Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ditchparrot19

Reclined airline seats debate

0  

  1. 1. Do you recline your seat on an airplane?

    • Yes
      28
    • No
      23

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

116 posts in this topic

Two flights were diverted recently due to disputes over reclined seats. I'm not a super-frequent flyer, but I have to take four or five trips a year for work that involve multiple flights and I absolutely detest the time I have to spend either on a plane or in an airport.

I've never once reclined my seat when someone was behind me and I never will. I believe it to be rude as hell and that it exacerbates an already stressful situation, but apparently I'm in the minority of Americans in that view (according to a national poll).

I'm 6'2" and oftentimes when the person in front of me reclines, the back of the seat falls within about an inch of my knees. I always express my displeasure immediately and if the person responds with an I-don't-give-a-rat's-ass attitude I'll make certain that I "inadvertently" drive my knee with a considerable amount of force into the back of the seat at least a couple of times during the flight while changing positions or getting up to use the restroom. "Accidents" do happen, after all.

I read an article that mentioned that a couple of low-budget carriers (Spirit and Allegiant Air) have removed the reclining feature entirely. I'd book with one of them every time if I could, but it doesn't appear if they'll be an option for me very often.

Which side do you folks fall on?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

I believe it to be rude as hell and that it exacerbates an already stressful situation, but apparently I'm in the minority of Americans in that view (according to a national poll).

I'll make certain that I "inadvertently" drive my knee with a considerable amount of force into the back of the seat at least a couple of times during the flight while changing positions or getting up to use the restroom. "Accidents" do happen, after all.

Those two statements are at odds with one another. You're opposed to being rude, you acknowledge that you're in the minority, and yet you do something that is intentionally rude and not at all a "right" afforded to you by the very nature and design of the thing (i.e. seats allow you to recline; a person reclining is doing a perfectly expectable thing that is, again, the majority choice).


I don't recline very often, but sometimes I do, typically when someone small is behind me (or nobody), I really want to take a nap and the edge of the seat isn't providing any support for my head (either against a window or the neighboring seat), etc.

I'm also more comfortable sitting up, too, though. My car seats are always more upright than most.

I don't begrudge the people who recline in front of me. It's their right to do so. Does it suck? Yes. But so does having to wait in line at the bank or whatever - I'm not gonna get mad at people for going to the bank. Besides, airline seats recline about four inches these days.

P.S. Poll added. Seriously, why don't people add polls to obvious poll-deserving questions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it's polite to ask. If someone behind me asked me to not recline, sure I'll do it. I'm not going to be a dick about it. Airplanes suck. I'm not trying to make it more uncomfortable for someone else. If I want to recline, I'll ask the person behind me. So, it depends. I think if you ask the person in front to stop reclining and he doesn't do it, it's a dick move. Unless you are 4'8. However, I would not recline if the person behind me is 7'3 or fake Hasheem Thabeet... http://deadspin.com/if-hasheem-thabeet-sits-behind-you-in-coach-dont-recli-1627402297

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool question, an ill reserve my comments about the original post because Erik already addressed that and I happen to agree with him 100 percent on this one! Do I recline my seat? Yes, I don't have any reservations about reclining, and no, I have absolutely no issue with others doing so either! I don't consider my self a frequent flyer, but I travel a considerable amount and not once has someone asked me not to do so, and not have I ever asked someone not to do so! I am not that tall, but I still feel cramped when someone is reclined, but if the airlines didn't intend for it to be that way they would just make it an unavailable option! Actually, the thought of asking someone in front of me to stop reclining has never even crossed my mind, and I didn't think that anyone would ever ask either... Would I accommodate someone if they did ask me... Yeah, I think I would, but I wouldn't be gap with it (although, I'd probably do it with a smile as to not make the person asking feel like a privileged brat asking of me to forgo my in flight privilege for his comfort) Hey I have an idea, you don't want to feel cramped? Get a first class seat, they are awesome! In fact that is the whole point of getting a first class seat, so that you can do wetfyw while getting served every other need and getting every other perk on a flight ;), don't sit in coach and then complain about the rotten conditions you have to live with, and the lack of leg room, plus the occasional overweight two seat hogging passenger! It comes with the territory and you either get with it or find another mode of transportation or dish out the money to be in a high class setting :) Hmmmm, this post took a weird turn, but I'm clicking submit anyway without proofing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The recline feature is there, so I use it if I want to, but not trying to make the situation more complicated than necessary.

Flights has to divert because of recline arguments between passengers? The level of stupidity in some sometimes amaze me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would feel like a world class douche asking someone not to recline their seat on an airplane. I fly a lot and have never had someone ask me to not recline my seat, but if I did I would tell them to take a bus next time.

My advice to the OP is to select the first row of seats whenever possible, you'll have a bulwark in front of you instead of seats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would feel like a world class douche asking someone not to recline their seat on an airplane. I fly a lot and have never had someone ask me to not recline my seat, but if I did I would tell them to take a bus next time.  My advice to the OP is to select the first row of seats whenever possible, you'll have a bulwark in front of you instead of seats.

What if you were 7'3 :-D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I rarely fly but I've taken the bus to and from school quite a bit. Maybe I've gotten lucky because most people asked me if it's okay to recline before doing so. I don't recline very often but if there's someone behind me I ask first.

I think in some of the recent reports that ditchparrot19 mentioned, someone used Knee Defenders, which physically prevent the seat in front from reclining. I think it's kind of hilarious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I fly a lot. I mean a lot. I'm 1M miler with united. So I get upgraded to business/first class frequently. Thank goodness there is a lot more leg room there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I fly quite often for business and never recline my seat if someone is behind me.  I'm 6' 2" and 240 lbs so coach isn't exactly roomy for me but reclining my seat pretty much ensures misery for the person behind me unless they are a kid or very small person.  I think it's time airlines just got rid of seats the recline to avoid the problem.

I also always go for the seats with more legroom if they are offered so I don't have to worry what the person in front of me does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't recline my seat. I don't love it when the person in front of me does it, but I understand that it's considered socially acceptable, so I'm not a dick about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't recline my seat. I don't love it when the person in front of me does it, but I understand that it's considered socially acceptable, so I'm not a dick about it.

That's very non-goonish of you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Two flights were diverted recently due to disputes over reclined seats. I'm not a super-frequent flyer, but I have to take four or five trips a year for work that involve multiple flights and I absolutely detest the time I have to spend either on a plane or in an airport. I've never once reclined my seat when someone was behind me and I never will. I believe it to be rude as hell and that it exacerbates an already stressful situation, but apparently I'm in the minority of Americans in that view (according to a national poll). I'm 6'2" and oftentimes when the person in front of me reclines, the back of the seat falls within about an inch of my knees. I always express my displeasure immediately and if the person responds with an I-don't-give-a-rat's-ass attitude I'll make certain that I "inadvertently" drive my knee with a considerable amount of force into the back of the seat at least a couple of times during the flight while changing positions or getting up to use the restroom. "Accidents" do happen, after all. I read an article that mentioned that a couple of low-budget carriers (Spirit and Allegiant Air) have removed the reclining feature entirely. I'd book with one of them every time if I could, but it doesn't appear if they'll be an option for me very often. Which side do you folks fall on?

Want more legroom, fly first class. The guy in front of you paid for his seat too. What side so I fall on? The side that thinks you're being a prick. FWIW, I fly over 100 flights per year. The vast majority, in the back of the bus. Love me an upgrade when I get it though! :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I fly frequently.

The only time I have ever used the recline function was when there was no row directly behind me. I consider it the height of rudeness.

I have been made very uncomfortable by people in front using theirs.

With space in planes being used up by extra seats, I think the recline function on all seats that can interfere with seats behind them should be disabled.

The thing is that you don't need to have a seat that reclines, so why not make sure that everyone is treated fairly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the time I don't recline and when I do I only go back a little. I am amazed at how far back some people crank that seat back, I wouldn't even find the position comfortable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I like it when the person in front of me reclines. That way I can just lay back and hike my legs over their seat and let my feet rest against their chest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, I'm on board with any plans or companies that remove the "recline" feature on their seats.

Suits me just fine.

But if they choose not to, and stay the same as they are now, well, that's fine too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want more legroom, fly first class. The guy in front of you paid for his seat too. What side so I fall on? The side that thinks you're being a prick.

FWIW, I fly over 100 flights per year. The vast majority, in the back of the bus. Love me an upgrade when I get it though!

That is a shitload of flying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon