Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3539 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, RFG1022 said:

Has anyone had experience with these 2 ball brands? I'm looking for something with bite on the greens and control?

Thanks,

I've been playing the e6 for years. Love it. Not quite as soft as the B330Rx, but I find it the best fit for me. Never tried the Calloway

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I like both but can't say that either has a great deal of spin around the green.   Both are known for limiting spin on a drive but with adequate distance.   

Best solution is to buy a sleeve of each and give them a go.   I prefer the E6 but probably play the Calloway more often.   

Another to try is the Srixon Q-Star, very similar ball. 

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The two balls are similar...

The e6 does play pretty straight, and has decent bite on full approach shots. One problem: inside 20 yards, you pretty much have to go with a chip and run. It's hard to get checkspin near the green. In the spring it works great when ground is a bit soft. Once things start drying out, you don't get much close in.

e6 is great if you sometimes play bump and run shots inside 100 yards. It flies straight and will bounce a few times rather than stopping too quickly.

The SuperSoft leaks a bit more left and right, but gives you some checkspin inside 20 yards. Not that I back it up, but the short wedges hit and release maybe 3 yards. it also has decent bite on full approach shots.

For comparison, the Supersoft is probably closest to the TopFlite Gamer.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have to dig through my collection of found golf balls and try the Callaway Supersofts.  Can't offer advice on those but as a high handicapper with ball control issues I can say the Bstone E6 is a great ball that flies straight, feels good off any club including a putter, and will check up better compared to low spin distance balls as @WUTiger has mentioned. I can say if you're  not a less than bogey golfer you will most likely enjoy the E6 but try both. @DriveforShow swears by Calloway Supersofts and I respect her opinion. Try a sleeve of both and if don't mind report back. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Like others, I use the e6, and can't come up with a reason to change. They do everything my swing has them do. The only super soft ball I have used was a 50 compression ball. I think they were distributed by Kraft Smores, or maybe they were Wilson. I forget.  It was ok, but it wasn't an e6. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I recently switched to the e6 from ProV's and love them. Around the greens have taken some getting used to.  As others have mentioned the e6 rolls out more than other balls on short shots into the green.  I think the feel of the ball off of irons is great and found the feel off the putter to be even better.  The ball goes so damn straight, I often question if it's legal.  I haven't played the super soft, but I can't say enough about the e6.  I agree with @dennyjones.  Buy a sleeve of each and give them each a shot.  I just got two dozen e6's from Golfsmith for $50. I'm "that guy" that likes to play a yellow ball, but the e6 yellow isn't my fav personally.  It's not as bright as others and I find it harder to spot in the grass compared to e6 white.   


Posted

Actually I just bought a box of Supersofts last week and have played two rounds with them. They aren't bad balls, but I like the e6 better. The e6 is a bit straighter and has a more pleasing feel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Golden Greek said:

I'm "that guy" that likes to play a yellow ball, but the e6 yellow isn't my fav personally.  It's not as bright as others and I find it harder to spot in the grass compared to e6 white.   

Last weekend I played some old E6 I have and another golfer casually flipped me crap about the yellow. I didn't know you could get teased for this. I think he was trying to be funny... I guess I still have a lot to learn about this game.

The SuperSoft comes in even more "outrageous" colors like (gasp) pink...

I played E6 all last year and it does check a little bit before releasing a few feet. It is straighter and a longer for me than comparable balls. However, I did not like the feel on putts and chips, so I switched balls for 2016. The E6 will do for me in a pinch, but I would not buy them again.

I bought one (1) sleeve of Supersoft to try them and I did not like them. All I can say positive about Supersoft was I seemed to hit a bit longer with my irons. I also hit some out of control shots with Supersoft. Some people swear by them. They did not work for me.

Edited by Kalnoky
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I never got along well with either of these. The supersoft is just too soft feeling for me, which seems strange since I like the feel of wilson zips *which by the way I'd recommend quite cheap and good spin around the greens imo*. The e6 does seem to fly a bit straighter off the tee but I like a bit more grab on shorter shots than I can attain with it. On full shots in I can generate more than enough spin with most balls these days, so I focus more on the 30 and in shots.

Edited by Jeremie Boop

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I find the balls to be very different for my 88-90 driver SS.  The e6 is not as long for me but somewhat better around the green, very similar to the NXT Tour.  I enjoy playing golf balls like the SuperSoft because of the extra distance I get, but I do have to allow for more rollout on the greens.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I liked both balls a lot before I made the switch to urethane. I now play the e6s little brother, the bridgestone e5. Long and straight distance of a two piece but tour level spin from the urethane cover. The e6 has perfect feel, trajectory, and distance. It gets slightly better spin around the greens as well but at 28.99 a dozen, the e6 is really a rip off as there are similar balls for significantly less coin. Loved the supersoft at first but eventually just felt too soft for my liking. Btw, the e5 is the same price as the e6 and it gets the urethane cover so its a great bargain and a better performer than the e6 and ss. Yrmv but thats my .02

Best of luck

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Both balls are more about full swing performance. Since higher handicap golfers miss a lot of greens they'd (me) be better served learning fail safe chipping techniques to save strokes. I'm a keep it simple type and keep the ball on the ground as much as possible because distance control is easier that way, trying to fly the ball to a target and judging how it will stop is iffy. When I play premium balls the problem is usually too much spin and not being able to always strike it perfectly to predict it and most lies around the green aren't good for it anyway.

 

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Dave2512 said:

Both balls are more about full swing performance. Since higher handicap golfers miss a lot of greens they'd (me) be better served learning fail safe chipping techniques to save strokes. I'm a keep it simple type and keep the ball on the ground as much as possible because distance control is easier that way, trying to fly the ball to a target and judging how it will stop is iffy. When I play premium balls the problem is usually too much spin and not being able to always strike it perfectly to predict it and most lies around the green aren't good for it anyway.

 

Agreed and a point I've been trying to make is high spin balls are not going to help a high handicapper.

Does anyone think I'd have better results if I was using a high spin premium urethane ball?  I think it would be just as random as it already is:

 

GG stats.PNG

gg stats 2.PNG

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, No Mulligans said:

Agreed and a point I've been trying to make is high spin balls are not going to help a high handicapper.

Does anyone think I'd have better results if I was using a high spin premium urethane ball?

 

GG stats.PNG

gg stats 2.PNG

I don't but you hit quite a few greens for your handicap. I just looked and I am at 41%.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, Dave2512 said:

I don't but you hit quite a few greens for your handicap. I just looked and I am at 41%.

Lies, damn lies and statistics.

I'm wondering if our statistics are not comparable as I'm more often than not playing on an executive course.  A lot of my approaches from over 100 yards are from perfect lies, as in tee'd up in a tee box.  Even still, the 45% < than 15 yards from outside 100 yards does seem high.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Dave2512 said:

Since higher handicap golfers miss a lot of greens they'd (me) be better served learning fail safe chipping techniques to save strokes.

That's me missing the greens alright. Forever scrambling. Ironically I have to say the Premium balls are much better greenside, even for me. I keep some premium balls I practice chipping with, just for fun. The spin is incredible. You can stop them within a foot. The feel off the putter is amazing. It literally make practice fun. If I could only strike these balls well (full swing) I would absolutely play them. I am basically forced to play cheaper "straight" balls because of my accuracy problems. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3539 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • To put into more context Shorter backswing helps me set up everything I need to do in the downswing. If the right arm beds 100+ degrees, it makes it nearly impossible.  Currently, I am not delivering the correct dynamic loft at impact. My vertical launch angle for a 6 iron is around 22 degrees. The PGA Tour average for a 6 iron is around 14 degrees. This is due to a few things. First, not getting open enough at impact. The more I can get my right side forward, the more the hands can get forward at impact. Currently my turn stalls. That goes into hip movement stuff. Second, I go into left wrist extension through impact. This adds loft. I need to go into left wrist flexion sooner and add a bit of wrist rolling over to square the face. This lowers the loft by shaft lean and closing the face. When I do my wrist stuff the VLA gets down to about 19 degrees. I still got a bit more to go.  We worked on some distance wedge stuff as well. More of a clock system. Position 1 is hands about waist height. Position 2 is between position 1 and 3. Position 3 is hands about shoulder height. Set up with weight on front foot. The backswing is a lot of torso pivot only feel. Speed in the downswing comes from torso pivot. Right side turns through, keeping and increasing pressure under the front foot. Don't slide the hips forward. It is more pivoting around the left leg. To help with smash factor and launch angle, add in a bit of wrist stuff and hitting the pitch like a draw shot. That is more something I need to work on.   
    • Amazingly, I found this thread while looking to see if others have answers to the same question.   My preferred putting drill is a variant of one from LSW.  For context, as I type this, my handicap is at 10.3, and in my total 2026 rounds, I am at -0.20 strokes gained putting vs a 20 handicap baseline, and I am just shy of losing a full two strokes putting to the 10 handicap baseline, all this despite yesterday's round being marginally better than the 5 handicap baseline (yay for high variance statistics).  I also didn't practice much putting on a real green in 2026 (or 2025) until about two weeks ago, other than pre-round warm-ups.  This is obviously something I need to work on.  I think I last actively practiced (as in, many days, regularly) putting, on a real green, actively in Spring/Summer 2022. Anyway, the double around the world:  pick a distance (I often use 4' or 6') and lay down 12 coins, face-up.  The "standard" version is to do this at 3' and have to make 12 in a row.  That's worth doing periodically.  I know some people do this at 4' or even 5', but with scratch players making 80% from 4', I worry that if I tried to do this at 4', I wouldn't finish by sundown, and I'd certainly just get frustrated.  But the version I enjoy is to have to make them all, twice, eventually.  Pick a starting point and putt from there.  If it is made, and the coin is heads-up, turn it over.  If it was tails-up, pick it up.  The coins are tracking how many times you've made it from that spot so far.   A good score from 4' is 37 total putts for a bogey golfer (65% make rate) and 30 for a scratch player (80% make rate).   At 6', a bogey golfer (39% make rate) should be happy with a 61, while a scratch player should aim to do better than 44.  To make counting easier, I remember (or otherwise mark) the first spot, and when I reach that, I count how many coins are still on the green and add them to my total.  I actually don't count the first two times around (since the count after two go-arounds will be 24, right before counting to start the third) and add 24 at the end.   ----- I also like the "Fall Line" drill from ESC.  I stopped doing it a while back because I couldn't distinguish my own failure from being bad at hitting a 6' putt.  Now that I think I can hit a 6' putt successfully, it's time to go back to that one. Lastly, there are two indoor drills I have enjoyed in the past and am getting back to.  One is the ruler drill from LSW.  The other is one that I was shown in another thread that involves basically seeing what it is like to line up square, something I could have been missing.  ----- Okay, lastly for real, before a round I will also try to figure speed for 12', 21', and 30' putts.  I find a flat (or flat enough) spot on the practice green and step off 4, 7, or 10 steps.  I aim to hit the ball that exact distance (with the 12', I prefer to hit just past it;  with the others, I aim to hit the exact distance).  I view this as similar to learning some partial clock positions (or similar) with wedges to use as a baseline for preparing a shot.  Amazingly, for all my overall putting woes, when SG is broken down by distance I'm usually doing quite well outside of 12'.  This is one of those reasons I'm glad to see SG:P broken down by distance -- it tells me where I need to focus to improve.  While a three-putt from 30' has the same effect on SG:P no matter why, there's a difference in what practice priority to make if that's because the first putt rests 8' from the cup (where Tour players are 50/50) versus if the first putt regularly cozies up within 3-4' but that resulting putt is missed.  I almost never work on speed like this outside of pre-round warm-up.
    • Wordle 1,773 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,773 4/6* ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,773 4/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 ⬜⬜🟨🟨🟩 🟨🟨⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.