning.

Yeah..."I walk so fast and hit it so far that it's unfair".   Kind of like "woe is me, I'm so rich it hurts to sit down because my wallet is so fat"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, iacas said:

 

That was a non-apology apology, take back the apology, tell the haters **** you, but I love you, even though you hate me.

All while looking right up his nose....Yup!   I'm a fan!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, krupa said:

The commentator on the original video did say "and you wonder why they were put on the clock on the 10th hole." So there was that.  I don't know if a warning was given but if the rules say you get a warning after being put on the clock, then the rule needs to change.  Putting a player on the clock should act as the warning and if the rule is 30-40 seconds to hit a shot, no grown adult should bitch if they're given a penalty after 2 minutes whether they were given a warning or not.

I don't want to unjustly punish players but at the same time, I expect them to take responsibility for their actions which is something BDC is frequently unwilling to do. He has a very common behavior: dance around the edge of rule-breaking, complain/blame others when he's held to account, capitulate and apologize after he gets push-back from the people around him/social media.  Remember that funky putter he tried to use last year? 

I would imagine the reason (or at least A reason) why the warning comes after being put on the clock is because they don't put players on the clock, they put entire groups on the clock.  Consider a scenario where they weren't on the clock but then fell behind because of this incident, which all agree is 100% due to Bryson and his caddie.  The next hole Justin Thomas is in between clubs or has issue with the wind, or Bryson hit from beyond a mound and Justin didn't quite realize when his turn began and he takes 43 seconds to hit his shot.  Does he "deserve" a penalty for that?

Rhetorical question, by the way, I know some might say yes.  I'm just brainstorming why it's probably a good thing to give a warning after the group falls behind.


I kinda wish they kept stats on these things, by the way.  Just how long every players takes to hit every shot, and then we could see where 2:20 for an 8' putt stands.  Is it the worst ever, or this season, or this tournament, and by what factor, or perhaps it doesn't stand out enough and its commonplace?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, Vinsk said:

Bryson spoke on ‘Out of Bounds’ radio with Pat Perez and Michael Collins. Sucks I missed it. I heard the first few minutes...did anybody catch this?

I just downloaded it to my iPhone. Haven’t listened yet. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Golfingdad said:

I kinda wish they kept stats on these things, by the way.  Just how long every players takes to hit every shot, and then we could see where 2:20 for an 8' putt stands.  Is it the worst ever, or this season, or this tournament, and by what factor, or perhaps it doesn't stand out enough and its commonplace?

They have those stats. They just don’t share them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't like the idea of a clock for each shot, because every shot is different.  But what about a chess style clock?  You get some total time to play all of your shots in a round, no matter how many.  You get a penalty stroke at the end of the round for each minute (or two) you go over.  The trick is of course figuring out when to start the clock, since the players will figure out how to game the system.  It probably has to start when they are "in the vicinity" of their ball, close enough to be getting a rough idea of distance and lie.  Obviously this is only going to be possible at the PGA Tour level, but everyone else should be playing ready golf, and keeping up would do the job.  (Yes, I know that isn't real life, but if the tour stops having really slow players, perhaps it trickles down.)

I didn't hear the whole thing yesterday, Perez had obviously had a bit, Collins was trying to be serious.  Bryson was a little right, and a lot wrong (in my opinion), but the big takeaway I got was that the players are using the system.  If they all (or at least one in each group) drag their feet a bit, no one ever gets behind, and no one ever gets put on the clock, and it can take as long as they want.  IF (and I do think there is an if) slow play is of importance to the tour, they need to adjust the rules, and then enforce them.  But, do they really consider it a problem?  The tour is, after all, the players.  If seems to be important to some, but if they really want to stop it, it could end tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, jlbos83 said:

But, do they really consider it a problem?  The tour is, after all, the players.  If seems to be important to some, but if they really want to stop it, it could end tomorrow.

I don't think they're going to do anything significant until it starts to affect their wallet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 hours ago, iacas said:

 

I am officially a hater now. I used to think he was a bit quirky and possibly even a breath of fresh air. He refuses to own his problem.

Saying that he walks fast and that there are other slow players doesn't excuse taking 2 and a half minutes to hit a  putt of any length.

What a complete and utter jerk. 

He may as well have said "Hey y'all, I'm richer than you are, so screw you."

Edited by leftybutnotPM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He’s missing the point entirely. It doesn’t matter if he full on sprints to his ball. He’s taking well over 40 seconds to hit his shot. And he’s making it sound like he’s getting to his ball so much sooner than others. He’s not. Except for common delays, bathroom stops, shoe lace tying, etc. these guys hit their shot and walk to their ball. He’s not doing that any faster by any significance. He’s just being a putz who needs to own up that he’s too slow.

Edited by Vinsk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, iacas said:

They have those stats. They just don’t share them.

But how much fun would we have here if they did?!   :-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, David in FL said:

But how much fun would we have here if they did?!   :-D

Or Kopeka.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/14/2019 at 9:44 PM, Vinsk said:

He’s missing the point entirely. It doesn’t matter if he full on sprints to his ball. He’s taking well over 40 seconds to hit his shot. And he’s making it sound like he’s getting to his ball so much sooner than others. He’s not. Except for common delays, bathroom stops, shoe lace tying, etc. these guys hit their shot and walk to their ball. He’s not doing that any faster by any significance. He’s just being a putz who needs to own up that he’s too slow.

Spot on. He needs to acknowledge he has a problem playing his shots timely and be determined to remedy that, just like Kevin Nah did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow!  Just read about his video regarding his slow play last week. His statement says it all: "So screw all y'all haters, no big deal. I still love you all, even though you hate me."

Passive-aggressive douche.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

19 minutes ago, Yukari said:

Wow!  Just read about his video regarding his slow play last week. His statement says it all: "So screw all y'all haters, no big deal. I still love you all, even though you hate me."

Passive-aggressive douche.

GCLogo.png

With slow play questions following him from New Jersey to Illinois, Bryson DeChambeau had a colorful reply to those still hounding him about a putt he hit a week ago.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The biggest problem with slow play is that the tour doesn't seem to be doing anything, purely because the players are the goose that lays the golden egg.  Until viewers or TV channels start pushing back, they will keep ignoring the issue. 😢

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2019 at 5:41 AM, saevel25 said:
merlin_159122028_55d5e903-db1c-4b3e-973c

Other golfers had complained about his pace during Friday’s round.

I would disagree. I don’t think you can compare 30-40 seconds to over 2 minutes!!!

Yep. Please do this going forward Thomas. 

 

Quote

“I’m trying to do my absolute best. I’m trying to provide entertainment,

Well, he certainly accomplished that, and managed to alienate the entire tour playing behind him... 😁😂😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2019 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
  • Posts

    • Another idea is to make your own shaft flex board. Maltby sell one for $180. I once made one for free using a scrap of plywood, and some 2", 1/4" dowell material. Hung it on my garage wall.  I marked known  clubs flexes on the board as reference points, using a consistent weight. The board also gave me other info besides flex.  It was crude looking, but did the job.  It mattered little what the manufacturer's rating on the shaft was, which was usually different from each company. What ever my flex board showed me, was what the actual flex was when compared to the known flexes I used.   Maltby probably has a picture of his flex board on his website. Probably other sites have picts available too. With a little self ingenuity, a person can study the picture, and build their own. It's pretty easy. 
    • I thought about this a while, and then had an epiphany last night.  Without a perfect test, the answer is almost definitely no. It's a fairly simple statistical calculation called Bayes' Theorem. The end result is that you'll end up preventing more people from driving when they aren't drunk than preventing drunk drivers. I'm going to plug in numbers, but since I'm (likely correctly!) assuming drunk driving is a rare event, the numbers don't really matter that much. I'm also going to assume the test is extremely accurate. Let's say that in 1/10,000 car trips, the driver is too drunk to legally drive. This is probably an underestimation by a factor of 100, if not more, if you think about how many car trips there are in a day. Let's assume that the when the test is positive, the driver is drunk 99.9% of the time. And then assume that when the test is negative, the driver is sober 99.9% of the time (in other words, if the test is negative, the driver is drunk 0.1% of the time). We can use this to plug in probabilities for each event. Probability that a driver is drunk: .0001 Probability that a driver is sober: .9999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a positive test: .999 Probability that a drunk driver gets a negative test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a positive test: .001 Probability that a sober driver gets a negative test: .999 Bayes' Theorem applies here. It says: The probability that someone is drunk driver given a positive test is equal to the probability of a drunk driver gets a positive test times the probability of a drunk driver; that divided by the following: the probability of a drunk getting a positive test times probability of a drunk driver plus the probability of sober driver getting a positive test times the probability of a sober driver. In mathematic terms (DD=drunk driver; SD = sober driver; + = positive test): P(DD | +) = (P(+ | DD)*P(DD))/((P+ | DD)*P(DD)+P(+ | SD)*P(SD)) Plug in the numbers: P(DD | +) = ((.999)*(.0001))/((.999)*(.0001)+(.001)*(.9999)) P(DD | +) = .0908 In other words, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 9%. Meaning that out of a 100 people that test positive under this test, 91 of them would actually be sober. Because the test is imperfect and drunk driving is rare, it's going to impact more sober drivers than drunk drivers. Even if the test is 99.99% accurate and as a false positive rate of 0.01%, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is only 50%. Note that I'm assuming that 1/10,000 car trips is one by a drunk driver. If you assume 1/100,000 car trips are by a drunk driver, the probability of a drunk driver given a positive test is 0.9%. (You can also use this calculate to find out the odds that a drunk driver will have a negative test, but I have other stuff to do now...) So, without a nearly perfect test, it's a bad idea for the entire population. If drunk drivers were more frequent, then it would make more sense. Hence, it makes sense for someone who is more likely to drive drunk, and why the current policy probably makes sense. 
    • Hey Ben, good to see you’re still around!   I remember those irons. They’re beautiful! Sorry, I can’t help with the driver though…
    • Sometimes this is called a Telehandler, and sometimes its called a Rough Terrain Fork Lift. It all depends on where you live. 
    • Dragging the handle without the correct wrist movements to go with it can lead to an open clubface at impact. But without a video it's hard to determine the underlying cause of your problem.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Edsland
      Edsland
      (65 years old)
    2. KingHack82
      KingHack82
      (37 years old)
    3. snowbeast
      snowbeast
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...