Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Driver vs. 3-Wood? Hit Driver.


Note: This thread is 1489 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

100%!


I stopped carrying my 3 wood for this very reason. Tried to “play it safe” on occasion but results were usually worse than a 20 years offline poke with the driver. 
 

5 wood goes 210 and RARELY am I presented with a shot that I NEED to hit further than that. So… 3 wood out!


  • 1 month later...
Posted

For me the 3 wood is a much better choice when I have to work the ball hard around a corner.  It's less likely to turn out overcooked.


Posted
On 11/7/2021 at 9:18 AM, iacas said:

The driver is the most forgiving club in the bag. Sure, it has the most potential to go offline, but the 20-30 yards the 3W costs you do NOT make up for a 1% increase in fairways hit. Particularly since the shorter shots should find more than 1% more fairways just by the nature of them traveling less distance. I rarely see people cold top it off the tee with their driver — the thin ones usually still go 200 or so. But I have seen people top the ball 20 yards with their 3-woods while trying to "do the smart thing."

Been weighing this out of late.  There is something inside that says I "must" vary what I hit off the tee, which I really like to do especially when doing casual rounds.  Yet after studying the yardage numbers the Approach S20 has tracked, I am giving away 20-30 yards off the tee "every time!"  Further review of the data, shows that of the courses I play regularly, there is usually just one hole per course where 3w distances out better for me than the driver.   

 

On 11/7/2021 at 9:18 AM, iacas said:

But I have seen people top the ball 20 yards with their 3-woods while trying to "do the smart thing."

You must have been watching me tee off - more than once, I have experienced such!    

Ping G400 SFT 10deg  R flex
Ping G410 3w R flex
Ping G400 3h and 4h R flex
Taylormade SLDR 5i thru PW graphite shaft R flex
Cleveland CBX wedges - 50, 54, 58 or 52, 58 (depending on my mood)
Odyssey Versa or White Steel #5
Srixon Q Star

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Interesting.   I have a driver and a 4-wood.  The 4-wood is 25 years behind the driver and I would assume better than 1% difference in fairways hit, but a bad hit is a bad hit and going to miss anyway.

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
On 11/7/2021 at 9:18 AM, iacas said:

I rarely see people cold top it off the tee with their driver

They’re obviously not as talented as I am 🙃

I don’t hit 3w off the tee for accuracy. I only choose it off the tee for distance reasons, though often I’ll opt to take a little off my driver swing instead.

  • Like 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Let's just assume (not sure it is true), but lets say that the 3-wood goes offline proportional to yardage difference (25-yards for 2-HDCP). 

10% decrease. Let's say the ball goes 35 yard right on a slice. At 10%, that is 3.5 yards less right. So, even though we see 10% yardage loses, 10% less slice isn't that much. 

If I told someone, hey, hit your 3-wood than your driver, it will curve 10% less offline. That sounds good. If I say, Oh hey, hit your 3-wood, it will curve 4 yards less. For someone who hits a 30-40 yard slice, that doesn't help much. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
33 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Oh hey, hit your 3-wood, it will curve 4 yards less. For someone who hits a 30-40 yard slice, that doesn't help much. 

Perhaps you should tell 'em to hit their pitching wedge.  Unless their name is Vinsk they will find the near-center of the fairway more often. 😄

@saevel25 - I always appreciate your calm scientific/mathematical analysis of things.  Keep it up.  Happy Holidays!

  • Funny 1

Posted (edited)

I dont bother carrying a 3 wood and I only hit 5 wood off the tee on holes that a straight drive from the tee will reach trouble. Good advice.

 

Edited by Nail
Irrelevant info
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Personally, I have done a ton of research on this topic. ... 🤪

I have worked to develop my own algorithm as to when to hit driver off the tee. 

I have tested this algorithm over almost 30 years of playing golf. Here's what I have found. 
 

1. Hitting driver is fun.

2. Hit driver on any hole you are allowed to.

3. If the hole is open and there's room to either side, hit driver.

4. If the hole is too narrow or hitting driver is too risky, see points 1 and points 2 above and hit driver. 

5. When in doubt hit driver. 

6. If it's not a par 3, hit driver. 

7. Hitting driver is fun. 

8. Golf is better if you are hitting your driver.

9. Golf is great if you are hitting your driver well.

10. Life in general is better if you are hitting your driver well. 

 

I know, sometimes things get confusing and doing all of the calculations required above can be challenging when on the tee. In that case, just hit driver. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Funny 3
  • Informative 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Golf myth # 325: "3 wood is more accurate than driver."

People who fear inaccuracy with their driver are almost certainly going to be just as bad with their  3 wood.

You have a much better chance of topping or mishitting a 3 wood than a driver.

Pros hit 3 woods bacause they run out of fairway with driver, not because they are more accurate.

If the average golfer could hit a 3 wood straighter than a driver, he/she'd be better off ditching the driver 100% of the time.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted
36 minutes ago, Shorty said:

Pros hit 3 woods bacause they run out of fairway with driver, not because they are more accurate.

True. But I think Henrik Stenson may be an exception to this. 

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Just now, Vinsk said:

True. But I think Henrik Stenson may be an exception to this. 

Yes, Mr. Stenson may be the outlier here.  I read something a couple years ago that tracked the touring pros and their relative accuracy with the 3-wood.  They were less accurate than with their driver.


Posted

My rule of thumb is very simple.  90 percent of amateurs shouldn't have a 3 wood in the bag.  They get more distance and generally accuracy with the driver (even a higher lofted mini driver) off the tee and can hit a 5 wood better off the fairway.  In fact, I only have a 2 and 4 hybrid in my bag between my driver and 5 iron.

What's in the bag

  • Taylor Made r5 dual Draw 9.5* (stiff)
  • Cobra Baffler 4H (stiff)
  • Taylor Made RAC OS 6-9,P,S (regular)
  • Golden Bear LD5.0 60* (regular)
  • Aidia Z-009 Putter
  • Inesis Tour 900 golf ball
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Based on my stats for all rounds played this year, I hit my Driver straighter then my 3 Wood anyway so...🤷‍♂️

driver2021.JPG.a0cff8105a4c46a2561043ec83af0f64.JPG

3wood2021.JPG.5286e7af8fec422f8ab0b94221fed87c.JPG

Jim Morgan

Driver: :callaway: Paradym 10.5 deg Reg
Woods: 3W :callaway: Epic Flash 15 deg, Heavenwood:callaway:GBB 20 deg
3 Hybrid: :callaway:  Epic Flash 21 deg, 5 Hybird: :callaway: Apex 24 deg
Irons: :ping: G425 Graphite 6-SW, Wedges: :ping: Glide 58 deg
Putter:   :tmade: ZT Broomstick :aimpoint: Express
 :titleist: golf bag, Pinned RF

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I have always hit a driver off the tee better (straighter) than my 3-wood so I stopped even trying it years ago. In fact, I just dumped my 3-wood last season because I have found that I have little use for it. I hit my 5-wood almost as far with more control.

Bill M

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For me I'm more accurate with my 3 wood, but not but enough to make the distance loss worth it, I think.

Driver:

1464912818_DriverStats.png.661baece137ec10cad2395457f211abe.png

3 wood:

325246389_3woodstats.png.7500e79056c48a2e54ffc9a41cea1022.png

The 3 wood sample size is pretty low, though. I don't use it much off the tee - I would rather hit a hybrid if I'm going to club down from driver.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
bryson-dechambeau.jpg

Hitting a shorter club off the tee might seem like the smart play, but it doesn't necessarily give you the best scoring average.

2022 and it became mainstream! 😁

  • Thumbs Up 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1489 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It was worse than that.  Under 10 course handicap I think was NDB, but 10-19 CH had a maximum score, and 20-29 had a higher one (by one).  Might have been 7 and 8, I'm going from memory here.  When my handicap was low 20s / high teens, I had to look up  my course handicap every time I had a bad hole and adjust before I posted the number.  Now there's maybe one hole per course where that might be an issue, and I have the option to enter hole-by-hole in the GHIN app anyway if I have any doubts.   I remember reading a lot of Dean Knuth's writing 15-20 years ago, when I was starting in golf.  I liked the history of the (old?) handicapping system.  I really like the changes WHS brings with par.  I suppose I'm sorry he doesn't seem to like that change, I thought it solved a problem that had been irking me. 
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Couple of things. In the UK they play a lot of stableford competitions. 2 points for a net par, 1 for a bogey, 3 for a birdie, 4 for an eagle, 0 for a double bogey or worse. Playing to your handicap typically means getting 36 points, being 18 x 2 points. If your course rating is a long way different from par, then playing to your handicap would mean getting 32 points or 40 points or some such. I wouldn't be at all surprised if that input from the R&A is the reason for the CR-Par adjustment, which brings it to 36 points is playing to your handicap. A round of net pars really should be playing to your handicap. Now it is. Yay. I would think the people most likely to be upset about the CR-Par adjustment would be 6 or 7 indexes whose course is par 72, with a 74/140 rating. 6.5 x 140/113 + 74 - 72 = 10. So the "single figure" golfer who has probably defined himself that way for a long time is now a 10 and getting double digit strokes. Oof. I must admit I'm a 0.0 right now (sure makes the math easy) and if I play Bethpage Black from the blues, suddenly I'm a 7. That takes a little bit of getting used to. It also means I do have to pay attention to the stroke indices to be sure of whether I'm making the net double bogey adjustment properly.  I do think it's much less likely that NDB is applied properly vs the old system where it was max double bogey or max 7 depending on handicap (I think anyway - I know it was max double bogey at my handicap level - I didn't much care about where it changed or what it changed to). NDB is clearly better, but it does mean people either have to adjust it themselves accurately (questionable) or input their hole by hole scores (also questionable). I do it, because I care about it (and don't tend to make too many scores worse than double and also rarely play courses where I'm giving strokes back to the course and would therefore have max bogey on some holes). I'm sure there are many who don't and will just guess or assume. Under the old system, if I was playing a scratch tournament (which is most of my golf), I didn't care what my course handicap or stroke allocations were. They didn't affect my posted scores at all. Now they do (although the MGA and LIGA post all scores at their events themselves directly - something I am very happy about). That is a complication under the new system - one I think is worth it given the benefits, but a complication all the same.
    • Wordle 1,811 4/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Good analogy Stinky 😜
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.