## Recommended Posts

New piece from Aimpoint founder, NO POINT IN A SINGLE POINT OF AIM

Quote

What we can clearly see in these real-life examples is that the Single Point of Aim theory is useless as a predictor of break around the hole.  Not only because the math doesn’t allow for it, but also because real golf greens, as opposed to hypothetical ones, have changing slopes around the hole.  If you want to be a great green-reader, learn to evaluate each putt by itself based using the concept of side-slope along the line of play.  It will be dramatically more effective and will not ever give you the wrong direction.

##### Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

New piece from Aimpoint founder, NO POINT IN A SINGLE POINT OF AIM

What I love about aimpoint, is that I don't have to understand any of that. Lol.

##### Share on other sites

When I'm on a green putting up or down a slope, I like to estimate the actual distance and the "stroke speed distance".  For example, I have a 30 footer that is downhill.  I'll make a guess on how hard I need to hit the ball and think to myself, "hit this like a 10 footer".  I'd like to come up with a more solid way to make these guesstimates.

Has anyone tried to dial in speed/distance control using your feet?  After all, we have already trained our feet to feel percent slope.

What I'm thinking (percentages aren't real, just for discussion purposes):

Say 1% slope = plus or minus 10%

2% slope = plus or minus 25%

3% slope = plus or minus 50%... etc.

(Maybe plus or minus won't work and one would need seperate percentages for uphill vs. downhill putts.)

For example you have a 20 footer that is on an average of 3% downhill slope; then 20 - (20*50%))  = 10 feet.  In this case you put your 10 foot stroke on the ball and expect the ball to travel 20 feet.

I'm thinking of experimenting with this idea and see if anything can be made of it, unless someone can point out the flaw in my thinking or a better approach.  Comments please

Edited by No Mulligans

##### Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

What I'm thinking (percentages aren't real, just for discussion purposes):

Say 1% slope = plus or minus 10%

2% slope = plus or minus 25%

3% slope = plus or minus 50%... etc.

It's not going to be linear like that across all the stimps.

20 footers…

Stimp Slope Uphill Downhill
8 1% +3.0 -0.7
8 2% +4.8 -2.7
8 3% +6.4 -4.8
8 4% +8.2 -7.0
10 1% +3.4 -1.3
10 2% +5.7 -3.8
10 3% +8.0 -6.8
10 4% +10.3 -9.7
12 1% +4.1 -1.8
12 2% +6.8 -5.4
12 3% +9.5 -8.7
12 4% +12.2 -12.3

Yeah, I don't know that I'd really worry about trying to memorize anything like that. Just feel it, and hit the putt the right distance.

##### Share on other sites

Faldo explains AE, did a pretty decent job of it if you ask me. Wait, some can distinguish between a 0.5 and a 1? I still have problems with 1. And a foot past the cup? Not 6 inches? Not crazy about use of the word phenomenon.

##### Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

Wait, some can distinguish between a 0.5 and a 1? I still have problems with 1.

Yeah, for me, a 1 is "this is level. No, wait, I think I feel a little (r to l, or l to r). Or is it?" But it is, and I know which way it is.
2 is an immediate "boy, I barely feel just a little (whichever way). Just barely."

OT: Kind of reminds me of when the Huey pilots would try to teach me how to fly the thing.  In handling the controls, they would say "don't move the collective, just think about moving it. And that's enough."

##### Share on other sites

Yeah, no way.

Confirmed by Mark Sweeney and some others. There's no way to hole the putt on that black line…

##### Share on other sites

I started practicing with some Aimpoint express techniques today. Anyone see some major gains (or at least decent gains) in their putting stats or stroked gained putting from using it? I was REALLY suprised with how much I liked the technique, and how at least day 1 seemed to really have an impact.

##### Share on other sites

9 hours ago, HJJ003 said:

I started practicing with some Aimpoint express techniques today. Anyone see some major gains (or at least decent gains) in their putting stats or stroked gained putting from using it? I was REALLY suprised with how much I liked the technique, and how at least day 1 seemed to really have an impact.

I dropped a couple of strokes per round after starting AimPoint. Express is faster than the original or Mid-point methods and I use it all the time.

Don't forget the Bead and Speed parts of putting. AimPoint gives you the read and you will feel confident you are right on this after a few rounds.

##### Share on other sites

On 4/12/2017 at 1:54 PM, No Mulligans said:

When I'm on a green putting up or down a slope, I like to estimate the actual distance and the "stroke speed distance".  For example, I have a 30 footer that is downhill.  I'll make a guess on how hard I need to hit the ball and think to myself, "hit this like a 10 footer".  I'd like to come up with a more solid way to make these guesstimates.

Has anyone tried to dial in speed/distance control using your feet?  After all, we have already trained our feet to feel percent slope.

What I'm thinking (percentages aren't real, just for discussion purposes):

Say 1% slope = plus or minus 10%

2% slope = plus or minus 25%

3% slope = plus or minus 50%... etc.

(Maybe plus or minus won't work and one would need seperate percentages for uphill vs. downhill putts.)

For example you have a 20 footer that is on an average of 3% downhill slope; then 20 - (20*50%))  = 10 feet.  In this case you put your 10 foot stroke on the ball and expect the ball to travel 20 feet.

I'm thinking of experimenting with this idea and see if anything can be made of it, unless someone can point out the flaw in my thinking or a better approach.  Comments please

First off I am not an "Aim Point" person. Nothing against it, and I'm happy those who do use it have shaved strokes off their scores. I just do my own thing when it comes to putting.

As to your question about speed, and distance control. I use how far I turn my head, at address, to make that last look at my target. Then use how far I turn my head, to how far of a back stroke with my putter. Longer head turn equals a longer back stroke with my putter. Shorter head turn equals shorter back stroke.

It's pretty old school, and it does take some practice to get the head turn, and the back stroke in tune with each other. Also, there is compensation to be learned for uphill, and downhill rolls.

I can honestly say that I am almost never, ever short on my putts.Most of my short misses are due to me hitting a fat putt.

##### Share on other sites

It looks like AimPoint is rolling out a 3D green mapping feature.  Any thoughts @iacas @mvmac?

Edited by Kekeisen
fat-fingered the submit button.

##### Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kekeisen said:
It looks like AimPoint is rolling out a 3D green mapping feature.  Any thoughts @iacas @mvmac?

None here yet… they've always mapped greens. That's how the TV tech worked back even 8-10 years ago.

##### Share on other sites

Rose was woefully under the hole on this putt. This looks like a two handed express read? If he aims more left it has more time to build speed. Maybe this is just one of those what are ya gonna do putts.

##### Share on other sites

This is the official AP thread right?

Technically it is 4 fingers, dunno why she just didn't use one hand.

##### Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nevets88 said:

This is the official AP thread right?

Technically it is 4 fingers, dunno why she just didn't use one hand.

If her pinky is slightly narrower than the rest of her fingers, she gets a more accurate read with two hands.

##### Share on other sites

I use two hand for slopes of five and above.

##### Share on other sites

On 4/12/2017 at 1:54 PM, No Mulligans said:

When I'm on a green putting up or down a slope, I like to estimate the actual distance and the "stroke speed distance".  For example, I have a 30 footer that is downhill.  I'll make a guess on how hard I need to hit the ball and think to myself, "hit this like a 10 footer".  I'd like to come up with a more solid way to make these guesstimates.

Has anyone tried to dial in speed/distance control using your feet?  After all, we have already trained our feet to feel percent slope.

What I'm thinking (percentages aren't real, just for discussion purposes):

Say 1% slope = plus or minus 10%

2% slope = plus or minus 25%

3% slope = plus or minus 50%... etc.

(Maybe plus or minus won't work and one would need seperate percentages for uphill vs. downhill putts.)

For example you have a 20 footer that is on an average of 3% downhill slope; then 20 - (20*50%))  = 10 feet.  In this case you put your 10 foot stroke on the ball and expect the ball to travel 20 feet.

I'm thinking of experimenting with this idea and see if anything can be made of it, unless someone can point out the flaw in my thinking or a better approach.  Comments please

I have been doing this for a couple of years and I have figured out a system that works for me pretty well. On my home course (Stimp 10) it's -10% for each percentage of slope downhill and +15% for each percentage of slope uphill. I combine this with how far I take my club back. I think there is a distance course for Aimpoint and I haven't taken it yet to see how it differs from what I have been doing. If anyone has any questions I can elaborate.

##### Share on other sites

On 2/24/2019 at 7:31 AM, boogielicious said:

I use two hand for slopes of five and above.

I use two hands for 4 and above.   The courses I play rarely have anything about a 4.

## Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×

• ### Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap

• Want to join this community?

We'd love to have you!

• ## 2019 TST Partners

• ### Posts

• Won the handicap section of the Coffee Cup I played in my home course on Sunday
• While I think Phil should not be playing because of all the reasons stated.  He is endorsing by his mere presence a government that has numerous instances of human rights violations.  As an elder statesman, so to speak, and future a HOF member of the PGA his presence does provide validation to the tournament. But he could have handled it so much better to avoid some of the flack he is getting. He could have used the same turning 50 logic and that he doesn't expect to have an opportunity to play the tournament again, (whether a true statement of not).  But the real response to put things into perspective would be to say... "Unlike the military weapons that have been sold to Saudi Arabia for decades, the products I use can't be used to kill Americans." I spent 30 years in the defense industry and it is pretty amazing what products are sold to foreign countries.  The products are not the latest products, or upgraded version, and lack sensitive USG capability, but they none-the-less they represent some of the best that America has made.  Unfortunately, allies can become enemies is short order.  None of this is directed to a specific administration, party, or to be interpreted as political in nature.  It has been done for years. What is the most amazing part of a Foreign Military Sale is that a branch of the service, say the Air Force, will negotiate a contract with a defense contractor using DOD acquisition regulations to the benefit of the foreign entity.  I was never able to get my head around hearing an Air Force officer tell Americans working for an American company that his job was looking out for the interests of the country of (insert name of country).  It was utterly mind boggling. So, while I agree Phil should not play, hitting a golf ball seems to pale in comparison. John
• Probably a PhD in comparative women's studies and Social Environmental Hysteria from a California college. Fill them with scotch and we are talking.  I need a ball retrieval tool, a clean rag, a drill and a straw.
• I agree.. OSU can not grant Clemson a 21 point lead. Though, I think OSU is equipped to make it close if they do. The number of times they go on a 21 point streak in a short amount of time is still amazing to me. It's been like clockwork. OSU feels out what the other team does for about 3 drives and then just steps on the gas on offense and defense. I am not sure that I would take the Wisconsin game as what this team is though. You have a team motivated for revenge, they worked on all the deficiencies that Illinois and OSU exposed on them, and they threw the kitchen sink at OSU. You have OSU's #1 DB go out and things start to get exposed a bit. Who would have thought that Wisconsin's QB would pull the ball and run it. Great adjustment there for Wisconsin. It gave them a lead at the half, but then OSU held them to 80 yards for the rest of the game (excluding the last drive in garbage time)  Still, OSU needs to match Clemson drive for drive if they come firing right out of the gate. Kinda like how OSU kept up with Michigan and pulled away.
• All good points. But the lurking issue for me is how OSU performed for more than half the game against Wisconsin. You give Clemson a 21pt start...you’re done. OSU a great 3-4th quarter team but that sluggish start won’t fair well with any of the top four teams. I think (hope) it’s a dogfight. I’m not too hopeful how OU will do against LSU. Zero discipline and an iffy defense isn’t what you want against LSU.

• ### Today's Birthdays

1. great golf tools
(81 years old)
2. Sean Sully
(40 years old)

×
×
• Create New...

## Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...