Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

USGA/R&A Distance Insights Project (Updated Feb. 2021)


Note: This thread is 1478 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
34 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Here's where I come down on this.  For now, at least.  No bifurcation.  Freeze all club specs (COR, head size, etc.) and ball performance in place right now.  Nobody gets any longer; nobody gets any shorter.

Two things:

  • Those things have been frozen in place for years. Decades.
  • How are you going to stop people from optimizing launch conditions, or from swinging faster?
34 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

Tour pros can still shill clubs and balls... but it's almost like buying a new car.  The design can change yearly (or twice yearly if it's TaylorMade) and be the bold, stylish, sleek new model.  But the performance specs stay the same.  Clubs wear out, we'll need new ones.  Balls get old with age, so the manufacturers can continue to release this year's model, just no performance changes that don't fit with the USGA and R&A.

Clubs aren't getting longer now, unless you believe the marketing bullshit.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, iacas said:

Two things:

  • Those things have been frozen in place for years. Decades.
  • How are you going to stop people from optimizing launch conditions, or from swinging faster?

Clubs aren't getting longer now, unless you believe the marketing bullshit.

That's all I'm saying, keep everything frozen in place.  And I never believe marketing bullshit unless I can verify it.  Remember, I'm in marketing, advertising and TV commercial production.  So BS can't be slipped past me.  And, with self-integrity, I never exaggerate a product's or company's strong points.  Just won't do it and my clients understand this.

2 hours ago, iacas said:

How are you going to stop people from optimizing launch conditions, or from swinging faster?

I'm not.  That's in my statement.  Personal performance dynamics are encouraged and launch monitors are valid contributors.  So are devices.  All practice oriented.  But, to be truthful, I kinda believe we're almost maxed out there with respect to the touring pros.  Other than using illegal substances I don't think Cameron Champ has left any yardage on the table.


Posted

(sarcasm) I'm wondering if the USGA will start putting restrictions on bicep and quadriceps size in relation to flexibility (/sarcasm)

Drivers aren't giving 5 more yards every year. The Ping G30 driver hits the ball about the same distance as the Epic Flash or TM M5 with the same golfer at the same SS - I saw the video. Maybe they're more forgiving today with their "AI designed" faces but that affects amateurs more than it does the pros who make center strike more frequently than the rest of us. A lot more frequently. 

I'm a musician, or rather tried to be. The people at the top of the field are freaks of nature. It's the same with golf. The people who play at the elite level in on the PGA tour are freaks of nature. How many people who start playing golf even aspiring to play on the tour make it to the tour at any level? What percentage of those are the 150 players who get to be on TV every week? And fitness, sports training, swing analysis, coaching, have all advanced. And now the USGA is about to make decisions for everyone based upon these 150 players. What will they do? Ban training? Ban swing analysis? 

My guess is that equipment manufacturers will have a big say in any decision, and they're not going to want to roll back drivers, irons, or balls because they won't be able to sell these ideas to the consumer that making the game harder for them is a good idea.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 minutes ago, DrvFrShow said:

(sarcasm) I'm wondering if the USGA will start putting restrictions on bicep and quadriceps size in relation to flexibility (/sarcasm)

Drivers aren't giving 5 more yards every year. The Ping G30 driver hits the ball about the same distance as the Epic Flash or TM M5 with the same golfer at the same SS - I saw the video. Maybe they're more forgiving today with their "AI designed" faces but that affects amateurs more than it does the pros who make center strike more frequently than the rest of us. A lot more frequently. 

I'm a musician, or rather tried to be. The people at the top of the field are freaks of nature. It's the same with golf. The people who play at the elite level in on the PGA tour are freaks of nature. How many people who start playing golf even aspiring to play on the tour make it to the tour at any level? What percentage of those are the 150 players who get to be on TV every week? And fitness, sports training, swing analysis, coaching, have all advanced. And now the USGA is about to make decisions for everyone based upon these 150 players. What will they do? Ban training? Ban swing analysis? 

My guess is that equipment manufacturers will have a big say in any decision, and they're not going to want to roll back drivers, irons, or balls because they won't be able to sell these ideas to the consumer that making the game harder for them is a good idea.

We need a sarcasm emoji! 

I agree with you.   If they want to make the game more difficult for the pros, make the rough thicker and the greens more firm.  Leave the other 99% alone.

  • Like 1

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I think its fairly important to read what the Conclusions actually say.  The Ruling Bodies are going to look at club design and testing in order to minimize any future equipment-related distance gains, but there are no plans to reduce distance across all levels of the game.  They will explore a Local Rule that, at the choice of the folks who run competitions, would specify the use of equipment that produces shorter drives.  But you and I will NOT be required to use short-flight balls, or less effective drivers.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
14 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

there are no plans to reduce distance across all levels of the game.  They will explore a Local Rule that, at the choice of the folks who run competitions, would specify the use of equipment that produces shorter drives.  But you and I will NOT be required to use short-flight balls, or less effective drivers.  

Yeah, which as you then say, doesn't mean they won't try to reduce it for the PGA Tour.

3 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

That's all I'm saying, keep everything frozen in place.

Again, things have been frozen, but distances are still increasing, and they need to "stop" that trend.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, iacas said:

Again, things have been frozen, but distances are still increasing, and they need to "stop" that trend.

But those distances are increasing because of practice devices, launch monitors, focused workouts, better nutrition.  But, as in my Cameron Champ example, I think they are just about maxed out.  It is a very athletic/Olympics thing to let body improvement/body performance lead the way.  Not equipment.

And wouldn't that be a good thing to improve our performance through life-enhancing means rather than buying the new Ping driver offered up next season?

Edited by Double Mocha Man

  • Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

That's all I'm saying, keep everything frozen in place.

Did you see the chart from post 15? Golf equipment performance has been regulated  as we know it today for at least 14 years. Yet, the distance “problem” has only emerged in the past three years or so.

3 hours ago, Double Mocha Man said:

I kinda believe we're almost maxed out there with respect to the touring pros.  Other than using illegal substances I don't think Cameron Champ has left any yardage on the table.

I agree there will be a limit to what’s physically achievable, but I don’t think we’re there yet. Modern technology has allowed people to understand and analyze athletic movements like never before, and you see improvement in athletic performance in almost every major sport.

Even if Champ was the ceiling (he’s not, LD guys swing faster than him), the next step in the progression would be a tour full of guys that swing just as fast. Tiger used to be pretty much the longest guy on tour and now he’s merely above average. It’s not so much that he’s slowed down, but that the rest of the field has caught up to him.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, billchao said:

Even if Champ was the ceiling (he’s not, LD guys swing faster than him), the next step in the progression would be a tour full of guys that swing just as fast. 

LD guys are a freak side show, with freak equipment which I enjoy as a diversion.  And their "fairways" are quite wide and they rarely hit those fairways.  A lot of guys/gals win with one drive of 8 in bounds.  A lot of tour pros could compete in the LD contests but dial it back to score better on tour.


Posted

Do the powers that be think the problem is distance off the tee or distance by all clubs?  Wondering if they would look more at reducing output of the driver or the golf ball to remedy what they see as a problem.

8 minutes ago, billchao said:

It’s not so much that he’s slowed down, but that the rest of the field has caught up to him.

No, he's slowed down from his heyday.  A couple of years ago at the Bahamas when he recorded the fastest single swing on Tour was how he used to swing all the time in the early days.  Tiger was WELL into the 120s+ clubhead speed.  Now, he just bunts it out there with that little cut of his to get it in play.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It is interesting listening to some of the podcasts today and reading opinions. I mean I'm not sure where  Andy from Fried Egg got this stat, but adding even 150 yards to course involves obtaining on average 8 acres of additional land.

In an age of conservation and the younger generation being more and more concerned about conservation and land use, it's an issue I care about as a 34 year old who works in a field related to land planning.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

So right now...do we think we have reached peak physical ability to drive the ball in 2018/19? Do people want to maintain what is now but might not be ok if it got higher?

I know some will say different sport and situation but I cant help but think of today's long distance runners likely maxing out peak possibilities in endurance racing. However, Nike came out with the shoe that was giving those  runners almost a 2minute advantage and they just decided to not ban them for Tokyo.

In a way it's a reverse of the golf situation. Technology increased, no one saw it as a problem because players didnt max it out physically until 10-14 years later.

 

 

merlin_143807904_da5a8e92-769a-4d15-85b1

Track and field’s world governing body ruled that the next-generation running...

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
28 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

LD guys are a freak side show, with freak equipment which I enjoy as a diversion.  And their "fairways" are quite wide and they rarely hit those fairways.  A lot of guys/gals win with one drive of 8 in bounds.

I brought up LD as an example of human potential, not as a comparison of golf skill to tour pros.

33 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

A lot of tour pros could compete in the LD contests but dial it back to score better on tour.

We have threads on this. I don’t agree with your position at all. A small number of tour pros could compete for sure, but not a lot.

33 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

No, he's slowed down from his heyday.  A couple of years ago at the Bahamas when he recorded the fastest single swing on Tour was how he used to swing all the time in the early days.  Tiger was WELL into the 120s+ clubhead speed.  Now, he just bunts it out there with that little cut of his to get it in play.

Tiger Woods slowing down has nothing to do with the rest of the field speeding up. In 2007 there were nine players on the PGA Tour that averaged over 120mph club speed (Tiger was #2, 123.95mph). In 2019, there were 25.

Tiger didn’t play enough events to make the list in 2019, but in 2018 he was 17th on tour at 120.24mph. He’s not just bunting it out there.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, billchao said:

We have threads on this. I don’t agree with your position at all. A small number of tour pros could compete for sure, but not a lot.

My dream LD guy would be Jim Furyk.  Skinny arms and all.  😁  Otherwise you're looking at Koepka, maybe Reed, Kokrak, Woodland... the bulky guys.  But they would never ruin their swings by going all out.  Too much money to be made on the Tour.


Posted

There's motion capture technology and a golfer can put on a suit and they can analyze minutia in their swing and make improvements. It's tech. Fitness. They can't stop it. 

Just make the rough more penal. 

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I may be wrong about this, but here is my opinion anyway.  

The real financial underpinning of the golf industry as well as the game played at the elite levels for big money is the millions of amateur golfers who buy the clubs and balls and pay the greens fees and take the lessons, and who shoot in the 80s and 90s.   That's where the billions of dollars that support professional golf really come from.   Those people are not demanding a reduction in their distances.  In fact, any action to reduce their distances or make the game even more difficult than it already is would cause a lot of them to give up the game.   And that would severely damage the sport.   

In addition, I don't I don't see any demand among the average golf fan to have the PGA Tour reduce distances.  Zero.    

I know Jack Nicklaus used a one-iron for that famous shot that hit the pin on that par-3 in the US Open.  And I know that same shot requires a lot less than a one-iron now.  But who cares, other than Jack?  

 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Marty2019 said:

In addition, I don't I don't see any demand among the average golf fan to have the PGA Tour reduce distances.  Zero.    

Do you hang out with a lot of golf fans? Have you heard of the term "bomb and gouge"? It's boring golf to watch. Seeing wedges into par 4s all day just isn't interesting and can't be related to by most golfers. I know that it isn't the tour's goal to make their product relatable to the average golfer, but it is in their interest to keep it interesting for fans. At the moment, it isn't that interesting.

  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
10 hours ago, DrvFrShow said:

There's motion capture technology and a golfer can put on a suit and they can analyze minutia in their swing and make improvements. It's tech. Fitness. They can't stop it. 

Just make the rough more penal. 

I agree with you on this. If they can make a -15 winning score course a +1 for the US Open, then they can change other course designs to make it more risk reward for 300 yard drives. We’ve seen news about older course moving bunkers and such already. 
 

The human body is going to keep getter better regardless if they restrict golf technology (which they already have). 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1478 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Still working on the backswing a bit. Hand still gets away from the body, out towards the ball, and at A2 the club wants to roll over and get flat at A3. It's just very difficult to shallow from that position like I want. Which makes my downswing work impossible.  Backswing I have been playing around with the left leg straightening to start the backswing. It's like, a slight shove of the hips right with the left leg. Then just keep the flex in the right knee as I turn into it. I kind of like it. I never had a good swing trigger. It helps keep my left knee extended.  Yea, definitely feeling the hand path is traveling down the feet line, and straight up. A little bit of wrist rotation, and a lot more hinge sooner in the right wrist and elbow. I am trying to get the feeling that the arm hinging up then is the cause for the right shoulder to retract to finish the backswing. Club feels much more vertical at A3. I am trying to have my wrist fully hinged by then.  Feel the club and arms stop at A3.5 (my A4). If my arm collapses late, then I turn into that and I am pretty much screwed. The club and arms kind of have a floaty feeling, where they are just suspended in air for a bit, then drop.  Downswing I have been trying to think of a good visual for this mentally. I like the idea of my hands taking a wide arc to my right pocket, or I am taking the back of the hosel and trying to hit the ground behind my right foot.    Left knee stuff, just sooner. 
    • Day 78 - 2026-03-10 Backswing work at the net with foam balls, a few real ball swings.
    • Day 525 - 2026-03-10 Got some work in before lessons today (was going to play after but it decided to POUR). Then like three minutes in later on.
    • Day 2 (10 Mar 26) - Worked on weight shift feel using slap stick drill (hands about 6” apart - coming back weight on trail foot - down - thru weight on lead foot….moved it to hitting chips w/9i playing what I call “leap frog” - hit 1st about 10yds, the next a couple past the 1st, for about 6 balls total.  Love it as the lies change, the distances vary making each swing slightly different. 
    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.