Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, David in FL said:

For what it’s worth those of us who have opened up are showing Covid stats very similar to those places that remain locked down.  In some cases better.

This is the main point that should be debated and studied. Do restrictions work? If so, which ones? If not, we should eliminate them. Restrictions are costly to businesses, education, etc. They should be used only when absolutely necessary and proven to be effective. Perhaps there is strong science behind them, but the way the "open" and "closed" states are trending in tandem it's not real clear they work at all. 

8 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

I see that now. Not sure why I didn't see it before.

I edited to add the graph after I saw your question. More helpful to see both. 

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 3.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Administrator
Posted
13 minutes ago, Braivo said:

Do restrictions work?

Yes. Jesus.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 minutes ago, iacas said:

Yes. Jesus.

Ok. Let me rephrase the question. Do they work well enough to justify their trade-offs? That's the question we should be able to debate openly. 

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 minutes ago, Braivo said:

Perhaps there is strong science behind them, but the way the "open" and "closed" states are trending in tandem it's not real clear they work at all. 

The USA is unfortunately a poor example because the timing and severity of the measures to prevent the pandemic varied so much from state to state, and even though there may have been restrictions on some interstate travel, it's not like it was enforced to a degree that mattered. Pandemic response, IMO, devolved into political theater (by all parties), and stopped being treated as a generational public health emergency. But it is pretty easy to see what measures are most effective by looking at the commonalities among countries that had really good outcomes, like Taiwan, New Zealand, Vietnam, etc. (kind of like commonalities of the swings of the best golfers).

  • Extensive testing
  • Extensive contact tracing
  • Immediate and mandatory quarantine for positive cases and contacts
  • Travel Restrictions
  • Universal mask adoption
  • Social distancing
  • Lockdown/shelter in place when needed

With regards to economic tradeoff, I would guess that countries that did best in stopping the pandemic with these measures, also had the best economic outcomes.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Michigan had over 3k confirmed cases yesterday. 

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Braivo said:

This is the main point that should be debated and studied. Do restrictions work? If so, which ones? If not, we should eliminate them. Restrictions are costly to businesses, education, etc. They should be used only when absolutely necessary and proven to be effective. Perhaps there is strong science behind them, but the way the "open" and "closed" states are trending in tandem it's not real clear they work at all. 

I edited to add the graph after I saw your question. More helpful to see both. 

Ah. So I am not crazy.

Well, at least not because of that.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, David in FL said:

If I’m not wearing a mask, I promise I won’t run up and hug you.

You probably wouldn't have hugged me before the coronavirus.  I'm quick, you wouldn't catch me.

2 hours ago, iacas said:

Yes. Jesus.

Hey, no politics or religion!  😁


  • Administrator
Posted
7 hours ago, Braivo said:

Ok. Let me rephrase the question. Do they work well enough to justify their trade-offs? That's the question we should be able to debate openly. 

Yes, thank you.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, Braivo said:

Do restrictions work? If so, which ones?

From 

apa_210305_covid_texas_restaurant_reopen

Investigators compare rates of new COVID-19 daily cases and deaths before and after state mask mandates and the lifting of in-person dining restrictions.
Quote

The numbers are in to back up two policies designed to restrict the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that when states lifted restrictions on dining on premises at restaurants, rates of daily COVID-19 cases jumped 41 to 100 days later. COVID-19-related deaths also increased significantly after 60 days.

On the other hand, the same report demonstrates that state mask mandates slowed the spread of SARS-CoV-2 within a few weeks.

The study was published online March 5 in the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

 

Craig
What's in the :ogio: Silencer bag (on the :clicgear: cart)
Driver: :callaway: Razr Fit 10.5°  
5 Wood: :tmade: Burner  
Hybrid: :cobra: Baffler DWS 20°
Irons: :ping: G400 
Wedge: :ping: Glide 2.0 54° ES grind 
Putter: :heavyputter:  midweight CX2
:aimpoint:,  :bushnell: Tour V4

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, Braivo said:

Ok. Let me rephrase the question. Do they work well enough to justify their trade-offs? That's the question we should be able to debate openly. 

No, Jesus.  

But the difference probably lies between those who live in Pennsylvania which is deprived of freedom and those who live in Florida, which embraces it.  😊

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 minutes ago, David in FL said:

But the difference probably lies between those who live in Pennsylvania which is deprived of freedom and those who live in Florida, which embraces it.  😊

Nope.

  • Florida: 9.24% of the population has had COVID-19.
  • Pennsylvania: 7.58%.

And a good chunk of that was Philly right after New York spiked like crazy.

@David in FL, Florida's handling of COVID-19 has been a joke.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, iacas said:

Nope.

  • Florida: 9.24% of the population has had COVID-19.
  • Pennsylvania: 7.58%.

And a good chunk of that was Philly right after New York spiked like crazy.

@David in FL, Florida's handling of COVID-19 has been a joke.

And we are wide open and living life, as we have been for the past 8 months.  As a result, our economy is strong.
 

Pennsylvania’s handling of COVID-19 has been right up there with  California, New York, and Michigan.  Which may be why Florida has seen such an influx of people from your neck of the woods.  

Come on down. You can wear a mask if you like, or not.  We are easy to get along with.  😊

Edited by David in FL

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, David in FL said:

And we are wide open and living life, as we have been for the past 8 months.  As a result, our economy is strong.
 

Pennsylvania’s handling of COVID-19 has been right up there with  California, New York, and Michigan.  Which may be why Florida has seen such an influx of people from your neck of the woods.  

Come on down. You can wear a mask if you like, or not.  We are easy to get along with.  😊

First of all, I'm not a doctor. 

Second of all, I've stated many times the quality of my education. 

Having said that, I remember early in the pandemic "they" said that you had to wear your mask to protect others. From what I understood you can spread the disease through your mouth and through your nose. So wearing a mask helps stop the spread. But you can catch the disease through your mouth, through your nose, AND through your eyes. So, wearing a mask only partially protects you from catching the disease. 

I don't know if that's true. (As stated, I'm no doctor.) But if it is, then I think its rather selfish to not wear a mask. My feeling is if I get the COVID I can get through it. But if I don't wear a mask I'm jeopardizing the health of all the high risk folks I encounter, and they may or may not be able to get through it. 

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, ChetlovesMer said:

I don't know if that's true. (As stated, I'm no doctor.) But if it is, then I think its rather selfish to not wear a mask. My feeling is if I get the COVID I can get through it. But if I don't wear a mask I'm jeopardizing the health of all the high risk folks I encounter, and they may or may not be able to get through it. 

I agree with this 100%.  I am not a Dr. either but my sister & sister in law are RNs and I have Doctors as clients and they tell me that if 1 of 2 people in close proximity wear a mask each have less risk of catching covid than if neither wears a mask.  If both wear a mask the risk goes down further for both.  Without knowing who is high risk I feel we owe it if each other to help reduce risk for all.  It is not about if I will survive it, it is about protecting those that will not.

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

So, wearing a mask only partially protects you from catching the disease. 

Well....we don’t eject fluids from our eyes like we do with our noses and mouths. Eyes can be a receiving port for particles but not a distributor. So, wearing masks are preventing one from casting matter that may contain the virus if infected. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, iacas said:

Nope.

  • Florida: 9.24% of the population has had COVID-19.
  • Pennsylvania: 7.58%.

And a good chunk of that was Philly right after New York spiked like crazy.

@David in FL, Florida's handling of COVID-19 has been a joke.

What is the trade-off for being 1.68% better than another state? Completely collapsing your local economy for 1.68% difference? Is it worth it? 

Again, you have to look at both sides of the equation. Looking strictly at virus numbers and ignoring the other impacts is too narrowly focused. 

7 hours ago, David in FL said:

And we are wide open and living life, as we have been for the past 8 months.  As a result, our economy is strong.
 

Pennsylvania’s handling of COVID-19 has been right up there with  California, New York, and Michigan.  Which may be why Florida has seen such an influx of people from your neck of the woods.  

Come on down. You can wear a mask if you like, or not.  We are easy to get along with.  😊

Right. People can decide their own risk tolerance. If they want to stay home until a vaccine, their choice! 

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, Braivo said:

What is the trade-off for being 1.68% better than another state? Completely collapsing your local economy for 1.68% difference? Is it worth it? 

Not sure I would claim that economy has collapsed in PA. This statement seems a bit over dramatic to me. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

Not sure I would claim that economy has collapsed in PA. This statement seems a bit over dramatic to me. 

You always attack my word choices rather than the content of my statements. Telling. 

Is 1.68% worth the loss of economic activity over the last year? (Is that better?)

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1132 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 41, June 14.  I spent 10 minutes, half hitting W half hitting 6-iron, practice shots (indoors, off a mat, into a net)
    • Day 620 - 2026-06-14 Got some work in before and after lessons. Definitely didn't adduct my arms 130° in doing so.
    • Day 79: played 18. Shot a +5 76. Iron play was much better - 11 GIR. Hit a drive 380. Normal day. 
    • Day 14 (14 Jun 26) - Continued work with irons (8i-Pw), hard foam balls and getting consistent impact - same as previous drills - using gates for 1/2 and “simulated” course conditions on the second half.  
    • I like discussing the golf swing. Whether you call it "swing theory" or what, I like to talk about things that can expand the potential for what I know and understand. As a scientist, I like being shown that I'm wrong, too, because as I've said a bunch of times… "you're wrong and here's why" is an instant opportunity to upgrade my knowledge. I also like to help golfers, and one of the things I'm most glad to have moved away from from 15 years ago was the "Hands In" idea from S&T. Jim Waldron is often credited (probably rightly so) with explaining why so many Tour players and good players talk about "keeping their hands in front of themselves" while it appears that they're moving their arms around their bodies. From over 30 years ago: I've also got videos like… this (Instagram link here😞 I'm happy to say that I've become friends with Shaun and Mike at Athletic Motion Golf (AMG), too. I tend to get along with other smart folks who measure things, who look critically at information, who don't assume that what they thought 20 years ago holds true today. I get along with folks who look for chances to instantly upgrade their knowledge. Andy Plummer remains one of the people who does not look for these opportunities. He didn't care in early 2013 when we had evidence that the information in their S&T 2.0 DVDs was bogus, and they seemingly don't care now. They've been attacking (it's their favorite pastime) AMG in particular for the better part of a year now. There have been a few shots back at them from AMG (like… this), no doubt. But as is typical of the AMG fellas, it's with measured data. Well, recently, Andy took yet another shot at AMG: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZfHe0DuPXC/. Andy demonstrates that true power in the golf swing comes from doing stuff like this: Andy claims that the idea that the arms mostly lift and lower, while the body turns, is bogus. What golfers should be doing is using "angular velocity" to abduct and adduct their shoulders to move the club fast like this (above). Then he makes a ridiculous example of what AMG supposedly teaches, but misses by a mile. Now, it doesn't take a biomechanist to know that you can't possibly swing as Andy demonstrates. His right arm is so far around and behind him that his left arm would have to grow several feet to reach the grip of the club (or alignment stick), and a follow-through with the right arm position like that would be absolutely silly. But, it's a demonstration, so let's not read too much into it. However, I find ideas like this dangerous. Again, I like to help golfers, and in my opinion, the idea that you should abduct and adduct your arms a lot is a dangerous one. There's some adduction and abduction going on, but… it's not much. Anyway, this statement was posted: 130 degrees of dynamic range of horizontal abduction and adduction is quite the claim! I posted some comments to Andy and others, and was issued a challenge: Well, okay then. Here's Bryson's lead shoulder adduction: This measures the angle between the "virtual spine," the left shoulder, and the elbow. Bryson has a 97.34° "adduction angle" at P1, a 62.53° angle at P4, and returns to an 89.21° angle at impact. Rounding, that's a change of 34° from address to the top, and then a change (back toward the angle at address) of about 26° from the top to impact. If we want to worry about only horizontal abduction and adduction (where D = adduction and B = abduction): Left shoulder: 8.33° D, 38.74° D, 14.67° D Right shoulder: 1.03° D, 55.75° B, 14.04° B If we call moving the arms farther around you as negative, those are changes of -30.41° from P1 to P4 for the left shoulder and +24.07° from P4 to P7 for the left shoulder and -56.78° and +41.71° for the right shoulder. I have no idea on earth where he gets 130°. From the last frame of Bryson's swing where he's at 126.98°? But the lowest that number gets is 62.53°, for a range of 64.45, or less than half of the 130° claimed (plus it includes part of the swing, post-impact, that has no bearing on what the ball does). For good measure, another pretty good player: Left: 22.55° D ➡️ 33.35° D (∆ 10.8°) ➡️ 17.36° D (∆ 15.99° from P4, 5.19° from P1) Right: 15.03° D ➡️ 24.29° B (∆ 39.32°) ➡️ 1.93° D (∆ 26.22° from P4, 13.1° from P1) Of the biomechanists and experienced 3D users (on any platform), none of them have seen anything like 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction from a good player P1 to P7. And, like my little joke above, even if you go to the end of the swing, you rarely get much more than a little over halfway there. Maybe Andy is adding them? He does say in the video "and then add it to that with the lead arm." (I think that's what he says, but this isn't an additive type system.) I regularly coach golfers out of positions with a lot of adduction and abduction. I regularly work golfers away from moving their arms around their bodies. Even my juniors (the ones who have paid attention anyway! 🤣) can recite "arms = up/down, body = around." Like this: So, I don't know where this leaves us. Andy claims to have seen something on GEARS that shows 130° of dynamic adduction/abduction. I'm open to being wrong, but… I don't think I am here on this one. And, until that comes to be, I will continue to stand up for what I think is the best information, and do my best to work with golfers toward simpler, easier moves that don't get them stuck. Simpler, easier moves like the moves Tour players and great players tend to make, not complicated, difficult moves. Shaun and Mike said it in a video once where they demonstrated that the average Tour player adducts their lead arm 20° across their chest from the top to impact (P4 to P7), while the amateur often tries to go 40°. They said something like "the amateur is trying to move their arm TWICE the distance in the same amount of time as the professional athlete." Yep. The swings of great players are often easier and simpler. They are not abducting and adducting their arms much in comparison to average golfers. As a smart man once said: "Why would you teach something (abduction in this case) that bad golfers already do?" On a related note… the S&T crowd continues to be… well, who they've been as long as I've known them. Take this comment for example: I mean… I would think that this is pretty self-explanatory, but then again… I didn't think it needed explaining to begin with. P.S. As I was finishing up this article, another biomechanist replied with something so simple I hadn't even thought of it as I had immediately jumped into looking at the actual measurements: "90 doesn’t even seem physically possible.“ No, sir. It doesn't.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.