• Announcements

    • iacas

      Visit FlagstickRule.com   03/13/2017

      Visit the site flagstickrule.com to read about and sign a petition for the USGA/R&A regarding the one terrible rule in the proposed "modernized" rules for 2019.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
inthehole

Typically - do you take a FULL practice swing before every shot ?

40 posts in this topic

I know it varies from shot to shot & club to club ... BUT ... on average, do you take one full practice swing, a bunch of partial swings, or just set up with a mini-waggle or two as part of your pre-shot routine and have at it.

I always have used the one full practice swing routine, but in thinking about it, seems unnecessary.     I think I'm going to try to cut down on this & keep the pre-shot routine it to a couple little waggles at set up and see how it works out ...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

If it's a full swing shot, I typically take one practice swing at about 70% effort, step back behind the ball to pick a line, and then step back up to the ball and hit... If it's less than a full swing though, I take more practice swings at close to full effort to try to get the right feel for the shot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, never.

However, its funny that you ask this now, because I just posted this like 10 minutes ago ... http://thesandtrap.com/t/6754/developing-a-repeatable-swing/0_30#post_931793

Long story short ... I think I'm going to experiment with a full practice swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I try to, it's part of my routine but it can get loose if I am just farting around. Next season I intend to be more consistent with how I approach shots. Looking back at my best rounds those were the days I did everything the same.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Nope. Just a slow little half swing to get any tension out of the arms.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Always.

I begin with a quarter swing where I try to get the right impact "feel" (shaft leaning slightly forward, weight transferred forward, light brush of the turf with the clubhead). Sometimes it takes about 2-3 quarter swings, but once I get the right feel, I immediately transition into one full practice swing. The feeling I am looking for again is a light brush of the turf, with the clubhead connecting just in front of the ball position. If my swing takes a divot, something is wrong. If my swing hits only air, something is wrong. Once I get that nice brush, I move into my stance and swing away!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't remember the last time I did.

Seriously, it may have been over a decade ago.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not really. I might make a full motion if I'm trying to feel my A4 position, but definitely not at normal speed.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A couple pendulums to get the feel of the length of the club correct.  (Before that, what Big C noted was identical to my habit)

I'm starting to think that just getting up there and hitting is the right thing to do as I gain confidence, though.  I'm wondering if there's a bonus in emphasizing the visualization of the swing and shot, and de-emphasizing the physical practice swing.  hard to tell until I get to test it, I suppose.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sometimes I do and sometimes I don't.  When I do take a full practice swing I brush the ground.  I also do kind of a Mike Weir thing where I make a back swing rehearsal waggle over the ball, then I hit it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I usually make one swing that's as close to simulating the swing I intend to make as possible without hitting the ground (so no chance of a divot). I do it back behind the ball before I really start what I consider my pre-shot routine.

Once I address the ball I take the club back to it's horizontal position in the takeaway, as sort of a slow waggle, to get a feel for that position that I need to cross on my back swing and then hit the ball.

All I'm really looking for with a practice swing is to watch the club head pass though the impact zone to see if it's travelling on the right line for the shot I'm trying to play. If I don't like the look or feel of it I am likely to do it again (but that seldom happens).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do like a half speed swing. Usually only one but if something feels odd ill do a couple until it feels right. Its more so I make a concise effort to keep my tempo smooth. When I half ass it I usually hit a bad shot.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I always take the same swing I plan on using when i step up to the ball. even If it takes 1 time or 3, until I get the swing I want.

This is the only way I have found to be more consistent with each shot i make.

I have found when i just grip and rip it does not go well.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, usually three 50% speed full swings.  When you get older, cool weather and slow pace means having to stretch out between each full shot.  When it's nice and warm with a good amount of humidity, I do this much less because it's easier to stay loose. It's important to note that on the tee box, I take my swings BEFORE teeing up.  Then it's tee it up, address ball and go.  On the fairway it's behind the ball, then address and go.

Also practice the less-than-full-swing pitch and chip shots 3x as well.  As soon as I believe the swing meets the distance I step up, hit it and leave it short!

dave

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not really. I might make a full motion if I'm trying to feel my A4 position, but definitely not at normal speed.

This is what I do too. The speed is (or at least feels like it is) much slower than my normal swing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't really call it a full swing. It really is just me taking sort of a 3/4 swing at 50% effort to get a feel for what I'm trying to do when I'm over the ball.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I take about a 50-75% swing unless it's a crazy opened up lob wedge I need to get up really fast in which case I swing for the bleachers to get a feel of the turf since I'm usually in the rough when I do it.  I will also amend my 50-75....if I'm in heavy rough no matter the club I give a full practice to feel the resistance I'm going to get and if I think it's even possible to advance vs punch out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • There are several statements that I disagree with which I feel are important to discuss: All golf balls do not go about the same distance.  A low compression, 2-piece Surlyn covered model will launch higher and with less spin than a 5-piece, high compression urethane covered model which will result in a noticeable difference in distance off the tee.  Dean even stated in another answer "The soft golf ball market has taken off due to the lower spinning balls means players can be longer in distance." Regarding balls for different swing speeds and compression:  3) Bridgestone (and I think Callaway) has come out with tour caliber balls for players who swing under 105mph. Is it possible to design a tour caliber ball for a specific segment of swing speed or is this just mostly a marketing thing?  DEAN: The whole swing speed story to me is one of the most over-rated stories in golf. Companies force or teach golfers to play low compression balls so their low swing speed can compress the ball. The problem with this is that low compression balls have the lowest spin in all shots, so they are pushing players to play a ball with no performance at all… and when you need that spin around the green, it's not there…            I almost don't know where to start on this one.  The concept of designing golf balls based on swing speeds doesn't teach or force players to use a low compression ball...it's about using a ball that has the appropriate compression for your swing speed.  Some players will have better results with a higher compression ball, others will have better results with a lower compression.  Keep in mind, there is a difference between "lower compression" and "low compression".  Most of the urethane tour balls have a compression rating somewhere between the mid 70s to mid 90s.  Tour models like the Chrome Soft, B330-RX and B330-RXS are in the mid 60s, which is lower.  Balls like the Supersoft and e6 are in the upper 30s and 40s, which is considered low.  Dean's statement that "low compression balls have the lowest spin on all shots" is somewhere between a little misleading and flat-out wrong.  It's true that a lower compression ball will spin less (and launch higher) than a firmer ball on full shots.  But on short game shots around the green, the ball is not compressed.  On pitch shots, chip shots, and greenside bunker shots for example,    the only part of the ball that is being activated is the cover. Notice on this chart that the lowest compression ball is very close to the highest spinning, and the lowest spinning ball has almost the same compression rating!  The point is, compression has little to no affect on short game shots...the cover is the main factor.  All 4 of these models have a urethane cover, but the two that provide the most spin have softer covers.  To put this in context, the chart below was a test Golf Digest did in 2015 which shows the performance on a partial wedge shot (I think it was 40 yds) with most of the balls on the market at the time The different colors represented the price point.  These results don't match the first chart I posted exactly which can happen when player testing (this one shows the B330 has higher spin than the RXS). Is there a difference between the lower spinning "red dots" and the highest spinning?  Sure.  There should be though.  Golf balls are designed to have different types of performance for different types of players.  The B330-RX has the lowest spin among the red dot models, but that doesn't mean it's lacking in performance...it spins exactly how the ball designers intended it to, because not everyone wants/needs maximum spin.  Notice the e7...this is a high compression ball very comparable to the B330, but has very different spin characteristics. So again, higher compression doesn't mean higher spin around the green and lower compression doesn't necessarily mean low spin.  About the only thing that I could agree with Dean's comment on would be that all the ultra-low compression balls are Surlyn covered models designed for distance, so it's true that these balls have low spin on all shots and will not offer the same level of performance around the greens, but again, that has more to do with the cover than the compression.  The fact is, there are lower compression balls that perform at the highest level. The B330-RXS is the same type of ball as the Pro V1 in many respects, and performs just as well as, or even better for many players, so I'm surprised by his comments that fitting for swing speed is over-rated and lower compression balls have no performance.  That's like saying getting fit for the correct shaft flex is over-rated, and softer flex shafts don't perform as well as stiffer shafts!  Does anyone consider the Dynamic Gold S-300 to be a lower performing shaft than the Dynamic Gold X-100?  No, of course not. They are designed to do the same thing, but because some players don't swing as fast as others the softer flex will give them better results, just like the B330-RXS is the equal to the B330-S, but will fit players who don't swing as hard better. I'm also not on-board with the opinion that fitting with a driver is a "mistake" and when testing to choose a ball based on 100 yds and in.  I'm not saying that short game performance isn't important, but wow...to claim that testing with a driver is a mistake is ridiculous.  I'll make a simple point on this...anyone can hit good wedge shots with a Pro V1 or B330 or Z-Star.  Fast swingers, slower swingers, high handicappers, low handicappers...it doesn't matter, they can all get good results on wedge shots.  Does that mean that's the ball they should play, and it will work equally as well for the other aspects too?  No.  A wedge can mask any issues in performance because of the loft and backspin, but the driver exaggerates issues.  The same players who hit respectable wedge shots with various tour balls might struggle to keep shots in play or lose potential distance. And before anyone tries to use the old "the driver is used 14 times a round, but half of the shots are inside of 100 yds" argument...save it.  If you play a high spin ball and you're struggling to hit the fairway with your tee shots, that ball will not help you save shots around the green.  Too much spin for players who can't control it is worse than a lower spinning model. Sorry Dean...not trying to blast you or anything, just putting in my two cents.  Ok, maybe more like four cents!
    • So......Is this your point @Jack Watson?
    • https://thesandtrap.com/b/clubs/titleist_716_ap1_review My review for the site is above. I've been using them since writing this review. Excellent clubs. One watch out is with short game shots with the PW and GW. They will go a bit farther than a corresponding chip or pitch with the equivalent wedge. The ball feels like it jumps off the face with good contact. So be careful with that.
    • Thanks for all the comments. I realize change is always hard but single length, lie and weight make so much sense to me. I am going to build a set of Value Golf clubs and see what happens. As improve I may go back to normal but who knows.  I think it will be better for learning the overall game. Which in my opinion and observance needs a lot of help. In my other hobbies that required learned skills it was easy to find groups to help you with the skills and drills to improve them. Businesses that the hobby supported held seminars and workshops covering all aspects. Trying to find help, other than paid lessons, is impossible, at least in my area. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Golfgirl10543
      Golfgirl10543
      (43 years old)
    2. jkettman
      jkettman
      (28 years old)
    3. old man1953
      old man1953
      (64 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon